大家
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[大家]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[郭国汀 美國言論自由发展簡史 [1]]
郭国汀律师专栏
·陈泱潮论改良主义/郭国汀
·文化大革命是中国民主革命的序幕 郭国汀
·陈泱潮妙评邓小平的“瞎猫屠夫理论” 郭国汀
·陈泱潮精评毛泽东 郭国汀
·论共产党官僚垄断特权阶级 郭国汀
·共产党官员为什么普遍腐化堕落?郭国汀
·“三个代表”是个什么玩意? 郭国汀
·对抗性的社会基本矛盾 郭国汀
·为何中共官员多具有奴隶主和奴仆的双重人格? 郭国汀
·共产专制特权等级制 郭国汀
·人民“公仆”是如何变成骑在人民头上作威作福的老爷的? 郭国汀
·神化首要分子神化党与邪教 郭国汀
·宗教政治与人权灵本主义 郭国汀
·陈尔晋论今日中国社会主要矛盾及前途与命运
·陈泱潮先生在当代中国思想史上的地位 作者:曾节明
***(44)反中共极权专制暴政争自由宪政人权民主绝食抗暴民权运动
·南郭致涵习近平先生
·郭律师致高智晟女儿格格的公开信
·福布斯报导高智晟失踪事件
·胡锦涛必须对高智晟受酷刑负直接罪责!
·郭国汀 高智晟律师为何不发声?
·我眼中的高智晟
·郭国汀 从我的经历看中共当局诽谤高智晟的下流
·所谓高智晟公开声明及悔罪书肯定是伪造的
·真正的中国人的伟大怒吼!
·加拿大著名人权律师安世立支持声援全球绝食抗暴的声明
·闻律师英雄高智晟再遇车祸有感 郭国汀
·呼吁全球万人同步大绝食宣言
·全球接力绝食抗暴运动的伟大意义 郭国汀
·郭国汀声援和平抗暴 呼吁抛弃中共
·中国律师界应全力声援高智晟
·专家剖析高智晟煽动颠覆国家政权案
·抓捕关押高智晟的整个过程都是违法的/郭国汀
·中共迫害高智晟亲人丧心病狂,中共党魁胡锦涛难辞其咎
·绝食维权抗暴日记
·郭国汀 漠视大陆维权是一种自杀行为
·英雄伟人与超人高智晟
·告全体中国律师及法律人书----闻高智晟被秘密绑架感言
·郭国汀: 高智晟遭秘密绑架可能成为中共灭亡的导火索
·给真正的中国女人的公开信
·郭国汀:驳刘荻的非理性投射说
·决不与中共专制暴政同流合污--------第29个全球接力绝食抗暴日记 郭国汀
·一部见证当代中国社会现实的伟大纪实作品--序高智晟《中国民间企业维权第一案》
·郭国汀呼吁国际重视高智晟妻儿的遭遇
·将接力绝食抗暴运动进行至最后胜利
·我为中华律师英雄杨在新喝彩 郭国汀
·郭国汀向老戚致敬
·万众一心,众志成城——全球万人同步绝食抗暴日记 郭国汀
·责令中共当局立即无条件释放兰州大学学生刘西峰!郭国汀
·加拿大著名人权律师ANSLEY支持声援全球绝食抗暴运动的声明
·郭国汀:中国律师应当向高智晟,浦志强律师学习!
***(45)人权研究
***中国人权律师基金会
·郭国汀推荐黄金秋竞选[第三届中国自由文化运动政论奖]推荐函
·郭国汀提名陈泱潮为2009中国自由文化奖之文化成就奖获奖候选人
·郭国汀提名张博树为2009中国自由文化奖之法学奖获奖候选人
·推荐郭国汀先生参选2009年台湾民主人权奖书
·letter of recommendation of Guoting for 2008 Asia Democracy and Human Rights Award
·提名郭國汀律師作為[第三屆亞洲民主與人權獎]候選人的推薦函
·支持郭国汀律师负责组建中国人权律师基金会
·第二届《中国自由文化奖》评奖程序的修改建议
·郭国汀提名张鉴康律师作为第二届自由文化奖之人权奖候选人
·关于提名陈泱潮竞选[中国自由文化运动文化成就奖]推荐函
·推荐郭国汀先生参选第三届「亞洲民主人權獎」推荐书
·Letter of recommendation of Guoting Guo for 2008 The Third Asian Democracy and Human Rights Award
***(46)关注西藏新疆少数民族人权
·解决西藏问题的最佳方案--宪政联邦体制
·中共政权对藏民族所犯下的罪恶
·西藏自古以来属于中国吗?--西藏与中国关系简史
·什么是西藏问题?
·达赖啦嘛论解决西藏问题的原则
·中共宗教灭绝政策的实质是从精神心灵上扼杀藏人
·西藏自古以来属于中国吗?
·西藏问题的实质
·自由法治宪政民主联邦体制是解决西藏问题的最佳方案
·达赖啦嘛最常使用的词汇
·达赖啦嘛的使命与梦想
·达赖啦嘛论西藏问题的实质
·达赖啦嘛论西藏文明文化和历史
·达赖啦嘛论解决西问题的原则
·达赖啦嘛论爱同情怜悯与慈悲
·达赖啦嘛论藏传佛教的价值
·是中共暴政而非汉族奴役迫害藏民族!
·新疆暴亂是中共流氓暴政故意利用民族茅盾转嫁统治危机人为泡制的惨案
·坚决支持藏民维民争自由,平等,人权,民主的英勇抗暴运动
·从图片新闻看达赖喇嘛的国际影响力
·达赖喇嘛语录郭国汀译
·蜡烛与阳光争辉------从温家宝批达赖喇嘛说开去
·达赖喇嘛代表流亡政府及全体藏民与中国政府和平谈判理所当然----兼与王希哲兄商榷
·三一四西藏暴乱事件的真相
·布什总统再度敦促中国(中共)与达赖喇嘛对话
·达赖喇嘛抵美国西图参加为期五天的慈善的科学基础大会,据称150000门票全部售出
·布什总统出席奥运开幕式已不确定
·达赖喇嘛今天重申不抵制奥运会
·布什总统决意出席奥运开幕式并非仅由于他性格顽固
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
郭国汀 美國言論自由发展簡史 [1]

