新会员区

第六感
[主页]->[新会员区]->[第六感]->[写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国记者协会]
第六感
·中国一流大学校长为何洋相百出
·美华裔夫妇杀死5岁女儿 凶手疑受李洪志邪说洗脑
·港界“金融大鳄”肖建华:私生活极度糜烂,堪比古代昏帝!
·多次卷入争议性交易!“隐形富豪”肖建华的种种黑色发家史
·安全专家:肖建华全用女保镖不寻常,与卡扎菲「媲美」?
·澳大利亚知名器官移植问题专家:“法轮功”所谓“器官活摘”被作为政治工具
·给“滕彪们”的一点批判与忠告
·给“滕彪们”的一点批判与忠告
·揭秘“谢阳遭酷刑”,全都他妈的是套路!
·揭秘“谢阳遭酷刑”,全都他妈的是套路!
·“谢阳遭酷刑“,假的!律师江天勇变身导演
·郭文贵:做人要善良 不要欺负穷人
·郭文贵诽谤--财新传媒声明
·郭文贵跳梁小丑欲盖弥彰难掩媒体耳目
·郭文贵其人:活脱脱一个攻人下三路的怂包!
·郭文贵谎言:傅政华已经被中纪委控制
·郭文贵谎言:傅政华已经被中纪委控制
·郭文贵,你说的被控制呢?
·郭文贵,你说的被控制呢?
·是不是有钱就玩女人?中国大陆隐性富豪郭文贵竟然糟蹋了一批公司女员工!
·是不是有钱就玩女人?中国大陆隐性富豪郭文贵竟然糟蹋了一批公司女员工!
·细数“泸县太伏中学生死亡事件”中造谣生事的海外反华组织
·细数“泸县太伏中学生死亡事件”中造谣生事的海外反华组织
·国际刑警组织红色通缉令:全球缉拿在逃华商郭文贵(图)
·国际刑警组织红色通缉令:全球缉拿在逃华商郭文贵(图)
·应试教育,没什么见不得人的
·人民不欠祁同伟一个副省长,欠不欠寒门子弟一个公平?
·朝鲜开出弃核条件每年6百亿美元为期10年
·攻击太极拳的背后:外国全是真的好的,中国全是假的坏的
·朝鲜反噬说明的四个问题
·一个骗傻子的政治谎言:多党制可以防止腐败
·最近很火的一首小诗,转发分享
·川普女婿之妹在华推投资换绿卡项目掀波澜
·哎呀我去,李洪志大法日嫁女,被爆李美歌奉子结婚
·国法如山不可凌,岂容戏子辱英雄!
·朝鲜未删减版讨中檄文更暴力: 中国全国都沉沦为反朝前哨
·侠客岛:朝中社,你批评中国的言论很无理
·侠客岛:朝中社,你批评中国的言论很无理
·李美歌婚期临近,知情人爆出婚照
·郭文贵用谎言壮胆 他涉嫌严重犯罪
·郭文贵不该面对的5个最核心问题
·林毅夫: 郭文贵指控99% 不是真实
·谢阳重获自由,陈桂秋为何如此反常
·国乒退赛后刘国梁首度发声:管理中心体制有弊端
·今天,清华大学专门给这位考生写了封信:人生实苦,但请你足够相信!
·向发动机投币的老太 您考虑过飞机感受吗
·全能神在青岛的地下组织被捣毁 判刑14人
·劲爆视频:郭文贵和他的女助理啪啪啪录音曝光
·大陸熱帖:假如印度一定要戰 中國該怎麼折磨他?
·刘晓波病情通报
·刘晓波病情通报
·救救中国水库!揭露美国毁灭中国水利最新阴谋!
·香港女特首两个儿子都毕业于剑桥,她的育儿观只有8个字
·30天与3天,这就是美国警察和中国警察的区别
· 中国暴富群体的原罪真相
·懂得拐弯,才是人生的大智慧(深度好文)
·香港回归后,我国犯的重大失误!中国要根除港独毒瘤必须去殖民化!
·德美医学专家会诊刘晓波内部高清视频流出
·中国医大一院就刘晓波病亡举行新闻发布会
·刘晓波后事正有序处理中 刘霞在沈阳是自由的
·刘晓波后事正有序处理中 刘霞在沈阳是自由的
·宣判了!香港4“辱国议员”被剥夺议员资格
·日本横滨发现两具遗体 确认为失联多日的福建两姐妹
·李洪志以239万美元出售在美豪宅
·李洪志以239万美元出售在美豪宅
·李洪志贬低攻击基督教佛教等宗教的言论集锦
·侮辱耶稣,亵渎佛主,美国还保护他?谁这么横?
·阅兵之后要祭旗
·大阅兵传递五个重大信号:中国军队堪称世界一流
·美国刚刚曝光了一个震惊世界的惊天大案!和每个人都有关系!
·军改后首次阅兵为何选择在内蒙古朱日和
·三条鱼的故事,看哭无数人
·中国卫生部副部长黄洁夫:手术刀下的谎言和药瓶里的欺骗
·中国卫生部副部长黄洁夫:手术刀下的谎言和药瓶里的欺骗
·郭文贵从18层滚下来
·郭 文 贵住所遭债主和抗议者围堵(图)
·郭 文 贵住所遭债主和抗议者围堵(图)
·旅美侨领林威廉说,美国不应该成为郭文贵这种人渣的天堂。应该把郭文贵抓起
·郭文贵实际控制的又一公司--河南裕达置业公司及高管、职员骗取贷款票据承兑
·郭文贵盘古金泉物业持续遭债主围堵
·解放军,请尽快活捉越境印军!
·饱和攻击打航母?现在轮到中国头疼这个问题了
·日媒就中印对峙发声 曝华军事攻击真正目的
·疑郭文贵向明镜新闻支付巨额账单曝光
·中方攻势进入新阶段?日媒:印毫无胜算
·数十名纽约市民聚集酒店,呼吁酒店驱逐国际刑警组织通缉人员郭文贵
·郭文贵来美获得的权利,看美国政治对法律的兼容性!
·伊利诺伊大学斯普林菲尔德分校雇员强奸17岁中国留学生 获刑6年半
·让印度通告诉您中印对峙背后的惊天秘密
·你的精神长相里藏着你说过的话、做过的事、走过的路……
·中印战争:中国面临的战略风险
·菲外长直言:有人就是想羞辱中国
·纽约华人社团:郭文贵是全世界最可耻的卑鄙小人(视频)
·郭文贵美女秘书屈国姣爆料。阿联酋派出的人已到纽约,要找郭文贵算账!
·郭文贵美女秘书屈国姣爆料。阿联酋派出的人已到纽约,要找郭文贵算账!
·美国福建同乡会名誉主席郑棋召开新闻发布会澄清谣言
·法广:郭文贵用西装领带贿赂英国前首相布莱尔(图)
·法广:郭文贵用西装领带贿赂英国前首相布莱尔(图)
·美国福建同乡会名誉主席郑棋到郭居所交涉被诽谤一事!
·美国福建同乡会名誉主席郑棋到郭居所交涉被诽谤一事!
·郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国记者协会


