政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[The Last Nail in the Coffin of Constructive Engagement ]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·中缅两国人民要爱国爱民爱传统友谊
·泰国克拉运河终于开挖了
·纪念缅甸学生七七惨案52周年
·缅甸贪官震宇宙惊天下?
·天大巨贪是缅甸或中国将军们?
·莫言的锵锵真言
·益寿抑癌健康蔬菜排行榜
·天朝神仙辟谷术与增寿功
·讴歌太平盛世中国夢
·从人民巡警爱人民讲起
·吃价廉物美的保健蔬菜!
·大资本家李嘉诚有话说
· 缅甸仰望中国巨贪巨腐
·龙的传人欧来欧去记
·缅甸华族看香港占中
·缅甸莱比塘铜矿惨案
·赤子心童年梦
·缅甸第67周年独立节
·知否您身价💲千万¥万万缅元超百亿?
·彭家声誓要打回老家果敢去
·赛万赛采访缅甸众民族武装组织
·缅甸和谈双方须互让共赢
·歌曲:习近平寄语中华儿女
·食人族与美韓中三俘虏
·缅甸UNFC对68周年联邦节的声明
·猜谜:诸子百家?三教九流?习大大寄语?
·缅甸是战是和,登盛政府是问
·能耳闻眼见心知又如何呢?
·为后代活得有尊严而天长地久奋斗!
·缅甸和平,时进时退
·彭家声真的打回老家果敢去了
·缅甸果敢特区战火冲天
·68周年缅甸联邦节的感概
·果敢彭家声泣告天下同胞书
·临时协议是让缅甸多走一段路
·中国人不是瑞苗胞波吗?
·克伦民族联盟KNU声明
·有关缅甸果敢内战的舆论
·果敢战乱是侵犯国家主权吗?
·走向更完整的联邦制
·大缅族主义情绪被煽动起来了
·由缅甸王朝末日说起
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·由普京的锵锵之言讲起
·缅甸军队展开冷血进攻
·缅甸革命元老德钦丁米雅逝世
·缅甸军政府长寿百年?
·缅甸为民请命的名律师 U Aung Htoo
·中国为首迅速崛起
·缅甸UNFC对目前和谈与陆空攻击发表声明
·赛万赛谈最近缅甸和谈进展
·缅甸全国停火在拐弯爬行
·成龍——100%龙的传人
·缅甸果敢:温2009年知2015年
·停战!建设缅甸Federal邦联!
·缅甸全国停火会议五月初续开
·缅甸边签全国停火协议边打内战
·缅甸佤邦五月初续开全国停火会议
·缅甸UNFC主席给登盛总统的公开信
·缅甸众少数民族维护果敢兄弟
·缅甸佤邦五月初和平会议困难重重
·缅甸果敢军四月战果
·缅甸五月初佤邦和谈任重道远
·望缅甸联邦和平复兴
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议开锣了
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议首日
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和平会议第四天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和谈会第五天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑峰会胜利闭幕
·缅甸民族武装组织邦康峰会公报
·缅甸三分鼎立,看谁出奇制胜
·缅军誓要以果敢之血洗其臭脚
·缅甸温教授谈“联邦”
·看中国如何应对缅军逼民地武缴枪
·从果敢战事痛忆白华红华互屠
·Great! 世界宗教议会!
·缅甸内战源于大缅族极端主义背叛彬龙协议
·缅甸独裁将军们四两拨千斤
·谈昂山素姬首次访华
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·缅甸将军们放下屠刀就立地成佛?
·缅甸学生七七惨案永不忘!
·煎炸烘烤动植物食品极不健康
·笑+思考+运动 = 健脑强身
·KNDO 六十七周年建军节讲话
·缅甸阿尔茨海默症
·缅甸CNF正义的呼声!
·缅甸EAO不忘小兄弟民族
·缅甸和平夜长梦多险恶
·怀念王毅诚老师
·湖南窃贼偷佛国玉坠
·缅甸众民族武装怒吼了 !
·克伦民族抵抗组织怒吼了
·韩国逍遥游
·登盛政府会平稳移交政权吗?
·寄厚望于昂山素姬新政府
·且看登盛军民政府如何逊位
·Q类败类在神州复活
·克伦民族节68周年讲话
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The Last Nail in the Coffin of Constructive Engagement

(S.H.A.N. & Burma's News Published by Burma's Chinese 貌强 ) by Kanbawza Win

   In our world where business always overrules the conscience, it seems that the Constructive Engagement Policy initiated by the leaders of the core核心 members of ASEAN towards Burma has finally meet its doom. This is not because suddenly their twinge of conscience pop up but because they finally discovered that they will lose formidable trading partners of the Western countries if these ASEAN countries continue to ignore the gross human rights violations going on in Burma even as they continue to exploit Burma's natural and human resources. They now have to admit that there are much more civilized people in the World who would not ignore the suffering of the Burmese people and can easily turn their screws on these ASEAN values.

   When the Burmese Junta came to power in 1988 killing thousands of peaceful demonstrators two schools of thoughts emerged as how to deal with this Burmese regime. One is to isolate the regime or at least to exclude from international financing (such as World Bank, IMF and ADB etc) and investment to force to regime to come to terms with the reality and was favoured by the West supported by Burmese pro-democracy and ethnic groups. The other was an open door policy, investing, trading and recognizing the Burmese Junta as a way to foster liberalization to create a more democratic form of government. This was christened as Constructive Engagement Policy by ASEAN.