郭国汀美國言論自由发展簡史 [1]
   (自由圣火首发)
   文章摘要: 美國言論自由憲政權利的發展史表明:言論自由首先表現為對政府權力的嚴格限制,並通過憲法第一修正案禁止國會通過任何禁止言論自由的法律,否則因違憲而無效,而美國最高法院確實反復宣告美國政府頒佈的眾多法規因違憲而無效。
   作者 : 郭国汀,
   發表時間:11/21/2007
   言论自由(表达自由)是联合国一系列公约反复加调,也是几乎世界各国宪法明文规定的基本人权.言论自由是人之为人不可剥夺的最重要的一项基本自由.思想自由、出版自由、宗教信仰自由、结社组党自由与之密切相关。思想自由若无言论自由支撑也就没有意义;如果没有言论自由,出版自由毫无意义;要是没有言论自由,宗教信仰自由也将不复存在。没有言论自由,人必将成为奴隶,而非有自由意志的人。没有言论自由,决不可能有人权,也不可能有法治,因为没有人权的法治只能是伪法治。因此,言论自由是最基本的人权,也是最重要的政治权利。然而任何权利都是人们在与政府长期反复斗争中争来的,言论自由权亦不例外。今日美国是全球言论最自由的国度之一,美国言论自由发展史颇具典型意义,对吾国言论自由权的实现具有重要借鉴指导价值。此论题值得深入研讨,本文仅是抛砖引玉 [2],以期国人高度重视之。
   
   1 殖民地时期的言论自由状况
   The most stringent controls on speech in the colonial period were controls that outlawed or otherwise censored speech that was considered blasphemous in a religious sense. A 1646 Massachusetts law, for example, punished persons who denied the immortality of the soul. In 1612, a Virginia governor declared the death penalty for a person that denied the Trinity under Virginia's Laws Divine, Moral and Martial, which also outlawed blasphemy, speaking badly of ministers and royalty, and "disgraceful words."
   美國殖民時期當局對言論自由,主要是对褻瀆宗教言論的限制。例如1646年马州法律规定否定灵魂不灭的言论构成犯罪;而1612年维州州长竟将否定三位一体说者处死。
   
   2 1700年美国仍适用英国煽动性诽谤政府法规范言论
   During colonial times, English speech regulations were rather restrictive. An English seditious libel law made criticizing the government a crime. According to the English Court of the Star Chamber, the King was above public criticism and statements critical of the government were forbidden. Chief Justice Holt, writing in 1704, explained the apparent need for the prohibition of seditious libel, "if people should not be called to account for possessing the people with an ill opinion of the government, no government can subsist. For it is very necessary for all governments that the people should have a good opinion of it." The objective truth of a statement in violation of the seditious libel law was not a defense.
   1700年以前,依英國煽动性诽谤法(在美國適用)煽動性誹謗政府或其首腦均構成犯罪,王座法院认定國王不應受公眾批評,而且陈述客观事实并不能成为抗辩理由。
   
   3 1735年美國言論自由得以確立的首個案例
   The trial of John Peter Zenger in 1735 was a seditious libel prosecution for Zenger's publication of criticisms of the Governor of New York. Andrew Hamilton represented Zenger and argued that truth should be a defense to the crime of seditious libel, but the court rejected this argument. Hamilton persuaded the jury, however, to disregard the law and to acquit Zenger. The case is considered a victory for freedom of speech as well as a prime example jury nullification. The case marked the beginning of a trend of greater acceptance and tolerance of free speech.
   盡管法官不接受[真實]事實抗辯,但辯護律師卻說服陪審團最终認定被告無罪,突顯了陪審團在刑事訴訟中的巨大作用。而中共专制暴政下的所謂人民陪審制度,徒有陪審其名而無陪審員決定罪與非罪實權之實。
   