   Dear Miss Kate, Miss Aruna and Mr. Cezary:
   
   On October 22, the Wall Street Journal published your report, China’s Pursuit of Fugitive Businessman Guo Wengui Kicks Off Manhattan Caper Worthy of Spy Thriller, which reported some of the contacts between official from China’s Ministry of State Security and Guo Wengui. The report writes about situation when four officials from China’s Ministry of State Security met with Guo Wengui, and cited insiders in the White House and documents given by Guo.
   

   I have no objection to your report and actually it's a good story to say. But after repeated deliberation, there are a few serious problems that have forced me to write to you and submit the letter to SPJ.
   
   First, in the report, you quoted Guo Wengui’s files which show that he was persecuted by Chinese government. What needs to be stressed is that these files are false documents. Not only Chinese government, but lawyer Wen Yunchao, Teng Biao and at least thousands of others pointed out that the documents are fake.
   
   As professional journalists, I'm sure that you captured this vital point, then, why didn’t you indicate in time in your report that Guo Wengui’s files were widely considered to be forged or at least controversial?
   
   I looked through your report, and find it at last in the 18th paragraph below the picture of documents, i.e., the second paragraph to the last that says with only a few words of understatement, “Beijing has said the document is a forgery.”
   
   This is a typical and irresponsible way of writing that deliberately mislead the readers. Due to the hassle of the long report, most readers will not browse through the end, which means that many of them can't see the simple statement at the end of the report.
   
   I ask you, as professional media , if you report Guo Wengui’s events out of serious and objective media ethics, would you still write the report in this way? Will it highlight your rigorous and objective attitude if you mislead readers to believe in Guo Wengui’s forged papers? Can the standard of your work represent the Wall Street Journal's professional level?
   
   Second, it is true that events of Guo Wengui have become sensitive and complicated due to legal issues that are added by political colors. But it doesn't change the fact that Guo has insulted and offended women. If you don’t believe in the previous content, can you accept and promote Guo Wengui's practice of abusing "Ma Rui is pig, and if she rape a pig, the pig commits a suicide" in his live broadcast. Do you despise women's rights and ignore the network humiliation of the victim just like this?
   
   Harvey Weinstein sex scandal got picked up by all the major news services, but medias became blind when Marui was raped and Guo Wengui used social media to expose Marui’s privacy and abuse her. I want to ask you, what is your report’s principle, objectivity or optional negligence based on color or race. If Marui is a white, will you report Guo Wengui indiscriminately and describe him as a political symbol and try to get him off?
   
