政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[貌强:Keep Burma's Seat Vacant]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·缅甸国内外形势说变就变?
·缅甸掸族领袖如何看昂山素姬和登盛政府
·独裁者守望台对“新缅甸”的评价
·赛万赛对缅甸局势是否太乐观?
·掸公主 Sao Noan Oo 对英国有话说
·佤邦联合军保家卫邦不怕空袭
·匈牙利布达佩斯一日游
·捷克布拉格一日游
·缅军与克钦军交火不断 中国参与斡旋
·赠神州红尘众生的锵锵劝世良言
·忆10年前云南8日游
·最美教师张丽莉与日日向善的中国人民
·最美司机48岁吴斌
·普世價值的中國先知——方励之
·谈白岩松与昂山素姬为民请命
·悼六四硬汉李旺阳被“自杀”
·温教授貌强谈若开宗教种族暴乱
·谈缅甸古今大小民族主义
·1962年缅甸学生七七惨案
·缅甸前国防总长谈罗兴迦人来龙去脉
·赛万赛谈登盛政府一年多政绩
·温教授点评大缅族主义/缅甸军队
·嚴家其谈中国民主法治轉型
·掸邦众族民主联盟昆吞武讲话
·缅甸众少数民族点评停战和谈
·罗兴迦悲剧迴光返照众生相
·给8888学生领袖哥哥基的公开信
·赛万赛盛赞登盛总统最近言行
·缅甸民主同盟DAB对和解停战声明
·掸邦进步党成立41周年纪念
·缅甸2012年五大民主服务奖章得主
·缅甸联邦众土族在泰缅边境开会
·缅甸联邦众土族开会声明
·掸邦众族民主联盟主席昆吞武赴美领奖
·美国之音访问掸邦民主联盟主席昆吞武
·缅甸有了选举就成真正民主国家吗?
·赛万赛点评昂山素姬与吴登盛总统
·温教授点评昂山素姬与吴登盛总统
·廉萨空博士回缅甸参加研讨会
·赛万赛谈缅族缅邦一分为七
·鲍彤吁温总出面澄清家族财富
·缅甸若开邦又爆发新暴力冲突
·温教授痛斥大缅族主义祸国殃民
·从外援谈到非缅族众原住民的权益
·转基因与新瘟疫SARS
·中国缅甸油气管道
·美国逼中国在其中国近海包围圈开战
·缅甸南传佛教禅修法
· 中华民族复兴的四大步骤
·昂山素姬面对“中國問題”严厉考验
·未来20年两大权力转移
·马英九与昂山素姬关心刘晓波
·莫言的自述与诺贝尔委员会的评价
·襄助缅甸,中国能比美国做得更多
·神州边防武警见义勇为,海外炎黄子孙惊喜交集
·缅甸非政府众组织反对中缅油气管道与深水港
·震惊大陆法庭的法轮功辩护词
·諾貝獎得主134人聯名要求釋放劉曉波
·勿忘邓小平上世纪末10点警告
·缺维生素B2易患痔疮溃疡肿瘤癌症
·让戒定慧佛光普照缅甸大地
·热烈欢呼粟秀玉老师荣获缅甸佛学奖!
·2013年初谈缅甸缅甸人中国中国人
·缅甸中国必须互利双赢
·缅甸卑谬世界文化遗产一日游
·骠族老同学谈眼皮下缅甸红尘
·骠族老同学谈眼皮下缅甸红尘!
·缅甸政府与众少数民族半世纪内战复燃
·中缅边境军民要以正视听
·缅甸蒲甘世界文化遗产一日游(1)
·缅甸中国边民有话说
·缅甸蒲甘世界文化遗产一日游(续1)
·绝密档案 招标中标 鸡的屁
·少吃长寿送煤气炉
·缅甸海归谈缅甸中国关系
·昂山素姬弃美投华?
·铜矿村民愤概昂山素姬调查报告
·缅甸斗士海归责怪昂山素姬
·独裁观察家点评昂山素姬
·缅甸评论家奉劝昂山素姬
·于建嵘与柴静的中国梦
·美国反式脂肪与中国粮油食品奶粉
·缅甸会成卢旺达第二吗?
·中国贪官与美国梦
·诺奖得主的健康长寿秘诀
·古人的劳逸养生与食疗
·中国摩登僧尼与时俱进
·中华五千年文明遗产馆
·吴内昂谈缅甸2008年宪法与人权
·与中国渐行渐远的缅甸
·为老外所描述的中国人而痛哭
·科学地话说杨桃
·中国人为何多会早死
·奥巴马应赦免斯诺登
·推荐斯诺登为诺贝尔和平奖候选人!
·习近平贺马英九当选国民党主席
·旅美华人谈美国生活和房价
·经济动物在英国皇家音乐厅表演
·中缅天然气管道开始向中国通气了!
·建滇缅公路为中印经济走廊
·赛万赛谈和平奋斗建真正缅甸联邦
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
貌强:Keep Burma's Seat Vacant

   By Dr. Tayza - London, UK

   Translated by Maung Chan (Burma’s Chinese)

   Note by Maung Chan:Dr.Tayza Thuria is a patriotic Burmese medical doctor as well as a human rights activist of Burma, currently in London, England.

   He publishes “the Burma Digest”, a campaign journal for democracy, human rights and federalism in Burma, with Prof. Kanbawza Win as patron, Ko Htun Aung Gyaw, Sai Wansai, Dr. David Law and Dr. Win Naing as board of advisors, Khin Ma Ma Myo, Lwin Aung Soe, Ko Ko Thett, San Oo Aung, Tai Samyone, Feraya Nangmone, Ko Moses as think-tank, and Raluca Enescu as international coordinator.

