新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Recommended Nobel Peace Prize purpose executor Gu Xiaojun]
石三生
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·我为什么咬定莫言?
·“三个代表”高风险
·“精准扶贫”或是梦
·无梦---兼答卢德素
·“特赦贪官”不如放弃“三个代表”
·“马会韩”后“习马会”
·“放开二胎”要感谢莫言?
·最不可琢磨的汉语言
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(二)
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(三)
·日本人更懂中国
·日本人最懂中国
·“双十一”、打假与打虎
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均(二)
·“白毛女”或与“依法治国”相左
·莫曹杨与《打倒鲁迅》
·鲁迅与洋人杨恒均
·中央网信办为何不自信?
·杨恒均与“王的女人”将如何逆转?
·“三个自信”滋养腐败
·IS的乌托邦与周主席的“中国梦”
·张艺谋与韩寒心有灵犀
·王健林禁妄议 王思聪很惜玉
·公正如画、强拆似虎、腐败在继续
·请孙政才书记宣讲公正
·请允许我跟着李敖喊“万岁”
·请允许我跟着李敖挺圣战
·李敖老矣 唯言不休(复旦版)
·李敖还敢掀起一场中西文化论战吗?
·顾腚难顾头的文明---李敖清华演讲赏析
·左撇子的李敖不懂普世价值
·胡耀邦是怎样离开的人间?
·李敖宣布起义,北大怎么办?
·莫言的末日论与李敖的千年愿
·从中国第二大重要新闻说起
·从纽约时报整版赞习说起
·法官指天发誓启示录(二)
·法官指天发誓启示录
·高瑜认罪—一场游戏又一场梦
·杨恒均的好日子或快到头
·2016起,中国将成地球第一谎言强国
·杨恒均与石三生,谁是白痴?
·释永信无私生女 调查组或有私情
·顾晓军民主奖---一个让精英羞愧的奖
·释延洁呓语西天 中国梦泛滥成灾
·中共到底迷信不迷信?
·建言中共修改宪法序言
·建言人大修改宪法宣誓词
·刘晓庆逃税还是“逃睡”?
·新政为何笑冤不笑贫?
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈贺卫方代理李庄诉中青报案
·思鸡肋弃阿斗 哈罗李敖或归隐
·被贺卫方、李庄们玩残了的法律
·被莫言、李敖们玩残了的文学
·国务院管鸟事比管人事更靠谱
·贪官与鸟齐赞河南法治好
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·柴静是编剧雾霾是天气;“公正第一”才是思想
·河南法治动物为救少林寺?
·政法大学出尔反尔 邓亚萍进退两难
·邓亚萍兼职政法大学教授是腐败
·李冰冰卖萌 孔子学院无人睬
·政法大学越描越黑 邓亚萍免费获诽谤
·猜猜邓亚萍的金牌与博士那个真?
·邓亚萍的清华学士文凭或造假
·一生两死---从邓亚萍说到方静与徐明
·邓亚萍的剑桥博士真不了
·笑看吴法天李吉明双挺邓亚萍
·金将军太会玩:美女、核弹两不误
·茅于轼又荒唐 茅粉们再呓语
·石三生大师又多了一提鞋的
·为什么茅于轼能发出独立的声音?
·猜猜是谁阻止了朝鲜美女的演出?
·茅于轼的人文经济学都扯些什么?
·杨恒均呼吁特赦腐败 中纪委机关报自讨没趣
·向中纪委机关报推荐一下顾晓军
·也谈中纪委机关报斥责的“比烂”心态
·龙应台挺浦志强,与天何干?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Recommended Nobel Peace Prize purpose executor Gu Xiaojun

