政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    BURMA-缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[BURMA-缅甸风云]->[貌强:Harn Yawnghwe, EU, USA and Burma’s Junta]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·昂山素姬面对“中國問題”严厉考验
·未来20年两大权力转移
·马英九与昂山素姬关心刘晓波
·莫言的自述与诺贝尔委员会的评价
·襄助缅甸,中国能比美国做得更多
·神州边防武警见义勇为,海外炎黄子孙惊喜交集
·缅甸非政府众组织反对中缅油气管道与深水港
·震惊大陆法庭的法轮功辩护词
·諾貝獎得主134人聯名要求釋放劉曉波
·勿忘邓小平上世纪末10点警告
·缺维生素B2易患痔疮溃疡肿瘤癌症
·让戒定慧佛光普照缅甸大地
·热烈欢呼粟秀玉老师荣获缅甸佛学奖!
·2013年初谈缅甸缅甸人中国中国人
·缅甸中国必须互利双赢
·缅甸卑谬世界文化遗产一日游
·骠族老同学谈眼皮下缅甸红尘
·骠族老同学谈眼皮下缅甸红尘!
·缅甸政府与众少数民族半世纪内战复燃
·中缅边境军民要以正视听
·缅甸蒲甘世界文化遗产一日游(1)
·缅甸中国边民有话说
·缅甸蒲甘世界文化遗产一日游(续1)
·绝密档案 招标中标 鸡的屁
·少吃长寿送煤气炉
·缅甸海归谈缅甸中国关系
·昂山素姬弃美投华?
·铜矿村民愤概昂山素姬调查报告
·缅甸斗士海归责怪昂山素姬
·独裁观察家点评昂山素姬
·缅甸评论家奉劝昂山素姬
·于建嵘与柴静的中国梦
·美国反式脂肪与中国粮油食品奶粉
·缅甸会成卢旺达第二吗?
·中国贪官与美国梦
·诺奖得主的健康长寿秘诀
·古人的劳逸养生与食疗
·中国摩登僧尼与时俱进
·中华五千年文明遗产馆
·吴内昂谈缅甸2008年宪法与人权
·与中国渐行渐远的缅甸
·为老外所描述的中国人而痛哭
·科学地话说杨桃
·中国人为何多会早死
·奥巴马应赦免斯诺登
·推荐斯诺登为诺贝尔和平奖候选人!
·习近平贺马英九当选国民党主席
·旅美华人谈美国生活和房价
·经济动物在英国皇家音乐厅表演
·中缅天然气管道开始向中国通气了!
·建滇缅公路为中印经济走廊
·赛万赛谈和平奋斗建真正缅甸联邦
·江山易改?本性难移?
·赛万赛谈缅甸宪法危机
·奥巴马力挺缅甸金宫寺
·赛万赛谈2013年缅甸和解进程
·温教授谈1947年彬龙协议
·公说公有理,婆说婆有理
·公说公有理,婆说婆有理(续1)
·南中精神照耀伊江莱茵河
·危害健康的加工食品与铝锅
·中国缅甸瑞苗胞波
·缅甸该学中国哪些?
·给参加2000论坛的昂山素姬一封信
·赛万赛谈缅甸全国内战停火
·携手平等合作,互利双赢共富共荣
·江西省四日游
·慟神州老少抢位打架
·从奥巴马竖毛泽东铜像谈起
·小乘、大乘、密教、喇嘛、达赖
·惊喜祖籍国与时俱进
·台湾民主基金会颁奖给缅甸克伦族人权小组
·天朝土豪游客天上来
·丑陋的 Chinese 败类
·天朝富豪精英傲翔天上
·缅甸中国健康饮食须知
·掸复委掸邦军姚色克说要退位
·中国人质素比上不足比下有余
·美国不像东南亚种族歧视与偏见
·从中国古今13尊大佛说起
·2014年初缅甸纵横谈
·缅甸内战为何停停打打?
·亡国奴与龙的传人
·纵浪大化中,乘流沧海浮
·中国农民工是贱民
·中国车以缅甸为基地进军东南亚
·父亲节笑活
·昂山素姬能当选缅甸总统吗?
·缅甸将复兴为世界米仓与中等收入国
·父亲节另版笑活
·中国快成科技创新大国
·缅甸空军将装备中巴“枭龙”战机
·中缅两国人民要爱国爱民爱传统友谊
·泰国克拉运河终于开挖了
·纪念缅甸学生七七惨案52周年
·缅甸贪官震宇宙惊天下?
·天大巨贪是缅甸或中国将军们?
·莫言的锵锵真言
·益寿抑癌健康蔬菜排行榜
·天朝神仙辟谷术与增寿功
·讴歌太平盛世中国夢
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
貌强:Harn Yawnghwe, EU, USA and Burma’s Junta

   

Burma’s Chinese minority has spread the following information in Chinese media worldwide :

