百家争鸣
刘蔚
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[刘蔚]->[Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Pois]
刘蔚
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之10—我们不要再上共产党“集体主义”的当了
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之11—道听途说的话
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之12—回顾六四屠杀,看今天的维权风云
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之13—把军人头脑废掉的共产党军队
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之14—谁是好人,谁是坏人?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之15—共产党变得比过去缓和了吗?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之16—八九民运的被镇压不应成为中国人摆脱共产党统治的障碍
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之17—听说有人要向妇孺开枪,我说我哭了
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之18—要吹牛还是要讲真相?
·刘蔚:唤醒国人之19—共产党玩“生存权”的把戏
·唤醒国人之20—乱认母亲要到什么时候?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之21—“弱势群体”的真相
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之22—多数民营企业,外资企业不过是共产党开的连锁店
· 刘蔚: 唤醒国人之23—驳共产党说的适者生存
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之24—共产党真的骂不垮吗?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之25—中共军攻打台湾的敌我识别问题
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之26—人与人之间的交往
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之27—共产党管区的攀比真要人的命
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之28—水资源,人人有份
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之29—大气资源,人人有份
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之30—共产党根本没有理由收取人民的水电气费
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之31—森林资源、石油资源,人人有份
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之32—华山什么时候真正回到人民的手中?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之33—土地资源,人人有份
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之34—中国何时才能成为中国人的家园?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之35—伟大的全民大革命
·唤醒国人之36—为什么13亿中国人应平分共产党管区的财产?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之37—共产党管区的稳定比乱世更可怕
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之38—改革、不革命带来的流血比革命还多
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之39—还原革命的真相
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之40—城市居民最低生活保障是共产党给百姓画的一张饼
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之41—论革命的方式
·唤醒国人之42—共产党才是有史以来最邪恶的反革命,反动派
·唤醒国人之43—共产党才是最大的汉奸
·Awakening Chinese People 12—Thinking of June 4
·唤醒国人之44—亿万人民不需要去遵守共产党几个官员搞出来的法律
·唤醒国人之45—中国百姓的生活是变好了还是变苦了?
·Awakening Chinese People 16—the 1989 Democratic Movement
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之46—共产党管区围墙的功能
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之47—共产党说人们去挣钱的真相
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之48—我们几千年的祖先是看得起病的
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之49—我们的祖先几千年来都不存在上学难的问题
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之50—我是个普通百姓,真好
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之51—共产党管区家庭的功能
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之52—科学,信仰;强人,好人
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之53—用我们的整体优势对抗共产党的各个局部优势
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之54—共产党管区生活的三种人:吸血鬼、奴才、革命者
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之55—论对共产党不满的人士的质量
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之56—一朝枪在手,起义路上走
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之57—哪些是革命,反革命,反动派
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之58—为什么共产党反革命能在大陆打败国民党革命派?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之59—八九民运的不兴旺不是因为当年没有及时妥协
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之60—传单写好了
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之61—代中国百姓写的一封给联合国的信
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之62—人来到这个世界做什么?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之63—不要随大流
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之64—我们在这个世界上起怎样的作用?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之65—八九民运,十八年了
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之66—现在中国真正的民办媒体
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之67—共产党绑在人们身上的四道锁链
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之68—是谁害死了鼠尾草?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之69—2000年以来共产党管区每年的非正常死亡
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之70—普通人纪念六四的三个办法
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之71—今天活着的人不比六四死难者幸运
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之72—对八九民运各方的评价
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之73—谁是今天中国的精英?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之74—不参与高考、买房、炒股等活动才好
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之75—我们今天最需要参与的活动
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之76—不要让美好的信息在我这里停下来
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之77—共产党管区的经济在大幅退步
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之78—是谁在利用人?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之79—说说亲共人员对民主的攻击
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之80—相信人民的革命首创作用
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之81—十亿成年人平均就只有四百元人民币一个月
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之82—中国谁当政都一样吗?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之83—共产党的平反毫无意义
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之84—播放新闻联播时出去走一走
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之85—雷锋称不称得上好人?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之86—起义被镇压的后果
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之87—各起义军应该不会相互争战
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之88—谁在逃避,谁在尽责?
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之89—面对共产党的压榨,不应该中立
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之90—看中共媒体、民办媒体对重庆水灾的不同报道
·唤醒国人之91—共产党实行的是党书记专政
·唤醒国人之92—中国人生活困苦的两个根源
·唤醒国人之93—共产党的精神堕落建设
·唤醒国人之94—中国人当代的第一所民办大学
·Wei Liu: Awakening Chinese People 14—Who Are the Good Guys, Who Are the Bad Guys?
·Wei Liu: Awakening Chinese People 47—The Truth of the Communist Party’s Saying that Chinese People Go to Make Money
·唤醒国人之95—算算平均每年的物价涨幅
·唤醒国人之96—我就是要起义
·唤醒国人之97—可以用暴力革命结束共产党的统治
·唤醒国人之98—以和平革命结束共产党的统治是可能的
·唤醒国人之99—和平革命对参与者的要求不亚于暴力革命
·唤醒国人之100—怎样进行和平革命?
·唤醒国人之101—市镇起义发动时的景象
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之102—市镇起义的意义
·唤醒国人之103—起义军不必担心共产党的核生化武器
·唤醒国人之104—参加市镇起义的人员
·唤醒国人之105—市镇起义两个月时的景象
·唤醒国人之106—天下大乱才好
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Pois

