百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[letter of recommendation of Guoting for 2008 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award ]
郭国汀律师专栏
·郭国汀:正义者永不孤单
·虽千万人,吾往矣!
·法律人的历史使命---郭国汀答《北大法律人》主编采访录
·法律人的历史使命 网友评论
·如何成为一名伟大的,优秀的法律人?
·如何成为一名伟大的律师?网友评论
·为当代中国人的幸福而努力奋斗
·我的告别书—再见中国律师网
·勇敢地参政议政吧 中国律师!
***(23)《郭国汀自传》郭国汀著
·《郭国汀自传》第一章:阴错际差(1)
·《郭国汀自传》第二章:灭顶之灾
·《郭国汀自传》第三章:奋力拚搏
·《郭国汀自传》第四章:东山再起
·《郭国汀自传》第五章:山重水复
·《郭国汀自传》第六章:永恒的中国心
·郭国汀致海内外全体中国网民的公开函
·极好之网站-天易综合网
·天易论坛宣言—天道至大,易道天成
·南郭不与匿名者论战的声明
·请广西网友立即转告陈西上诉
·就朱镕基与法轮功答疑似五毛党徒古镜质疑
·马克思最大的缺陷之一是其根本不了解人的本性
·南郭谈论习近平
·南郭谈论习近平秘信
·马克思恩格斯列宁之无产阶级专政辩析
·轮流强暴马恩之恶果——“无产阶级专政”
·郭律师就民运英友张林之女安妮被非法剥夺入学权事致习近平/李克强公开函
·郭国汀:批驳体制内文人俞可平严重误导国人的谬论
·父权政治公民政治及专制政治
·什么是我们为之奋斗牺牲的正义和自由?
·什么是自由主义?新自由主义?改革自由主义?
·《匪首毛泽东》20.野心恶性膨胀的邪恶致极的毛泽东
·中共政权的性质与现状
·Politics and truth
·Justice and pursuit of truth
·God and modern politics
·Why Federalism?Dose Federal system better to protect minority rights?
·Injustice as the root of terrorism: Social political and economic fact
·列宁之“无产阶级专政”批判
·ompare Analysisof Marx and Lenin’s Theory of the Dictatorship of the
·我的坎坷律师生涯(9):孤独的长跑者
·《我的坎坷律师生涯《我的坎坷律师生涯》(7):知青岁月》(7):知青岁月
·有关圣经翻译的若干问题
·郭国汀:论爱情
·錯帐俏曳傅模珨凳旰笥H自糾錯我還不偉大嗎?!
·文革教训原因考
·开放党禁与多党联合政治——回顾三大改造、三面红旗、反右、文革史有感
·论质、量互变关系
·学习与开放
·无产阶级领袖有感
·无产阶级领袖的重大作用
·勇敢地参政议政吧!中国律师们!
·郭国汀:从 “中国律师人”说开去
·中國律師朋友們幸福不會從天降
·律師的文學功底
·郭國汀:中國涉外案件沒有一起獲得執行
·南郭:堂堂正正做個真正的中國人!
·郭国汀:愿王洪民先生在天之灵安息.
·南郭:令郭國汀律師老淚縱橫的真情
·郭国汀:民族败类!你是否中国人?
·郭國汀:令我熱淚橫流的小詩
·郭国汀:专制流氓暴政本质的再暴露
·郭國汀:強烈譴責中共惡意迫害自由戰士楊天水 許萬平
·今天我絕食——英雄多多益善!
·一个中国人权律师的真实故事
·郭国汀:全球接力绝食抗暴运动的伟大意义
·郭国汀:闻律师英雄高智晟再遇车祸有感
·只有思想言论信仰结社出版新闻舆论的真正自由能够救中国!
· 南郭:自由万岁!新年好!
·志当存高远-我的理想与追求
·我的知识结构与思想
·人生 道德 灵魂/南郭
·男子汉的眼泪/郭国汀
·相信生命—郭國汀律師印象
·南郭点评
·Racism is the biggest enemy of Justice and equality
·The Essence Distinguish Between Marx and Lenin on the Dictatorship of
·Race Politic as the Enemy of Justice and Equality
·The Great Leap Famine: Natural Disaster or Political disaster or Murde
·Homosexuality: a legal or moral problem?
·1958-1962年中国历史上最具毁灭性的大灾难
·马恩列无产阶级专政研究手稿/郭国汀
·郭国汀:穷大律师与亿万富翁
·政治体制改革的实质与根本要件/郭国汀編译手稿
·台湾自由宪政民主之路/郭国汀编译
·Terrorism and state terrorism studying
·The Truth of Chinese Economic development studying by Thomas Guoting G
·Comparing Analysis of Marx and Lenin’s Theory on the Dictatorship of
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
letter of recommendation of Guoting for 2008 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award

   letter of recommendation of Guoting for 2008 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award

   

   

   Reply to: Clive M. Ansley

   VIA E-MAIL & MAIL 306 – 576 England Avenue,

    Courtenay, BC

   July 5, 2008

   

   Taiwan Foundation for Democracy

   No. 4, Alley 17, Lane 147, Sec. 3, Sinyi Rd., Taipei 106, Taiwan V9N 2N3 CANADA

    Tel: 250-338 0202

    Fax: 250-338 0902

   Website: www.ansleyandcompany.com

   

   

   

   

   Dear Sirs/Mesdames:

   Re: Guo Guoting

   I am very pleased to nominate the captioned human rights lawyer and democracy fighter, Guo Guoting, for your 2008 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award.

