百家争鸣
明暗經緯錄
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[明暗經緯錄]->[韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊]
明暗經緯錄
·民主黨在加州取得期中選壓倒性勝利
·美帝即將取消一個中國政策
·辛亥革命是中華子女締造的偉大革命
·人浮於事的七千萬共黨人員
·高人指點蔡英文成為台灣首長
·中國人命賤可以為一個中國政策永遠背書
·論窯洞習近平比清華胡錦濤的政治血統高貴
·二次金改案扁判無罪與五都選舉
·高人指點馬英九當未來一個中國的總統
·少數黨與在野黨的區分
·憶台灣望中州南陽
·一黨兩院制 vs 二黨兩院制
·全美和統會論壇智囊可能掐死中華人民共和國一線生機
·為什麼中共沒有骨氣﹖
·美國是實驗室的啄米鴿
·破壞中華民族和解的罪人
·心劍
·為什麼要苛待江西萍鄉工人
·中華母親 妳好慘烈啊!
·中華父親 恕己待人
·照汗青 心劍
·悲壯史詩 我父參加華北保衛戰
·中華民國抗戰紀事 國軍中條山戰役
·風與沙漠綠洲
·望青天
·胡錦濤語言矮化自己成政治侏儒
·父親的金十字架
·我的支離破碎股票無端上漲6倍
·共黨空降和統兵部隊到香港
·泱泱大國美國放棄庚子賠款
·共產黨一黨專制把上海教師大樓活活燒死53人
·民進黨為何往事不堪回首
·一黨專制薄弱的應對機制
·給民進黨主席蔡英文的公開信
·蔡英文的台大教授張麟徵喊妳棄暗投明
·分析中共對台五都選舉奧步 被美封殺
·共黨餘毒處處對中國文化下標籤
·連戰爺爺與孫立人爺爺的祖墳
·畢竟抗戰歷史不是蔣家獨享的過去
·兩岸非常姻緣篇 給大S的勉勵
·中國社會主義特色對待自己河南工人的無情無義
·送給郭台銘新生麟兒的一句話 守善不如改善
·比較中國兩硬漢楊佳與習近平
·美國女性是組裝潛水艇的功臣
·兩岸問題核心
·台灣如何變成蘇維埃的特務勢力範圍
·孫中山先生的擘劃是以經緯描述一個國勢
·馬列狗官失格乎﹖上海靜安區教師公寓失火慘案
·陝北農家女兒露著下體與共產黨一起真都起家啦﹖
·吸血鬼中共
·治中國人的虛華不務實
·國民黨生于甲午憂患 共產黨死于安樂
·祭甲午116年讓共黨快活安樂死!
·國民黨遲來的耕者有其田
·中國大陸的整容技術世界第一危險
·國民黨連戰主席的長子被行刑式處決暗殺
·衝著國民黨而來的選舉暴力 金銀銅鐵齊跌
·台灣人的危機
·連勝文大難不死必有後福
·台灣的民主你來自于何方﹖
·國父孫中山在天之靈保祐嘉勉國民黨贏得台灣三都市長
·台灣沒有亂套 中共白費心機
·明主之行制也天 韓非子•八經
·向最高職權中共政治局九個常委問罪中原艾滋病毒血債
·比較中美台醫療制度
·祭中原
·中華民國不止是台灣的主權
·趕不動的大軍!
·士不謀而親 不約而信
·中共的認同危機
·美國聯準會英雄式解救過世界的金融體制危機
·美國跛腳眾議院通過減稅法案234﹕188
·胡總一月甭來美國了!
·猛龍過江大無畏
·歐巴馬總統要正名同性戀
·分析奧巴馬變臉
·李登輝污的十
·台灣圖騰三太子老家在河南南陽
·我與連戰的尋根 鎮館之寶 楚國萬萬歲! 共黨死翹翹!
·北京搶走南陽的古寶編鐘一組及古楚鼎
·歐巴馬至今沒有一件事對得住人民
·奧巴馬敗家子揮霍無度
·富裕美國人又痛宰美國普通老百姓7000
·中國未亡信號
·南韓無法學到湯恩伯對日的軍事上成就
·持久八年之戰 中土幾被燃燒
·比較國民黨與共殘黨土改制度
·美軍在參政院捷勝
·俄共寇費正清的陰魂不散
·戰後和平紅利獎金的分封制
·中國銀行的源頭
·中華民國的資產﹕ 兆豐銀行的前因後果
·中共企業 非法強自獨佔大陸領土凡61年
·特威權外交官郝爾布魯克離世
·論中共與民進黨的風水 風流雲散 法力無邊
·我與蔣經國的兒子﹕
·比較國民黨與中共的稅制
·台灣獨立國動輒扣人威權帽子
·抗美援朝梅開二度 花開蒂落 共帝亡國 民謠
·經綸世務者 窺谷忘返
·論中共太子黨的傳承
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊

   
   韓國特色的臆想症受到了打擊
   
   紐約時報﹐ 8月25日
   


   韓國三星敗訴, Apple 蘋果公司勝訴﹐陪審團判決﹐獲得$1 billion 10億美金的賠
   償。
   
   殺雞儆猴﹐誰敢亂說亂抄襲﹖
   
   版權所有﹐翻印必究。
   
   再說屈原是韓國人﹖
   
   老子告訴你﹐三星﹐是河南中原的星星。
   
   偷走咱的文化福祿壽三星﹐變成你的商標?
   
