滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[Remembering Tiananmen/Straits Times]
滕彪文集
·Beijing Suspends Licenses of 2 Lawyers Who Offered to Defend Tibetans in Court
·National Endowment for Democracy 2008 Democracy Awards
·获奖感言
·司法与民意——镜城突围
·Rewards and risks of a career in the legal system
·太离谱的现实感
·35个网评员对“这鸡蛋真难吃”的不同回答(转载加编辑加原创)
·Dissonance Strikes A Chord
·顺应历史潮流 实现律协直选——致全体北京律师、市司法局、市律协的呼吁
·但愿程序正义从杨佳案开始/滕彪 许志永
·维权的计算及其他
·我们对北京律协“严正声明”的回应
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(上)
·网络言论自由讨论会会议纪要(下)
·Well-Known Human Rights Advocate Teng Biao Is Not Afraid
·法眼冷对三鹿门
·北京律师为自己维权风暴/亚洲周刊
·胡佳若获诺贝尔奖将推动中国人权/voa
·奥运后的中国人权
·Chinese Activist Wins Rights Prize
·我无法放弃——记一次“绑架”
·认真对待出国权
·毒奶粉:谁的危机?
·不要制造聂树斌——甘锦华抢劫案的当庭辩护词
·“独立知识分子”滕彪/刘溜
·经济观察报专访/滕彪:让我们不再恐惧
·人权:从理念到制度——纪念《世界人权宣言》60周年
·公民月刊:每一个人都可能是历史的转折点
·抵制央视、拒绝洗脑
·公民在行动
·Charter of Democracy
·阳光茅老
·中国“黑监狱”情况让人担忧/路透社
·《关于取缔黑监狱的建议》
·用法律武器保护家园——青岛市河西村民拆迁诉讼代理词
·关于改革看守所体制及审前羁押制度的公民建议书
·仅仅因为他们说了真话
·再审甘锦华 生死仍成谜
·邓玉娇是不是“女杨佳”?
·星星——为六四而作
·I Cannot Give Up: Record of a "Kidnapping"
·Political Legitimacy and Charter 08
·六四短信
·倡议“5•10”作为“公民正当防卫日”
·谁是敌人——回"新浪网友"
·为逯军喝彩
·赠晓波
·正义的运动场——邓玉娇案二人谈
·这六年,公盟做了什么?
·公盟不死
·我们不怕/Elena Milashina
·The Law On Trial In China
·自由有多重要,翻墙就有多重要
·你也会被警察带走吗
·Lawyer’s Detention Shakes China’s Rights Movement
·我来推推推
·许志永年表
·庄璐小妹妹快回家吧
·开江县法院随意剥夺公民的辩护权
·Summary Biography of Xu Zhiyong
·三著名行政法学家关于“公盟取缔事件”法律意见书
·公益诉讼“抑郁症”/《中国新闻周刊》
·在中石化上访
·《零八宪章》与政治正当性问题
·我来推推推(之二)
·我来推推推(之三)
·國慶有感
·我来推推推(之四)
·国庆的故事(系列之一)
·国庆的故事(系列之二)
·
·我来推推推(之五)
·我来推推推(之六)
·净空(小说)
·作为反抗的记忆——《不虚此行——北京劳教调遣处纪实》序
·twitter直播-承德冤案申诉行动
·我来推推推(之七)
·关于我的证言的证言
·我来推推推(之八)
·不只是问问而已
·甘锦华再判死刑 紧急公开信呼吁慎重
·就甘锦华案致最高人民法院死刑复核法官的紧急公开信
·我来推推推(之九)
·DON’T BE EVIL
·我来推推推(之十)
·景德镇监狱三名死刑犯绝食吁国际关注
·江西乐平死刑冤案-向最高人民检察院的申诉材料
·我来推推推(之十一)
·法律人的尊严在于独立
·我来推推推(之十二)
·听从正义和良知的呼唤——在北京市司法局关于吊销唐吉田、刘巍律师证的听证会上的代理意见
·一个思想实验:关于中国政治
·公民维权与社会转型(上)——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲
·公民维权与社会转型——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲(下)
·福州“7•4”奇遇记
·夏俊峰案二审辩护词(新版)
·摄录机打破官方垄断
·敦请最高人民检察院立即对重庆打黑运动中的刑讯逼供问题依法调查的公开信
·为政治文明及格线而奋斗——滕彪律师的维权之路
·“打死挖个坑埋了!”
·"A Hole to Bury You"
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Remembering Tiananmen/Straits Times

https://www.straitstimes.com/opinion/remembering-tiananmen
   
   The STRAITS TIMES
   
   Goh Sui Noi

   Jun 7, 2019
   
   "We remember June Fourth because there are people who dearly want us to remember. It comforts them to know that we remember.
   
   "We remember June Fourth because there are also people who desperately want us not to remember. They want us to forget because forgetting helps to preserve their political power."
   
   These poignant lines are from a poem by sinologist Perry Link. They encapsulate the struggle to this day between those Chinese people who desire political change and their rulers who seek to eliminate threats to their power, 30 years after the bloody crackdown on June 3-4 against pro-democracy protesters camped out on Tiananmen Square.
   
   The poem was read at a dinner during a three-day forum last month in Taipei to commemorate the incident, now described by the authorities as a "political turbulence", but by those who lived through the harrowing night as a "massacre".
   
   Several hundred, perhaps thousands, died that night - unarmed protesters comprising mainly students and workers, and residents who had come out to support them, fired upon by soldiers and rolled over by tanks in and outside the square.
   