   I acknowledge at the outset that my recommendation is being sent after your June 30 deadline for receiving nominations and for that I apologize. I trust that my tardiness will not prevent you from considering Mr. Guo for this award. My delay in sending this nomination is in no way the fault of Mr. Guo. I had set aside a time for writing this, but a “perfect storm” of events prevented me from completing the task on time. Unexpected developments in a Supreme Court hearing involving the Falun Gong permanent protest site in Vancouver required substantial overtime work and this happened while my Associate, who was assisting me on this case, was absent from British Columbia. Also, June 30th fell during a four day Canada National Day holiday and that meant that I had no support staff in my office.

   I trust you will understand and will not penalize Mr. Guo because of my failure to meet the deadline, particularly when he is obviously so richly deserving in terms of his unchallengeable merits.

   Mr. Guo emerged as a leading Human Rights lawyer in China in 2003, and very quickly achieved recognition on the international stage. He was subsequently profiled in a New York Times article which highlighted his courageous devotion to defending critics of the Chinese Communist Party, persecuted Falun Gong practitioners, political dissidents, and others who had become targets of the Chinese Communist Party.

   At the time the Times article appeared, Mr. Guo was already experiencing intimidation by the Party and by the “Justice” Ministry controlled by the Party. He had first provoked the wrath of the Party by defending fellow lawyer Zheng Enchong on spurious charges of unlawfully providing state secrets to foreigners. Zheng had run afoul of the Party by bringing a class action on behalf of some five hundred Shanghai homeowners evicted from their homes without compensation in order to facilitate a major project by a powerful Shanghai developer who was in bed with the Shanghai authorities. After Guo Guoting stepped forward to undertake Zheng’s legal defence, he was repeatedly warned by “Justice” Ministry officials and lawyers instructed by those officials that he should walk away from the case and that if he did not, his career would be seriously damaged. But Guo Guoting ignored all the pressure, saw the trial of Zheng Enchong through to the end, and publicly excoriated the Chinese Communist Party.

   It is difficult to comprehend, and impossible to exaggerate, the courage which Guo Guoting demonstrated between 2003 and 2005.

   First, “Justice” Ministry officials broke into his office and confiscated his computer, containing all his legal files and records generated in twenty years of practice. Then the “Justice” Ministry subjected him to a bogus and disgraceful “hearing” which concluded with the confiscation of his licence to practise law. The authorities also closed down his office and made every possible effort to dissuade his clients from contacting him. He was deprived of his right to earn a livelihood.

   In the interim, he had also defended or acted for several Falun Gong practitioners, notwithstanding the Chinese Communist Party prohibition against all lawyers from providing legal representation to Falun Gong practitioners; he had defended the famous political dissident, Shi Tao; he had also defended a number of individuals deemed “enemies” by the Chinese Communist Party, including Huang Jingqiu, who was jailed for attempting to organize a political party, and Qi Yanlai, who was persecuted for telling the truth about Falun Gong.

   Mr. Guo in this period also proceeded to publish a large number of internet critiques of the Communist Party one-party dictatorship, in absolutely scathing terms.

   To the best of my knowledge, Mr. Guo was the first Chinese lawyer to publicly expose the Chinese “judicial” system for the fraudulent and cynical theatre that it is. He was pointing out the obvious, but no one else had dared say it before: If one political party controls all legislation, exercises control over all lawyers and prosecutors, and completely controls all courts and judges, how can it be possible to argue the existence of judicial independence and the Rule of Law? Mr. Guo argued that justice and equity could not possibly exist in a system in which almost 100% of all judges, members of the Judicial Committees, and Secretaries of the Political/Legal Committees which stand above the “courts” were Communist Party members.

   Eventually, in early 2005 Mr. Guo and his family were placed under house arrest. Approximately thirty Shanghai police officers were stationed outside his residence each day, his home telephone was cut off, and his cell phone was confiscated. Police indicated that formal “criminal” charges were being prepared against Mr. Guo.

   However, before police had laid charges, Mr. Guo had attracted such international attention that his continued persecution had become an embarrassment to the Chinese Communist Party Government. Lawyers Rights Watch Canada and other human rights organizations wrote open letters to Hu Jintao. As the Party had done with Wang Dan, Wei Jingsheng, and others, it decided to bring an end to the embarrassment by allowing Guo to go abroad. He came to Canada as a refugee and has worked unstintingly and unceasingly ever since in the cause of human rights in China, the defence of Chinese Human Rights advocates in China, and the promotion of democracy in China. In all three of these areas, Guo Guoting has published voluminously on the internet.

   I have had the opportunity and privilege of working with Mr. Guo over these past three years and have often participated in public forums with him. I have no hesitation in testifying to his honesty, integrity, and tireless devotion to the causes of human rights, democracy, and the Rule of Law in China.

   I continue to marvel at the unbelievable courage Mr. Guo displayed in standing up to the Chinese Communist Party and clinging steadfastly to his principles in the days before he went into exile abroad.

   Should you need further comment from me, please let me know and I shall respond immediately.

   Yours truly,

   Clive Ansley

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场