百家争鸣
徐沛文集
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[徐沛文集]->[冯胜平算共特吗?]
徐沛文集
·郑重声明(11)
·三退声明(12)
·郑重声明(13)
·郑重声明(14)
·郑重声明(15)
·郑重声明(16)
·郑重声明(17)
·郑重声明(18)
·郑重声明(19)
·您退了吗?
·庆祝百万华人告别中共
·庆祝两千万中华儿女“三退”
·借文献君 请君三退
·反共与反华
·中共花瓶
·罪有应得
·因六四而反共
·以不同的方式抵抗红祸
·英雄何其多?— 林立果不是唯一
·法兰克福书展上的红牢和女囚
·人各有命—也谈流亡
·一甲子红牢 四代人抗争
·没有柏林墙的冷战
·“一虎八奶”
陈独秀李大钊和鲁迅胡适等五四狂人
乃五四“新文化”及中共党文化的奠基石
·女人之见 - 挡道的鲁迅
·再别鲁迅
·不比鲁迅
·杨绛和鲁迅
·鲁迅解药
·鲁迅天敌
·主攻鲁迅
·李登辉和鲁迅
·清水君之冤、虹影之光彩与鲁迅之罪
·谁有鲁迅遗风? — 评比曹长青和高行健
·鲁迅害了几代人?— 从“阳光男孩”说起
·不忘清水君等仁人志士
·女性认识—针对胡适
·就辞评委和批胡适的答复
·我看五四
·五四后果:女“性解放”
·同是三八 — 背对丁玲
·我看红色文艺及其源头
·我看五四“新青年”(从胡兰成到萧军)
·我看五四“新女性”(从张爱玲到萧红)
·我看民运
·我看政治 
·闲话左右派 — 浅析党文化 
·朱蒙与陈独秀
·谁是汉奸?(钱钟书—鲁迅—汪精卫)
·千家驹见证因果报应与人间奇迹
·韩寒和清水君一样与鲁迅如同水火
·韩寒与廖祖笙的幸运与不幸
·被鲁迅们颠倒的价值观及其恶果
· “最大骗局”是鲁迅 - 韩寒也是受害者
·就鲁迅致网友
女性系列
·鹏程万里?
·两情若是长久时
·半老徐娘
·男女之别?
·墨爾本夜話
·女性与女权
·从“私生活”看女性解放
·女性经验
·问女何所思?
·问女何所忆?(修订版)
·从情妇谈起
·女性意识
·不同的惨案 相同的地方
·红星宋祖英
·与科隆缘分不浅
·出身不同流亡相同
·四次堕胎与X次恋爱
·我的洋债主
·留德手记 — 两个八月
答谢网友
·答谢网友
·批评与自我批评 — 献给网民
·读刘亚洲的公开信有感 — 兼谢各方网友
·谢谢关心
·就杨恒均作答
· 猜疑比共特危害大 -与翻墙者共勉
不知中秋是何日
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告

(冯胜平算共特吗?)接上页博讯www.peacehall.com

   
   《中国之春》由王炳章博士于1982年创办,是美国第一个反对北京政权的学生组织。它在组织美国的中国学生方面做得非常成功。在1987年春的中共中央第12届常委会上,邓小平亲口指责王炳章博士。邓指控王妄图“带领中国走向资本主义的道路”(这个就是邓在1986年底到1987年1月间发生的学运后所谈的资产阶级自由化问题——译注)。
   
   北京——很可能还有它在华盛顿的盟友——很焦虑。而且,中国本土上的学生也变得越来越激进。《中国之春》的平面印刷杂志那时是通过私带的方式进入到大陆的,这份杂志加剧了中国学生的激进程度,这也是中国官方在那以后一直这样说的。
   
   冯发动围攻
   
   在1989年1月8日,冯和他的15名支持者在《中国之春》执行委员内部发起攻势,将王和所有的组织创办者全部开除出去。冯,原本是普林斯顿大学一个默默无闻的学生,此时立即进驻华盛顿特区,在克莱恩的一个两间房的办公室里面工作,办公室位于K大街。冯担任《中国之春》负责人后的所做的第一件事就是发起指控王炳章贪污款项的大规模行动。王被迫建立一个新组织——中国民主党,但局面远不如从前,加上当时正处于天安门大屠杀前夕。1989年6月30日,北京时任市长陈希同,发表讲话,为天安门大屠杀做辩护。他在讲话中特别点名指控王博士和他的中国民主党“煽动学生”并“趁动乱之际直接插手”。
   
   
   接管北京之春不久后,冯和他的同伴开始修正他们对中共政权发出的反对声音,使得批评变得非常温和。同时,雷•克莱恩创建了一个新的刊物,《中国及亚太通讯》,任命冯为编委会成员。通过那个编委会,冯交往了一系列现职的和已经退休的美国情报机构人员。
   
   事实证明,克莱恩对冯的“投资”非常有用。在北京1989年6月的大屠杀事件发生不久,克莱恩随即拽着冯参加在华盛顿特区的一个又一个的记者招待会,以在会上“解释”所发生的事情,也“解释”乔治•布什总统的行为,布什总统当时的行为导致整个社会斥责他为背叛了被屠杀的中国学生的胆小鬼,并激起国际社会的愤慨。
   
   克莱恩与冯一起组建了一个新的组织,叫做“中国团结委员会”。这个新组织表面上宣称要作中国学生运动和美国情报人员之间的桥梁。虽然我们不知道冯以此身份与哪些人见面,但是克莱恩的亲密同僚,具有亚洲情治背景的前CIA局长威廉•柯尔比和前五角大楼情报机构长官理查德•斯蒂威尔将军必然包括其中。
   
