百家争鸣
郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[True meaning of the Republicanism]
郭国汀律师专栏
·西方媒体首次报导苏家屯事件!
·中共活割法轮功学员人体器官主调查人DADID Matas 获Tarnopolsky 2007年人权奖(英文)
***(2)郭国汀律师为法轮功强力抗辩
·Resolution for Falun Gong in Congress of USA
·法轮圣徒瞿延来为何令南郭敬重?答MICRONET有关瞿延来的质疑
·中共为何血腥镇压法轮功?
·诉江泽民案美国依据国际法的义务:是对公共安全的危胁还是种族灭绝?
·值得中国律师学习的起诉书: 诉江泽民\李岚清\罗干\刘京\王茂林损害赔偿两千万加元
·郭国汀论辩法轮功
·我为法轮功说句公道话
·陈光辉监外执行、保外就医申请书
·为争取信仰自由权已绝食抗争七百八十天的瞿延来.
·百无一用是中国律师
·答三项基本原则
·中共必须立即停止镇压法轮功
·我为什么为法轮功辩护? 郭国汀
·我为法轮功抗辩的真实心声
·法轮功真相之我见
·中共才是真正的邪教----中共血腥残暴迫害法轮功的根源
·中共镇压法轮功的国际法分析
·中共滥用教制度镇压法轮功的法理解析
·当代中国的盖世太宝[610办公室]研究(英文)
·有感于对法轮功学员的强制教育
·中共当局必须立即无条件释放刘如平律师!郭国汀
·声援支持杨在新律师!
·郭国汀章天亮曾宁谈425和平上访到千万退党的精神延续
·中共专制暴政一直在杀人----悼念讲真相英雄陈光辉
·FALUN GONG PERSECUTION FACTS HEET
·RELIGIOUS FREEDOM AND FALUN GONG IN CHINA
·2
·Falun Gong Wins Motion in Historic Torture Lawsuit against Former Head of China
·为法轮功抗辩与自由中国论坛部份网民的论战
·Dr Wang Wenyi will be remembered by history as a great courage hero
·法轮功是比中共有过之无不及的一人专制吗?-答谭嗣同先生
·法轮功讲真相无罪
·郭国汀:对法轮功学员的劳教、判刑是非法行为
·郭国汀介绍为法轮功学员打官司的曲折经历
·质疑张千帆教授对法轮功的评价 郭国汀
·宣誓证词Affidavit
·中共一贯谎言连篇是个地道的骗子党!
·中共下达密文奥运成迫害最大借口
·中国著名人权律师从为法轮功辩护看中共践踏法律(图)
·郭国汀律师批评中共奧運前加劇迫害法輪功
·郭国汀律师呼吁台湾政府予吴亚林政治庇护
·郭国汀律师称中共持续非法迫害法轮功及其辩护律师
·答Gavin0919郭国汀是法轮功走狗之指控
***(3)郭国汀为法轮功辩护的专访
·专访郭国汀律师(上) :为法轮功辩护
·专访郭国汀律师(下) :回首不言悔
·RFA:郭国汀介绍为法轮功学员打官司的曲折经历
·自由亞洲電台专访郭國汀谈為法輪功學員打官司
·希望之声郭国汀专访:对法轮功学员的劳教、判刑是非法行为
***(三)郭国汀律师为郑恩宠抗辩
·我为郑恩宠律师抗辩的前前后后
·为郑恩宠案翟明磊等中国新闻记者六君子的声明
·敬请关注郑恩宠律师所谓"非法获取国家秘密罪"一案
·历史将证明郑恩宠律师无罪/郭国汀
·郑恩宠案二审辩护词及网友评论/郭国汀
·关于会见在押的郑恩宠的第二次申请函
·郑恩宠律师“为境外非法提供国家秘密罪”一审判决书
·上海市高级法院郑恩宠案刑事裁定书
·郑恩宠冤案再审案至全国律协诸位会长之公开函/郭国汀
·中国最需要像郑恩宠这样的律师
·诽谤郑恩宠律师的中共党奴及特务名录
·再谈郑恩宠案 郭国汀倡律师网上辩护
·我为郑恩宠辩护的前前后后 郭国汀
·上海普通市民感受的郑恩宠大律师
·关于郑恩宠案我的声明
·我为郑恩宠律师辩护
·一切源于郑恩宠案,可敬的国安兄弟请自重!
·郑恩宠聘请辩护人的真相
·郑恩宠聘请辩护律师真相之二
·真为这位北京律师脸红!
·张思之大律师冒着酷暑赴看守所会见郑恩宠
·上海监狱当局婉拒郑恩宠的辩护律师会见
·关于会见在押的郑恩宠的第二次申请函
·揭开“时代精英“画皮
·答时代精英,
·再答时代精英教导
·向张思之律师,郑恩宠律师学习,致敬!
·南郭:仗义执言的律师还是没良心的律师
·驳“文律”兄郑案高论/南郭
·中国最需要像郑恩宠这样的律师
·凡跟郭国汀贴者一律入选黑名单
·批驳李洪东之首恶律师说!
·历史岂容任意伪造!
·惊闻郑恩宠律师夫人蒋美丽被拘捕!
·郑恩宠案二审会维持原判,辩护律师难辞其咎。
·求名求利的律师代表
·答L君之三项基本原则
·郑恩宠案网友评论
·网友支持或反对郑恩宠的评论
·支持或反对郑恩宠的网友评论之二
·中国律师声援支持郑恩宠
·吴国策律师:“求名求利的律师代表——某律师的心里”系他人盗名发表的声明
·中国律师声援支持郑恩宠律师
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
True meaning of the Republicanism

