大家
郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[大家]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[Homosexuality: a legal or moral problem?]
郭国汀律师专栏
·法律人的历史使命 网友评论
·如何成为一名伟大的,优秀的法律人?
·如何成为一名伟大的律师?网友评论
·为当代中国人的幸福而努力奋斗
·我的告别书—再见中国律师网
·勇敢地参政议政吧 中国律师!
***(23)《郭国汀自传》郭国汀著
·《郭国汀自传》第一章:阴错际差(1)
·《郭国汀自传》第二章:灭顶之灾
·《郭国汀自传》第三章:奋力拚搏
·《郭国汀自传》第四章:东山再起
·《郭国汀自传》第五章:山重水复
·《郭国汀自传》第六章:永恒的中国心
·郭国汀致海内外全体中国网民的公开函
·极好之网站-天易综合网
·天易论坛宣言—天道至大,易道天成
·南郭不与匿名者论战的声明
·请广西网友立即转告陈西上诉
·就朱镕基与法轮功答疑似五毛党徒古镜质疑
·马克思最大的缺陷之一是其根本不了解人的本性
·南郭谈论习近平
·南郭谈论习近平秘信
·马克思恩格斯列宁之无产阶级专政辩析
·轮流强暴马恩之恶果——“无产阶级专政”
·郭律师就民运英友张林之女安妮被非法剥夺入学权事致习近平/李克强公开函
·郭国汀:批驳体制内文人俞可平严重误导国人的谬论
·父权政治公民政治及专制政治
·什么是我们为之奋斗牺牲的正义和自由?
·什么是自由主义?新自由主义?改革自由主义?
·《匪首毛泽东》20.野心恶性膨胀的邪恶致极的毛泽东
·中共政权的性质与现状
·Politics and truth
·Justice and pursuit of truth
·God and modern politics
·Why Federalism?Dose Federal system better to protect minority rights?
·Injustice as the root of terrorism: Social political and economic fact
·列宁之“无产阶级专政”批判
·ompare Analysisof Marx and Lenin’s Theory of the Dictatorship of the
·我的坎坷律师生涯(9):孤独的长跑者
·《我的坎坷律师生涯《我的坎坷律师生涯》(7):知青岁月》(7):知青岁月
·有关圣经翻译的若干问题
·郭国汀:论爱情
·錯帐俏曳傅模珨凳旰笥H自糾錯我還不偉大嗎?!
·文革教训原因考
·开放党禁与多党联合政治——回顾三大改造、三面红旗、反右、文革史有感
·论质、量互变关系
·学习与开放
·无产阶级领袖有感
·无产阶级领袖的重大作用
·勇敢地参政议政吧!中国律师们!
·郭国汀:从 “中国律师人”说开去
·中國律師朋友們幸福不會從天降
·律師的文學功底
·郭國汀:中國涉外案件沒有一起獲得執行
·南郭:堂堂正正做個真正的中國人!
·郭国汀:愿王洪民先生在天之灵安息.
·南郭:令郭國汀律師老淚縱橫的真情
·郭国汀:民族败类!你是否中国人?
·郭國汀:令我熱淚橫流的小詩
·郭国汀:专制流氓暴政本质的再暴露
·郭國汀:強烈譴責中共惡意迫害自由戰士楊天水 許萬平
·今天我絕食——英雄多多益善!
·一个中国人权律师的真实故事
·郭国汀:全球接力绝食抗暴运动的伟大意义
·郭国汀:闻律师英雄高智晟再遇车祸有感
·只有思想言论信仰结社出版新闻舆论的真正自由能够救中国!
· 南郭:自由万岁!新年好!
·志当存高远-我的理想与追求
·我的知识结构与思想
·人生 道德 灵魂/南郭
·男子汉的眼泪/郭国汀
·相信生命—郭國汀律師印象
·南郭点评
·Racism is the biggest enemy of Justice and equality
·The Essence Distinguish Between Marx and Lenin on the Dictatorship of
·Race Politic as the Enemy of Justice and Equality
·The Great Leap Famine: Natural Disaster or Political disaster or Murde
·Homosexuality: a legal or moral problem?
·1958-1962年中国历史上最具毁灭性的大灾难
·马恩列无产阶级专政研究手稿/郭国汀
·郭国汀:穷大律师与亿万富翁
·政治体制改革的实质与根本要件/郭国汀編译手稿
·台湾自由宪政民主之路/郭国汀编译
·Terrorism and state terrorism studying
·The Truth of Chinese Economic development studying by Thomas Guoting G
·Comparing Analysis of Marx and Lenin’s Theory on the Dictatorship of
·China overtake the USA becoming an economic superpower??? by Thomas G
·人性论:人性本恶或人性本善? 郭国汀
·《诗经》英译(精选)/郭国汀編译
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告

(Homosexuality: a legal or moral problem?)接上页博讯www.peacehall.com

   In human history, almost all country treated homosexual as crime and immoral which would be held to death, only recent two decade start decriminalization of homosexuals. However, decriminalization of homosexuals does not necessary turn it into moral, same as adultery used to be a crime, after decriminalization becomes an immoral issue.

   III Homosexuals as pathological disease?

   About the cause of homosexuals there are many theories. The earliest one is In 1852, Casper suggested that pederasty might be innate. With male genitals, body hair, voice, build and habitués but female from the inside, who desired men and abhorred women (Higgs 1999:74).a century later, A group of German researchers has suggested that too much or too little of certain sex hormones while a baby is in the womb can lead to later homosexual orientation (Stanway354). Another theory is that early child rearing experiences. Boys might over identify with their mothers or perhaps just fail to identify with their fathers, and hence in later life come to recognise their sexuality in female sexuality(Stanway 356).

