百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[法治的基本原则]
郭国汀律师专栏
·《我的二十年律师生涯》—与《中国律师网》网友们的对话
·New York Time A Mild Shanghai Lawyer and His Accidental Crusade
·Guoting(Thomas) Guo's Resume
·A Chinese Human Right lawyer’s story by Guo Guoting
·My life mission , to help my country to set up the true rule of law. By Guo Guoting
·New York Judge interview with Thomas G.Guo( Guo Guoting)
·China Human Right report 2005
·Is there human rights in China?
·Thomasguo 's speech on the searching Justice conference
·My Human Rights Lawyer’s Career (Profile)
·Index of Guo’s on Articles and Activity of Human Rights
·rticles written by and about Guo Guoting and International Report links
·Index of Guo’s works and articles on advocating freedom, human rights, democracy
·A Mild Shanghai Lawyer and His Accidental Crusade
·郭国汀从最佳海事律师到人权律师 【人物】
***政治学研究
·政治的基本概念
·正义的学说
·正义的第一原则:政治权力的合法性
·正义概念的进化与发展
·人民反抗暴政的革命权利
·当代世界政治现状
·独裁专权(即威权)与独裁统治及极权暴政
·政治权力的限制与平衡原理
·政治文化与政治
·什么是政治形态
·民主法治及权力
·True meaning of the Republicanism
·Judicial Independence and Canadian Judges
·如何制约流氓暴君下屠杀令扑灭宪政民主大革命?
·关于成立临时或流亡政府我的原则与立场
·公平游戏规则公平竞争是第一价值原则
·中国民主运动要不要遵守公平游戏规则?
·中国民运长期四分五裂的根源何在?
·郭国汀:唯有程序正义才能根治中国民运四分五裂顽症
·民运内部必须是平等尊重基础上充分争论协商妥协式的真诚合作
·自私是否人的本性?
·暴君与暴政
·暴力革命与和平演变的前提与条件
·关于暴力革命答深山质疑
·勇敢地参政议政吧!中国律师们!/郭国汀
·语言风格——关于袁红冰改良还是革命的争论
·就袁红冰之《改良还是革命》与申先生的论战/郭国汀
·英雄人格哲学—袁红冰《自由在落日中》读后
·划时代的政论——简评袁红冰《改良,还是革命?》
·为什么袁红冰之《改良,还是革命?》是划时代的政论?
·再论政治案低调消音妥协辩护论的严重危害性
·再论政治案件低调消音妥协辩护论的危害性引起争论
·政治案辩护律师的最佳策略
·驳政治肮脏论
·文字狱与极权专制体制
·暴政与人种的优劣/新南郭
·虚伪是极权专制的必然付产品
·极权专制政体与思想家
·最暴虐无道的政府!/南郭
·郭国汀:歌功颂德或批评批判?
·判断一个政权合法性的公认标准
·判断政府合法性的普世公认标准 郭国汀
·中国律师理所应当关心政治 郭国汀
·政治体制的根本问题
·中国的前途在于专制改良还是政治民主革命?
·西方现代政治民主的基本要件
·郭国汀: 政府无权杀人!
·政府绝对无权武力镇压(屠杀)和平集会示威游行或罢工的公民
·国民有权推翻暴力镇压(屠杀)和平抗议民众的任何政府
·中国历史上不存在极权
·民主政治的终极目标是自由——答尼采黄昏君的质疑/南郭
·极权专制独裁者与知识分子
·与网友谈论民主政治与政权合法性
·政府不得滥杀和平请愿公民的最新国际公约
·中共极权专制暴政祸国殃民绝对乏善可陈
·郭律师评价中国律师诉讼及司法体制现状
***(40)宪政研究
·什么是宪政?
·什么是共和?
·宪政的实质
·分權制衡理論的历史淵源
·中国自由文化运动与宪政研究
·The Arguments For and Against the Notwithstanding Clause
·Freedom is not free but it is costly
·宪法改革的设想 南郭提要
·联邦共和民主宪政体制是美国经久强盛不衰的原因
·党化党控教育是中共祸国殃民的一大罪恶
·立宪时代的法政哲学思考提要
·有限政府与法治宪政
·联邦主义要旨
·It’s Not Patriotic to Violate the Constitution
·An Imperial Presidency Based on Constitutional Quicksand
·US Constitution revolution for real democracy
·One of the major writer whose legal thought Influence the Americas Founding Fathers
·Beyond the Constitution
·Philosophy Constitutionalism
·USA Constitution is in grave danger
·Constitutional Interpretation
·The Bill of Rights
***(41)民主研究
·美国宪政民主的基本要素
· 政治民主机制的最新发展--监督民主
· 序《民主导论》
·民主的真实含义
·自由宪政民主政治的七项实质要件
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
法治的基本原则

