百家争鸣
郑恩宠
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郑恩宠]->[华人基督徒发布《宗教自由普渡共识》]
郑恩宠
·百位律师和公民援救唐吉田律师20万医疗费
·政府危机还能赔多少冤错案?
·赞唐吉田律师2天获30万医疗费捐款
·挺起中国律师的脊梁!
·维权律师和乌合之众谁得人心?
·上海张培鸿律师为十字架辩护
·宝钢崔健倒台牵出多少上海官员?
·宝钢“地震”牵吴邦国炮击上海帮
·上海访民谁请不起律师名单列出来!
·欢迎各界参加《公民监督书》联署
·祝上海访民程玉兰获得自由!
·支持皱丽惠律师撤销中华律师协会
·学新加坡还不如学台湾
·反腐不放开户口仍不得人心
·中美律师联手为区伯提供法律服务
·千人请愿呼吁释放五女权人士
·上海高调访民有几个获难民资格?
·中共收购香港亚电视台告破产
·中共重视律师和上海维权对策?
·黄可洪律师参加广东家乡马栅村维权抗暴
·律师回乡参加广东万人抗暴
·刘晓源律师已介入广东村民万人抗暴案
·李光耀铲除共党与美结盟经济起飞
·真相是炸弹将谎言炸得粉碎
·祝杨继绳获自由写作奖
·靠大妈大爷为主的维权将结束
·舒向新律师敲诈政府案拖4年将宣判
·上海入狱访民没律师第一时间服务?
·江泽民生父系汉奸铁证如山
·李威达律师为辽宁访民服务上海访民呢?
·广东万人抗暴告别大妈式维权
·上海自贸区换主任江泽民失势
·长平:从厦门抗议到古雷爆炸
·自贸区设双主任上海第一虎是谁?
·李光耀学蒋介石1927年取缔共产党
·中共高度重视法律人维权者如何对策?
·上海又一国企贪官李军倒台
·江泽民是韩正后台兼答上海访民
·韩正旧部上海化工医药王李军倒台
·倒台的李军系上海共青团干部出身
·蔡瑛律师被关87天给访民的启示
·女权人士谢律师丢饭碗来营救
·习近平迫不及待法官收入为什么?
·上海副秘书长被抓江泽民在上海
·希拉里律师参选总统给中国人的启示
·美国为何要中国律师而不要贪官?
·女律师崔慧被北京法官打伤
·我和百余律师谴责北京法官殴打女律师
·五姐妹获释谢中国律师勇士们
·法庭上唱国际歌还称反共英雄?
·女儿美国遇滕彪谈维权年青化
·德国作家当年营救中国作家
·高层定调继续加大打压访民
·中国法官为何在罢工和怠工?
·北京法院就殴打女律师进行调查
·北京法院殴打女律师崔慧经过
·王健被拘十天见律师上海访民无此福气?
·蔡瑛律师冤案政府不赔万千民众何时获赔?
·我加入四百多位律师联署抗议殴打律师
·北京京润律师所发生爆炸案
·顾志坚弟兄安息
·敢为颠覆政权案辩护的刘正清律师
·鲍彤:修炼法轮功无错
·香港律师关注组就大陆律师屡次被打声明
·众律师声明指衡阳警方歪曲事实
·谢德国驻华大使与北京律师饭聚(一)
·2.德国驻华大使与北京律师饭聚
·3.德国驻华大使与北京律师饭聚
·五省30律师谴责河南法院声明
·香港4.25集会游行看人心向背
·警惕有访民或许比中共更腐败
·律师法庭上批江泽民为法轮功学员辩护
·赞徐显明任中央政法委副秘书长
·数律师与警方决战济南街头
·数律师与警方决战济南街头
·香港真假普选涉13亿人的人权问题
·全国拆迁居民应声援舒向新律师
·习近平何时会解决上海的访民问题?
·鲍彤谈时局
·祝贺陈建刚律师维权团成立
·法轮功是最敬重律师的团队之一
·民运高度重视来自国内律师
·中国“良心犯的孩子”组织将成立
·冤民祭奠林昭要破除领袖依赖症
·香港支持假普选方案不足一半
·人心向背和二亿人三退数字真实
·中共信访砸烂公检法访民太傻
·信访砸烂公检法访民太傻(二)
·祝中国政治犯、良心犯后代组织成立
·到中纪委上访的后果
·援救陈光武律师行动将展开
·广东反恐将拆迁户当演练对象
·学香港争民主现年青化、知识化
·朱立伦访复旦为何打青年牌
·亲属被抓如何请律师?
·两岸关系不是权贵、国共关系
·余文生律师被拘99天律协不作为
·上海干部经商规定出台与人亡政息
·6省14律师聚江苏法院斥法官违法
·崔慧律师起诉北京通州公安局不作为
·习近平拿多少钱搞法律援助?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
华人基督徒发布《宗教自由普渡共识》

