[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[Rule of Law requires our consciousness and responsibility]
滕彪文集
·709抓捕兩週年 律師籲持續國際施壓
·挽劉曉波聯
·The Political Meaning of the Crime of “Subverting State Power”
·滕彪/夏业良:公共知识分子和自由主义
·中国民主前路研讨会/RFA
·中国流亡律师滕彪,要做黑暗中的闪电
·Selected Publications/presentations as of 2017/8
·The Costs and Risks of Fighting for Human Dignity and Freedom
·China faces split into seven parts
· A Call for Investigation Into HNA Group’s Activities in the US and L
·王全璋律师竞逐郁金香人权奖:无畏强权 勇气与付出
·〝维稳〞维到联合国?人权观察批中共
·City of Asylum -Interview
·对中共的绥靖政策已致恶果浮现
·China’s top human rights lawyer in exile to speak at Saint Michael’s
·Activist expats raise voices on China rights crackdown
·A Human Rights Lawyer Lifts the Communist Party’s Spell
·Returning to Revolution
·One-man rule? China's Xi Jinping consolidates grip on power
·劉曉波對維權律師的關注
·滕彪:中国自由民权运动与习近平时代
·Kidnap, torture, exile: Dr. Teng Biao shares his story
·維權、佔中與公民抗命
·Arrested, Assaulted and Tortured: Exiled Human Rights Lawyer Details P
·滕彪律师评论郭文贵事件的意义
·Coercive Family Planning in Linyi
·Chinese lawyers hailed as “heroes for justice”
·THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF THE DISAPPEARED
·《失踪人民共和国》
·EXEMPLARY FIGURES REPORTED BY GARIWO
·在劫难逃
·李明哲案 滕彪:陸意圖影響台灣政治籌碼
·人权律师解密北京的"水晶之夜"
·李明哲案:臺灣退無可退
·作为人类精神事件的刘晓波之死
·北京驱逐"低端"人口的制度根源
·Atrocity in the Name of the Law
·学者解析中共执政密码
·暴行,以法律的名义
·人道中国十周年纪录短片
·“中华维权律师协会”评出十佳维权律师
·中国妇权成立十周年纪念
·武统狂言背后的恐懼
·以法律名義被消失,中華失踪人民共和國
·川普公布首批人权恶棍 滕彪:震慑中共
·「蚂蚁金服」在美并购遭拒 中国官媒指不排除反制措施
·CCP is taking China towards more and more Owellian state
·中国公民社会前景:乐观还是堪忧?
·中共渗透遭美欧澳等国谴责 专家析世界格局
·Laogai, le goulag chinois
·不反思計劃生育 中國就沒有未來
·中国:溃败与希望
·Conversation on China’s human right
·Draconic Restrictions on Uyghur Cultural And Religious Freedoms
·寧添十座墳,不添一個人
· the only way seems to become more dictatorial and oppressiv
·不管藍營綠營,面對的都是「集中營
·惠台政策还是经济统战?
·专访:用李明哲案件恐吓整个台湾
·習近平進一步向毛澤
·中共專制政權威脅全世界
·新戊戌变法的变与不变
·【Documentary】China: Spies, Lies and Blackmail
·No escape: The fearful life of China's exiled dissidents
·中国异议人士逃抵西方仍难脱离中共监控威胁
·The State of Human Rights Lawyers in China
·权益组织:电视认罪—一场中国官方导演的大戏
·温良学者 正义卫士(一)
·Has Xi Jinping Changed China? Not Really
·訪滕彪律師談中共政權對於全世界民主自由人權發展的負面影響
·中共绑架中国
·美国务院发布人权报告 点名批评中国等八国
·滕彪,温良学者 正义卫士(二)——发出不同的声音
·鸿茅药酒:中共制度之毒
·on televised confessions
·滕彪,温良学者 正义卫士(三)——挑战恶法 虽败犹荣
·温良学者 正义卫士(四)——铁骨也柔情
·温良学者 正义卫士(五)——黑暗中的闪电
·美两党议员推法案 要求调查中共渗透/NTD
·Video【Teng Biao: From 1989 to 1984】
·第二届藏港台圆桌会 中国律师表态支持自决权
·自由民主與自決權:第二屆藏港台圓桌會議
·Exiled in the U.S., a Lawyer Warns of ‘China’s Long Arm’
·端传媒滕彪专访:一个曾经的依法维权者,怎么看今日中国?
·VOA:川金会上 人权问题真的被忽略了吗?
·“中国的长臂”:滕彪审视西方机构对华自我审查
·中国长臂迫使西方机构公司自我审查/RFA
·美退出人权理事会 滕彪呼吁应将人权与经贸利益挂钩
·“中国政治转变的可能前景”研讨会纪要
·滕彪:川普退出人权理事会是为人权?西藏、新疆民族自决
· The Second China human rights lawyers day
·第二届“中国人权律师节”将于7月8日在纽约举行
·【video】A message from a Chinese human rights lawyer
·【RFA中国热评】美中贸易战、 “七五”、“709案”
·回顾709案:中国迫害律师的第三波高潮
·中国人权律师节力赞人权律师的意义
·高智晟、王全璋获颁首届中国人权律师奖
·Chinese rights lawyers and international support
·高智晟王全璋纽约获人权律师奖 亲友代领
·709大抓捕三周年 境内外纷有声援行动/RFA
·Forced disappearances
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Rule of Law requires our consciousness and responsibility

   
   
   Rule of Law requires our consciousness and responsibility---An open letter to Chinese representatives in the Congress on the Law of the World
   
