百家争鸣
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人]
郭国汀律师专栏
·Dr Wang Wenyi will be remembered by history as a great courage hero
·法轮功是比中共有过之无不及的一人专制吗?-答谭嗣同先生
·法轮功讲真相无罪
·郭国汀:对法轮功学员的劳教、判刑是非法行为
·郭国汀介绍为法轮功学员打官司的曲折经历
·质疑张千帆教授对法轮功的评价 郭国汀
·宣誓证词Affidavit
·中共一贯谎言连篇是个地道的骗子党!
·中共下达密文奥运成迫害最大借口
·中国著名人权律师从为法轮功辩护看中共践踏法律(图)
·郭国汀律师批评中共奧運前加劇迫害法輪功
·郭国汀律师呼吁台湾政府予吴亚林政治庇护
·郭国汀律师称中共持续非法迫害法轮功及其辩护律师
·答Gavin0919郭国汀是法轮功走狗之指控
***(3)郭国汀为法轮功辩护的专访
·专访郭国汀律师(上) :为法轮功辩护
·专访郭国汀律师(下) :回首不言悔
·RFA:郭国汀介绍为法轮功学员打官司的曲折经历
·自由亞洲電台专访郭國汀谈為法輪功學員打官司
·希望之声郭国汀专访:对法轮功学员的劳教、判刑是非法行为
***(三)郭国汀律师为郑恩宠抗辩
·我为郑恩宠律师抗辩的前前后后
·为郑恩宠案翟明磊等中国新闻记者六君子的声明
·敬请关注郑恩宠律师所谓"非法获取国家秘密罪"一案
·历史将证明郑恩宠律师无罪/郭国汀
·郑恩宠案二审辩护词及网友评论/郭国汀
·关于会见在押的郑恩宠的第二次申请函
·郑恩宠律师“为境外非法提供国家秘密罪”一审判决书
·上海市高级法院郑恩宠案刑事裁定书
·郑恩宠冤案再审案至全国律协诸位会长之公开函/郭国汀
·中国最需要像郑恩宠这样的律师
·诽谤郑恩宠律师的中共党奴及特务名录
·再谈郑恩宠案 郭国汀倡律师网上辩护
·我为郑恩宠辩护的前前后后 郭国汀
·上海普通市民感受的郑恩宠大律师
·关于郑恩宠案我的声明
·我为郑恩宠律师辩护
·一切源于郑恩宠案,可敬的国安兄弟请自重!
·郑恩宠聘请辩护人的真相
·郑恩宠聘请辩护律师真相之二
·真为这位北京律师脸红!
·张思之大律师冒着酷暑赴看守所会见郑恩宠
·上海监狱当局婉拒郑恩宠的辩护律师会见
·关于会见在押的郑恩宠的第二次申请函
·揭开“时代精英“画皮
·答时代精英,
·再答时代精英教导
·向张思之律师,郑恩宠律师学习,致敬!
·南郭:仗义执言的律师还是没良心的律师
·驳“文律”兄郑案高论/南郭
·中国最需要像郑恩宠这样的律师
·凡跟郭国汀贴者一律入选黑名单
·批驳李洪东之首恶律师说!
·历史岂容任意伪造!
·惊闻郑恩宠律师夫人蒋美丽被拘捕!
·郑恩宠案二审会维持原判,辩护律师难辞其咎。
·求名求利的律师代表
·答L君之三项基本原则
·郑恩宠案网友评论
·网友支持或反对郑恩宠的评论
·支持或反对郑恩宠的网友评论之二
·中国律师声援支持郑恩宠
·吴国策律师:“求名求利的律师代表——某律师的心里”系他人盗名发表的声明
·中国律师声援支持郑恩宠律师
·网警\网友\特务与郑恩宠案
·郑恩宠律师的最后一篇代理词
·关于记者杨金志、陈斌严重侵犯郑恩宠律师名誉权的律师函
·郭国汀律师如果你还是个真正的男人的话,请你勇于承担败诉的责任。
·郑恩宠案上海当局特务什么下流无耻的手段皆用
·谋害郑恩宠的凶手是谁?