   由于有了这样的关系,《中国之春》发言人所采取的路线会变成那样也就不足为奇了:他们说什么北京学生“做得太过”以及“应该通过协商”等等之类的话。这其实是白宫的路线。而且就在发生天安门大屠杀之后不久,冯开始指责林顿•拉鲁切(登载本文的杂志创办人——译注)以及《高级情治概览》(就是登载本文的杂志——译注)的“极端主义”,并扣之以“骗子”的大帽子。这,也是白宫的态度。柯莱恩自己也曾指责过林顿•拉鲁切是中国学生面前的“魔鬼”。
   本文刊登于《高级情治概览》(EIR)1990年5月18日,第73页“国内栏目”
   
   英文原文链接——
   
   http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1990/eirv17n21-19900518/eirv17n21-19900518_073-whos_protecting_beijings_spies.pdf
   
   注:“王被迫建立一个新组织——中国民主党”,有可能叫中国自由民主党。
   
   =====================================
   附件1-2
   
   谁在保护北京的间谍
   
   作者:约瑟夫•布鲁达
   
   (英文原件)
   
   Click here for Full Issue of EIR Volume 17, Number 21, May 18, 1990
   
   http://www.larouchepub.com/eiw/public/1990/eirv17n21-19900518/eirv17n21-19900518_073-whos_protecting_beijings_spies.pdf
   Who's protecting Beijing's spies?
   
   by Joseph Brewda
   Evidence has emerged that the Bush administration may be protecting mainland Chinese intelligence operations on U.s. territory. According to recent revelations, a Chinese national who seized control of the China Spring group last year is a penetration agent of the People's Republic of China Ministry of State Security. China Spring had been the most important U.S.-based Chinese student organization opposed to the Deng Xiaoping regime. Its policy changed dramatically after Feng Shengping-the alleged P.R.C. operative-took charge. Feng works out of the Washington office of former State Department intelligence chief and CIA deputy director Ray Cline. Cline is a decades-long trusted operative for George Bush. This has led some to conclude that the P.R.C. intelligence coup involving Feng was approved by the White House.
   
   Accusations against Feng center around a series of Minis- try of State Security internal documents which had reportedly been leaked to, or stolen by, opponents of the Beijing regime and smuggled out of the mainland. The documents, and sup- porting evidence, have been making the rounds of the Chi- nese student movement over recent weeks.
   One document, dated April 1989 and entitled "Summary of Progress," deals with P.R.C. intelligence operations in the United States directed against Chinese student organizations. The document details Feng Shengping's role in "infiltrating" China Spring. It notes that a state-by-state takeover of the U.S. organization, made possible by Feng and what the min- istry refers to as his "task force," was then in progress. It reports that actual opponents of the Deng regime within the organization were being isolated. Other documents report on Feng and his associates' role in regularly funneling informa- tion to their superiors relating to Chinese student movement leaders in the United States.
   
   China Spring was formed in 1982 by Dr. Wang Bing- zhang, as the first U.S.-based student organization opposed to the Beijing regime. Its organizing among the Chinese student community in the U.S. proved to be quite successful. In the spring of 1987, Deng Xiaoping himself denounced Dr. Wang in his speech before a plenary session of the 12th Chinese Communist Party Central Committee. In that speech, Deng accused Wang of trying to "lead China on the road to capitalism."
   
   Beijing-and possibly its allies in Washington-was worried. Meanwhile, students in China itself were also be- coming increasingly radicalized. China Spring literature smuggled onto the mainland became instrumental in that growing radicalization, as Chinese authorities have since stated.
   
   Feng launches a preemptive coup
However, on Jan. 8, 1989, Feng and 15 of his supporters ran a coup within the executive committee of China Spring, and expelled Wang and all of the organization's founders. Feng, who had been an obscure member based at Princeton University, promptly moved to Washington, D.C. to work out of Cline's two-room office on K Street. Feng's first action as head of China Spring was to initiate civil action against Wang for allegedly pilfering funds. Wang was forced to establish a new organization, the Chinese Democratic Party, in greatly reduced circumstances-and as the revolutionary events in Tiananmen Square approached. On June 30, 1989, the mayor of Beijing, Chen Xitong, delivered a speech justi- fying the Tiananmen Square massacre, in which he specifi- cally denounced Dr. Wang and his Chinese Democratic Party for "inciting students" and having had "a direct hand in the turmoil."
   
   Shortly after taking over China Spring, Feng and his associates began modifying their opposition to the P.R.C. regime to that of mild criticism. At the same time, Ray Cline formed a new publication, China and Pacific Rim Letter, and placed Feng on its editorial board. There, Feng joined a number of active and retired U.S. intelligence agents.
   
   Cline's "investment" in Feng proved to be handy. Imme- diately following the June 1989 massacre in Beijing, Cline dragged Feng from one Washington press conference to an- other, in order to "explain" what had happened, and also to "explain" the behavior of President George Bush, whose cowardly betrayal of the massacred Chinese students was then provoking international outrage.
   
   Cline then worked with Feng to form a new organization known as the China Solidarity Committee. The stated pur- pose of this new organization was to serve as a liaison be- tween the Chinese student movement and the U.S. intelli- gence community. While it is unclear whom Feng is meeting with, Cline's close associates with Asian intelligence back- grounds include former CIA director William Colby and for- mer Pentagon intelligence chief Gen. Richard Stilwell.
   
   Given such connections, it is not surprising what the line adopted by China Spring spokesmen has become. The Beijing students "went too far" and "should have negotiat- ed," they say. This is the White House line. It was also shortly after the Tiananmen Square massacre that Feng began denouncing Lyndon LaRouche and EIR for "extremism" and for being "crooks." This is also a White House line. Cline, for his part, has taken to denouncing LaRouche before Chinese students as the "devil."

[上一页][目前是第2页][下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场