百家争鸣
雷声
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[雷声]->[《纽约太阳报》建议向香港“雨伞革命”领袖颁发诺贝尔和平奖]
雷声
·可放弃自己权不能剥别人权利
·揽权本身就为腐败敞开大门:讨论腐败从贪污权力开始
·你可以放弃自己的权利,但不能剥夺别人的权利
·吴敬琏:腐败的实质是权力寻租
·丁学良新作:印度比中国更有优势
·林大军:再次忽悠欺骗大陆民众,绝不为反腐唱赞歌
·張三斷言:習由強勢反腐走向更專政
·屠城家族窃国掠影
·謊言起家,謊言建政,謊言治港
·纪念抗战,蒋中正功盖青史
·準的可怕 43個簡化漢字的現實預兆
·中共三位“抗日”将军战死之迷 全是蒙人
·绝不允许后代再经历这样的痛苦
·陈事美:惊人的反土改预言
·陈事美:惊人的反土改预言
·扮萌装纯恬不知耻的红二代/陈维健
·中共没有抗击日本帝国
·奇葩文转帖:我在英國蹲監獄
·国内网友斥红二代扮萌装纯恬不知耻
·准备好了吗?中国将面临全线大衰退
·贪官与血统:红二代不贪?
·“普通话”的惊人内幕
·中共「推普废粤」的政治动机
·ISIS首领与马恩列斯并列
·毛泽东的私生活
·香港学生罢课,要求人大道歉
·六四精神之炬被香港学子高高擎起
·梁粉李小姐转向称会考虑占中
·梁粉李小姐转向称会考虑占中
·梁粉李小姐转向称会考虑占中
·电视剧《邓小平》隐瞒哪些史实?/程凯
·今夜,我们为香港人民自豪!
·一个地主孙的血泪成长史
·香港民主示威对习近平构成挑战
·港台學潮與世代正義(洪鑫誠)
·香港民主示威对习近平构成挑战
·习近平的字典里没有"妥协" 中国梦里也没有反对派
·BBC记者引警方消息:反占中有黑社会参与
·BBC记者引警方消息:反占中有黑社会参与
·法律窗口:美国如何看待和处理公民抗命
·抱紧自由,风雨中迎接光辉岁月
·寄希望派无中生有的“习民主”
·鲍彤盛赞占中:出色完成2个历史任务
·为什么香港人对民主的愿望越来越强
·习近平在香港的盲点/ 猷子
·《纽约太阳报》建议向香港“雨伞革命”领袖颁发诺贝尔和平奖
·权力中心总想垄断真理和道义/王德邦
·强势独裁是民主转型的拦路虎/严家伟
·北美崔哥挺港警热传文造假穿帮了 被揭的体无完肤
·北美崔哥挺港警热传文造假穿帮了 被揭的体无完肤
·曹子文给邓榕邓楠的公开信
·林彪最大污点:长春围城饿毙数十万难民
·喂人民服雾【天津快板】
·广西政协常委装妈与学生对话
·两万八路军不敌5百日军?
·香港“雨伞革命”中学生组图
·反占中蓝丝带召集人李偲嫣 妓女身份被揭
·真假依法治国,四中全会检验
·真假依法治国,四中全会"验尿"
·方舟子打假周小平:梦里游了趟美国便控诉美国罪恶
·试看整人者,人亦整其人
·指鹿为马的时代
·网络作家抽周带鱼,妙语连珠
·为什么左右全民群殴周小平
·周小平风波笑点何在?
·10年前捧红3位好学生今何在?
·习大大的锅
·世纪梦幻:习近平反腐出民主!/张三一言
·一个真实的蒋中正
·毛颂蒋之信隐瞒七十年
·为什么现在要讲法治了
·中华民国总统有权对香港大陆说三道四
·陕西失独父母到省政府请愿
·刘少奇的结局
·法轮功围堵中南海导致政改夭折/周瑞金
·“做二”之道关键在韬光养晦
·从小官巨贪到老虎苍蝇标准
·列宁真相被揭,俄各阶层震惊和愤怒
·voa:习近平专机惊爆象牙走私,有何背景?
·法治的主要任务不是治官
·中国在中日斗争中昏招连连无一胜绩
·中国在中日斗争中昏招连连无一胜绩
·中国在中日斗争中昏招连连无一胜绩
·彭定康忧香港出现伊朗式民主(即假普选)
·章小舟:基于“民意分类”视角观察“习氏反腐”等现象
·恢复国民党的反对党精神/陈永苗
·李克强接见12家草根组织负责人
·香港占中升级为南韩模​式/谢选骏
·镇压学生运动的人都没好下场
·镇压学生运动的人都没好下场
·镇压学生运动的人都没好下场
·绝食学生促特首重启政改展开对话
·反腐变围剿政敌,廉政排名下降
·绝食学生黄之锋母亲的公开信
·反腐变反政敌,廉政排名下降
·这些红军将士干下什么伤天害理之事
·周永康涉泄密习近平家族财富
·周永康泄密温家宝习近平财富
·谢选骏:新母系社会的诞生——伊斯兰国扩张的西方内助
·周永康泄露了习近平等的财产
·幸好我们还在,不然死无对证了/邓晓芒
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
《纽约太阳报》建议向香港“雨伞革命”领袖颁发诺贝尔和平奖

