至于 Di Nino先生要求我拿出证据，证据就在我们的公开信中，盛雪的主席期限在２０１４年就已经到期。我愿意进一步拿出有关盛雪政治问题的证据，这也是你们三人均经历和知道的。从今年2月22日到3月12日，中共海外喉舌《明报》在二十天内写了五篇专讯文章支持盛雪，你们不觉得这很反常吗？他们（明报）拒绝听取任何其它意见。我们给他们写了信，还派朋友亲自去见他们，他们恶劣的态度在文明的西方国家是很少遇到的。我的第二个附件是一篇曝光中共政权如何控制海外中文媒体的文章。这篇文章说，《明报》是中共所控制的四大主要海外中文媒体之一。我并不吃惊你们不能理解复杂的海外中国民运。
Diane Liu （刘晓东）
4/5/2016 (April 5, 2016)
Dear Mr. Craig:
Thank you for your replying to our Open Letter. I remember that I have never wrote any personal letter to you before. Also, thanks for the emails from attorney David Kilgour and former senator Con DiNino. I believe, one day, you three will feel sorry for your accusations when the truth is brought to daylight.
I would like to tell you that my opinion about Xiaobo Liu’s event has not changed. I am against the Chinese regime’s illegal detention of Xiaobo Liu for his speech. Also, I disagree with his statement “I Have No Enemies — My Final Statement”. I have attached my two articles about my opinions. One is an article that I wrote to show my opinions about Xiaobo Liu’s event， the other is an open letter I wrote to the Nobel committee about Xiaobo Liu’s Nobel nomination which twenty Chinese democratic activists co-signed.
As for Mr. Di Nino asking me to present proof, it is in our open letter Sheng Xue’s Chairman term has expired in 2014. I would like to present further proof to show Sheng Xue’s political problem that you three has experienced and know personally. From February 22 to March 12, 2016 the Chinese regime’s overseas mouthpiece Ming Pao wrote five articles in twenty days to support Sheng Xue. Don’t you think it is abnormal? They have refused to hear any other opinions. We have sent a letter and sent a friend in person to them. Their bad attitude is rarely experienced in a civilized western country. The second attachment is an article revealing how the Chinese regime controls the overseas Chinese media. It says Ming Pao is one major media among four major overseas Chinese Medias controlled by the regime. It does not surprise me that you do not understand the very complicated situation of the overseas Chinese democratic movement.
I hope these two attachments might help you to revise your thinking.
4/5/2016 (April 5, 2016)
Dear Ms. Liu,
Your lengthy diatribe against Sheng Xue and her supporters that you sent to David Kilgour was forwarded to me. Given that you attack me in several ways, I thought I should respond. However, I don't have unlimited hours and resources so, trust me, my comments will not amount, like yours, to eleven pages of drivel.
First, let me be clear that I utterly reject your allegations that Sheng Xue is responsible for "false invoices, immigration fraud, embezzlement of donations and funds." You do not present one shred of evidence, and never have, to substantiate these lies. If there is any truth whatsoever to your wild claims, I should think that you and your Chinese handlers would have long since presented relevant financial records and sworn affidavits. I invite you to come to Toronto with all the evidence you can muster to challenge my firm belief that Sheng Xue is a victim of your malicious lies, not a perpetrator of fraud.
You are well aware, of course, that FDC Canada conducted an exhaustive examination of its financial records and concluded, in September 2014, that there is “no indication of embezzlement”, and “no evidence to support misconduct” in her dealings with the Refugee Board. You ignore the truth and promulgate lies.