大家
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[大家]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[答张鹤慈先生质疑]
郭国汀律师专栏
·记名提单若干问题研究
·集装箱保险合同若干法律问题
·船舶保险合同“船舶出租”应指光船出租
·试论船舶保险合同项下“碰撞、触碰”的法律含义
·“新世纪”轮船舶保险合同(固定物、浮动物? )争议案的反思
·水上油污若干法律问题 郭国汀
·油污国际公约若干问题 郭国汀
·海上油污损害赔偿适用法律研究/郭国汀
·《郭国汀海商法论文自选》
·处理货抵目的港后收货人不提货的措施
·评一起重大涉外海商纠纷案的判决
·托运人对海运合同货损、货差没有针对承运人的诉权
·海上货运合同货差纠纷案析
·共同海损案法律分析
·货物被骗属于货物一切险承保范围
·上海吉龙塑胶制品有限公司诉上海捷士国际货运代理有限公司无单放货争议案
·GENERAL TRADE诉绍兴县进出口公司国际货物买卖合同品质纠纷案析
·货代违约造成贸易合同毁约应向谁索赔损失?
·对一起复杂行政诉讼案的法律思考
·2002年国际船舶保险条款
·Peter . Liu劳动争议初步法律意见/郭国汀
·船舶保险合同(保证条款)争议案析/郭国汀
·自有集装箱被占用案初步法律意见/郭国汀
·马士基集团香港有限公司与中国包装进出口安微公司签发放行提单再审争议案析/郭国汀
·析一起签发放行记名提单再审争议案/郭国汀
·上海亚太国际集装箱储运有限公司诉天津海峡货运有限公司上海分公司海上货物运输合同货物被盗损失代位追偿案析/郭国汀
·海上保险合同争议起诉状/郭国汀
·民事答辩反诉状
·关于应当如何理解《INSTITUTE CARGO CLAUSES (A)》中“一切险”责任范围的咨询复函/郭国汀
·海运运费及代理费问题的解答/郭国汀
·美亚保险公司上海分公司诉BDP亚洲太平洋有限公司海上货运合同货损争议代位追偿案析/郭国汀
·货代违约造成贸易合同无效怎么办?郭国汀
·捷运通有限公司诉东方集团上海市对外贸易有限公司海上货运合同争议案析/郭国汀
·平安保险公司代位追偿案析/郭国汀
·记名提单若干法律问题上海吉龙塑胶制品有限公司诉上海捷士国际货运代理有限公司无单放货争议案析/郭国汀
·乐清外贸公司与长荣航运公司海上货物运输合同争议案初步法律意见书/郭国汀
·新世纪轮船舶保险合同争议上诉代理词
·“富江7号”轮沉船保险合同争议案析/郭国汀
·上海吉龙塑胶制品有限公司诉上海捷士国际货运代理有限公司无单放货争议案析/郭国汀
·马士基集团香港有限公司与中国包装进出口安微公司签发放行提单再审争议案析/郭国汀
·评一起重大涉外海商纠纷案的判决 郭国汀
·请教郭国汀律师有关留置权问题
·新加坡捷富意运通有限公司诉上海中波国际贸易有限公司运费争议案析/郭国汀
·中国海关实际运作的宣誓证言/郭国汀
·亚洲的国际商事仲裁中心及其仲裁制度的特点-颜云青 郭国汀译
·亚洲的国际商事仲裁中心及其仲裁制度的特点-颜云青 郭国汀 译(下)
***郭国汀律师专译著
***(1)《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译 郭国汀校
·寄语中国青少年——序《英国保险协会保险条款诠释》
·《英国保险协会保险条款诠释》译后记
·《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译
·《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译 第二编 海上货物保险格式
·《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译 第三编 海上船舶格式保险单
·《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译 第四编 对船东的附加保险
·《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译 第五编 为各利益方的保险
·《协会保险条款诠释》陈剖建/郭国汀译 第六编 战争和罢工险格式
***(2)英国协会保险货物保险条款英中对译
·1934年1月1日协会更换保险条款/郭国汀译
·1982年1月1日协会货物(A)条款/郭国汀译
·1982年1月1日协会货物保险(B)和(C)条款/郭国汀译
·1982年8月1日协会恶意损害保险条款/郭国汀译
·1983年9月5日协会商品贸易(A)(B)(C)保险条款/郭国汀译
·1984年1月1日协会黄麻保险条款/郭国汀译
·1986年1月1日协会冻肉保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶战争险和罢工险条款/郭国汀译
·1982年1月1日协会货物罢工险条款/郭国汀译
·1982年1月1日协会货物战争险保险条款/郭国汀译
·1982年10月1日协会煤炭保险条款/郭国汀译
·1983年10月1日和1995年11月1日协会船舶定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1984年1月1日协会天然橡胶(液态胶乳除外)保险条款/郭国汀译
·1986年1月1日协会冷冻食品(冻肉除外)保险A条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会运费定期战争和罢工险条款/郭国汀译
·1986年1月1日协会冷冻食品(冻肉除外)保险(C)条款/郭国汀译
·1983年2月1日协会散装油类保险条款/郭国汀译
·1983年12月1日协会盗窃、偷窃和提货不着保险条款(仅用于协会保险条款)/郭国汀译
·1986年1月1日国际肉类贸易协会冻肉展期保险条款(仅适用于协会冻肉保险(A)条款/郭国汀译
·1986年4月1日协会木材贸易联合会条款(与木材贸易联合会达成的协议)/郭国汀译
***(3)英国协会保险船舶条款英中对译
·1983年10月1日和1995年11月1日协会船舶定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1987年7月20日协会船舶港口险定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1988年6月1日协会造船厂的风险保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶乘客设备定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶航次保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶全损、共同海损和3/4碰撞责任航次保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶运费定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会机器损害附加免赔额保险条款/郭国汀译
·1985年11月1日协会游艇保险条款/郭国汀译
·1987年7月20日协会船壳定期保赔保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日附加免赔额适应条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶额外责任定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶全损定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶限制危险定期保险条款/郭国汀译
·1995年11月1日协会船舶运费航次保险条款/郭国汀译
·1996年1月1日协会运费共同海损-污染费用保险条款/郭国汀译
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
答张鹤慈先生质疑