   美國《紐約太陽報》周二發表社論,談及香港的「雨傘革命」,認為學生領袖之一、學民思潮召集人黃之鋒,應獲頒諾貝爾和平獎。
   
   文章一開始就問「諾貝爾和平獎有年齡下限嗎?」,指出香港近日爭普選的和平運動,是由架著厚厚眼鏡的17歲學生黃之鋒領導,形容他冒著生命危險,為香港下一代爭取權利,比所謂成年人更有智慧。
   
   社論強調,經濟自由和政治自由並無分別,並引用美國前總統卡特名言:「偉大的民主國家不是因為強大繁榮而自由。我相信我們是因為自由而強大繁榮、具影響力。」文章讚黃之鋒深明這個道理,但比他年長的人卻不能,強調「我們應頒諾貝爾獎給他,這是他應得的」。(施旖婕/綜合報導)


   
   A Nobel Prize for Hong Kong
   Editorial of The New York Sun | October 7, 2014
   
   
   Is there a minimum age for winning the Nobel Prize for Peace? We ask because of the astounding events that are unfolding at Hong Kong. They are being led by a young student with — as William McGurn pointed out on Mary Kissel’s broadcast for the Wall Street Journal — thick spectacles and a bowl haircut. He’s risking his own life to emerge at the head of a protest seeking to claim for his generation their future rights. He’s Joshua Wong, 17 years old. How can he be so much wiser than all the so-called adults in communist China?
   
   It’s not just the communists. Fifty-nine financial leaders have reportedly just signed a letter to the protestors. “Disrupting the social order of Hong Kong is not helpful to the development and discussion of the political reforms,” they harrumphed. “Nor would it solve any problem.” Among the signatories, according to the South China Morning Post, are some of the most powerful bankers in the city. “If the situation continues to worsen, the success made after the hard work and efforts of generations of Hong Kong people would go down to the drain. The victims will be Hong Kong people.”
   
   What balderdash. If the people of Hong Kong will be the “victims” of this trouble, who is the perpetrator? Not the protestors, for sure. They are peaceful, middle-class youths (and no doubt some who are upper class and lower class) seeking to redeem promises that Red China made by binding international treaty, on file with the United Nations. Democracy. Mr. McGurn pointed out that this is nothing like the “Occupy” protests that struck in New York. They were a Marxist movement, like the democracy-denying communists in Beijing. The communists are the threat to Hong Kong’s people.
   
   The financiers’ letter reminds us of the notorious statement in the 1980s by Thomas Thebald, head of international banking for Citibank. It was the time when bank lending to communist Poland and other regimes in the Soviet bloc was being uncovered and was emerging as a political issue. “Who knows what political system works,” Mr. Theobald said. “The only test we care about is: Can they pay their bills?” The cynicism — not to say ignorance — of the statement shocked America’s intelligentsia, among others, as the Reagan revolution was gathering steam.
   
   It’s a footnote to this story — but an important one — that the Wall Street Journal is in the thick of it across two generations. It is the journalistic tribune whose motto is “free people and free markets.” The message was taken into Asia in 1976 via its Asian Wall Street Journal, its first overseas edition. (Its visionary editor, Peter Kann, ended up as chairman of the home company.) It was a time when the establishment mantra was build the economy first and political freedom will follow. It was a invitation to tyranny.
   
   What the Journal stressed is this: There is no difference — none — between economic freedom and political freedom. They are the same thing, the warp and woof in the fabric of freedom. This is not a Republican or a Democratic point. One of the best articulators of the principle was President Jimmy Carter, who, speaking at Notre Dame, declared: “The great democracies are not free because we are strong and prosperous. I believe we are strong and influential and prosperous because we are free.” It’s one of those mysteries how 17-year-old Joshua Wong can grasp this point when his elders can’t. But we say give him the Nobel Prize. He’s earned it.
   
   来源:The New York Sun
(2014/10/08 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场