政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[The Last Nail in the Coffin of Constructive Engagement ]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·缅甸好汉的小国群英宴
·缅甸拟大打内战与滥印万元钞票
·缅甸正渡黎明前的黑夜
·三高外,提防类胱氨酸过高!
·缅甸三大力量摆开攻守阵势
·昂山素姬前途充满黑色13日
·中缅边区毒品业娱乐业及边贸
·中药虫草
·改革的鐘聲正在響起
·好人好事好国度永远值得热恋
·澳洲坚果(夏威夷果)Macadamia
·KNU对缅甸内比都炸弹爆炸之声明
·又一亲密战友去向马克思哭诉
·又一亲密战友去向马克思哭诉
·柏林的马克思坐着恩克斯站着
·缅甸国防军的种族奸杀灭绝政策
·缅甸国防军的种族奸杀灭绝政策
·昂山素姬呼吁尽快停火和谈的公开信
·缅甸联邦缅族与非缅族历史恩怨宿仇
·掸邦掸族断臂将军召吞英
·缅甸种族冲突能政治解决吗?
·缅甸是世界数二数三贪腐穷困国
·缅甸是世界数二数三贪腐穷困国
·缅甸的和平曙光
·93岁缅甸作家达贡达雅呼吁国内和平
·何谓和平?何谓停火?如何和谈?
·昂山素姬 Reith 第一讲:自由
·昂山素姬道高一尺,将军们魔高一丈
·昂山素姬边妥协边缓进
·缅甸三方对话才能全面和解
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第三讲
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 自由第四讲
·缅甸众族并肩共和蓝图
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第五讲
·缅族需改唯我独尊心态
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第六讲
·抛弃彬龙协议将激发缅甸各族自决
·联邦众族团结委员会覆函缅甸联邦政府
·缅甸宗教自由吗?
·昂山素姬对中国缅甸伊江建坝的意见书
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第七讲
·缅甸掸邦众族关心狱中68岁领袖昆吞武
·缅甸要片面或全盘和解?
·昂山素姬BBC Reith 第八讲
·缅甸新政府似无意改革或和解
·缅甸乱世出英雄?
·安息吧!赛森尊好战友!好兄弟!
·缅甸要真正联邦制或大缅族独裁制?
·缅甸克钦邦克钦族反对中国支持缅甸政府
·缅甸释放政治犯才能加速民主进程
·近代中国缅甸恩怨
·缅甸政府对昂山素姬与非缅族众原住民的策略
·勿忘缅甸半世纪内战难民与狱中仟捌政治犯
·昂山素姬与丹麦师生谈领袖谈民主运动
·钦族老革命谈昂山素姬与缅甸政府
·国际缅甸民族院奠基会反对民盟参加政府补选
·对昂山素姬与民盟参加政府补选面面观
·非缅族众原住民委员会ENC欢迎民盟NLD重新注册
·缅甸民主力量FDB对民盟注册与补选发表声明
·昂山素姬允诺兼顾民主与各族平等
·旅加缅甸9团体支持民盟注册与补选
·缅甸改革风吹草低见牛羊?
·缅共呼吁人民对中美勿一边倒
·美国回亚洲开辟新冷战
·美国回亚洲开辟新冷战
·缅甸左拥中国右抱美国
·缅甸左拥中国右抱美国
·非缅族众政党向美国国务卿请愿
·韩永贵与昂山素姬的杠杆作用
·恢复四大功能就永離癌症
·恢复四大功能就永離癌症
·温家宝在世界未来能源峰会上的讲话
·勿背叛国父昂山理念!
·勿背叛国父昂山理念!
·赛万赛谈缅甸2012年初局势
·温教授谈缅甸独立后与现在
·中国改革须走出“转型陷阱”
·恢复四大功能就永離癌症
·非缅族政党对第二彬龙会议的看法
·昂山素姬在克钦邦重提彬龙精神
·缅甸华族2012年生活守则
·缅甸联邦人民要各族平等、民主共和!
·缅甸彭家声的果敢军也愿和解
·缅甸学运领袖对登盛国会发言的反应
·缅甸联邦有望持久和平吗?
·2012年三八妇女节感言
·赛万赛点评登盛总统的和平三步走
·Khin Ohnmar 剥缅甸伪平民政府洋葱
·昂山素姬外泄的竞选录音
·缅甸人民大谈民主
·广州人物周刊拜访昂山素姬
·昂山素姬竞选缅文原稿
·土司公主3月2日的神圣呼吁
·缅甸官方大谈为国为民反贪反橡皮图章
·缅甸补选点滴趣闻
·昂山素姬为何坚信登盛总统诚意改革
·昂山素姬民盟胜了不骄傲也不辱人
·少食+多菜少荤+快乐+早睡早起 =长寿
·未来吃什么?
·腦退化症
·缅甸国内外形势说变就变?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The Last Nail in the Coffin of Constructive Engagement

(S.H.A.N. & Burma's News Published by Burma's Chinese 貌强 ) by Kanbawza Win

   In our world where business always overrules the conscience, it seems that the Constructive Engagement Policy initiated by the leaders of the core核心 members of ASEAN towards Burma has finally meet its doom. This is not because suddenly their twinge of conscience pop up but because they finally discovered that they will lose formidable trading partners of the Western countries if these ASEAN countries continue to ignore the gross human rights violations going on in Burma even as they continue to exploit Burma's natural and human resources. They now have to admit that there are much more civilized people in the World who would not ignore the suffering of the Burmese people and can easily turn their screws on these ASEAN values.