·郑恩宠案上海高院驳回上诉后网友们的评论
·请记住一位伟大的律师英雄——郑恩宠/郭国汀
***(四)香港联中公司与厦门国际贸易信托投资公司国际贸易争议再审案
·司法腐败的典型案例
·最高法院无理拖宕九年拒不下判再审案代理词
·反了你!竟敢不尊敬我大法官!
·就十五载官司致最高法院法官的公开函
·中国法官如何让吾尊敬/南郭
·最高法院的院长们为何威胁郭国汀律师?
***(五)涉外亿元合同诈骗案
·涉港“亿元”合同诈骗案之辩护词/郭国汀
·惊心动魄的辩护
·涉外亿元诈骗案致有关负责人的公开函
·致福建省委、省政府各位领导及福州市委、市府各位负责人的公开信
·关于本司与福州市粮油公司贸易纠纷案及因此而被无辜拘留、逮捕者至福州市、福建省、中国政府、公安、检察各部门负责人公开函:
·亿元合同诈骗案至福州市市长函
·亿元合同诈骗案至福州市委书记函
·关于亿元合同诈骗案至福州市委书记的函
·亿元合同诈骗案至中央政法委书记紧急呼吁函
·福州市公安局插手涉港经济纠纷造成海内外不良影响事
·亿元合同诈骗案郭国汀律师与龚雄副市长会谈备忘录
***(59)(五)郭国汀律师名案劲辩
***(1)政治良心案
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人

中国是国际网络表达自由的头号敌人
   欧洲议会于七月六日通过一项决议将中国列为国际互联网表达自由的头号敌人;同时谴责Yahoo, Google and Microsoft助肘为虐。 “a number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report, including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam. ” “whereas Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services in the Chinese internet market;”
   Texts adopted by Parliament
   
   Thursday 6 July 2006 - Strasbourg Provisional edition
   Freedom of expression on the Internet P6_TA-PROV(2006)0324 B6-0401, 0402,
   0404, 0408, 0411 and 0414/2006
   
   European Parliament resolution on freedom of expression on the Internet
   The European Parliament ,
   - having regard to its previous annual resolutions on the situation of
   human rights in the world,
   - having regard to its previous resolutions on human rights and freedom of
   the press and on the evaluation of the World Summit on the Information
   Society held in Tunisia in December 2005,
   - having regard to Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human
   Rights,
   - having regard to Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights,
   - having regard to the EU Guidelines on Human Rights Dialogue (2001) and
   on Human Rights Defenders (2004) and their first evaluation under Austrian
   Presidency,
   - having regard to the Declaration of Principles adopted by the World
   Summit on the Information Society on 12 December 2003
   - having regard to the Joint Declaration of 21 December 2005 by the UN
   Special Rapporteur on Freedom of Opinion and Expression, the OSCE
   Representative on Freedom of the Media and the OAS Special Rapporteur on
   Freedom of Expression,
   - having regards to the EU policy on human rights and democratisation in
   third countries adopted by the Council in December 2005,
   - having regard to the European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights
   (EIDHR),
   - having regard to Rule 115 of its Rules of Procedure,
   A. whereas Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights states
   that everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right
   includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive
   and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of
   frontiers;
   B. welcoming the statement of the World Summit in Tunis of 16-18 November
   2005 on the primary importance of the information society for democracy and
   respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms; in particular the freedom
   of expression and opinion, as well as the freedom to receive and access
   information;
   C. whereas the fight for freedom of expression has today largely shifted
   on-line as the Internet has become a mean of expression of choice for
   political dissidents, democracy activists, human rights defenders and
   independent journalists worldwide;
   D. whereas access to the Internet can strengthen democracy and contribute
   to a country's economic and social development and restricting such access
   is incompatible with the right to freedom of expression;
   E. whereas restrictions should only exist in cases of using the Internet
   for illegal activities, such as incitement to hatred, violence and racism,
   totalitarian propaganda and children's access to pornography or their sexual
   exploitation;
   F. whereas, according to Reporters Without Borders, authoritarian regimes
   and governments have been working on ever more far-reaching methods of
   controlling the Internet, chiefly using more and more sophisticated
   filtering technology and surveillance of electronic communications and
   setting-up cyber-police;
   G. whereas, according to human rights organisations, a large number of
   cyber-dissidents are detained in prison - most of them in China - including
   Hao Wu, Chinese blogger and documentary filmmaker, Yang Zili, Chinese
   cyber-dissident, Shi Tao, Chinese journalist at the daily Dangdai Shangbao,
   Motjaba Saminejad, Iranian blogger, Mohammed Abbou, Tunisian lawyer, Pham
   Hong Son, Vietnamese doctor and Habib Saleh, Syrian online journalist;
   whereas the most recent cases concern the Egyptian bloggers Mohamed Sharkawy
   and Karim Lel-shaer;
   H. whereas a number of countries can be seen as enemies of freedom of
   expression on-line as stated in the last Reporters Without Borders report,
   including China, Belarus, Burma, Cuba, Iran, Libya, Maldives, Nepal, North
   Korea, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan and Vietnam.