   1. the Panel Discussion of the Association Suisse-Birmanie on 29-3-2007

   2. EU extended diplomatic and economic sanctions against Burma few weeks ago

   3. EU-USA leaders agreed to step up pressure on Burma’s junta recently

   4. Burma’s junta on the broad grin: “Political Power Grows Out of the Barrel of a Gun”

繁体 Traditional Chinese: Taiwan, Hongkong, Macau

   http://asiademo.org/index.php?charcode=Big5 他山之石

   http://epochtimes.com/b5/7/5/6/n1700959.htm

简体 PRC Chinese: Worldwide

   http://news.boxun.com/news/gb/intl/2007/05/200705060725.shtml

   http://epochtimes.com/gb/7/5/6/n1700959.htm

   http://www.newcenturynews.com/Article/ShowArticle.asp?ArticleID=52919

   http://secretchina.com/news/gb/kanshijie/yazhou/2007/0505/194076.html

   http://asiademo.org/ 它山之石

   http://1000site.com/article.cfm?id=20587&cid=92

   http://boxun.com/hero/2007/Burma'sChinese/36_1.shtml 缅甸风云 BURMA

   

Association Suisse-Birmanie in Geneva

   A Panel Discussion was organized by the Association Suisse-Birmanie on 29 March 2007 in Geneva. Panelists are 1. Harn Yawnghwe, Director of the European Office for the Development of Democracy in Burma (Euro-Burma Office), Brussels 2. Professeur Paulo Sergio Pinheiro, United Nations Human Rights Special Rapporteur for Burma; 3. Dr Jean F. Freymond, Director of the Centre for Applied Studies in International Negotiations (CASIN), Geneva. Members of the Burmese delegation to the UN Human Rights Council, expatriate Burmese, activists and the general public total more than 100 people attended. Voice of America, Burmese Section, and Radio Cite Geneva carried reports on the event.

   Ms Blooming Night Zaw, Joint-Secretary of the Karen Women’s Organization, presented a copy of “State of Terror”, reporting the Burma Army’s violence against Karen women, to Professeur Paulo Sergio Pinheiro.

Five Main Points Concluded after Discussion:

   1.SANCTIONS

   It was generally agreed that it was not productive to argue over whether sanctions against the SPDC have worked or not. Sanctions were invoked as a symbolic measure to censure the SPDC over its failure to respect the will of the people of Burma in the 1990 elections, and for its gross abuse of the human rights of the people of Burma. As such, sanctions against the SPDC must be retained because the human rights situation in Burma has not improved and the elections results have not been honoured. Regardless of what happens politically in Burma, or who is in government, if human rights are abused by the authorities, it is the duty of the international community to report and highlight these abuses.

   2. HUMANITARIAN AID

   It was generally agreed that the dire situation of the people of Burma calls for the international community to deliver humanitarian aid. It was agreed that it should not be dependent on whether or not the SPDC agrees to allow the aid to be delivered. If people are suffering, they should be helped. Innovative ways and means to deliver aid to the most vulnerable populations should be explored even if it means crossing international boundaries.

   3. TOURISM

   The official position of the Burmese democracy movement towards tourism was pronounced by Daw Aung San Suu Kyi in 1996. She said, “Do not come now.” This policy was set in the context of the SPDC’s then campaign to earn foreign exchange to sustain its rule through tourist dollars. The situation has changed drastically in the last ten years and it is now possible to visit Burma without giving funds to the regime. The SPDC is also no longer looking for tourist dollars. The sale of natural gas is now the regime’s mainstay. However, since Daw Aung San Suu Kyi is being held incommunicado, the movement’s tourism policy cannot be changed. The participants respected the movement’s existing policy but noted that under other dictatorships, tourism can be a factor in making people less dependent on the dictatorship by giving them an alternative source of income and information.

   4. TRANSITION

   It was generally agreed that the SPDC, which holds power in Burma, has to want a transition in order for it to happen. It was also agreed that the SPDC has to initiate and participate in any transition in order to minimize instability.

   5. DIALOGUE

   It was generally agreed that the SPDC does not want a dialogue with the opposition. However, it was felt that in order to bring about a transition and better conditions for the people of Burma, it is crucial to engage the SPDC in a dialogue. It was suggested that new approaches and entry points should be explored.

The sanctions of EU & USA

   We have seen that US and European Union leaders agreed to step up pressure on Burma’s military junta during a one-day summit meeting in Washington on April 30 .The summit was attended by US President George Bush and a number of European government leaders, including Angela Merkel, Chancellor of Germany, which currently holds the presidency of the European Council.

   The summit press secretary’s office said in a written statement that the US and EU had “successfully cosponsored” resolutions on human rights and social affairs in Burma”, “We continue intense exchanges on Burma at all levels,We are convinced that the effectiveness of our efforts is amplified by delivering the same political messages and coordinating possible actions.”

   The statement also said the EU, which extended diplomatic and economic sanctions against Burma last week, had used the Asia-Europe Meeting, or ASEM, “to press the Burmese regime to adopt a more inclusive political process and introduce a timetable for democratic reform.”

   EU foreign ministers meeting in Luxembourg last Tuesday reiterated their call for national reconciliation in Burma and expressed concern over human rights abuses and restrictions on the work of domestic and international human rights organizations in Burma.

   Neither sanctions nor constructive engagements worked out well. In fact 55 millions suffering people become the victims of geopolitics, nothing more.

Political Power Grows Out of the Barrel of a Gun

   Dear friends,

   Have you not seen that the Burma’s Fascist generals are holding bottles of Whisky on the broad grin?

   Harn Yawnghwe, our revolutionary leader and Director of the European Office for the Development of Democracy in Burma told us, “the Burmese junta believes absolutely that political power grows out of the barrel of a gun, and wants definitely to rule Burma for ever ,if possible, under its dictatorship”.

   

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场