新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern]
石三生
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
·卖艺也卖身
·蔡英文与龙应台及小粉红
·肖仲华与周小平
·中纪委也学会了吹牛?
·中纪委何时扫荡“地主帮”?
·“负能量”缺席是“五个一百”的耻辱
·蔡英文回应石三生
·复旦博士于迎丽装傻为哪般?
·阎肃“假去世”与山东老汉“活人出殡”
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·习总回应石三生?
·两会代表到底怕什么?
·留美女生主犯忏悔:自由是恶魔
·华东师大学者自杀,证明上帝如白痴
·李克强的创新与唐僧的紧箍咒
·党媒姓党,却炒作一个神经病
·揭开任志强“反党”的画皮
·国务院意见扰民 党媒辩解更添堵
·拆了败家的鸟巢如何?
·鸟巢是恐怖分子的老巢?
·仰慕白痴的姚晨为何有八千万粉丝?
·鸟巢怎可能不腐败?
·鸟巢为何成禁区?
·百家讲坛与史学奇才抑郁自杀
·史学奇才自杀是因为作假吗?
·史学天才林嘉文或装死
·党媒姓党,只是不懂常识与常理
·于丹与北大终于要合伙坐实“天才少年”
·王毅响应顾晓军 “九二共识”已过时
·鸟巢的回应---边自夸;边删贴
·推荐顾晓军、潘基文、蔡英文联袂角逐诺奖
·北京法官被杀,与司法不公有关系吗?
·马彩云法官被杀,官方应公开真相
·倡议追授马彩云法官全国模范、烈士、博士
·凯迪网友七嘴八舌议马彩云法官被授勋
·马彩云法官与北师大女教授
·请王岐山书记谈谈马彩云被枪杀案
·政协发言人爱吹牛,出两小题难倒他
·用“大脑革命”质疑马彩云法官被枪杀
·马彩云法官被杀,“正义”或是元凶
·倡议追认马彩云法官为“两会代表”
·依法治国,应取缔两会提案
·谁是当今文坛第一
·两会中的腐败---申纪兰篇
·两会中的腐败--傅莹卖书,莫言扯淡
·公开叫卖、转让”当今文坛第一”
·任志强、李悔之与“动物世界的阴谋”
·大陆的尴尬:承认台湾宪法,只能“一国两政”
· 习总巧应顾晓军 “九二共识”成历史
·九三学社中央委员为何也做五毛?
·全国政协委员朱征夫是敢言还是扯淡?
·台湾蔡英文欠大陆顾晓军一个人情
·任志强与任大炮
·习总揭开了人类起源之谜
·台湾文化的假正经
·向高级动物鲁山老泉致敬
·顾晓军创立了新哲学,中国大脑敢挑战谷歌智能吗?
·中国将错过下一波浪潮---大脑革命
·中国正在错过下一波浪潮---大脑革命
·中国人的悲哀
·申纪兰代表的智能超越了阿凡狗
·顾晓军思想远播阿拉伯世界
·从两会代表的马桶式思维说开去
·我与叙利亚执政党成了好朋友
·给“一带一路”泼点冷水
·天上真的会掉馅饼
·高级动物在行动
·因推荐“公正第一” 石三生下场堪忧
·请问生意场大人:该如何谈生意?
·大脑革命影响谷歌 阿凡狗戏弄聂卫平
·生意场的生意经与顾晓军民主奖
·石三生影响着索罗斯和聂卫平
·当执政党不在乎被冒充
·因小气,蔡英文正在丧失先机
·报告!我要吃敬酒
·刘刚才赞顾晓军,温云超就疯了
·冒充之恶与北风之毒
·不讲公正第一,岳阳法官下口咬
·顾晓军思想是人类社会的航标灯
·华东师大或有难言之隐
·人民日报敢不敢与顾晓军一辩?
·刘刚道歉,顾晓军主义再增辉
·温云超何时得的健忘症?
