百家争鸣
郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[人民反抗暴政的革命权利]
郭国汀律师专栏
·情由可言,难言之隐
·沉重的心!
·我为小点格格说句公道话
·堂堂正正做个真正的中国人!
·为自由为独立为思想的彻底解放大家努力呵!
·吾之专业乃出庭诉讼律师
·怒气
·最美丽的人
·南郭评论美人美言美语美文
·吾之教授梦在今天实现! 南郭
·南郭:我的遗嘱与托孤
·男子汉的眼泪/南郭
·性格决定命运/南郭
·文学感言/郭国汀
·郭国汀:春
·郭国汀:读实秋有感.
·郭国汀:理想.
·郭国汀:律师.
·郭国汀:作文.
·郭国汀:坚韧不拔
·郭国汀:兴趣.
·信函/南郭
·日记与书信/南郭
·性格/南郭
·天才,蠢才,笨蛋/南郭
·陈良宇是中共残酷政治斗争的牺牲品
·郭国汀 国人民族主义乃中共误导所致
·人民公社万岁?!--《辉煌的幻灭》读后感
·如何成为一名伟大的,优秀的法律人?网友评论
·如何成为一名对社会有用的人
·谁杀死了中国伟大的诗人杨春光?
·忆对我前半生影响至深的三位老师
·A Letter to a Chinese
·不敢讲真话的民族注定是受奴役遭天谴的软骨头的劣等种族
·This is no time to kowtow to China
·南郭初步定论宣昶玮
·自封上帝皇帝圣人者:狂妄无知之徒?!
·南郭点评宣昶玮自封紫薇圣人
·南郭点评张千帆教授论宪政
·愤怒出诗人,悲愤出伟诗
***(55)郭国汀律师专访
·世纪回眸(69)-专访郭国汀之一
·世纪回眸(70)-专访郭国汀律师之二
·郭国汀谈郭飞雄、力虹、陈树庆遭被捕
·法律人的历史使命---答《北大法律人》主编采访录
·郭国汀律师答亚洲周刊纪硕鸣采访实录
·希望之声专访:声援高智晟同时也是在为自己
·胡平章天亮郭国汀谈中华文化与道德重建
·希望之声专访郭国汀 中共是最大的犯罪利益集团
·中共已是末日黄昏----郭国汀声援杨在新律师
·希望之声专访郭国汀用法律手段揪出幕后凶手
·【专访】郭国汀从海事律师到人权律师的转变
·专访郭国汀:为女儿打破沉默
·郭国汀谴责中共对他全家迫害恐吓
·郭国汀律师谈中国司法现状
·人权律师郭国汀在加拿大谈六四
·加拿大华人举办烛光悼念纪念六四-著名人权律师郭国汀称退党运动具有重大意义 
·采访郭国汀律师:被逼离婚 战斗到底
·华盛顿邮报报导高智晟律师事件
·[专访]郭国汀律师:从刘金宝案谈开去
·希望之声专访郭国汀和盛雪
·大纪元专访郭国汀 中共垮台是必然的
·郭国汀谈高智晟律师的公开信
·中共的末日只是时间迟早的问题
·中华文化与道德重建
·【专访】郑恩宠律师郭国汀谈郑案内情
·【专访】辩护律师郭国汀谈清水君案
·郭国汀指雅虎遵守当地法律说无法律根据
·郭国汀触怒司法当局:中国律师维护社会正义风险大
·US lawmakers ask Beijing to reinstate law firm of rights activist
***国际透视
·北朝鲜疯狂发展核武器为哪般?
·中国强劳产品出口的罪孽
·郭国汀 中国人民的真正朋友加拿大总理斯蒂芬 哈柏
·只有抛弃马列毛实现法治自由民主21世纪才有可能属于中国
·华盛顿邮报详细报导陈光诚案判决情况
·中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人
·华盛顿邮报陈光诚案庭审报导Chinese Rights Activist Stands Trial After Police Detain Defense Team
·新闻检查最严厉的十个国家胡锦涛称要向北朝鲜和古巴学习政治!
·国际人权观察就赵长青狱中受虐致胡温公开函
·中国驻美使馆拒收立即释放师涛的国际呼吁书
·国际保护记者委员会哀悼吴湘湖记者
·BBC 英语新闻报导《冰点》被封事件
·国际保护记者委员会关注声援杨天水
·国际保护记者委员会谴责中共迫害记者李长青
·国际保护记者委员会呼吁立即无条件释放杨天水
·CPJ URGER MR.HU RELEASE JOURNALISTS IN CHINA
·Overcoming Violence Abroad and at Home
·Lawyers Sentence Tests IOCs Ability to Enforce Olympic Promises
·Free China Rally in Canberra,
·Open Letter to President Hu Jintao and Prime Minister Wen Jiabao from the Coalition to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong in China (CIPFG)
·非洲的复兴(African Renaissance)
***(56)大学日记
·错误是我犯的,但数十年后亲自纠错我还不伟大吗?!
·郭国汀 “只有社会主义才能救中国”质疑
·国家是民族矛盾不可调和的产物而非阶级斗争的产物/郭国汀
·阶级斗争的思考/郭国汀
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
人民反抗暴政的革命权利

