政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[貌强:Keep Burma's Seat Vacant]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·缅甸僧侣和平示威,丹瑞大将心乱如麻
·缅甸和平示威扩大,丹瑞家人领先逃亡
·反对无理威胁和平集会与游行
·缅甸民族委员会NCUB 对广大士兵的呼吁
·缅甸联邦民族委员会告人民书-3
·SDU’S STATEMENT ON RECENT SPDC’S CRACKDOWN/貌强
·SDU对军政府最近开枪镇压的声明
·缅甸军政府凶杀案将告国际刑事法庭
·恢复掸邦委员会支持缅甸僧侣与民众
·缅侨向联合国与国际机构火急呼救!
·制止缅甸军政府杀害僧侣学生民众
·请求教皇给缅甸人民雪中送炭
·缅甸医生专业医务人员呼吁总罢工
·教皇雪中送炭:为缅甸苦难人民祈祷
·正义要伸张!公道要讨回!
·众土族委员会ENC对缅甸当前局势的声明
·缅甸的华人悲歌
·缅侨恳求中国在安理会勿再投否决票
·全缅学生民主先锋谈缅甸危机
·缅甸律师委员会对甘巴里《缅甸报告》的看法
·缅甸民族委员会NCUB欢迎安理会声明
·缅甸当前急务纵横观
·感谢德国人民支持缅甸和平正义斗争
·缅甸动乱,丹瑞大将有话说
·缅甸众土族国际公开大学AEIOU急需捐款
·缅甸丹瑞大帝狞笑睥睨自豪
·老战友 Prof. Win 的心底话
·毒品枭雄昆沙盖棺论定
·老战友还有话说
·缅甸众土族最欢迎昂山素姬声明
·韩永贵在捷克国会的缅甸问题讲话
·众合法土族政党支持联合国代表代发的昂山素姬声明
·缅甸和平民主阵线10月18日声明
·人权特使会成为甘巴里第二吗?
·与韩永贵漫谈丹瑞昂山素姬走向
·赛万赛笑缅甸军政府杀一儆百
·对掸邦昆沙的另类盖棺论定
·缅甸丹瑞大帝笑评东盟宪章
·缅甸大帝与总理谈东盟来龙去脉
·缅甸众土族委员会拜访印度观察家研究基金会
·缅甸众土族委员会答印度记者问
·苦修我不入地狱谁入地狱的缅甸高僧
·巴瓯民族解放组织支持昂山素姬声明
·缅甸丹瑞大帝2007年12月3日语录
·缅甸民族委员会欢呼美国HR3890号制裁决议
·缅甸问题根源是彬龙精神不见了
·克伦族谴责缅甸种族灭绝内战
·缅甸丹瑞大帝笑骂民主
·缅甸学运领袖波昂觉永垂不朽!
·缅甸联邦土族与少数民族问题
·缅甸各族欢呼联合国原住民权利宣言
·缅甸若开邦人民致函联合国
·纪念缅甸独立节60周年
·缅甸掸族公主痛斥军政府
·缅甸土族哭祭60周年独立节
·古来稀大哥的前列腺毛病
·缅甸僧伽与人民,是鱼水关系
·缅甸僧伽们入世行动了
·钦族阵线谈印度与缅甸军政府
·缅甸民族委员会08年元月24日声明
·缅甸掸族拟加入众土族委员会ENC
·缅甸掸族领袖赛万赛答缅甸文摘问
·由红色高棉想到缅甸军政府
·缅甸掸族的61周年掸邦节
·克伦族掸族领袖游说欧盟6年15次
·平等、民主、发展——救缅甸!
·与赛万赛谈2008年初缅甸局势
·缅甸联邦民族委员会对曼侠被杀害之声明
·人倒下,但曼侠英魂永远活着!
·缅甸革命师生痛失曼侠学兄
·曼侠名列缅甸军政府刺杀单
·谈缅甸国民大会、公投、普选
·美国教授讲缅甸的过去现在未来
·反对缅甸5月公投与2010年普选?
·国际缅甸僧伽总会拜访海牙UNPO
·正视缅甸宪法公投与大选
·缅甸问题以和为贵、利民为本
·缅甸独裁政府——你不打,他不倒!
·缅甸联邦民族委员会有关“宪法公投”声明
·国民党马与民进党谢的选后感言
·温教授评缅甸公投与大选
·NCUB的缅甸反法西斯63周年声明
·达赖喇嘛发表“对全球华人的呼吁”
·“黃金甲--詩篇”
·寒竹点评 “达赖言论”
·缅甸另两大力量对宪法公决的声明
·缅甸在野另七党派反对宪法公决
·给斯宾诺莎的信
·缅甸在野众党派对停战集团的呼吁
·请国际监察员来缅甸察督全民公投
·缅甸钦族委员会第二周年大会声明
·分离运动与自决权问题
·缅甸僧伽新年祈祷民主快来
·Burmese Monks Pray for Democracy
·达赖、缅藏、僧伽喇嘛、背后黑手
·UNPO第九届大会将在欧洲议会召开
·缅甸僧伽昭告人民书
·缅甸国内外僧伽民众4月26日反宪法公投
·缅甸工联FTUB向国际控诉
·缅甸联邦民族委员会五一劳动节声明
·中国学者谈缅甸民主前景
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
貌强:Keep Burma's Seat Vacant

