新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea]
石三生
·高智晟正在拉底西方人的智商
·美国需要“新思维”
·2018年,上帝将因高智晟沦为笑柄
·基督教或涉嫌诈骗
·平民需要顾晓军
·被忽悠的诺贝尔委员会
·平民需要顾晓军(二)
·言论不自由也是腐败
·诺贝尔和平奖需要顾晓军
·郭文贵纳降表与黑老大获赔偿
·郭文贵飞扬跋扈 刘彦平委曲求全
·郭文贵引而不发 刘彦平此地无银
·《巡视利剑》难学 支持中纪委不易
·持续验证中共反腐败“零容忍”的真伪
·顾晓军与马克思
·联合国也腐败,特朗普应支持顾晓军
·川普联合国首秀,令人肃然起敬
·郭文贵信口雌黄 共青团斯文扫地
·看不懂的腐败之郭文贵与曲龙案
·给反腐败泼点冷水
·郭文贵大骂大帮忙?
·郭文贵大骂大帮忙之二
·中共是否需要讲诚信?
·中共带头违宪 百姓有苦难言
·黄河、反腐败及其他
·鲁炜有点委屈
·鲁炜不倒,虐童案难发酵
·鲁炜倒了,周小平与杨恒均开撕
·为共产党人杨恒均辩护
·报告川普:周小平造谣说美国也“虐童”
·周小平或是“虐童”事件谣言的始作俑者
·“虐童”事件谣言中,两高认怂
·中共治国,政府作孽易百姓伸冤难
·新时代杂谈之国家博物馆的黑名单
·新时代杂谈之反腐败的潜规则
·新时代杂谈之六月的质疑与反炒
·新时代杂谈之言论越来越不自由
·端午时节话屈原
·新时代之新、旧社会乱弹琴
·顾晓军与老领导及航母
·崔永元与郭文贵
·崔永元爆料---折射出中共视法律为草芥
·顾晓军与茅于轼及航母与自由
·顾晓军与茅于轼及航母与自由之二
·崔永元爆料与镇江老兵维权
·胡锡进与镇江老兵维权
·崔永元、镇江老兵、祖国及其他
·崔永元与范冰冰
·崔永元与方舟子
·崔永元与罗大佑及柴静
·崔永元与马元
·时代的先驱---顾晓军先生与他的反对派理论
·海航抱佛脚暴露的是党思想之匮乏
·脑控与泼墨门
·王丹与高智晟及人权
·王丹与高智晟已成中国进步的绊脚石
·默克尔与刘霞
·刘刚大师再梦呓 刘霞难成昂山素季
·默克尔与王全璋及脑残的维权
·刘刚与董瑶琼
·崔永元与董瑶琼
·“老人帮”与崔说立波秀
·“老人帮”与“老领导”
·崔永元与韩寒
·马克思老矣 特朗普生猛
·凤姐与周立波及董瑶琼
·许志永又在给诺贝尔和平奖评委喂药
·中纪委太入戏:天网恢恢,又疏又漏
·新时代假摔演过头 董瑶琼难充政治犯
·毛遂自荐魏京生斗士奖
·疫苗案又起,刘强东要发水倒灌龙王庙?
·魏京生的维权与刘刚的棋艺
·疫苗制假,是党的过,也是刘强东的过
·“公正第一”或能解中共当前的困局
·顾晓军与王沪宁
·顾晓军与刘刚
·顾晓军与习近平及特朗普
·董瑶琼与岳昕及北大与佳士
·“大脑革命”与新时代的愚民戏
·顾晓军为百姓代言 许章润替权贵担忧
·顾晓军与中共讲理 孙文广陪中共演戏
·顾晓军的“自洽”与习近平的“自信”
·没有终结的中国网络第一间谍战--顾晓军与杨恒均之争
·为腐败们曾经的开明叹息
·向中共推荐顾晓军先生和他的“大脑革命”
·再谈顾晓军的趋势论与杨恒均的国师梦
·范冰冰被抓与崔永元无关与马元有关
·向中南海御用智囊团推荐顾晓军
·诺贝尔奖需要顾晓军
·顾晓军与胡鞍钢及贸易战
·顾晓军与王沪宁及贸易战
·三谈顾晓军的趋势论与杨恒均的国师梦
·中共需要顾晓军
·为央视、为“朱军性侵”助助威
·美国总统特朗普是顾晓军的知音?
·顾晓军与茅于轼及贸易战
·孙立平张冠李戴 班农故意扭曲
·致美国总统特朗普先生的一封信
·天灾人祸与中美贸易战
·岳昕与周小平及龙应台
·中美贸易战继续 “一国两政”或成真
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred eighty
   
   Translator: God has eyes


   
   Undeniable --- centennial Nobel Peace Prize has
   been able to Achievement brilliant today, with
   its great humanistic spreadvalues ​​ by the
   winners. From Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent,
   non-cooperation "," rich countries should cancel
   the debt of poor countries, "South African
   Archbishop Desmond Tutu, everyone reflects the
   values advocated​​ by the Nobel Peace Prize at a
   certain time and space advanced and universal
   feelings.
   