   Beijing has sought to obliterate from Chinese memory the 1989 student-led pro-democracy movement and the violent suppression of it, banning public commemoration of the event and censoring any mention of it on social media, among other measures.
   
   It looks to have succeeded, with many young Chinese today having little knowledge or understanding of what happened, and little interest in it as well.
   
   "The contents, the demands, the modes of organisation of this huge mass movement have been forgotten, and only a very small number of Chinese people who didn't experience it know anything about it," wrote China scholar Jean-Philippe Beja of Sciences Po in a paper that he presented at the Taipei forum.
   
   As for the reason why, "it is to pre-empt the pre-crackdown protests being an inspiration to Chinese citizens, particularly the younger generations, to organise themselves to protest and challenge the party's monopoly of power", said Professor Steve Tsang of the School of Oriental and African Studies in London, in an e-mail interview.
   
   REFORMISTS AND CONSERVATIVES
   The protests had occurred at a time when the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) was facing divisions internally between reformists who thought political reform was necessary to the deepening of economic reform, and conservatives who were worried that any political change would threaten the CCP's hold on power.
   
   Perhaps because of these internal divisions, the decision was made to send in the troops to quell the demonstrations that had spread to other cities, and brought up to a million people onto the square at their peak.
   
   For some, like Dr Teng Biao, 45, a human rights activist, it was to cow the Chinese people into submission in order to maintain stability. He pointed out that then paramount leader Deng Xiaoping was alleged to have said that the regime would be willing to "kill 200,000 people in exchange for 20 years of stability".
   
   Others, like Tiananmen protester and exile Wu Renhua, 63, believe it is because China's political system of one-party dictatorship does not allow anyone to challenge it.
   
   "Once there are people going into the streets to demonstrate, it views this as a challenge and a threat to its rule. So long as the student pro-democracy movement reaches a certain scale and becomes a threat to its power, it will resort to suppression," he said.
   
   Certainly, Chinese politics took a conservative turn after Tiananmen - Professor Link again: "We remember June Fourth because it was a historic turning point for one-fifth of the world. A turning point in a frightening direction."
   
   Ms Wang Chaohua, now 66, one of only two women student leaders at the Tiananmen protests and now an exile in the United States, agrees that June 4 was a crucial moment for China politically.
   
   She remembers that after the Cultural Revolution of 1966-1976 - a period of social and political chaos - the Chinese government's slogan was "stability, unity and looking forward". It wanted the people to put the tortured past of the Cultural Revolution behind them and look towards the future together.
   
   After 1989, she told this reporter in Taipei, the new slogans were "stability prevails over all else" and "development is the absolute principle".
   
   There was no more mention of unity, she noted. The accommodating of different social groups and organisations had ended.
   
   Safeguarding the CCP's rule became the highest principle under the new development ideology, she added.
   
   "Any social energy emitted that threatens the rule of the CCP needs to be suppressed, any form of instability must be nipped in the bud," she said.
   
   Mr Wu puts it thus: With each successive leader after June 4 - from president Jiang Zemin to president Hu Jintao to current leader Xi Jinping - China has taken a step backwards politically.
   
   "In the 30 years since the Tiananmen incident, we have not seen China making progress in the area of democracy. Instead, it is going down the path of greater autocracy," he said.
   
   Political control is tighter than ever, with the use of the latest technology - artificial intelligence, facial recognition, big data - to suppress dissent.
   
   And while China in the last 30 years has wrought an economic miracle, lifting hundreds of millions out of poverty and making life better for most Chinese, critics contend that without political reforms, this development has been accompanied by many ills.
   
   Corruption is rife among the ruling class, unbridled development has caused environmental damage, new-found wealth is not equitably redistributed so that income gaps have widened, and there is a sense of social and moral decay.
   
   China may be the second-largest economy in the world, but its development model "is a disaster for the vast majority of the Chinese people", said Dr Teng.
   
   For the Tiananmen protesters now in exile, and the rights activists who have followed in their footsteps in fighting for change, keeping alive not just the memory of the suppression but also that of the movement and what it demands, as well as the Chinese people's courage to stand up to the powers that be, is therefore as important if not more so than before.
   
   For, as Prof Link wrote: "We remember June Fourth because the worst of China is there - but the best of China is there, too."
   
   PASSING ON THE TORCH
   Some of the best and brightest of the generation of young people in 1989 had taken part in the protests that began as gatherings on the square to mourn the reformist former general-secretary of the CCP, Mr Hu Yaobang, who had died of a heart attack on April 15.
   
   They came from China's top universities, like Peking and Tsinghua. Some were already political activists, like Peking University student Wang Dan, who in 1988 was organising democracy salons to discuss political issues.
   
   The gatherings in April burgeoned and morphed into a pro-democracy movement that demanded the government deal with issues such as corruption and runaway inflation, allow greater media freedom, and implement educational and political reforms.
   
   But the student-led movement became a mass movement on April 27 when the students marched in defiance of an April 26 People's Daily editorial - a sign that this came from the very top of the Chinese leadership, Mr Deng himself - calling for an end to the "disturbances"; on that pivotal day, Beijing residents came out in their thousands to provide food and drinks to the demonstrators, or put themselves between the protesters and the police.
   
   Said Dr Wang Dan, now a historian, of that day: "It was the first time since 1949 under the Communist Party rule that the people had taken to the streets、、. From that day on, the government was the government, the people, the people, and the government was not with the people."
   
   On that day, too, wrote Professor Beja, "the Chinese people stood up: fear had receded and free expression was taking place".

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场