百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[互联网自由度的测定方法]
郭国汀律师专栏
·国际人权法律资料 取缔教育歧视公约
·关于就业及职业歧视的公约
·消除一切形式歧视妇女的国际公约选择性议定书2000
·联合国防止和惩罚种族灭绝罪的公约(1951)
·联合国有关难民身份的国际公约1954
·儿童权利国际公约1990
·起诉和惩罚欧洲轴心国主要战争罪犯的国际军事法庭协议(纽伦堡宪章)
***区域性国际人权法律文件
·1996年欧洲反破坏性异端决议及其邪教定义
·非洲人权和人民权利公约(1981)
·美洲人的权利与义务宣言(1948)
·美洲人权公约(1969)
·美洲防止和禁罚酷刑的公约
·防止酷刑和其他残忍不人道或有辱人格待遇或处罚的欧洲公约1989
·欧洲保护人权和基本自由公约(1950)
·欧洲社会宪章1961
·建设新欧洲的巴黎宪章1990
(B)***美国人权法律文件
·美国1620年“五月花号”公约(The Mayflower Compact)
·美国1786年弗吉尼亚宗教自由法令
·美国1776年弗吉尼亚权利法案
·美国1862年解放黑奴宣言
·美国1777年邦联条款
·美国1776年维吉尼亚权利法案
(C)***英国人权法律文件
·英国1998年人权法案
·英国1676年人身保护令
·英国1689年权利法案
·英国1628年权利请愿书
·英国1215年自由大宪章
***(52)郭国汀论法官与律师
·悼念前最高法院大法官冯立奇教授逝世四周年
·法官律师与政党 郭国汀
·尊敬的法官大人你值得尊敬吗?!
·郭国汀与中国律师网友论法官
·法官的良心与良知/南郭
·法官!这是我法律生涯的终极目标! 郭国汀
·律师与法官之间究竟应如何摆正关系?
·从 “中国律师人”说开去
·唯有科班出身者才能当律师?!答王靓华高论/南郭
·律师的责任——再答李洪东/南郭
·中国律师朋友们幸福不会从天降!/南郭
·我为北京16位律师喝彩!郭国汀
·郭国汀律师与网上警官的交锋
·我是中国律师我怕谁?!
·郭国汀 好律师与称职的律师
·温柔抗议对郭律师的ID第二次查封
·第五次强烈抗议中国律师网无理非法封杀郭律师的IP
·中国律师网为何封杀中国律师?
·中律网封杀删除最受网友们欢迎的郭国汀律师
·最受欢迎的写手却被中共彻底封杀
·我为何暂时告别中国律师网?
·南郭:律师的文学功底
·中国最需要什么样的律师?
·勇敢地参政议政吧!中国律师们!
·将律师协会办成真正的民间自治组织
·强烈挽留郭国汀律师/小C
·the open letter to Mr.Hu Jintao from Lawyers' Rights Watch Canada for Gao Zhisheng
·自宫与被阉割的中国律师网 /南郭
·做律师首先应当做个堂堂正正的人——南郭与王靓华的论战/南郭
·呵!吉大,我心中永远的痛!
·再答小C君/南郭
·凡跟郭国汀贴者一律入选黑名单!
·历史不容患改!历史专家不敢当,吾喜读中国历史是实
·思想自由的益处答迷风先生
·答迷风先生
·答经纬仪之民族败类之指责,汝不妨教教吾辈汝之哲学呀?
·南郭曾是"天才"但一夜之间被厄杀成蠢才,如今不过是个笨蛋耳!
·答时代精英,
·长歌独行至郭国汀律师公开函
***(53)大学生\知识分子与爱国愤青研究
·春寒料峭,公民兀立(南郭强烈推荐大中学生及留学生和所有关心中国前途的国人精读)
·大中学生及留学生必读:胡锦涛崇尚的古巴政治是什么玩意?!
·是否应彻底否定中华传统文
·向留学生及大中学生推荐一篇好文
·向留学生大学生强烈推荐杰作驳中共政权威权化的谬论
·强烈谴责中共党控教育祸国殃民的罪孽!--闻贺卫方教授失业有感
·學術腐敗是一個國家腐敗病入膏肓的明證
·中共专制暴政长期推行党化奴化教育罪孽深重
·教育国民化、私有化而非政治化党化是改革教育最佳途径之一
·论当代中国大学生和爱国愤青的未来
·给中国大学生留学生及爱国愤青们开书单
·中国知识分子死了!
·强烈推荐大学生与爱国愤青必读最佳论文
·敬请爱国愤青们关注爱国民族英雄郑贻春教授
·敬请海内外爱国愤青兄弟姐妹们关注爱国留学生英雄清水君
·敬请海内外爱国愤青们关注爱国留学生英雄冯正虎
·爱国愤青主要是因为无知
***(54)《郭国汀妙语妙言》郭国汀著
***随笔\散文
·中华文化精华杂谈
·儒家文明导至中国人残忍?!
·儒家不是中共极权专制暴政的根源
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
互联网自由度的测定方法

