[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    曾铮文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[曾铮文集]->[Insight into China’s boom]
曾铮文集
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(7)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(8)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(9)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(10)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(11)-美丽的瑞士小村庄
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔及其珍宝
·【图片游记】伦敦塔
·从我做陪审员的经历谈对梁彼得案的看法
·【图片游记】伦敦大学放映会
·【图片游记】芬兰:北极圈中的国度及女儿对母亲的国际营救
·"Injustice Anywhere Is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"
·《自由中国》伦敦高校放映 观众赞其将改变世界
·【图片游记】伦敦唐人街与大英博物馆
·【图片游记】艾克斯主教座堂-兼谈艺术的起源、目的和出路
·迷人的马赛老港
·《自由中国》在欧洲议会放映-新华社记者全程捧场
·一群法国人对一个中国人的“仰慕”-兼谈中国人的文化自信
·我的臺灣鄉愁
·洛杉矶“电召车”司机和他的四类华人客户
·在「末日」來臨的紐約 講述神韻的希望故事
·感悟神韻(之一)
·「財大氣粗」的孔子學院與「全球最恐怖上學路」
·感悟神韻(之二):感悟神韻的藝術風格
·感悟神韻舞蹈-感悟神韻(之三):
·感悟神韻音樂-感悟神韻(之四)
·感悟神韻聲樂-感悟神韻(之五)
·評《我不是潘金蓮》
·《致命中国》作者掌白宫贸委会 中美会爆发贸易战吗?
·快评川普总统就职典礼
·觀川普白宮發言人首次新聞發布會有感
·也談「文化自信」
·總統與媒體「幹仗」 誰贏面更大?
·評川普推特被美國國家檔案局收入歷史
·李克強買肉 Chinese Premier Li Keqiang Buying Meat
·倒行逆施的「兩高」釋法與歷史大勢
·再談「文化自信」
·童言童語
·女儿语录(2)Quote of My Daughter(2)
·女儿语录(3)Quote of My Daughter(3)
·女儿语录(4)Quote of My Daughter(4)
·女儿语录(5)Quote of My Daughter(5)
·從川普國家祈禱早餐會演講想到的
·感悟神韻(之六):感悟神韻的藝術家們
·这鸡蛋真难吃-The Egg Tastes Terrible
·女兒語錄6)Quote of My Daughter(6)
·我用書換來的最美麗聞浪漫的回報The Most Beautiful and Romantic Reward I
·有信仰與無信仰生命之區別——那個撕心裂肺的下午
·女兒語錄(7)Quote of My Daughter(7)
·女兒語錄(7)Quote of My Daughter(7)
·女兒語錄(7)Quote of My Daughter(7)
·女兒語錄(8)Quote of My Daughter(8)
·女兒語錄(8)Quote of My Daughter(8)
·女兒(毛衣)語錄(9)Quote of My Daughter(’s Sweater) (9)
·女兒(毛衣)語錄(9)Quote of My Daughter(’s Sweater) (9)
·當唐僧遭遇媒體……What Happens When You Fight Fake News?
·感悟神韻(之七):感悟神韻的觀衆反饋
·女兒語錄(10)Quote of My Daughter(10)
·女兒語錄(11)Quote of My Daughter(11)
·女兒語錄(12)Quote of My Daughter(12)
·女兒語錄(13)Quote of My Daughter(13)
·女兒語錄(14)Quote of My Daughter(14)
·女兒語錄(15)Quote of My Daughter(15)
·女兒語錄(16)Quote of My Daughter(16)
·感悟神韻(之八):神韻喚醒生命記憶
·感悟神韻(之九):感悟神韻的慈悲預警與開示(完結篇)
·女兒語錄(17)Quote of My Daughter(17)
·評川普缺席白宮記者晚宴
·川普首場國會演說中的掌聲
·舊文不舊:中共的字典里沒有「南韓」
·「不說話的右派」
·重溫童話
·最寶貴的建議與最難堪的問題 ——兼評北京新款抑制「不要臉」機器
·李克強訪澳 中領館僱人歡迎一天一百-Australian Chinese Offered $100 to W
·我是怎樣爲《靜水流深》找到英文出版社的?How Did I Find an English Lang
·曾錚學英文心得:必殺技只兩招
·曾錚演示法輪功第五套功法-神通加持法
·真材實料的造假
·曾錚學英文心得之二:方法、苦功及收穫
·女兒語錄(19)Quote of My Daughter(19)
·髒與淨的相對論 & 我是如何做到百毒不侵的?
·【十六年前的今天 】「信師信法」
·歡迎習主席有錢拿 Payment Promised for Crowd who Welcome Xi Jinping
·【曾錚快評】通知=統治?Notifying=Ruling?
·女兒語錄(20)Quote of My Daughter(20)
·十七年來的「糊塗帳」”Mysterious” Arrest
·一封差點讓我丟命的信
·正向思維又一例證
·憑什麼老是少數人挺身而出?
·曾錚的圖片故事(10)Jennifer’s Photo Stories (10)
·讀史筆記:重讀歷史之必要·帝王之言之行·鄉愁
·【對話網友】關於寫作與演講技巧
·評《三生三世十里桃花》
·評《三生三世十里桃花》续
·「繞樑三月」的美食經歷——在紐約
·Taking on the Chinese Authorities
·「三百六十行 行行出狀元」“Every Trade Has Its Master”
·Witnessing History: one woman’s fight for freedom and Falun Gong
·與《靜水流深》之恩人的聚會
·An Ordinary, But Extremely Extraordinary, Chinese-Style Mother
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Insight into China’s boom