   However, mainstream psychiatry and psychology have abandoned the idea that homosexuality is pathological, which concluded in 1957 “homosexuality cannot legitimately be regarded as a disease, because in many cases it is the only symptom and is compatible with full mental health in other respects.” In 1973, the homosexuality was eliminated from the American Psychiatric Association’s Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Ever Since, all major professional associations in mental health care have produced position statements documenting that same-sex sexual orientation is not a mental or physical illness and explicitly opposing efforts to change orientation. These statements are both influenced by and shape social attitudes and public opinion toward homosexuals people and help remove stigma toward them (Powell and Stein 2014:33). Ngunand Vilain (2014) announces that “preponderance of evidence from sexual orientation research strongly suggests that human sexual orientation has biological underpinnings … at the molecular level、、. there is little doubt that genetics plays a role in this trait”(p.183). In 2012, a California law stipulate : (1) “being lesbian, gay, or bisexual is not a disease, disorder, illness, deficiency, or shortcoming”.

   But dissident camps in psychiatry and psychology still maintain that homosexuality is a disorder of medical or psychological significance (Murphy 2014: 7). Bioethics saw some discussion about whether homosexuality was a disease, mostly as a test case for general theories of health and disease. Most of this analysis took place after mainstream psychiatry and psychology repudiated the view that homosexuality is pathological. Even now, however, some analysts in bioethics leave the door open to the prospect that homosexuality is “disordered” in some measure (Murphy 2014: 8) While many scientists conducting research on sexual orientation think that sexual orientation is innate and not a disease, Powell and Stein (2014) suggests that “ this is far from proven. 、、there is evidence that sexual orientation is somewhat fluid for some members of the population, undermining the notion that orientation is always firmly predetermined at birth”. Current research suggests that genetic and other biological factors likely play a role in the development of sexual orientations, this does not means that orientations are unchangeable (p. 35). Whether sexual orientation is the result of choice is a distinct question from whether it is immutable or innate. Although issues involving sexual orientation and choice are complicated, the evidence is strong that people’s conscious choices do not play a strong role in the development of sexual orientations (p.36).

   Many public figures openly express their negative opinion on homosexuality. The Lord Archbishop of Canterbury(1957) declared that “I believe that homosexual acts are always wrong in the sense that they use in a wrong way human organs for which the right use is intercourse between men and women within marriage. The ‘evil’ of the homosexual act is so self-evident in the fact that it is ‘a perversion of a natural function’ that we require no further proof or knowledge to validate our revulsion”. Sir C. Osborne (1966) commented: “I know nothing or very little about what is called buggery, but from what I do know about it, I hate it and I dislike it” (Woo 2014:11). In a radio interview on 6 June 2013, Ms Robinson urged gay people to seek reparative therapy, discussing a recent brutal assault on a gay man. She calls homosexuality worse than child sexual abuse, describe homosexuality ‘an abomination’. ‘It is the government’s responsibility to uphold God’s law’, which sanctions biblical death penalty for homosexuality. Of course, her remarks were met with public outrage and requests for prosecution (Curtis2013: 142).

   From above argument and evidence, we can see the public debate and scientist research on homosexuals is far from the final conclusion. Homosexuality as abnormal and immoral phenomenon can be proved from various facts. For example, One of history's most intriguing woman, Hungarian Countess Erzsebet Bathory (1560-1614) the prototypical lesbian vampire of horror films, may have been sexually aroused in her torture and murder of 610 maidens, she bathed in their blood to preserve her youth (Paglia 1990: 247). Another evidence is A fringe group homosexual practice that appeared in the 1970s: fist fucking, whose devotees crave anal penetration by a male arm, greased by Crisco, up to the elbow (Paglia1970: 264). The third instance is that modern male homosexual has sought ecstasy in the squalor of public toilets (Paglia 1990:21). Public toilets until the 1970s were favored cruising grounds. In 19 century street urinals were installed and these were heavily frequented by men wanting sex with other men (Higgs 1999: 67). Furthermore, In1970s, 574 male homosexuals were asked the number of sex partners they had, about 40% reported having at least 500 sexual partners. 3/4 male homosexuals reported more than thirty different partners during their lives. Most homosexual men have a higher number of sexual partners than most heterosexual men(Reinisch144).Finally, Homosexuals are “supposed to dislike women,” and yet they express their bizarre interests in superficial/unnatural women as their sexual objects (Woo 2014:8). These are only a few examples to show what kind of grotesque activity the homosexuals’ people desire to do. All such abnormal practice certainly against public morals, if not break the law.

   In principle, the homosexual must be in balance or disorder in their sexuality, and after hundred and thousand mixed blood and mixed sex between different generation offspring, some of them must be born with imbalance sex capacity and sexuality and this is an assumption that homosexual comes from. To avoid such abnormal offspring, before marriage, both side must be test their sexuality rate or sex hormones, and only allow those match in sex hormones couples got marriage and born children. According to Darwin's evolution theory, human being is evolved from inferior animal, since animal have selvage and primitive characteristics, only after hundred and thousand years evolution and civilization, it must mixed various generations copulated among man and woman, therefore, part of human being were born with imbalance body, mind and sex hormones and sexuality with abnormal psychiatry and psychology feature.

   VI Homosexuality is moral or immoral?

   It was granted that homosexuality is immoral, that same sex marriage would spread immoral ideas, and that same-sex marriage could put society at risk in all sorts of ways. Alex Rajczi (2008) argued that “none of this is true. The real argument for same-sex marriage is that there is not one single thing wrong with homosexuality”(p.502).

[上一页][目前是第2页][下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场