Locke’sidea of the People’s right of Revolution

   

   Guoting Guo

   

   

   “The power that every individual gave thesociety, when he entered into it, can never revert to the individuals again, aslong as the society lasts, but will always remain in the community; becausewithout this there can be no community, no commonwealth, which is contrary tothe original agreement… but if they have set limits to the duration of theirlegislative, and made this supreme power in any person, or assembly, onlytempor\ary; or else, when by the miscarriages of those in authority, it isforfeited; upon the forfeiture, or at the determination of the time set, itreverts to the society, and the people have a right to act as supreme, andcontinue the legislative in themselves; or erect a new form, or under the oldform place it in new hands, as they think good.”[1]Lockeasserted.

   

   In this conclusion Locke involves someimportant political philosophy idea: origin compact are among all member of acommunity not between the ruler and the people; this contract has specialcharacter which cannot change arbitrary, and sovereignty of the commonwealthcome from the consent of the people. The supreme power is the legislative whichis the trustee only and people as sovereignty has right to forfeit it and hasthe right of revolution against tyranny. In fact, Locke’s theory justifies theBritish Revolution in1688 and has significant influence on the AmericanRevolution in 1776 and numberless revolutions in the world. In my short essay, Iwould like focus on Locke’s idea of thepeople’s right of revolution against Prince or government.

   

   Aristotle according to the number ofrulers divide the governments into three categories: rule by one, Monarchy(Tyranny); by few, Aristocracy (Oligarchy); and by many, Polity(Democracy);Until middle age and before modern time, Christian political thinkers claimedthat all states power come from divined God; even at earlier modern time, Hobbesstill announced the sovereignty of state belong to the absolute Monarchy, forhe believes that even tyranny are better than the state of nature which hedescribed as “the war of all against all”. However, Locke’s political idea isrevolutionary, he asserted that the legislative is the supreme power in anysociety and the people remain the supreme power to remove or alter thelegislative, when they find thelegislative act contrary to the trust reposed in them[2],and all other powers in the society derived from and subordinate to it.[3] Accordingto Locke, the end of men enter intosociety is for enjoyment of their properties in peace and safety, and the fundamental positive law of all society isthe establishing of the legislative power, which is not only the supreme power,but sacred and unalterable; [4] Sincethe members of legislative are elected by people periodically, and the peopleauthorize the legislative to make laws and set rules as guards and fences tothe properties of all the members or the society,[5]asa logical result, people are thesovereignty of the state, and the People’s Sovereignty in fact justify theright of revolution of the people.