   
   
   Insight into China’s boom
   Sandra Hattingh
   The Epoch Times – Sydney, Australia

   Recent SBS TV Insight programme “China’s Boom – will it last?” caused controversy for reasons more profound than its topic.
   The sudden withdrawal from the debate by owner and CEO of Soho property development company came as the result of a simple question: “Zhang Xin in Beijing, you’re one of the richest property developers in China, one of the country’s new billionaires. Can you give us an idea of just how big your business interests are in China?”
   General enough question, but according to author Jennifer Zeng, a former policy research consultant and former financial consultant from China, this hurried and rather panicked withdrawal speaks volumes about the shadowy secrets behind the Chinese economy.
   “The actions of this Beijing CEO tell the whole secret of the Chinese economy; that is, no billionaires or millionaires dare to make public how they have become so rich, even if their money is clean. Most money is “dark” money,” said Ms Zeng who enjoyed a successful career within China’s booming economic sector, both public and private.
   While some Insight debaters were seemingly gleeful about China’s booming economy, not so was Mobo Gao, Associate Professor of Chinese Studies at the University of Tasmania: “I think that indicates the lawlessness of the Chinese capitalism currently. Because this really means that she (Soho CEO) can’t tell the scale of business. Why she’s afraid? Because that’s how business is done in China. It’s not lawful.”
   The SBS Insight debate questioned the stability of the boom economy on which Australia heavily depends. On the SBS website promoting the debate it stated: “Australia is riding high on the resources boom, with BHP Billiton recording the biggest profit by an Australian company ever. Recent tax cuts for all Australians were funded by China’s boom. But despite China’s rise its future remains uncertain.” The reality check continues: “Behind the economic boom is a looming environmental crisis….. The growing wealth gap continues to divide the country and rampant corruption infects every part of society.”
   Ms Zeng agrees: “The bigger picture is that nobody dares to make long-term business or investment plans in China; nobody feels that his wealth and social status are stable. Today you can be a billionaire, tomorrow you could end up in jail for whatever reason. Two things are sure: no big money is decent in China, and nobody is comfortable with being exposed to the public as being too rich.”
   “Wealthy people are fearful; poor people are miserable, who see no chance at all of getting anywhere in society, and who even have problems surviving. Middle class? There is no such thing in China. With everything subject to Communist Party whims, liable to change at any time, there is no political, social or economic environment for a middle class to be formed in society”, she says.
   “The bad debt of the banks may have well risen to somewhere between 40 per cent to 60 per cent, far above the 25 per cent”bankrupt” level by the international standard. Can we perceive such a society as stable? That’s the real mind of China under this regime: not daring to face the world and tell people anything about their “business”.”
   SBS was unable to bring the debate, originally between 40 people, from Beijing as they had planned. Media visas were denied to the Insight team by the Chinese Embassy in Canberra. “Of course it could have been a bureaucratic snuffle, but I also suspect that they did not like the idea of a debate. They did not want to lose the control of the content”, explained Insight guest Dr Minxin Pei of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, USA.

此文于2006年09月17日做了修改

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场