互联网自由度的测定方法

   版权所有人:自由之家

   译者:郭国汀

   
互联网自由度的测定方法

   自由的春色

   Freedom on the Net Methodology(draft)

   This 2009 pilot Freedom on the Net provides analytical reports and numerical ratings for 15 strategic countries. The countries were chosen in order to provide a representative sample with regards to geographical and regional diversity and economic development, as well as varying levels of internet and digital media freedom. The ratings and reports included in this pilot primarily cover events that took place between January 1, 2007, and December 31, 2008.

   2009年互联网自由指南提供了15个国家的指数分析报告。被选择的样板国家,主要考虑其地理位置、地区多样性和经济发展、以及各不同程度的互联网自由度。本指南所含的互联网自由度等级和报告,主要根据自2007年1月1日至2008年12月31日发生的事件而做出。

   What we measure

   测定依据

   The Freedom on the Net index aims to measure each country’s level of internet and digital media freedom on the basis of two key components – access to the relevant technology and the free flow of information through it without fear of repercussions. Given increasing technological convergence, the index measures not only internet freedom, but also access and openness of other digital means of news media transmission, particularly mobile phones and text messaging services.

   互联网自由度指南,是根据两个关键要素做出:其一,相关网络通讯技术和通过互联网自由传播信息而无需担忧受到起诉;其二,衡量每个国家互联网和数码媒体自由度的水准。本指南不仅以互联网自由度来衡量,而且以存取和开放其他数据手段的新闻媒体传送,特别是移动电话和文本资讯服务为依据。

   Freedom House does not maintain a culture-bound view of freedom. The index methodology is grounded in basic standards of free expression, derived in large measure from Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

   “自由之家”不以文化背景来界定自由的概念。本指南的测定方法所采用的自由表达的基本标准,很大程度上源于“世界人权公约”第19条的规定:

   Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive, and impart information and ideas through any media regardless of frontiers.

   “每个人均有言论和表达自由权;这种权利包括不受干扰地持有、寻求、接受和通过任何媒体不分国界地传送信息和观念的自由”。

   

   This standard applies to all countries and territories, irrespective of geographical location, ethnic or religious composition, or level of economic development.

   这项标准适用于所有国家和地区,无论其地理位置,种族或宗教成分及经济发展水平如何。

   In measuring digital media freedom, the index is particularly concerned with the transmission and exchange of news and other politically relevant communications, as well as the protection of users’ rights to privacy and freedom from both legal and extra-legal repercussions arising from their online activities. At the same time, the index acknowledges that in the some instances freedom of expression and access to information may be legitimately restricted. The standard for such restrictions applied in this index is that they be implemented only in narrowly defined circumstances and in line with international human rights standards, the rule of law, and the principles of necessity, and proportionality. As much as possible, censorship and surveillance policies and procedures should be transparent and include avenues for appeal available to those affected.