   By Dr. Tayza - London, UK

   Translated by Maung Chan (Burma’s Chinese)

   Note by Maung Chan:Dr.Tayza Thuria is a patriotic Burmese medical doctor as well as a human rights activist of Burma, currently in London, England.

   He publishes “the Burma Digest”, a campaign journal for democracy, human rights and federalism in Burma, with Prof. Kanbawza Win as patron, Ko Htun Aung Gyaw, Sai Wansai, Dr. David Law and Dr. Win Naing as board of advisors, Khin Ma Ma Myo, Lwin Aung Soe, Ko Ko Thett, San Oo Aung, Tai Samyone, Feraya Nangmone, Ko Moses as think-tank, and Raluca Enescu as international coordinator.

   Some editorials and wonderful articles of “the Burma Digest” have been translated on time into Chinese language by Burma’s Chinese and published in the world’s Chinese media, So some Chinese people of Taiwan, Singapore, Hongkong, Macau , China as well as U.S.A and Canada have read them and thus know “the Burma Digest” .

   The follwing is Dr. Tayza’s article, which has been translated into Chinese and published worldwide in the Chinese media .

Keep Burma's Seat Vacant

   By Dr. Tayza - London, UK

   In September, the sixth Asia Europe Summit Meeting will be held in Helsinki. During its EU Presidency, Finland will have the honor of hosting the sixth ASEM Summit. But will it be really honorable, we have to consider here.

   As a forum for informal dialogue between the Heads of State and Government of EU countries and South East Asian countries plus China, Japan and Korea, ASEM is a very plausible process to improve cooperation and understanding between Asia and Europe.

   But the problem is that sometimes Asian values and western values are quite different. Many an Asian Governments assume that their people should be happy and contented as long as they are fed, clothed and sheltered well, even though they don't have democracy, human rights and civil liberties.

   Some Asian Governments are never shy to brag about their belief that their authoritarian rules are very effective for expanding their economies and enlarging their trade surpluses over Europe and America, where democratic but weak governments are fussing too much about human rights and labor rights.

   When the two sides of a discussion forum are very different in their fundamental principles and values, it is just natural that controversies can arise frequently.

   One main controversy that arises whenever an ASEM summit is held is the issue of Burma. What to do with Burma and how to deal with Burma’s military regime.

   When the idea of a summit meeting between EU and Asian countries was first floated by Singapore in 1994, some East Asian countries were enjoying double digit economic growth rates and the Association of South East Asian Nations was inspiring to become the EU of Asia, with all ten countries in the region as its members. And Burma became a member of ASEAN in 1997.