法治的基本原则
   
   郭国汀
   
   

   
   法治到底有那几项基本原则?古今中外法学家们从未有过公认一致的结论,不同时期不同国家的法学家各有所见,有些主张大同小异有些则相差甚大。事实上,法治概念与所有其他概念一样,都是渐渐发展完善的。例如:
   
   
   
   首创“法治”一词的英国著名法学家戴西认为:“法治有三层含义:一是任何人均不得因法律未明文禁止的行为,而受到惩罚或支付赔偿;[1]二是每个人的法律权利和自由均得由普通法院决定;[2]三是每个人的个人权利均源于英国的共同法,而非源于一部成文宪法,因此,英国宪法乃是法院通常作用的产物,而非法院管辖权的渊源”。[3]亦即戴西之法治原则是指法无明文不为罪即罪行法定原则,法院裁断是非的最终决定权;及习惯法高于成文法。这显然与现代法学界公认的法治之“法律面前人人平等”的首要原则及法律恒定性,普遍适用性与可知性法治原则有重大区别。
   
   
   
   海瓦德(Heward)勋爵特别强调法治的三项原则:除非经普通法院法官和培审团依法定程序审理确认违法事实,任何人不得被非法拘禁,惩罚或判处损害赔偿;每个人,无论其地位如何,均受国家共同法律的管辖,且均应对其违反法律的任何行为按照普通法院(民事和刑事)承担个人责任;任何人不得以他的违法行事是因服从上级的命令为由有效抗辩。[4]这里海瓦德首先强调的是“正当程序原则”;其次,实质强调“恶法非法原则”;第三“法律面前人人平等原则”。
   
   
   
   约瑟夫(Joseph R)归纳法治原则如下[5]:1、法律应该是可预期而非溯及既往的(可知性);2、法律应当稳定而不能经常变更,因为若不了解法律内容,将妨碍人们受法律的指导(恒定性);3、制定法律应当有清晰的规则和程序(立法符合程序性);4、必须保障司法官的独立(法官独立审判权);5、应当遵守自然正义的原则,尤其那些关于公正审理听证的权利(法律公正正义性);6、法庭应当有对其他原则执行情况的司法审查的权力(法院最终裁定性);7、法庭应当是可接近的,任何人不得被拒绝正义(法院向全体公民平等开放);8、控制罪行防范机构的执法自由决定权以防其滥用法律”(限制法官自由决定权)。[6]
   
   
   
   富勒认为法治原则包括:法律的普遍性,众所周知,不得溯及既往,明确清晰,连贯性,可行性(不得要求不可能的事),恒久性,以及在公布的规则与官员行为之间完全相符。[7]
   
   
   
   贝尔顿( Kleinfeld Belton)认为“虽然未确立对所有实践均适用的法治的定义,但该基本领域有共同原则。他确认法治有如下五项原则: 1。政府受法律制约和统治;2。法律面前人人平等;3。法律和秩序的建立;4。正义的有效和可预测的适用;5。人权的保护”。[8]
   
   
   “法治的三项伟大原则乃是:法律的普遍性,立法权至上,司法和行政行为的合法性”。[9]
   
   “法治成为共同法的基本原则。其最基本的形式即为法律面前的平等,公正和正义”。[10]
   
   
   综合上述法学家们提出的18项法治原则可以归纳成如下五类:
   
   · 涉及立法机构的有三项:立法至上原则、立法与执法正当程序原则、习惯法至上原则;
   
   · 涉及法律立法技术程序正义者有三项:罪行法定原则、法律可知性原则、法律恒定性原则;
   
   · 涉及法院权能的有四项:法院最终决定权原则、法院司法审查权原则、法官独立原则、限制法官任意决定权原则;
   
   · 涉及法律公正实体正义者有四项:恶法非法原则;司法合法性原则;自然正义原则;公正和正义原则;此四项原则可归纳为法律正义性原则。
   
   · 涉及法律适用对象者有:法律面前人人平等原则、政府(总统)受法律约束原则、法律普遍适用性原则、公民可诉至法院原则、人权保护原则。前三项实质上同属法律面前人人平等。
   