   

   Locke assumes thatmen by nature are all free, equal and independent, without hisconsent, no one can be put out of this estate, nor subjected to the politicalpower of another.[6]So people’s consent actually becomes the root of all political power. Forenjoyment of lives, liberty and estate peace and security and avoid the stateof war, mankind quit their natural power, resign it to the public which canpunish the offences,[7]consentto constitute Political Society, that is, freemen consent of unite andincorporate into a society[8]. In such society must be have adecisive power, an authority and a standing rule and common judge to appeal toresolve the controversies and disputes among people.[9]Thusexcludes all private judgement, the legislators make laws, Umpire settlestanding rules, official apply and execute those rules equally to all member ofthe society, and common judges decidesall disputes happen between any members of that society and punishes thoseoffence.[10]

   

   Locke proposed that the end ofgovernment is good of mankind, and the end of political power is to preserve citizen’slives, liberties and fortune; He defined political power as: a right of mankindto make laws with penalties of death, and all less penalties, regulate and preservethe property, employ the force of the community, execute laws, defence thecommonwealth from foreign injury, for the public good.[11] Heassumes that the power origin from the compact and mutual consent of those whomake up the community.[12] Thus,political power should be limited and not an absolute or arbitrary.

   

   Since people have the sovereignty ofState, and the government is limited, whenever a Prince or legislative orgovernment breach the trust and abuse the power to invade the property,threaten the lives or deprive the liberty of the people, or simply as a tyrant, as a result will bring the situationeven worse than the state of nature and introduce to the state of war among thepeople, in such cases, People have the Right of Revolution which isinalienable.

   

   

   Althoughsuggested that individual can never revert the power which has given tocommunity after they enter into commonwealth, Locke firmly asserts the people’sright of revolution. However to execute such right must be very careful andonly under strict condition, if the government act within its legal power and didnot invade the fundamental right of the people, no right to revolution.

   Locke urged that “Anyone who by force invadesthe rights of people or prince, and lays the foundation for overturning theconstitution and frame of any just government is guilty of the greatest crime;they should be esteemed the common enemy and pest of mankind.”[13] Lockeinsists that in some situation, people have an inalienable right of revolutionagainst authority.

   

   

   Since the fundamental end ofgovernment is protect the lives, liberty and estate of the people, and thereason why mankind voluntary agree to give up their natural power enter into acommunity is for enjoyment of their property peace and security, therefore whenhappen following cases, which constitute fundamental breach of contract, thepeople have either the right of dissolve the legislative or the right of revolutionto overturn the government:

   

   When the legislative acts against thetrust by endeavour to invade the property of the people;

   

   When legislative make themselves mastersor arbitrary disposers of the lives, liberties, or fortunes of the people;

   

   Wherever the legislators endeavour totake away and destroy the property of the people; “where the laws cannot beexecuted, it is all one as if there were no laws”[14].

   

   Whenever the legislators or Prince reducepeople to slavery under arbitrary power,

   

   Whenever the legislative transgress thisfundamental rule of society; endeavour to grasp themselves, or put into thehands of any other absolute power over the lives, liberties, and estates of thepeople;

   

   When the legislative (or the Prince) actcontrary to their trust, the government are dissolved,[15]andwhenever the government disappear the society may be return to state of nature.According to Locke, Want of a commonjudge with authority, puts all men in a state of nature, the state of nature isa state of perfect freedom to order actions, dispose possessions within the bounds of the law of nature; Also a stateof equality, all the power and jurisdiction is reciprocal, all the sameadvantages of nature, use of the same faculties, equal one amongst anotherwithout subordination or subjection.[16]Ina state of nature, one man comes by a power over another, every man has a rightto punish the offender, has a power to kill a murderer,[17]andhas the executive power of the law of nature[18].

   

   If above situation occurs, either thelegislative changed or the legislators act contrary to the end for which theywere constituted; those who are guilty are guilty of rebellion.[19]Because by breach of the trust, Prince and legislative forfeit the power, “whenthe legislative is broken or dissolved, dissolution and death follows,” for“the constitution of the legislative is the first and fundamental act ofsociety,”[20]Locke explained. They put themselves into a state of war with the people, whoare thereupon absolved from any farther obedience, and are left to commonrefuge against force and violence. The people have a right to resume theiroriginal liberty, by establishment of a new legislative provide for their ownsafety and security[21],or overthrow the government to constitute a new one.

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场