刘蔚:五毛文字展示其中毒太深—六年高考1.57

   公友/民主人士/觉醒人士/普通百姓 刘蔚 2014年7月25日

   Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Poisoned

   Human Rights Worker/Democratic People/Awakened People/Common PeopleWei Liu July 25, 2014

   网上评论余杰作品的文字不少。这里我们来看一篇短的吧。

   There are many comments on Yu Jie’s works on the Internet. Let’s look at a short one.

   “余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国

   田峰 2012年

   余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国。其结局就是余杰先生离开了中国,去了美国。中国和美国不一样,美国有美国的特色,中国有中国的特色。只不过两国的特色不同罢了。指鹿为马不对,非得指马为鹿也不对。国情不同,种亦有别,不可强求。鲁迅就是前车之鉴,呐喊了那么多年,有什么用呢?不如归去!”

   “余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国”完

   “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States

   Tian Feng 2012

    Mr. Yu Jie’s mistake is to regard China as the United States. The result is his leaving China for the United States in 2012. China is different from the United States, with each of them has its own respective feature. It is wrong to regard a deer as a horse and it is also to regard a horse as a deer. The situation and the race between the two countries are all different and cannot expect to be the same. Lu Xun is a known failure example, who has shouted aloud for many years, but what outcome has it brought up? It’s better for him not to do anything!”

    The end of “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States”

   如果你还想你或你亲友每人拿回土地,住房,医疗,拿回包括公民税率,政府各方面开支等社会事务的表决权这些民主人权,你最好读完这篇长文。你可以从Google translate/谷歌翻译听文章的朗读。你可告诉你外国朋友/老师我写的英文。他们可以在google上用“Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”搜寻出我的文字。更多文章见我的海外博讯boxun网站的博客,加上前后的www, com 我名字在首页底部的作者群中。从2007年到2014年2月,我博客的显示点击量已达300万,而按博讯说的各博客的实际点击量是显示点击量的10倍以上,那我博客的实际点击量到2014年2月已达3000万。我们的文字是对中国民众说的,是我们认为真实的情况,欢迎各位,各媒体.转载,传播。一个人给5个以上人讲我们《伟大的中国全民大革命》中的1项国际公约,2项活动主张,4项基本人权,8项优秀活动,及本县/市政权楼等几个地址,民众兵器弹弓枪等起义事宜,壮大进步力量,救自己,救别人,救中国。

    If you want you or your friends in this life to get back the human rights of half an acre land, welfares of housing, medical care, the voting rights on the tax rate and the government budget, you’d better read through this long essay. Google translate can read text aloud for you. If you have foreign friends/teachers, you may tell them to read the English part of my essay. They can google me out by “Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”. More articles of mine can be seen in my blog at “boxun”, with “www” in the front and “com” in the back, my name Wei Liu/刘蔚 is at the bottom of the homepage. From 2007 to 2014, my blog has 3 million displayed visits, and the website says that the actual visits is 10 times as the displayed visits. Then the actual visits of my blog is 30 million. What we say here we hold is true and is for 1.3 billion Chinese people. Every one is welcomed to publish, to spread our words, one person tells 5 or more persons, about the 1 international convention, the 2 uprising opinions, the 4 fundamental human rights, the 8 excellent activities, the couple of addresses of the Communist regime buildings in the local county, the uprising elements like the slingshot of people’s weapon. Anyway, we expand the democratic strength to save ourselves, our friends and our country.