   Gao Zhisheng, Xu Zhiyong, and Teng Biao

   On Sep. 8th, 2005
   
   
   Dear Chinese representatives,
   How are you?
   We, as Chinese attorneys and scholars of law, have the same dream of “Building a Harmonious Society and Rule of Law in China” as you.
   Harmonious Society depends on democracy and rule of law, which is the essential lesson we learned from the civilization throughout history. We are delighted to see that you and other scholars of law from the world stand together to discuss democracy and rule of law in Beijing. You are carrying the dreams of millions of Chinese people that in the near future they can enjoy democracy, rule of law, human rights, and freedom as in other countries.
   However, at this flourishing and passionate moment, when you, as the representatives of Chinese attorneys and scholars, are giving presentations to the world, when Xiao Yang, the Judge of the High Court, is discussing the recent progress of rule by law in China, please do not forget the real situation outside of the Congress. Forgive us that we have to point out the reality now.
   Please remember that even today when you are gathering together for the meeting, there are a series of tragedies occuring in China.
   Citizens Guoqing Chen and other three people from HeBei province ChengDe city were imprisoned on suspicion of robbery and homicide in 1994. From then on, thirteen attorneys and several first-class jurists have represented them and pleaded not guilty. Without any solid evidence, Guoqing Chen etc. were sentenced to death five times and now they are still in prison. In fact, we already found the real murderer- we had presented his detailed plots, tools, and evidence to the High Court and the police department; yet nobody cares. Guoqing Chen and the other three still do not see any chance to be freed so far (see details at www.xianzhengchina.org). In 2005, do you notice how many cases are exposed by media and how many cases of injustice are still under covered? Which kind of responsibility do you think you should take when these innocent Chinese citizens are struggling for help?
   In June 2003, the local government of Yulin city in ShanXi province seized oil wells from independent drillers and had them nationalized by force. The independent drillers and investors elected their own legal representatives to protect their interests, but their case was rejected by Shan Xi provincial High court. In May 2005, police arrested twelve investors for protesting, and a Beijing-based lawyer Mr. JiuHu Zhu was also detained after filing the lawsuit against the Shanxi government on the investors'behalf. Mr. Zhu right now is still in prison. In fact, with help from local courts and police department, the Yunlin government took over the one billion dollar business from sixty thousand private investors in several days by force. The so called “legal government” ignored the legal process, and deprived any rights from the opposing party. The most unbelievable thing is that they still believe that anyone against them is their political enemy, so they will arrest whoever protests, files law suit, and represents the private investors, even the lawyers. Recently more people got arrested. They challenged not only the civil rights of Chinese people, but also the constitution and the great prospect of Rule of Law. How come we still can hold ourselves aloof from the world?
   In March 2004, Yu Huafeng, the associate-chief-editor and chief manager of Southern Metropolis News, and Li Minying, the former board member of the social committee in Southern Daily Newspaper Group, were found guilty and sentenced to prison for bribery and embezzlement. But the crystal clear truth is that the so called “embezzlement” is just a year-end bonus for Yu Huafeng, and the bribery the reward Minying Li got from the News group. It was such a routine procedure for a market-oriented multi-media group, but became the excuse of the local Guangdong provincial government to gain revenge for the exposure of the case of Sun Zhigang, a college graduate and graphic designer who was beaten to death while in police administrative detention, and the case of SARS. The local legal system produced the case of injustice, but refused to justify it. How can we pretend we don't know about it?
    From April to August in 2005, the “One Child Policy” was brutally enforced by the Linyi city officials in ShanDong province - false fines, illegal detentions, and the extortion of confessions by torture etc. To prevent their brutality from exposure, they put the human right activist Mr. GuangCheng Chen who is blind home confined. Mr. Chen escaped from their watch and came to Beijing to report their violations of human rights to the media. On Sep. 6th, 2005, when the Congress on the Law of the World kicks off in Beijing, Mr. Chen was beaten by a group of people without identity and abducted back to Shangdong province illegally. Now Mr. Chen is under security watch at home by more than ten people in every minute. How can we still call our society a harmonious society?
   In August 2005, some villagers in Tai-Shi of Panyu district in GuangZhou proposed to dismiss the village committee due to their corruption. The legal procedure was rejected by the local government. With no valid legal help, some villages went on a hunger strike. The local government responded by arresting those on the hunger strike. Until today, they are still fighting for their civil rights.
   In concordance with the cases of injustice, we are facing the status quo power, brutal and unfair legal system in China. Those interest groups with privileges submit themselves to the superior political power, which makes the enforcement of the constitution impossible. We found that all kinds of new laws are made everyday, but in the meantime the enforcement of laws is so superficial and inefficient. In those cases we presented above, the local governments ignored completely and brutally deprived the civil rights of the opposing parties, and made no response to their legal prosecutions. The courts published legal explanations of why these cases are dismissed one after another in order to protect the privileges of the government. Such type of behavior is the bane of the nation, the country, and human civilization. As the lawyers and attorneys and the people of the great nation, we shall take our responsibilities to deal with it. We can not turn away from the cruel reality that so many injustices are happening everywhere and everyday. Maybe you don't need to talk about it, but please don't forget your consciousness at the bottom of your heart, otherwise there is no hope and no future for the whole country.
   We witness the miseries, so we realize that it is a long way to build the rule of law, but it is our unavoidable duty. Please remember it and act accordingly. The history will record what is happening righteously.
   
   Translated by Xiaorong, 11/08/2005

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场