   Some editorials and wonderful articles of “the Burma Digest” have been translated on time into Chinese language by Burma’s Chinese and published in the world’s Chinese media, So some Chinese people of Taiwan, Singapore, Hongkong, Macau , China as well as U.S.A and Canada have read them and thus know “the Burma Digest” .

   The follwing is Dr. Tayza’s article, which has been translated into Chinese and published worldwide in the Chinese media .

Keep Burma's Seat Vacant

   By Dr. Tayza - London, UK

   In September, the sixth Asia Europe Summit Meeting will be held in Helsinki. During its EU Presidency, Finland will have the honor of hosting the sixth ASEM Summit. But will it be really honorable, we have to consider here.

   As a forum for informal dialogue between the Heads of State and Government of EU countries and South East Asian countries plus China, Japan and Korea, ASEM is a very plausible process to improve cooperation and understanding between Asia and Europe.

   But the problem is that sometimes Asian values and western values are quite different. Many an Asian Governments assume that their people should be happy and contented as long as they are fed, clothed and sheltered well, even though they don't have democracy, human rights and civil liberties.

   Some Asian Governments are never shy to brag about their belief that their authoritarian rules are very effective for expanding their economies and enlarging their trade surpluses over Europe and America, where democratic but weak governments are fussing too much about human rights and labor rights.

   When the two sides of a discussion forum are very different in their fundamental principles and values, it is just natural that controversies can arise frequently.

   One main controversy that arises whenever an ASEM summit is held is the issue of Burma. What to do with Burma and how to deal with Burma’s military regime.

   When the idea of a summit meeting between EU and Asian countries was first floated by Singapore in 1994, some East Asian countries were enjoying double digit economic growth rates and the Association of South East Asian Nations was inspiring to become the EU of Asia, with all ten countries in the region as its members. And Burma became a member of ASEAN in 1997.

   ASEAN with a wishful thinking hoped that they would be able to coax Burmese military dictators towards sincere democratic reforms, and so they embraced Burma as a member in ASEAN. And with the same false hope, they pushed for Burma's attendance in ASEM summits, but their European counter-parts declined to accept Burma's attendance, in the past.

   At the time of ASEM 2 summit, which was held in London in 1998, Amnesty International warned EU leaders, "Rather than sidelining human rights from the summit, the EU should be operating an ethical development policy at ASEM summit. Economic rescue packages, financial aid and business investment should be within the framework of ethical principles, so that human rights in the region are guaranteed both in the short and long term."

   And so Burma didn't get a chance to attend ASEM 2 in London, the city with the mother of all democratic parliaments at its centre.

   And Burma also was not allowed to participate in ASEM 3 in the year 2000.

   But then the dawn of 21st century saw Burma starting production of huge amounts of natural gas from its off-shore gas fields. And EU policy on Burma's attendance in ASEM started to change accordingly_ not very surprising.

   And Burmese military regime was allowed to attend the fourth ASEM summit in Denmark in 2002. But, thanks to Danish love for democracy, Denmark government refused to give entry visas to Burmese military officials. God Bless the Danes.

   But, it seems, Denmark's brave and bold move to reject visa clearance for Burmese military officials coming to ASEM 4 left some oil-and-gas hungry European powers bitterly disappointed. And so they started making preparations to make sure that Burma comes to future ASEM meetings in Europe.

   And they hired regime apologists to make up a report, which when it came out in April 2005 not surprisingly endorsed business engagements with Burma's military regime, one of the worst dictatorships in the world and notorious for its corruption, its total disregard for human rights and its genocide on ethnic minorities in the country.

   And since then pro-regime lobbyists in Europe started proposing that in emergency situations Europe-wide travel ban on Burmese military officials could be exempted. But, for what kind of emergency situations are visa-bans exempted, allowing Burmese military regime officials to come to ASEM 6 summit in Helsinki? Probably the fact that Chinese, Indian, Korean and Japanese companies making huge profits out of Burma's gas fields is prompting a sense of urgency among European businessmen.

   But, in fact, Europe was the birth place of the principles of democracy, civil rights and labour rights. And nowadays, apart from a few former Soviet countries, the entire Europe is rich and democratic_ a shining example of the fact that democracy goes hand in hand with stability and prosperity.

   But when we look at ASEM 6 summit's agenda, although there are business related issues to be discussed such as energy security, globalisation, competitiveness and structural changes in the global economy, not a single word is mentioned about democratization and promotion of human rights around the world_ perhaps to avoid causing embarrassment to the summit's Special Guests of Hounor, Burmese military generals. How sad!

   Europe's esteemed democratic values should not be tainted by the greed of some European businessmen and oil companies.

   ASEAN made the same mistake ten years ago. They expected a win-win situation of doing business with Burma 's military regime and persuading them at the same time to make democratic reforms. But in the end, Burmese generals' persistence in resisting international pressure for democratic reforms made ASEAN lose face with international community.

   ASEAN leaders, becoming too uncomfortable with losing too much credibility in international community because of Burmese generals, have recently decided not to allow Burma take ASEAN chair until Burma has sorted out it domestic problems. In other words they are keeping Burma 's chair in ASEAN vacant.

   Why not Finnish government follow suite? Why can't they keep Burma 's seat in ASEM vacant?

   The Danes have bravely shown that they don't like disgusting murderous military dictators coming to their country. Why the Finns are welcoming the same disgusting murderous military dictators into their country? Do the Finns need more gas and oil than the Danes? Or they just care less about democracy and human rights?

   Let us repeat here: Europe’s esteemed democratic values should not be tainted by the greed of some European businessmen and oil companies.

   Please leave Burma’s seat vacant in ASEM, and ASEAN, and if possible leave it vacant even in the United Nations General Assembly.

   Please keep it vacant until there is a democratically elected civilian government which respect human rights of all people and autonomy of ethnic people in Burma .

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场