   ASEAN with a wishful thinking hoped that they would be able to coax Burmese military dictators towards sincere democratic reforms, and so they embraced Burma as a member in ASEAN. And with the same false hope, they pushed for Burma's attendance in ASEM summits, but their European counter-parts declined to accept Burma's attendance, in the past.

   At the time of ASEM 2 summit, which was held in London in 1998, Amnesty International warned EU leaders, "Rather than sidelining human rights from the summit, the EU should be operating an ethical development policy at ASEM summit. Economic rescue packages, financial aid and business investment should be within the framework of ethical principles, so that human rights in the region are guaranteed both in the short and long term."

   And so Burma didn't get a chance to attend ASEM 2 in London, the city with the mother of all democratic parliaments at its centre.

   And Burma also was not allowed to participate in ASEM 3 in the year 2000.

   But then the dawn of 21st century saw Burma starting production of huge amounts of natural gas from its off-shore gas fields. And EU policy on Burma's attendance in ASEM started to change accordingly_ not very surprising.

   And Burmese military regime was allowed to attend the fourth ASEM summit in Denmark in 2002. But, thanks to Danish love for democracy, Denmark government refused to give entry visas to Burmese military officials. God Bless the Danes.

   But, it seems, Denmark's brave and bold move to reject visa clearance for Burmese military officials coming to ASEM 4 left some oil-and-gas hungry European powers bitterly disappointed. And so they started making preparations to make sure that Burma comes to future ASEM meetings in Europe.

   And they hired regime apologists to make up a report, which when it came out in April 2005 not surprisingly endorsed business engagements with Burma's military regime, one of the worst dictatorships in the world and notorious for its corruption, its total disregard for human rights and its genocide on ethnic minorities in the country.

   And since then pro-regime lobbyists in Europe started proposing that in emergency situations Europe-wide travel ban on Burmese military officials could be exempted. But, for what kind of emergency situations are visa-bans exempted, allowing Burmese military regime officials to come to ASEM 6 summit in Helsinki? Probably the fact that Chinese, Indian, Korean and Japanese companies making huge profits out of Burma's gas fields is prompting a sense of urgency among European businessmen.

   But, in fact, Europe was the birth place of the principles of democracy, civil rights and labour rights. And nowadays, apart from a few former Soviet countries, the entire Europe is rich and democratic_ a shining example of the fact that democracy goes hand in hand with stability and prosperity.

   But when we look at ASEM 6 summit's agenda, although there are business related issues to be discussed such as energy security, globalisation, competitiveness and structural changes in the global economy, not a single word is mentioned about democratization and promotion of human rights around the world_ perhaps to avoid causing embarrassment to the summit's Special Guests of Hounor, Burmese military generals. How sad!

   Europe's esteemed democratic values should not be tainted by the greed of some European businessmen and oil companies.

   ASEAN made the same mistake ten years ago. They expected a win-win situation of doing business with Burma 's military regime and persuading them at the same time to make democratic reforms. But in the end, Burmese generals' persistence in resisting international pressure for democratic reforms made ASEAN lose face with international community.

   ASEAN leaders, becoming too uncomfortable with losing too much credibility in international community because of Burmese generals, have recently decided not to allow Burma take ASEAN chair until Burma has sorted out it domestic problems. In other words they are keeping Burma 's chair in ASEAN vacant.

   Why not Finnish government follow suite? Why can't they keep Burma 's seat in ASEM vacant?

   The Danes have bravely shown that they don't like disgusting murderous military dictators coming to their country. Why the Finns are welcoming the same disgusting murderous military dictators into their country? Do the Finns need more gas and oil than the Danes? Or they just care less about democracy and human rights?

   Let us repeat here: Europe’s esteemed democratic values should not be tainted by the greed of some European businessmen and oil companies.

   Please leave Burma’s seat vacant in ASEM, and ASEAN, and if possible leave it vacant even in the United Nations General Assembly.

   Please keep it vacant until there is a democratically elected civilian government which respect human rights of all people and autonomy of ethnic people in Burma .

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场