   这样文字的作者是中中共奴才教育的毒太深了。奴才教育就是上面说的,只要你赞成中共,你的作品就是好的,反之就是坏的。我们说,“只有人民/民族才是评判好坏的标准。那就是13亿人一人一票表决,看哪方得的赞成票多或者赞成票是否超过反对票。”什么叫中国特色,恐怕中共高官及其理论家自己都不清楚。1987年中共十三大提出了“沿着有中国特色的社会主义道路前进”的理论,其中并没有实在的内容,如何实在地解决民众的土地,住房,食品,教育,医疗等基本生存问题,根本就没有谈。中国特色主要的目的是中共要玩一个白马非马的把戏。邓小平,赵紫阳的意思是“中国是社会主义,但它是有中国特色的社会主义,别再拿社会主义的一套理论来束缚中国。”

   The words of this author have shown that he has been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist slavery education. The slavery education is talked above that once you consent to the Communist Party, then your works is good; otherwise, it is bad. We say, “Only people is the criterion for good or bad; that is the universal vote among the 1.3 billion Chinese people, to see which side has more pro ballots than the con ballots.” What is the feature of China broadcasted by the Communist Party? Even the Communist Party’s high official or theorist cannot give a clear answer. In 1987 in the 13th Convention of that Party, it brought up the theory of “Advance on the Socialist Path with the Feature of China, but there is no substantial content in the theory, like how to solve people’s basic livings of land, housing, food, education, medical care and etc. The purpose of this theory is for the Party to play a game called a white horse is not a horse. The meaning of the high officials Deng Xiaoping and Zhao Ziyang is that “China is socialism or Communism, but it is the Communism that has the feature of China, and then do not use the Communist theory to confine China.”

   至于说此文作者提到的美国特色,去过美国的人都知道,美国根本不讲美国特色,而是讲普适价值,那就是民主公平。虽然美国在普适价值上还有缺陷,但它毕竟是做得最好的几个大国之一。

   As for the feature of the United States mentioned by the author, all people who have come to this country know that the United States never talks about the feature of the United States and talks about the Universal Value, which is democracy and fairness. Though the United States has some defects in the aspect of the Universal Value, after all it is one of the best big countries in the world.

   同样读过余杰作品的人多明白,余杰作品呼吁的中国人应该有民主公平是普适价值,是法国民众,美国民众,德国民众,中国民众,日本民众,英国民众等等都该有的权利。就这一观点,我们愿意13亿人来一人一票表决,看赞成票是否超过反对票?那位否定余杰的作者能不能告诉我们,世界上哪个国家的民众不该有民主公平呢?又能否愿意13亿人就你的观点进行一人一票的表决呢?

   Also those who have read Yu Jie’s works usually know his calling Chinese people to have democracy and fairness is the universal value; it is the human rights for French People, American people, Germen People, Chinese People, Japanese people, British People, and etc. For this point of view, we welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote, one person one ballot, and to see whether the pro ballots will be more than the con ballots. Can that author who negates Yujie tell us people in which country in this world should not have democracy and fairness? Can you welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote on your point of view, one person one ballot?

   我们看到否定余杰文字的这些人根本不谈余杰作品文字上的要素,就只是按中共语文中心思想式的与文字好坏无关的评论,他们评论的根本不是余杰的作品,只是显示他们要有意识无意识讨好当局的心态。各位可以看看,上面否定余杰的那篇文章,可以说对任何赞成民主公平的作者都适用。我看那些人读作品也就是认字,离透彻理解相差十万八千里。我说我读作品是基本上/大部分透彻理解了,就如我上面对余杰“绍兴的鸭”一文的分析一样。那些人能给民众写出那样的作品分析吗?有人说,“那些人是否定余杰作品的。”好,那些人又能写出展示文字要素的否定性作品分析吗?不能,过去不能,现在不能,将来也不能,因为他们是受中共中心思想式教育/奴才教育培养出来的。而五毛文字展示的是他们中毒太深。

   We see those who negate Yu Jie’s works have never talked about his language, and only comment it with the Central Idea taught by the Communist Chinese class, having nothing to do with the goodness or badness of a work. Their comments is not on Yu Jie’s works at all, but only show their mind consciously or unconsciously catering the Communist Regime. People can see, the above article negating Yu Jie’s works actually can be used to negate any writer for democracy and fairness. I see those people’s reading is also just recognize the words, far away from understanding well of the text. I say my reading mostly or at large understand the text well, just like what my text analysis did with Yu Jie’s “Shaoxing Duck”. Can those people show us such text analysis? Some people say, “Those people just negate Yu Jie’s works.” Then can those people show their negation with text/language/literary analysis? No, they cannot do it in the past, at present, or in the future, because they have been cultivated by the Central Idea/slavery education of the Communist, and the words of the Communist Replier/Wu Mao has shown that themselves have been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist education.

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场