尊敬的张鹤慈先生:
   今天偶然看到阁下的质疑:"现在不但国际媒体,就是法轮功自己的媒体,也不再提苏家屯了。【大卫乔高和麦塔斯游说全球十五个国家或地区,】也没有下文了。希望郭先生冷静的想一想。中共就是再有钱,有实力,也不可能封住世界的媒体。
   布什和美国政府都封不住对他们自己的尖锐的批评,中共反而能够封住?如果苏家屯的事件有百分之几的真实性,不要说反共的媒体,就是中立的媒体,从经济效率看,也绝对不会放过这个体裁。怎么可能就这么静悄悄的消失了?"

   其实,阁下所说的并非事实,恰恰相当,两天前德国第二大报法兰克福福汇报即再次报导了中共活割盗卖法轮功学员人体器官的专论.具体而言,比我发表"力被中共当局无罪重判的真实原因"当时,我又找到了至少20家海外各国媒体的相关报导.至于有关该至关重大罪孽的报导,详见附件1.附件2是我用英文撰写并发表于2006年8月间的一篇评论.此外,值得一提的是,充他的证据表明,google.com正在极力配合中共当局克意封杀有关中共当局要求封杀的人和事.故现在网上有关havesting organ of Falun Gong 的信息条目少得极反常.正可谓欲盖弥彰!
   若有任何疑问,欢迎讨论争辩.
   郭国汀
   附件一: 除了大纪元、新唐人、希望之声之外,最早报导苏家屯惨案的西方媒体是美国华盛顿时报,有意思的是,那只[雌鼠]迫不及待地在自由中国论坛上贴云:“华盛顿时报是一份小报!”据不完全统计,如今世界各国主流媒体报导苏家屯事件引起世人注目的中共活割盗卖法轮功学员人体器官人权惨案者有:
   A:美国之音、BBC、路透社、英国CHANNEL4、法新社、加通社、日本共同社、加拿大广播公司、加拿大电视台、比利时国家电视台、澳洲ABC电视台、瑞典国家电视台、瑞士电讯社、美国CBS电视台;
   B:加拿大国家邮报、基督教科学缄言报、圣路易斯邮报、悉尼晨锋报、澳洲NINEMSN报、澳大利亚人报、瑞典哥德堡晚报、加拿大渥汰华公民报、意大利那不勒斯日报、比利时晚报、比利时早报、比利时GVA报、福克斯、法国西部报、丹麦日德兰邮报、丹麦林时报、德国法兰克福福汇报、德国韦斯区登快报、德国西南新闻、麦卡法广告报、《美国大众媒体》、美国费城周报、美国德洲SPERO报、丹佛大学校报、日本世界日报、日本产经新闻、马来西亚太阳报、马来西亚中国报、马亚西亚东方日报、英国星期天先驱报、爱尔兰时报、爱尔兰医疗时报、爱尔兰检察官报、世界网络日报;
   C:大赦国际、加拿大记者俱乐部、联合国人权理事会主办的《健康伦理人权讨论会》、欧盟副主席、法国《为了人权而行动》组织、爱尔兰外交委员会、台湾陆委会、联合国将组织调查团、芬兰外交部长代表欧洲向中国外交部长正式提出关注该人权;
   D: 梵蒂冈电台、台湾中央广播电台、法国新闻电台、自由欧洲电台;
   F:日本《正论》杂志、日本SAPLO杂志、日本VOICE杂志、爱尔兰医学周刊、美国《国家观察》杂志、皇家医药期刊;
   G:美国、加拿大、德国、澳洲、新西兰、法国、韩国、丹麦、比利时、爱尔兰、英国、芬兰、瑞士、瑞典等国皆有不少议员正式向各国政府提出议案。法国司法部长、台湾副总统、欧洲委员会2006年二次决策会议11名委员联名提案、由此可见,中共专制暴政活割盗卖法轮功学员人体器官的惊天罪孽真相正在全球被彻底揭露。大卫乔高及大卫麦塔斯所作的调查及他们对中国人权的伟大贡献令人敬佩!
   附件二.
   Why the CCP Harvests the Living Falun Gong Practitioner's Organ?
   By Thomas G.Guo [1]
   August 7,2006
   I. Background:
   