   哈哈哈! 大快人心!
   
   假三星﹐抄襲中原﹐受到美國的制裁。
   
   看來﹐唯有國民黨老派﹐才能讓台灣登上亞洲4小龍之首。
   
   牛郎織女星下凡 7夕時
   
   
   
   
   附錄
   
   http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/25/technology/jury-reaches-decision-in-apple-samsung-
   patent-trial.html?_r=1&nl=todaysheadlines&adxnnl=1&emc=edit_th_20120825&adxnnlx=1345888827-
   BbeRa/6dHXT7m5CxSCHJWw
   
   Jury Awards $1 Billion to Apple in Samsung Patent Case
   
   Apple won a decisive victory on Friday in a lawsuit against Samsung, a verdict
   that will give Apple ammunition in a far-flung patent war with its global
   competitors in the smartphone business.
   What the Verdict Said
   
   * Samsung violated a series of Apple's patents related to the software and
   design of mobile devices.
   * Apple's patents were valid.
   * Apple did not violate any of Samsung's patents.
   * Apple was awarded $1 billion in damages.
   
   The nine jurors in the case, who faced the daunting task of answering more than 700 questions on sometimes highly technical matters, returned a verdict after just three days of deliberations at a federal courthouse in San Jose, Calif. They found that Samsung infringed on a series of Apple’s patents on mobile devices, awarding Apple more than $1 billion in damages.
   
   That is not a big financial blow to Samsung, one of the world’s largest electronics companies. But the decision could essentially force it and other smartphone makers to redesign their products to be less Apple-like, or risk further legal defeats.
   
   Consumers could end up with some welcome diversity in phone and tablet design — or they may be stuck with devices that manufacturers have clumsily revamped to avoid crossing Apple.
   
   Samsung said it would ask the court to overturn the verdict and, if that is unsuccessful, appeal to a higher court.
   The jury found that various Samsung products violated Apple patents covering things like the “bounce back” effect when a user scrolls to the end of a list on the iPhone and iPad, and the pinch-to-zoom gesture that users make when they want to magnify an image. Samsung was also found to have infringed Apple patents covering the physical design of the iPhone.
   
   In its decision on a countersuit by Samsung, the jury added some sting by finding in favor of Apple across the board. Samsung had asked for more than $422 million from Apple, contending it had violated Samsung’s patents, but got nothing.
   Because Samsung was found to have willfully infringed Apple patents, the judge in the case could grant an Apple request to triple the damages Samsung is required to pay, though lawyers said the size of the initial award made this less likely.
   Despite the eye-popping award, one of the largest ever in a patent case, the more important effect of the jury’s decision could be the impact it has on Android, the Google operating system used by Samsung and a broad array of other companies in their devices. For every iPhone sold worldwide, more than three smartphones running Android are sold, reflecting the meteoric rise of Google’s software.
   
   Apple’s suit against Samsung, the world’s largest maker of smartphones, has partly been viewed as a proxy war against Google, which Apple executives have derided as a copycat, swiping Apple’s innovations. Steven P. Jobs, the late chief executive of Apple, told his biographer that Android was a “stolen product.”
   Apple is expected to ask the judge in the Samsung case for an injunction preventing Samsung from shipping products that infringe on Apple’s patents. The verdict could also bolster Apple’s legal attacks on Android devices from other companies.
   “It’s going to make it very difficult for not only Samsung, but for other companies to mimic the Apple products,” said Robert Barr, executive director of the Berkeley Center for Law and Technology at the University of California, Berkeley.
   
   Charles Golvin, an analyst at Forrester Research, said consumers could experience some discomfort in their use of smartphones if Samsung and other manufacturers are forced to design around certain basic functions to avoid violating Apple’s patents, though he believes the decision will prod them to innovate. “Consumers will adapt, but there will be some bumps in the road as they make that adaptation,” Mr. Golvin said.
   
   The trial provided a rare window into the inner workings of the two companies, especially the highly secretive Apple, forcing them to divulge sales figures, business negotiations and internal memos. Apple executives offered colorful detail, like the way its designers cook up new products around a kitchen table at the company’s headquarters.
   
   The evidence Apple presented, including internal Samsung memos and strategy documents, left little doubt that the iPhone inspired a major effort by the Korean manufacturer to overhaul its mobile phones. But a key question throughout the trial was whether the jury would decide that Samsung had stepped over the line by improperly copying Apple’s technologies. The members of the jury did not explain their decision before stealthily heading out a side exit.
   
   The verdict in the trial hardly concludes the legal battles over patents among companies in the mobile business. There are dozens of such cases winding their way through the courts; Samsung and Apple have also been battling in Germany, Australia and elsewhere. Even so, Samsung remains a major supplier of components for Apple products.
   
   While the decision is likely to weigh on Samsung shares, it sent Apple’s stock up 1.8 percent in after-hours trading. In a statement, Katie Cotton, an Apple spokeswoman, applauded the court for sending a “clear message that stealing isn’t right.”
   
   “We make these products to delight our customers, not for our competitors to flagrantly copy,” she said.
   
   Samsung said in a statement that the decision was a “loss for the American consumer.”
   
   “It will lead to fewer choices, less innovation, and potentially higher prices,” the company said. “This is not the final word in this case or in battles being waged in courts and tribunals around the world, some of which have already rejected many of Apple’s claims.”
   
   Lisa Alcalay Klug contributed reporting.
(2012/08/25 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场