   在衡量数码媒体自由方面,本指南着重考虑新闻的传送、交换和其他与政治有关的通讯及用户权利和隐私的保护,以及免受由于他们的网络活动而引起的法律和法外追究。与此同时,本指南承认在某些情况下,自由表达和存取或传送网络信息可能会受到合法的限制。适用于本指南的此种限制标准乃是他们仅在严格限定的情况下,按照国际人权标准、法治和必要的原则和比例实行。审查、监视互联网的政策与程序,应当尽可能公开透明,并包括对那些受到影响的用户可用的上诉渠道。

   The index does not rate governments or government performance per se, but rather the real-world rights and freedoms enjoyed by individuals within each country. While digital media freedom may be primarily affected by state actions, pressures and attacks by nonstate actors, including insurgents and other armed groups, are also considered. Thus, the index ratings generally reflect the interplay of a variety of actors, both governmental and nongovernmental, including private corporations.

   本指南与其说是评价政府或者政府表现本身,不如说是对每个国家内个人享受的现实世界的权利和自由度作出评价。自由会受到国家行为以及非国家的主体,包括叛乱者和其他武装团体的影响。因此,本指南综合评价政府和非政府(包括私营公司)各种角色的相互反应。

   The scoring process

   评分程序

   The index aims to capture the entire “enabling environment” for internet freedom within each country through a set of 19 methodology questions, divided into three subcategories, which are intended to highlight the vast range of issues that can impact digital media freedom. Each individual question is scored on a varying range of points. Assigning numerical points allows for comparative analysis among the countries surveyed and facilitates an examination of trends over time. Countries are given a total score from 0 (best) to 100 (worst) as well as a score for each sub-category. The degree to which conditions in each country enable the free flow of news and information via the internet and other information and communication technologies (ICTs) determines their overall classification as “Free,” “Partly Free,” or “Not Free.” Countries scoring between 0 to 30 points overall are regarded as having a “Free” internet and digital media environment; 31 to 60, “Partly Free”; and 61 to 100, “Not Free”. An accompanying country report provides narrative detail on the points covered by the methodology questions.

   

   本指南旨在通过提出分成三大类19个分类92个子类的方法学问题,纪录每个国家互联网自由的整个“许可环境”,意在突显能影响数码媒体自由的大范围的问题。每个个体问题在不同系列点得分。确定数码点允许在被调查的国家中进行比较分析,有助于测验日后的发展趋势。各个国家给定一个总分,从0分(最好)到100分(最坏),并按每一个子类给定分数。每一国家通过互联网和其他信息通讯技术,能够自由流通传送新闻和信息的条件程度,决定他们总体归类为“自由”,“部分自由”,或“不自由”。总分在0分至30分之间的国家属于“自由”互联网和数码媒体环境;31分至60分的国家,属“部分自由”;61分至100分的国家,则属“不自由”。随附各国指数报告提供详细说明该方法学问题提及的各个问题。

   The methodology examines the level of internet and ICT freedom through a set of 19 questions, organized into three baskets:

   通过19个问题对互联网和信息通讯技术自由度的方法学检验,按下述分成三大类:

   • Obstacles to Access—including governmental efforts to block specific applications or technologies; infrastructural and economic barriers to access; as well as legal and ownership control over internet and mobile phone access providers.

   • 互联网使用权的障碍—包括政府极力封锁特定产品的申请或技术;登陆互联网的基础设施与经济障碍;以及对互联网和移动电话使用权供应商的法律与所有权控制。

   • Limits on Content and Communication—including legal regulations on content, filtering and blocking of websites; other forms of censorship and self-censorship; manipulation of content; the diversity of online news media; and usage of digital media for social and political activism.

   • 内容和通讯的限制—包括对互联网内容的法律法规,过滤和封锁网站;其他形式的审查和自我审查;操纵内容;网上新闻媒体的多元化;数码媒体用于社会和政治活动。

   • Violations of Users’ Rights—including legal protections and restrictions on online activity; surveillance, privacy; and repercussions for online activity, such as legal prosecution, imprisonment, physical attacks, or other forms of harassment.

   • 用户权利的侵犯—包括对网络活动的法律保护和限制;监视,隐私,和对网上活动的反应,诸如法律起诉,监禁,人身伤害,或其他形式的骚扰。

   Index Checklist Questions

   指南问题清单

    Each country is ranked on a scale of 0 to 100, with 0 being the best and 100 being the worst.

    每个国家均从0分到100分定级,最佳为0分,最差为100分。

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场