   True meaning of the Republicanism

   

   By thomasgguo

   

   Since my English is broken English which make me shame to write any English essays, although exiled to Canada six years, I still feel quite difficult to express myself clearly and accurately. However there is no way to improve my writing skill but writing, for practice make perfect.

   My writing is only for practice not for expert or educate purpose, welcomed any friend to correct my error either in grammar, word or theory, fact and ideas. Following comment all come from my reading and thinking,for space and private use, I do want list all where these ideas come from and did not involved any intellectual property problem.

   

   Second president of the United States John Adams observed that there ‘can be no republic without common good; no liberty without a republic, no common good without law, and no just law without a democratic branch in the constitution’. Here Adams combines the liberty with republic, Britain although remained the Monarchy but in essence adopted many principles of republic. But what is the republicanism?

   

   Republicanism first is the idea of Government exists for common good, second it is the popular sovereign, for the best test of the public good; third, it is liberty under law, which enacted with reason and natural law(God will), purpose protected citizens from any other’s including the state’s invasion.

   

   Liberalism was not known before 19 century. It was emerged with French revolution. Benjamin Constant articulated persuasively in1819, that liberty of ancients as actual participation in government, while liberty of modern meant the rule of law, and specific protections for individual rights, including freedoms of opinion, property, association,speech, religion, and private independence. He defined liberty as the right to be subjected only to the laws and never to arbitrary will of one or more individual.

   

   Republicanism and liberalism basically do not conflict with each other, for both endorse law as the necessary vehicle of social justice. Republicanism is the parent of liberalism. As a legal theory of republican Rome, republicanism revived in Renaissance Italy, restated in Commonwealth England, realized in United States in 1787, reanimated by the French revolution in 1793.

   

   The essential elements of a republican legal system include: 1)Pursuit common good, through 2) popular sovereign, and 3) the rule of law, under 4)mixed and balanced government, comprising 5) deliberative senate, 6) elected executive, and 7) representative House of legislature.

   

   Republicanism secures the liberty of all citizens according to just law, through an independence judiciary, and liberty means that no one is subject to any other’s arbitrary will.

   

   Central meaning of republican government is legislation for public or common good of people, need popular sovereign,because the people are best judge of public welfare and common interest;unfettered governors and factions will pursue their own interest as a human nature greed and selfish being; the rule of law constrains the people and governors from favour their private interests; senate as legislation, moderates the swings of popular emotion, protected minority’s rights, through deliberative debate . The House of Representative (Commons) controls the usurpations of the senate, and vice versa. Thus, the mixed republic government balanced governors against the senate and people are the best way to preserve the liberty of the whole.

   

   When missing any part of three: Executive,legislature and judiciary, the common good and liberty cannot survive. Popular sovereignty without balance is simple democracy not republic. The majority will abuse unprotected minority, therefore imperatively to tyranny of majority. The rule of law can advanced the tyranny of despots. Senators and governors may exploit their authority for private interest.

   

   Since individual independence is the first need of the modern society, ‘one must never require from them any sacrifices to establish political liberty.’ John Stuart Mill concluded that ‘the only purpose for which power can be rightfully exercised over any member of a civilized community, against his will, is to prevent harm to others’.

   

   John Locke defined the liberty of man in society as subjection to the duly enacted laws of a legislature established by consent,and independent of any private will. The legislative power should be limited tothe public good of society. Monarchist theorist Robert Filmer identified that the freedom as the ability for everyone to do what he lists, to live as hepleases, and not to be typed by any laws. Thus, freedom is not absolute right,it must be the liberty under the just law, which were enacted for common good,according to the reason and natural law, in another word the God’ will.

   

   Both Liu Xiaobo and Yany Hengjin donot understand what is republicanism and liberalism, neither of them have right idea of democracy too. And this is why Mr.Liu wrongly praise Mr. Yu Keping’s fake theory of democracy and Mr. Yang support Rousseu’s out of date and narrow applicable theory of democracy.

   

   I used to pointed out ten years ago, our Chinese are ignorance of modern political science, we know very little of theory and few have opportunity even have a look of those great politics works in the world. Of course,I myself also know very little, and this is why I need more study and thinking.

   

   Only republicanism democracy is for common good, the pure or direct democracy is for fraction interest instead of public advantage.What we should fight for is republicanism constitutional democracy. The rule of just law, which enacted according reason and natural law spirit for common good, is the secret for any success state.

(2012/01/01 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场