   However, when we are faced with the Nobel
   Peace Prize in the 20th century to create
   brilliant, can not fail to see --- as Mahatma
   Gandhi, the inheritor of the mantle of both the
   Dalai Lama, Aung San Suu Kyi, or Liu Xiaobo, the
   so-called "peace" ideology has been seriously
   lagging behind in this day and age, simply can
   not cope with the high-speed development and
   complex world. Rebuttable and from these heirs
   own experience, the incompetence of the so-
   called "pacifist" --- the Dalai Lama into exile;
   Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest;
   Liu Xiaobo was sentenced. Course, to hand over
   political power from the Dalai Lama, the
   mainland political indifferent; comeback after
   Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese civil war breaks
   out specific actions of the peace who does not
   promote human world peace: peace advocated by
   the Nobel Peace Prize purposes, is also
   experiencing insurmountable obstacles.
   
   Being called hero. It is such an outdated
   concept that has been unable to cope with the
   complexity of the world pattern era, Gu Xiaojun
   ideas emerged. Mr. Gu Xiaojun as a private
   citizen, with $ 35 more than a political game
   with the CPC theoretical articles, made the
   results are not unbeatable, and Ang, Liu Ji
   decades of efforts --- to ensure their own safety
   successfully lead to Communist China Politics
   and Law Committee and ideology downgrade.
   
   Explore Gu Xiaojun ideological success of the
   root causes, of course, first of all thanks to Gary's
   flow. In the human society has entered the era
   of the global village, when most countries
   around the world have chosen the democratic
   rule of autocratic Communist China also had to
   shy promised to gradually promote the
   democratic process, the former number two man
   of the Chinese Communist Party, Mr. Wen Jiabao
   has even threatened --- China's democracy will
   come in the modern realization (Gu's view, Mr.
   Wen Jiabao in fact in stupefying --- is the
   democratic responsibility can not be passed to
   the high quality of the people above). To break
   the curse of the Chinese Communists, with Liu
   Xiaobo's "colonial three hundred years" theory is
   simply not possible, due to the modernization of
   Mr. Liu Xiaobo colonial theory and Wen Jiabao
   trap actually resonate, are shifting the
   responsibility can not be democracy trouble.
   
   With select no enmity with the Chinese
   Communists --- but Mr. Gu Xiaojun by Ming
   repair the cliff, dark to crossing Chencang
   political theoretical articles side laid bare the
   CPC's obscurant "Communism is balderdash",
   "Three Represents is nonsense Hang Meng
   abduction; side proposed to allow the
   Communists can not be refuted "the public
   impartiality first values. Chinese people, by the
   decades stupefying education can go along with
   the Chinese Communist Party's "never
   Westernization" fallacy. But always like the big
   talk of the Chinese Communist Party, in the face
   of "the public impartiality" universal values, in
   addition to the metamorphosis blocked suppress
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun look with their own well-being for
   the people "in the same direction "the public
   impartiality, but perplexed, had plagiarized go
   into a nonsense of" fairness and justice "in order
   to confuse right and wrong.
   
   The world to see, "the public impartiality"
   universal values, has achieved numerous
   victories in the past 2012 --- big enough to cause
   the Politics and Law Committee, and ideology
   downgrade, small enough to let Ai Weiwei, Chen
   Guangcheng alone, malala international swindler
   one that is the prototype. Of course, the world
   should see that "the public impartiality" in the
   event of the Chinese Communist Party in every
   possible way blocked struggling to slightly under
   pressure test edge. Where it can be obtained,
   and Ang, Liu and other Nobel winners have the
   same support and recognition of the people of
   the world, "the public impartiality" human
   society will make a greater contribution.
   
   Today, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "gossip" democracy "to"
   Civil Rights "after the advent of, I feel duty
   bound to once again recommend to the Nobel
   Peace Prize judges. To please judges Mo looked
   this word of change over the past decade, the
   Chinese Communists precisely by the
   "democratic" stealing replaced by "people's
   livelihood" (Weifang street, originally called
   "democratic Street, Hu, Wen Party The changed
   during Minsheng Street "), the only excuse for
   economic development, political reform and the
   introduction of the supremacy of the
   maintenance of stability astray.
   
   Needless to say, Mr. Gu Xiaojun 'democratic'
   reform 'civil rights' "is a Chinese Communists
   headache but can not do anything political
   theory. Because the new session of the Chinese
   Communist Party ringleader --- set party,
   political and military power in hand, Mr. Xi
   Jinping, the most like the right of the people
   assigned to "talk about. Democracy is bound
   within the foreseeable future, in the hands of
   the Chinese Communists can be the "civil rights"
   and the "right of the people assigned to" the
   truth in the same direction. When Chinese
   Communists deny "civil rights" tantamount to
   self Zhangzui the all support it! This is also the
   root cause of the "gossip" civil rights
   "adventure".
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, please use you
   have no noble wisdom, carefully try to figure out
   what Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideas from "the public
   impartiality" to the "civil rights" wonders!
   Colonialism after the demise of the great Nobel
   Peace Prize whether the innovation ---- to
   continue the process of civilization of human
   society, the glory it? The world, as well as more
   than "the public impartiality" universal values?
   the public impartiality, free, more important
   than the "civil rights" rights?
   
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, March 24, 2013 05:01
   Yanbian]
(2013/04/04 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场