转载来源:参与首发
   
    华人基督徒发布《宗教自由普度共识》(中英文、图)
   
   [日期:2014-05-14] 来源:参与 作者:参与记者柳江河

   
   
   
   
   
   (参与2014年5月14日讯)2014年5月14日,一批知名华人基督徒知识分子和牧师、律师等,在普度大学(Purdue University)联合发布《宗教自由普度共识》。以下是《宗教自由普度共识》的中英文版本及首批签名。
   
    “宗教自由普度共识”及签名
   
    “宗教自由与中国社会:典型案例学术研讨会” 于2014年5月5-7日在美国普度大学(Purdue University)举行,参加者包括律师、牧师和学者。经过三天的热烈研讨,对于宗教自由问题形成很多共识,因此有人提议起草有关宗教自由的一个共识文本并且联署签名,借以传播对于宗教自由的认知、倡导对于宗教自由问题的关注。文本在经过全体参会人员讨论之后定稿,今天(2014年5月14日)予以公布。
   
    如果你愿意表达对于这个共识的支持,请发邮件到: [email protected],并请注明你的姓名、职业、居住地,也欢迎提交更详细的信息。
   
    “宗教自由普度共识”及签名
   
   我们深切关注以下现实:
   
   1、在中国的宪法和法律中,缺乏对宗教自由的清晰界定和足够的保护。
   
   2、在中国的法律和社会实践中,充满对公民的宗教自由的各种误解、侵犯、歧视和迫害。
   
   3、在中国知识分子和一般民众中,也因此对宗教自由的价值和涵义缺乏理解和基本共识。
   
   根据一系列国际人权公约对宗教自由的界定和保护,我们相信:
   
   1、宗教自由不但包括个人有选择相信或不相信某种宗教的良心自由和表达自由,包括家庭成员(成人和儿童)持有和表达宗教信仰的自由,包括父母有按着自己的宗教信仰教导子女或为子女选择宗教教育的自由,及儿童有相信宗教和接受父母所选择的宗教教育的自由;宗教自由也包括宗教群体在集体礼拜、设立宗教场所和使用宗教标识、出版宗教书籍及传播宗教信仰等宗教实践的自由。
   
   2、宗教自由是现代国家和社会的基本和核心的价值。对宗教自由的保障不完整,则宪法上的言论和表达自由、思想和学术自由、家庭及教育的自由等其他自由,均无法得到完整和切实的保障。
   
   3、宗教自由意味着宗教信仰和非宗教的思想体系在私人和公共领域内均拥有平等的表达自由和法律地位,宗教或非宗教的思想体系均不应被视为一种负面的和受歧视的思想体系。
   
   4、 宗教自由意味着对国家权力范围的一种限制,即国家不能判断任何宗教或非宗教思想体系在教义和道德上的对错和正邪,更不能以此作为处罚公民的依据。亦不能将任何一种宗教或非宗教的思想体系确立为国家的合法性依据或赋予其法律上的优先地位。
   
   5、宗教自由意味着国家无权或没有道德上的正当性,在“合法宗教”与“封建迷信”、“正教”与“邪教”或“正统”与“极端”之间进行区分和判断。任何传统宗教或新兴宗教的成员,都不应仅仅因其相信、表达、传播和实践其宗教信仰,而受到政府的审查和法律的判断。
   
   为此,我们热切呼吁:
   
   无论相信任何宗教、教派或非宗教思想体系的中国公民,都有责任在法律上和公共生活中尊重、保护和争取上述宗教自由的原则和价值。
   
   签名:
   杨凤岗教授
   王永信牧师
   刘同苏牧师
   王怡牧师
   滕彪律师
   张凯律师
   洪予健牧师
   傅希秋牧师
   凌沧洲先生
   夏钧律师
   曼德牧师
   颜新恩牧师
   吴朝阳先生
   陈建刚律师
   金明日牧师
   黎雄兵律师
   李和平律师
   刘军宁博士
   张千帆教授
   孙毅教授
   陈耀敏牧师
   金中权牧师
   王保罗牧师
   张培鸿律师
   昝爱宗先生
   李亚丁牧师
   陈永苗先生
   李苏滨律师
   李方平律师
   隋牧青律师
   江天勇律师
   陈国第律师
   邢福增教授
   张志鹏博士
   朱瑞峰先生
   王文锋牧师
   庄道鹤律师
   唐吉田律师
   肖芳华律师
   王成律师
   唐荆陵律师
   刘士辉律师
   范学德先生
   夏业良博士
   刘凤钢牧师
   刘官长老
   王志勇牧师
   张伯笠牧师
   张立恒律师
   陈佐人教授
   刘卫国律师
   温司卡教授
   等
   
   
   "Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom" with Signatories
   
   
   “Religious Freedom and Chinese Society: A Symposium of Case Analysis” was held on May 5-7, 2014 at Purdue University. The participants included lawyers, ministers, and scholars. Through engaging discussions, some consensus was reached. Consequently, some participants proposed to draft a text of consensus for signatures so that the understanding of religious freedom can be spread and greater attention can be paid to the issues of religious freedom in China. The text was finalized after further discussion by the symposium participants. The text and signatories of the Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom are made public today (May 14, 2014).
   