   Several students asked me why the CCP harvests the living FLG practitioner's organ? Is it really true? Is it just for money? It is unbelievable! A journalist and a doctor's wife, on March 8 of this year, revealed a shocking news report, which exposed the harvesting of the organs from live Falun Gong practitioners in a Sujiatun concentration camp. All main media in the world kept silence for months; however, on July 6, 2006, the Report of the investigation carried by two prominent Canadians, former M.P. David Kilgour and Human Right Lawyer David Matas, in which they confirmed the Living Organ Harvesting is true. The world main media all reported the news right away. Nevertheless, still there are many people who hardly believe such a horrible, evil crime against a human being and don't understand why? Before we answer these enquires, we have to learn some basic fact, what has happened to FLG practitioners?
   
   
   II. What has happened?
   
   1. On March 8, 2006 a journalist, Mr. Peter, revealed the shocking news that there are 6,000 FLG (Falun Gong) practitioners whose organs have been harvested for sale for transplant with high price, and then their bodies were incinerated. The World Organization to Investigate the Persecution of Falun Gong (WOIPFG) confirmed that hospitals and transplant centers in China use organs from living Falun Gong practitioners for transplants.[2] On March 28, 2006, the Chinese government openly denied the accusation. The speaker declared that" Most organs in the organ transplant operations in China have been from voluntary donation of Chinese citizens when they were passing away and very few from death penalty criminals" [3] However, the vice-minister of Health Minister of China, Mr.Huang Jiefu, admitted that the majority of the donors are from executed prisoners and there are only 5 % come from voluntary donors.[4]
   2. March 17,2006, the surgeon's wife, Ms. Anny, proved that her former-husband removed about 2,000 FLG practitioner's corneas during the early part of 2001 to the end of 2003. In April 2006, The Weekly Standard interviewed Ms. Anny who proved that the doctors removed FLG's kidneys, livers, hearts, skin tissues, and corneas. [5]
   
   3. April 2006, a military doctor confirmed that there is 36 similar concentration camps in China all involving the harvesting live organ business.[6].
   
   4. July 6, 2006, two prominent Canada human right activists investigation report confirmed that the harvesting is true, and about 41,000 organ transplant could not be explained at all. They said,"This is a form of evil we have yet to see on this planet," [7] (at the same day the Chinese embassy in Canada denied the charge again.[8])
   
   III. Lots of evidence shows that the harvesting of organs from living FLG practitioners is true!
   
    The reports of David Kilgour and David Matas collected 18 kinds of evidence to prove the facts of harvesting human organs:
   
   1. FLG's corpses with missing organs (pictures): The picture could explain better more than thousand words. Mr.Wand Bin, a FLG's practitioner from Hei Longjiang province was tortured to death then his heart and brain all disappear.[9] Mr.Ren Pengwu, a FLG's Practitioner from Ha Erbing, was tortured to death and his body organs all harvested then his body was forcibly burned up. Ms.Hao Runjun, a FLG practitioner from Guangzhou, was tortured by police to death then her body was opened without consent of the relative. Mr.Sun Duanjiang, a FLG practitioner from Ningde Fujian Province, also tortured to death by police and his body was opened without the consent of his wife.[10]
   
   2. The surgeon's wife's confessed that her former husband had removed 2,000 FLG practitioners' corneas in two years.
   
   3. China hospitals admissions: In a telephone investigation the doctors admitted their donors are FLG practitioners. For example, on April 28, 2006, the doctor of the Airforce Hospital in Chengdu confirmed that they could offer young healthy FLG practitioner donors.[11]
   
   
   3. The time waiting for transplant is only one or two weeks with a maximum of one month. This shows there are huge banks of living organs are waiting recipients. There must be a computer data bank of donors. In North American the transplant wait for a donor is three years. On April 28, 2006, the People's Hospital of Hu Nang offered to transplant 20 livers or a kidney for free![12]Just because of there are too many livers and kidneys waiting for harvesting.
   
   4. Victims interviewed proved that all FLG practitioners have their blood tested while in camps. Practitioners in detention are systematically blood tested. It is a pre-requisite for organ transplant. Donors need to be matched with recipients so that the antibodies of the recipients don't reject the organs of the donors.
   
   5. Human rights violations generally in China: In the end of 2005, the Chinese government first admitted to using the organs of executed prisoners. However, this happened for more than 20 years. In 1984, the Chinese government enacted a temporary regulation of the use of the body and organs of detained prisoners. In June 2001, Mr.Wang Guoqi, a military doctor of China in a hearing held by the House of Commons of the United States, confirmed that he had taken more than 100 executed prisoner's organs, all without the consent of the donors.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场