   据此可见法治观分为广义与狭义两类:广义的法治观包括程序和实体正义原则,而狭义的法治观仅含程序正义原则。我认为美国Puget大学桑德法学院吉姆斯旁德教授对法治的论述彼为经典“法治要求人们根据已知的,具有普遍适用性的固定规则来管理国家。如果要求人民遵守法治,那么法律就应当是众所周知的(至少是可知的);假如期望人民能够妥善安排他们的生活,那么法律(包括寻些怎样修改法律的规则)就必须是恒定的;最后,假使要真正做到法律面前人人平等,那么法律就必须是普遍适用的。”[11]亦即旁德教授归纳的法治四原则乃是法律的可知性、普遍性、和恒定性和法律面前人人平等。如果再加上法律正义性原则,和可诉性原则更趋于完善。因为单纯程序正义意义上的法治原则,无法保证法律本身的正义性,也无法确保受害公民的诉权。共产党国体制下正由于法律正义性和可诉性的严重缺位,进一步使得根本没有法治生存的余地。而所有的自由社会都是建立在相同的法治基础之上的。在某种意义上说,法治原则甚至高于民主原则。因为凡是法治健全的社会,公民的基本人权和自由皆有起码的保障;凡是没有法治或法治不彰的社会,公民既无自由,人权也决无法律保障。
   
   
   
   2010年5月31日第222个反中共极权专制暴政争自由人权民主绝食争权抗暴民权运动日
   
   
   
   
   
   [1] See A.V. A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 179-201 (7th ed. 1908) (the Rule of Law in England).at 183. As Dicey defined it, the Rule of Law had three meanings in England: (1) no one can be made to suffer punishment or to pay damages for any conduct not definitely forbidden by law; (2) everyone's legal rights and liabilities are determined by the ordinary courts of the realm; and (3) everyone's individual rights are derived from the ordinary law of the land, not from a written constitution, so that the English Constitution is the product of the ordinary functioning of the courts and not the source of the courts' jurisdiction
   
   [2] See A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 179-201 (7th ed. 1908) (the Rule of Law in England). at 189.
   
   [3] See A.V. A.V. Dicey, Introduction to the Study of the Law of the Constitution, 179-201 (7th ed. 1908) (the Rule of Law in England). at 191.
   
   [4]The Rt. Hon. Lord Hewart of Bury, The New Despotism (Benn, 1929) at 26-27. Hewart explained what he meant by the Rule of Law. His account, drawing heavily on Dicey, is unexceptional. He emphasised three principles in particular: that no one can lawfully be restrained or punished or condemned in damages save for a violation of the law established to the satisfaction of a judge or jury in proceedings regularly instituted in one of the ordinary courts; that everyone, whatever his position, is governed by the ordinary law of the land and personally liable for anything done by him contrary to that law, being subject to the ordinary courts, civil and criminal; and that no one charged with a violation of the law may effectively plead, in any court, that his act was done in obedience to the command of any superior.
   
   [5] Joseph Raz's principles of rule of law are as follows: • That laws should be prospective rather than retroactive. • Laws should be stable and not changed too frequently, as lack of awareness of the law prevents one from being guided by it. • There should be clear rules and procedures for making laws. • The independence of the judiciary has to be guaranteed. • The principles of natural justice should be observed, particularly those concerning the right to a fair hearing. • The courts should have the power to judicial review the way in which the other principles are implemented. • The courts should be accessible; no man may be denied justice. • The discretion of law enforcement and crime prevention agencies should not be allowed to pervert the law.
   
   [6] 另一作者归纳Joseph Raz法治原则如下:"The Rule of Law and Its Virtue" in The Authority Law, (Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1979 at 214-18.) (1 prospectivity, publicity and clarity; (2) stability; (3) making of particular laws and orders should be guided by public, stable, clear general rules; (4) independence of the judiciary; (5) conformity to natural justice (due process considerations such as fair hearing by unbiased tribunal) (6) judicial review (limited to ensuring conformity to rule of law); (7) easy accessibility to courts; and (8) control of discretion of crime-preventing agencies so that the law is not perverted.- Joseph Raz's list, which he considers incomplete, is: (1)可预期性,公开性和明确性;(2)稳定性;(3)制定特定的法律或命令应当受公开,稳定,清晰的一般原则指导;(4)司法独立;(5)与自然正义相符 (正当程序考虑诸如由公正的法庭公正审理);(6)司法审查(限制并确保符合法治);(7)容易诉诸法院;(8)控制犯罪防范机构的自由决定权以防法律被滥用。
   
   [7] Lon Fuller, The Morality of Law (New Haven: Yale University Press. 1964) at 41-44.)principles or precepts of the rule of law. Lon Fuller's list has been rightly influential: generality of law. promulgation. non-retroactivity, clarity, consistency of laws, not requiring the impossible, constancy of law through time, and congruence between official action and declared rule;
   
   [8] while there is no set definition of the rule of law encompassing all its practices, there is a basic realm of common principles. The scholar Rachel Kleinfeld Belton identifies five: 1. a government bound by and ruled by law; 2. equality before the law; 3. the establishment of law and order; 4. the efficient and predictable application of justice; and 5. the protection of human rights.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场