   Third, many medias and network have revealed a great deal of record and video evidence that Guo had bribed Chinese officials and tried to win support of Britain and American reporters such as Michael Forsythe, Tony Blair and others since this year. This evidence makes it clear that Guo is trying to bribe everyone he contacts. It is also evident that his disclosure is fabricated and fabled.
   
   I am not opposing to your report about Guo Wengui, but the way you deliberately hid some relevant details and cited so-called “people familiar with the situation” makes me wonder with every reason that during the process you wrote the story, Guo had tried to bribe you. Whether you have reaped the benefits is a problem I can not leave alone.
   
   Besides, there are reasons to be sceptical the people you cited are puppets bought off and controlled by Guo Wengui. Given this, dare you swear to god that your report is rigorous, objective and compatible with American media’s value?
   
   Fourth, I know that the Wall Street Journal is opposing President Trump. There’s no problem in it, the society in America is a free one, people have the right to support or oppose the President. Whether support or opposition, when being presented in a news report, it should not be tinged with the tendency of opposing for the sake of opposition.
   
   According to your report, people who have been cited 21 times should be some senior advisers in the White House. President Trump was chosen by the people, his staff and team represent for the interest of America. If this team could forge ahead in unity, it would be a good news for people of America and the whole world.
   
   However, the way you wrote the journal may put the team in a state of mutual suspicion. If the government can not focus on the developing of America because of mistrust, then who is to blame? Is it President Trump, the government, or you who tried to polarize the government?
   
   In this world, China and America have become the progressive role models of this great era. Set aside ideological differences, if both countries could deepen mutually beneficial cooperation in economy, legislation, security, environmental protection and other fields, it would good news for people in these two and even the whole world.
   
   It doesn’t make sense to me why someone would want to hinder the development of the world, why someone tried so hard using a clown and criminal to impede China-US cooperation, why someone attempted to deter people with a cheat and exhibitionist, who is of no political and economic values, from pursuit of well-being.
   
   If there really is someone as described above, I have to say, the tycoon named Guo Wengui, who used to trap officials and medias through bribery and bugging, has successfully repeated the tricks in America, you and your so-called insiders have been bribed and become his puppets.
   
   Because of this, I urge departments such as the American news management office and Journalists Association to launch a careful investigation into the biased report about Guo Wengui to maintain the credibility of American medias, clear names of the three journalists under questioning and reply to tens of thousands of netizens who had voted to question the journalists.
   
   Written by @TwiZhanJ, a humble and ordinary Twitter user who cares about universal values and human development.
   
   
   写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国新闻管理机构
   
   尊敬的凯特、阿鲁纳女士,塞尔瑞先生:
   
   10月22日,华尔街日报刊登一篇由你们执笔的,题为《中国国安人员赴美劝返郭文贵,各方交锋堪比谍战片》的报道,文章主要援引白宫知情人和郭文贵提供资料等方式,报道了中国国安人员与郭文贵接触的一些情况。
   
   首先,我对你们报道该起新闻事件没有异议,可以说这是一篇看起来很不错的报道,但仔细推敲下来,有几个严重问题使我不得不给你们写信,并同时将信件提交给美国的新闻管理机构。
   
   第一、你们在报道中引用了郭文贵用以证明其受到中国政府迫害的文件。但需要指出的是,这几份文件,在郭文贵出示后即已被广泛证实为虚假文件。除了中国政府的声明,温云超、滕彪律师等至少数千名网友均指证该文件却系伪造。
   
   作为专业的新闻人,我相信几位一定捕捉到了这个至关重要的信息点,那么,为什么在阁下的报道中,并没有及时指出郭文贵所出示的文件被舆论广泛评价为伪造、或至少存在争议性的重要情况呢?
   
   我翻遍阁下的报道,终于在你们配发这几份文件图片的十八个自然段之后,也就是文章倒数第二段才看到了轻描淡写的几个字:“北京方面指出这份文件是伪造的”。
   
   这是一种典型的刻意误导读者选择性相信的不负责任的笔法,因为,由于文章的冗长,大多数读者并不会一直看到结尾,也就是说,他们会因为没有看到你们刻意安排在文末的简陋声明,而误以为郭文贵出示的文件就是真的。
   
   我请问,作为一个专业的媒体人,假如你们报道郭文贵事件完全是出于严谨客观的媒体伦理,你们还会这样安排行文吗?你们刻意误导读者相信郭文贵伪造文件为真的做法,能够凸显你们的严谨客观吗?能够代表华尔街日报专业媒体的专业水准吗?
   
   第二、诚然,由于简单的法律问题被赋予政治色彩,导致郭文贵事件变得敏感而复杂。但是,这并不能改变郭文贵对女性侮辱侵犯的事实。如果你们不相信以前的,那么郭文贵在直播里辱骂“马蕊是猪、马蕊强奸猪猪都会自杀”的做法,就是你们可以接受和弘扬的吗?难道你们就是这样蔑视女权,无视受害者遭遇这样的网络羞辱吗?

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场