   4.1791年美国宪法第一修正案正式确立言论自由至高无尚
    Amendment I Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression.12/15/1791.
   Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
   
   第一條修正案。國會不得制定有關下列事項的法律:確立一種宗教或禁止信教自由:剝奪言論自由或出版自由:或剝奪人民和平集會及向政府要求伸冤的權利。
   
   5. 1798年美國言論自由的首個反彈
   
   In 1798, Congress adopted the Alien and Sedition Acts. The law prohibited the publication of "false, scandalous, and malicious writing or writings against the government of the United States, or either house of the Congress of the United States, or the President of the United States, with intent to defame . . . or to bring them . . . into contempt or disrepute; or to excite against them . . . hatred of the good people of the United States, or to stir up sedition within the United States, or to excite any unlawful combinations therein, for opposing or resisting any law of the United States, or any act of the President of the United States." set out punishments for publishing of up to two years' imprisonment for "opposing or resisting any law of the United States" or writing or publishing "false, scandalous, and malicious writing" about the President or Congress (but specifically not the Vice-President).
   The law did allow truth as a defense and required proof of malicious intent. The Federalists under President John Adams aggressively used the law against their rivals, the Democratic-Republicans. The Alien and Sedition Act was a major political issue in the 1800 election, and after he was elected President, Thomas Jefferson pardoned those who had been convicted under the Act. The Act was repealed and the Supreme Court never ruled on its constitutionality.
   該煽动反政府法是對憲法第一修正案的悖離,此罪没有使用暴力的前提条件,但须是故意诽谤才构成此罪,因此該法規定真實事實可作為抗辯理由,且控方須證明行為人主觀惡意,此点较之前述英国煽动反政府法是个进步。但該法僅实施三年,隨後即被傑佛遜總統廢棄;同時因該法被拘捕判刑的數十人全部無罪釋放。中國刑法中的反革命煽動罪,即今日之刑法第105条第2款之煽動顛覆國家政權罪,較230年前的美國煽动反政府法,還要落後反动得多。實踐中即便批評中共的言論完全屬實,幾無例外全被中共專制暴政 無罪重判,且檢察官甚至無需證實被告的主觀惡意!
   
   6. 1850年代及1860年初美国内战时期的言論自由
   As the controversy over slavery intensified during the 1850s, some states and municipalities enacted laws prohibiting "agitation" over the issue, but the First Amendment did not then apply to the states or their municipalities, and, in any event, those laws soon disappeared along with slavery itself. During the Civil War, federal authorities detained thousands of persons who had expressed Southern sympathies, but those who had merely spoken, and not acted, for the South almost always were released quickly.
   1850年代,美國南部各州曾頒布法規禁止煽動黑奴闹事,但因第一修正案僅適用於聯邦法而不適用於州法(第14修正案才規定第一修正案同樣對州法適用),且由於奴隸制本身很快即消失,故該法未引起宪法权利之争。美国內戰期间聯邦政府拘捕了數千名有同情南方言論的異議人士,但對於僅有言說而無行動者很快均釋放。
   
   7. 1917年言論自由憲政时代的到来
   The era of "freedom of speech" as a matter of adjudicated constitutional law began during World War I, with the trials of various persons who opposed and tried to obstruct United States participation in the war. Ever since, there has been a large amount of litigation over the definition of "speech" and the extent to which that speech is protected. A few questions that have been raised over the years indicate the scope and complexity of "freedom of speech" in American law:
   ·Is advocacy of illegal conduct constitutionally protected?
   ·Are false slanderous statements protected?
   ·Are obscene or pornographic words and depictions protected?
   ·Are commercial advertisements protected?
   。Is nonverbal conduct protected when it is used to communicate ideas?
   言論自由真正成為憲法爭议並由最高法院定论始於第一次世界大戰。因反战言论引发了大量涉言论诉讼,也促使法院考虑:煽动非法行为是否受宪法保护?虚假的诽谤性言论是否受保护?猥亵或色情言论是否受保护?商业广告是否受保护?用于表达观念的非语言性行为是否受第一修正案保护?美国最高法院审理了一系列此种涉及 言论自由的案件。限于篇幅将另文专论。
   
   8. 1940年史密斯法強調必須有煽動[暴力]才構成此罪 。
   The Alien Registration Act or Smith Act of 1940 is a United States federal statute that made it a criminal offense for anyone to" knowingly or willfully advocate, abet, advise or teach the duty, necessity, desirability or propriety of overthrowing the Government of the United States or of any State by force or violence, or for anyone to organize any association which teaches, advises or encourages such an overthrow, or for anyone to become a member of or to affiliate with any such association." The Act is best known for its use against political organizations and figures, mostly on the left. From 1941 to 1957, hundreds of socialists were prosecuted under the Smith Act. The first trial, in 1941, focused on Trotskyists, the second trial in 1944 prosecuted alleged fascists and, beginning in 1949, leaders and members of the Communist Party USA were targeted. Prosecutions continued until a series of United States Supreme Court decisions in 1957 threw out numerous convictions under the Smith Act as unconstitutional. The statute remains on the books, however.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场