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred sixty-seven
   
   Translator: God has eyes 


   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges: self would
   recommend to you in the name of "Shi Sansheng" famous Chinese writer, big thinker
   since Mr. Gu Xiaojun, I often focus on Chinese
   and foreign media speculation candidate, and
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun comparison. Compare the results,
   you have already seen: whether in thought, last
   year's biggest contribution, maintenance
   sentient beings rights that Mr. Gu Xiaojun called
   difficult it was comparable to a model.
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize Jury, you are living in the
   free world, and probably can not imagine a
   person's thinking will be frightening? Core "the
   public impartiality first thought Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
   is to make the Chinese Communists feel very
   fearful thoughts frequently necessary hatred
   eradicated. This does not, on February 17, Gary's
   Sina, End of the World, the blog three major blog
   are blocked. Even my one "to the judges of the
   Nobel Peace Prize Recommended rights pioneer
   Gu Xiaojun" are not spared in this text, but I
   mentioned Mr. Gu Xiaojun unparalleled
   contribution ---- "political game" contributed to
   "downgrade Ideology and Politics and Law
   Committee."
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize jury, I can not think ah!
   Former Communist China "Ideology and the
   Politics and Law Committee downgrade" now has
   become a fact. Why they do not let you say?
   From South Week began speculation before the
   Political and Law Commission informer Pu
   Zhiqiang look no reported strong words against
   Zhou Yongkang they not want to muddy the
   waters, denied Mr. Gu Xiaojun made of human
   society in the year 2012 this great contribution
   to this! Judges, you had better keep their eyes
   open, and do not let some pseudo activist crooks
   fool you!
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, in bringing about
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun Ideology and Politics and Law
   Committee downgrade "enormous contribution, I
   say that I am justified, others say, can not block
   the others mouth not. Please you are in charge
   of the Nobel Peace Prize, the justices, to preside
   the public impartiality, to see in the end who is
   a credit to!
   
   2012, described as a Chinese New Year! Occupy a
   fifth of the world's population, China staged
   scenes drama is more exciting than American
   movies ---- Wang Lijun defection of the U.S.
   Consulate, thin valley open to the incident, the
   Diaoyu Islands rattling eighteen ghost
   unpredictable. This dizzying scenes of the
   Chinese people see whom at great length, but
   also the global media.
   
   In this, called the "Three years have seen the
   greatest changes in the board swing only at
   considerable personal risk their lives, Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun hold high pour a thin banner start the
   game, with the former Communist ideology and
   the Political Committee ---- Chinese Communists
   hole a loose, he immediately come up with a
   less than hundred days, click through millions of
   the Bolian community blog. Bo Associated Press
   blog, hair left, thin forces simply hate him, has
   come to the point Gary's life-threatening. (See
   Epoch Times writer Gu Xiaojun for critical Wang
   Lijun material and repeated political
   intimidation ").
   
   In 2010, Mr. Gu Xiaojun first published
   "Discipline is very tough to beat the Politics and
   Law Committee, Politics and Law Committee
   proposed should be banned. Than Ganhao no
   substantial content Mao Yushi said a full year
   earlier.
   
   May 30, 2012, Mr. Gu Xiaojun published the the
   "forecast list of seven of the Standing Committee
   of the Chinese Communists eighteen. It is this
   text, triggering the global media to follow the
   trend of the quiz Communist China 18 large. Mr.
   Gu article Devil May Cry, God is simply scared
   triggered the unprecedented media game do not
   say, actually led to easy to master of the Ferrari
   car accident that took place in Beijing on March
   18. Some sites even at the cost of a full-page ---
   head title, two questions, three questions, four
   questions are all predicted sniper Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun Beijing Ferrari car accident news. (See
   Shi Sansheng Gu Xiaojun "permanent" main
   cause "Beijing Ferrari car accident" easy ","
   manufacturing hope in despair --- Ferrari car
   accident interpretation of the "crisis" about the
   interpretation of the Ferrari car accident "crisis"
   in the end how Shigerous ? United States, the
   New York Times also talked about it until after
   eighteen major.
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I believe you also
   do not want to see the Chinese people, even the
   freedom of speech are not unarmed strong words
   with the Chinese Communists? Toes want to be
   able to understand --- Southern weeks even can
   not hold a New Year message, there will be the
   ability and courage to dare to raise 100,000 fans
   for Pu Zhiqiang "tigers"? This is clearly not in a
   show you! Game with the CPC, not only
   audacious, but also need to have extraordinary
   wisdom! Need to have a great idea to allow the
   Communists did not, and can not refute. , Who
   can refute the face of such universal values as
   "the public impartiality first got it? In this, I
   recommend judges may wish to read Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, 2013, the first guess.
   
   Respected Nobel peace prize jury, Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun Ideology and Politics and Law Committee
   downgrade "contribution, you do not even have
   to listen to me or how people say? Only need to
   personally look the article Mr. Gu Xiaojun The
   Ins and Outs of the quiz and the world media to
   follow suit, on self will glance. Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   This is the extent of the contribution of the
   human society, to the great wisdom of the
   judges, naturally, can weigh prioritize your to!
   Please you have the Nobel Peace Prize justices
   battle just the heart of all the nominee placed
   in front of the Almighty God, look at who else
   can do a better job than Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Thursday, February 21, 2013 6:27]
(2013/02/21 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场