   Now after nearly one and half decade this Constructive Engagement Policy has become an adjective, a hall mark synonymous to the extent of the tragedy of 50 million plus people that did not move the proponents of democracy and free market. Several theories and hypothesis has been put up as reviving the official development assistance, promoting investment and even encouraging the NGOs to provide humanitarian assistance will bring the much-needed change in Burma. They label the pro democracy and the ethnic nationalities to be too impatient and unrealistic wanting an immediate transfer of power-full of Western style democracy and want an instant utopia. They argued that Constructive Engagement presented a rational approach, which takes into account existing realities and bring change in a controlled fashion. Now all these interpretation has come to a big Zero.

   The very fact that Burma and other Indo-Chinese states were accepted in ASEAN itself is something like a marriage between a cock and a duck because they belong to the family of fowls (Southeast Asian countries). Hence it neither produced a duckling or a chicken nor is unable to swim (democracy) or peck (communist). Instead comes out an odd species somewhat similar to an ugly duckling (a power maniac) with a hope that one day will miraculously change into a high flying swan. Burma is exactly like this. Now it seems that it’s no longer a question of whether you should talk to your neighbor who killed his sons, rape his daughters and beat up the wife but it’s a question of whether that abusive neighbor should be the leader of your village called ASEAN.

   Hence the question of self- respect arises for the people of ASEAN became pivotal. A new generation, better educated with much reasoning power that would not listen blindly to their leaders have crop up in Southeast Asia. They saw that the Constructive Engagement Policy as a thin guise to exploit Burma's natural and human resources for short-term gain and is indirectly propping up the regime with legitimacy. This is having a bad effect on their region and something must be done. Besides, witnessing the mammoth sufferings of the Burmese, the religious adherent began to question this illogical policy. The majority of the people in Thailand, Laos and Cambodia profess Buddhism; in Singapore the main religion is Confucian, while Brunei, Malaysia and Indonesia profess Islam and Philippines is Christian. Yet, not a speck of all these religious teachings were in Constructive Engagement Policy, in other words it paints the religious and moral bankruptcy of the region as a whole and ASEAN in particular.

   Incidentally in the economic scene unlike China's manufacturing miracle or India's services magic, there doesn't seem to be a single compelling theme in ASEAN economy, especially after the 1997 financial crisis. There are multiple strategies, initiatives, and success and failure stories. This tends to create a new scenario in the ASEAN business leaders who all the time are conducted to follow the government lead and adapted their strategy to go where the wind is blowing. Now suddenly governments in the core ASEAN countries began to play a different tune. The refrain is one of the supporting roles, not the virtuoso lead as the previous past. The government are encouraging private enterprises to think for themselves and shape their own destiny. They are to be innovative and create their own future. This compels a major shift in the mindset of the boardrooms and managers, similar to that the ship captain was left without the compass. They will have to fend themselves off. So they began to look at the world especially to the West where much emphasis is given on the prevalence of democracy and human rights. As far as Burma is concerned they could not rest their laurels on a short-term gain and be tarnished as unscrupulous exploiter forever. In other words the Constructive Engagement Policy is too pungent to have a good business dealings.

   Hence, the people began to question their parliamentary representative. These Members of Parliament began to speak out in their respective parliaments. Many a country unthinkable about a decade ago began to set up a parliamentary committee for the prevalence of democracy and human rights in Burma. The thinking of dominant one party dictatorship under the smokescreen of democracy of the region began to change. A classic example is Singapore, where hitherto PAP dominated by the "Father Son and the Holy Goh" was gone, when the Father and Holy Goh were in the annals of history and the son with its retinue of young Turks began to resent the accusation that Singapore's national character can be measure in dollars and cents, have now taken the initiative. At the last budget debate the S'pore government officials have a hard time answering to the quest of the parliamentarians questioning the Constructive Engagement Policy. It is the first time in the entire history of Singapore that has come out in the open, which was usually a closed-door affair as far as Burma and the hush hush narco dollars are concerned.

   Parliamentary Committee on Burma has been formed in the core ASEAN countries of Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia and S'pore have joined the bandwagon. PAP representative Charles Chong has said that besides taking away the chairmanship from Burma their main goal is for the flowering of democracy and the release of political prisoners. Come June and one will witness that the parliamentary representatives of the core ASEAN countries of Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia will join the Singapore Members of Parliamentarian to form the ASEAN Inter Parliamentary Committee to pressure their respective governments.It is also heartening to see that Malaysia Members of Parliament like Theresa Cock and Mr Lim talking very openly when the UMN0 is still a dominating power minus its helmsmen Dr Mahirthir Mohammad. Several representatives like Kraingsak Choonhaven of Thailand and several from Indonesia, Philippines have spoken out which we hope to bear fruit on ASEAN. Of course this is not because they are morally transformed but because they saw the writings on the wall that they will lose much with their Western Countries and international trading partners if they insist on this illogical policy. At last the Constructive Engagement Policy has pinch their pockets and they will have to move. They have witness that the nature of the Burmese Junta who will take one step forward to democracy by releasing the Nobel Laureate and taking two steps backwards by arresting her again. Indeed Than Shwe and its cohorts tried to assassinate her once and for all at Depayin, but the Military Intelligence chief Khin Nyunt knew it in advance and rescued her and for this he is now languishing in jail. How can a power maniac be the Chairman of this prestigious ASEAN?

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场