   I. whereas companies based in democratic States partly provide these
   countries the means to censor the web and to monitor electronic
   communication;
   J. whereas Chinese government has successfully persuaded companies such as
   Yahoo, Google and Microsoft to facilitate the censorship of their services
   in the Chinese internet market; also notes that other governments have
   required the means for censorship from other companies;
   K. whereas equipment and technologies supplied by Western companies such
   as CISCO Systems, Telecom Italia, Wanadoo, a subsidiary of France Telecom
   have been used by governments for the purpose of censoring the Internet
   preventing freedom of expression;
   L. whereas US legislators introduced a bill in February 2006, the Global
   On-line Freedom Act, aimed at regulating the activities of Internet
   businesses when they operate in repressive countries;
   M. whereas the EU should demonstrate that the rights of Internet users are
   at the heart of its concerns and that it is ready to act to promote free
   speech on-line;
   1. Reaffirms the fact that freedom of expression is a key value shared by
   all EU countries and that they have to take concrete steps to defend it;
   2. Calls, in this respect, on the Council and the EU Member States to agree
   on a joint statement confirming their commitment in favour of the protection
   of the rights of internet users and of the promotion of free expression on
   the internet world-wide;
   3. Reiterates its commitment to the principles which were confirmed at the
   Tunis Summit, viz.:
    - building the information society on the basis of human rights and
   fundamental freedoms,
    - combating the digital divide and seeking resources for action plans to
   foster development,
    - developing Internet governance arrangements which are more balanced,
   pluralist and representative of the States involved, to meet the new
   technological challenges (spamming, data protection, etc.);
   4. Strongly condemns restrictions on Internet content, whether they apply
   to the dissemination or to the receipt of information, that are imposed by
   Governments and are not in strict conformity with the guarantee of freedom
   of expression; strongly condemns the harassment and imprisonment of
   journalists and others who are expressing their opinions on the Internet;
   calls, in this respect, on the Council and the Commission to take all
   necessary measures vis-à-vis the authorities of the concerned countries for
   the immediate release of all detained Internet users;
   5. Calls on the Commission and the Council to draw up a voluntary code of
   conduct that would put limits on the activities of companies in repressive
   countries;
   6. Calls on the Commission and the Council to maintain the presence and
   active participation of the EU and the presentation of common positions
   especially with ECOSOC, ITU, UNESCO and UNDP;
   7. Calls on the Council and the Commission when considering its assistance
   programmes to third countries to take into account the need for unrestricted
   Internet access by their citizens;
   8. Welcomes the Joint Investor Statement on Freedom of Expression and the
   Internet at the initiative of Reporters Without Borders; stresses that
   corporations which provide Internet searching, chat, publishing or other
   services should have a responsibility to ensure that the rights of users are
   respected;
   9. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the
   Commission, and the governments and parliaments of the Member States

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场