   For those who want to support this consensus, please send an email [email protected] Please include at least this information: your full name, profession, and residence.
   
   "Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom" with Signatories
   
   We are deeply concerned about the following reality:
   
   1. China’s Constitution and law lack a clear definition of and sufficient protection for religious freedom.
   
   2. Misunderstanding, violation, discrimination and persecution abound with regard to religious freedom in legal and social practices of China.
   
   3. As a result, intellectuals and the general public in China lack an understanding of and a basic consensus on the value and implications of religious freedom.
   
   In accordance with the definition and protection of religious freedom prescribed by a series of international covenants on human rights, we hold the following beliefs:
   
   1. Religious freedom encompasses not only individual freedom of conscience and the freedom to express belief or disbelief in a religion, but also the freedom of family members (adults and children) to adhere to and to express their religious faith, the freedom of parents to instruct their children in their religious faith, the freedom of parents to choose religious education for their children, and the freedom of children to practice their religion and receive the religious education chosen for them by their parents. Religious freedom also encompasses the freedom of religious groups to practice their faith, to worship together, to establish religious venues, to use religious symbols, to publish religious books, and to disseminate religious faith.
   
   2. Religious freedom is a basic and core value of modern nations and societies. Without full protection of religious freedom, other freedoms such as the freedom of speech and the freedom of expression, the freedom of thought, the freedom of academic pursuit, the freedom of family, and the freedom of education that are guaranteed by the Constitution will not be fully protected in reality.
   
   3. Religious freedom implies that religious faiths and non-religious systems, whether in private or in public, are entitled to equality with respect to free expression and legal standing. Neither religious nor non-religious systems shall be deemed negative and discriminated against.
   
   4. Religious freedom implies a constraint on state power, i.e. the state cannot pass judgment on any religious or non-religious system as doctrinally or morally right or wrong, good or bad, let alone penalize citizens on basis of such judgment. Neither can the state make any religious or non-religious system the basis for the state’s legitimacy and accord it a preferential legal status.
   
   5. Religious freedom implies that the state has no right or moral authority to distinguish between “legitimate religion” and “feudal superstition,” between “orthodox religion” and “heterodox cult,” between “orthodoxy” and “heresy.” Members of any traditional or emerging religion shall not be subject to government censorship or legal judgment for merely believing, expressing, disseminating, or practicing their religious faith.
   
   To that end, we fervently appeal that:
   
   In legal and public life, all Chinese citizens, irrespective of their religion, denomination, and non-religious system, have the responsibility to respect, to protect, and to fight for the above principles and values of religious freedom.
   
   Signatories:
   Professor Yang Fenggang
   Rev. Wang Yongxin (Thomas Wang)
   Rev. Liu Tongsu
   Rev. Wang Yi
   Attorney Teng Biao
   Attorney Zhang Kai
   Rev. Hong Yujian
   Rev. Fu Xiqiu (Bob Fu)
   Mr. Ling Cangzhou
   Attorney Xia Jun
   Rev. Man De (Guo Baosheng)
   Rev. Yan Xin’en (John Yan)
   Mr. Wu Chaoyang
   Attorney Chen Jian’gang
   Rev. Jin Mingri (Ezra Jin)
   Attorney Li Xiongbing
   Attorney Li Heping
   Dr. Liu Junning
   Professor Zhang Qianfan
   Professor Sun Yi
   Rev. Chen Yaomin
   Rev. Jin Zhongquan
   Rev. Wang Baoluo (Paul Wang)
   Attorney Zhang Peihong
   Mr. Zan Aizong
   Rev. Li Yading
   Mr. Chen Yongmiao
   Attorney Li Subin
   Attorney Li Fangping
   Attorney Sui Muqing
   Attorney Jiang Tianyong
   Attorney Chen Guodi
   Professor Xing Fuzeng (Ying Fuk-Tsang)
   Dr. Zhang Zhipeng
   Mr. Zhu Ruifeng
   Rev. Wang Wenfeng
   Attorney Zhuang Daohe

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场