·与刘刚先生商榷
·方舟子出马,山东疫苗案将软着陆
·人民日报只敢叫阵,不敢较真
·人民日报认怂,让马克思主义蒙羞
·朝阳群众与海外精英
·向清华大学校长推荐“大脑革命”
·看李悔之如何为山东疫苗案灭火
·与“朝阳群众”、“华侨”说说精神病
·顾晓军与刘刚及其他
·马云投资夭折 刘刚大战北风
·朝阳群众与海外精英(二)
·刘刚大战北风,急坏了吕柏林
·朝阳群众与海外精英(三)
·请国务院收回成命
·“英雄所恨略同”与朝阳群众爱的癫狂
·刘刚给世界出了个大难题
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred thirty-five
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    


   Chapter II KuiWen Court established false cases (under)
   Procuratorate investigation and handling of the
   results, that is, tell me the pawnshop pawn
   ticket, did not break the law ". So, in the end
   pawnshop no illegal it? Of course. Just
   Procuratorate for some reason, the law turn a
   blind eye to it. I suspect the the pawnshop
   contract is forged, the pawn ticket of course, also
   a forgery:
   1, the pawn contract clearly does not meet the
   common sense, the one-year deadline actually
   expressed in the July 16, 2007, to July 16, 2008.
   Understand the point of financial common sense
   are not guilty of such a low-level error, not to
   mention the pawnshop to pinch pennies. It can
   be seen with the naked eye, a date after the
   alteration made by October 15, 2007.
   2,Pawning Measures, signed by Zhou Yongkang,and Bo Xilai requirements: real estate mortgage
   period should not exceed six months. Pawn
   contract for up to one year.
   3, the contract property keys in the hands of the
   secured party. My real estate has been in my
   hands. This proves that the pawn shops did not
   do even the actual assessment. Pawn contract is
   counterfeit. Later in the inspection of the court's
   docket Cravens, can prove that the: the Pawn
   time they had to July 16, 2007, to October 15,
   2007. Three months, reasonable and legitimate.
   What To pawn behavior the forged mortgage
   contract? Because I can no longer endure the
   buyer does not fulfill the contract, the buyer
   filed a civil action. Buyers fear of fraud and not
   another re-assurance to set their own fraud
   collusion with the pawnshop. Because under the
   existing law, the buyer even if I lose a civil
   lawsuit, if he bilk refused to implement the
   judgment of the Intermediate People's Court.
   And I can only requirement in the hospital to
   perform my property. So, the execution proceeds,
   pawn mortgage priority. That I was asked buyers
   to repay the pawn rows mortgage. Means as I
   JifeiShida half effort will go down the drain.
   Sure enough, is the vicious a coup! Ring ring,
   liquidated to occupy my real estate.
   Buyers just do a good job with the pawnshop
   buckle, in collusion with the Housing Authority
   false filing was not enough, they must also have
   the legal means can be cashed at any time. The
   root cause of this pawnshop collusion Cravens
   Court established false cases.
   Why Cravens Court established the false cases?
   1, Pawnshop prosecution time is immediately after
   my time in hospital sued the buyer. My first
   time to prosecute a lawyer bastard, and made in
   the hospital discomfort grid quickly dismissed.
   The pawn shops are not action, but will also do
   the extension of the pawn ticket that has
   expired. So the second time I re-prosecute, pawn
   shops this to the The Cravens court stand the
   matter (case files show time).
   2, litigation in the hospital because of the trial
   judge mischief mischief, insist on helping the
   defenShit cut 380,000 yuan housing fund to
   judicial appraisal contour homes approved the
   Weihai ETERN Forensic Center can withdraw the
   false identification etc., the six months of the
   civil case, the trial for a full 17 months, is a
   serious violation of the extended trial. The
   pawnshop the Cravens court case, actually no
   reason, time trial than I do here long. If false
   cases, Cravens court Why not scheduled closing
   it?
   3, is the verdict of the Intermediate People's
   Court signed May 27, 2009, to reach my hand (a
   lawyer), July 7 already. This is obviously
   intentionally delay the delivery time to do what?
   Used to start the Cravens court false cases. Do
   not to exclude the Cravens court case, Weifang
   Intermediate People's Court verdict came out,
   hastily made.
   In fact, Cravens Court established the
   genuineness of the case, just any literate person
   can check to understand. But since my report to
   the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's
   approach is handed over to the High Court.
   Provincial High Court to the Court of Weifang
   City. The Intermediate People's Court to the the
   Cravens court itself investigated. Self-
   examination and the results will be imagined.
   Can best the Cravens court stand grounds Jiaan:
   Cravens Court in this case nothing. Just pawn
   interest, more than the principal amount of the
   right? Open the pawn shop, also do charity it?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, January 15, 2013 06:43 china]
(2013/01/15 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场