   When the Burmese Junta came to power in 1988 killing thousands of peaceful demonstrators two schools of thoughts emerged as how to deal with this Burmese regime. One is to isolate the regime or at least to exclude from international financing (such as World Bank, IMF and ADB etc) and investment to force to regime to come to terms with the reality and was favoured by the West supported by Burmese pro-democracy and ethnic groups. The other was an open door policy, investing, trading and recognizing the Burmese Junta as a way to foster liberalization to create a more democratic form of government. This was christened as Constructive Engagement Policy by ASEAN.

   Now after nearly one and half decade this Constructive Engagement Policy has become an adjective, a hall mark synonymous to the extent of the tragedy of 50 million plus people that did not move the proponents of democracy and free market. Several theories and hypothesis has been put up as reviving the official development assistance, promoting investment and even encouraging the NGOs to provide humanitarian assistance will bring the much-needed change in Burma. They label the pro democracy and the ethnic nationalities to be too impatient and unrealistic wanting an immediate transfer of power-full of Western style democracy and want an instant utopia. They argued that Constructive Engagement presented a rational approach, which takes into account existing realities and bring change in a controlled fashion. Now all these interpretation has come to a big Zero.

   The very fact that Burma and other Indo-Chinese states were accepted in ASEAN itself is something like a marriage between a cock and a duck because they belong to the family of fowls (Southeast Asian countries). Hence it neither produced a duckling or a chicken nor is unable to swim (democracy) or peck (communist). Instead comes out an odd species somewhat similar to an ugly duckling (a power maniac) with a hope that one day will miraculously change into a high flying swan. Burma is exactly like this. Now it seems that it’s no longer a question of whether you should talk to your neighbor who killed his sons, rape his daughters and beat up the wife but it’s a question of whether that abusive neighbor should be the leader of your village called ASEAN.

   Hence the question of self- respect arises for the people of ASEAN became pivotal. A new generation, better educated with much reasoning power that would not listen blindly to their leaders have crop up in Southeast Asia. They saw that the Constructive Engagement Policy as a thin guise to exploit Burma's natural and human resources for short-term gain and is indirectly propping up the regime with legitimacy. This is having a bad effect on their region and something must be done. Besides, witnessing the mammoth sufferings of the Burmese, the religious adherent began to question this illogical policy. The majority of the people in Thailand, Laos and Cambodia profess Buddhism; in Singapore the main religion is Confucian, while Brunei, Malaysia and Indonesia profess Islam and Philippines is Christian. Yet, not a speck of all these religious teachings were in Constructive Engagement Policy, in other words it paints the religious and moral bankruptcy of the region as a whole and ASEAN in particular.

   Incidentally in the economic scene unlike China's manufacturing miracle or India's services magic, there doesn't seem to be a single compelling theme in ASEAN economy, especially after the 1997 financial crisis. There are multiple strategies, initiatives, and success and failure stories. This tends to create a new scenario in the ASEAN business leaders who all the time are conducted to follow the government lead and adapted their strategy to go where the wind is blowing. Now suddenly governments in the core ASEAN countries began to play a different tune. The refrain is one of the supporting roles, not the virtuoso lead as the previous past. The government are encouraging private enterprises to think for themselves and shape their own destiny. They are to be innovative and create their own future. This compels a major shift in the mindset of the boardrooms and managers, similar to that the ship captain was left without the compass. They will have to fend themselves off. So they began to look at the world especially to the West where much emphasis is given on the prevalence of democracy and human rights. As far as Burma is concerned they could not rest their laurels on a short-term gain and be tarnished as unscrupulous exploiter forever. In other words the Constructive Engagement Policy is too pungent to have a good business dealings.

   Hence, the people began to question their parliamentary representative. These Members of Parliament began to speak out in their respective parliaments. Many a country unthinkable about a decade ago began to set up a parliamentary committee for the prevalence of democracy and human rights in Burma. The thinking of dominant one party dictatorship under the smokescreen of democracy of the region began to change. A classic example is Singapore, where hitherto PAP dominated by the "Father Son and the Holy Goh" was gone, when the Father and Holy Goh were in the annals of history and the son with its retinue of young Turks began to resent the accusation that Singapore's national character can be measure in dollars and cents, have now taken the initiative. At the last budget debate the S'pore government officials have a hard time answering to the quest of the parliamentarians questioning the Constructive Engagement Policy. It is the first time in the entire history of Singapore that has come out in the open, which was usually a closed-door affair as far as Burma and the hush hush narco dollars are concerned.

   Parliamentary Committee on Burma has been formed in the core ASEAN countries of Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia and S'pore have joined the bandwagon. PAP representative Charles Chong has said that besides taking away the chairmanship from Burma their main goal is for the flowering of democracy and the release of political prisoners. Come June and one will witness that the parliamentary representatives of the core ASEAN countries of Thailand, Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia will join the Singapore Members of Parliamentarian to form the ASEAN Inter Parliamentary Committee to pressure their respective governments.It is also heartening to see that Malaysia Members of Parliament like Theresa Cock and Mr Lim talking very openly when the UMN0 is still a dominating power minus its helmsmen Dr Mahirthir Mohammad. Several representatives like Kraingsak Choonhaven of Thailand and several from Indonesia, Philippines have spoken out which we hope to bear fruit on ASEAN. Of course this is not because they are morally transformed but because they saw the writings on the wall that they will lose much with their Western Countries and international trading partners if they insist on this illogical policy. At last the Constructive Engagement Policy has pinch their pockets and they will have to move. They have witness that the nature of the Burmese Junta who will take one step forward to democracy by releasing the Nobel Laureate and taking two steps backwards by arresting her again. Indeed Than Shwe and its cohorts tried to assassinate her once and for all at Depayin, but the Military Intelligence chief Khin Nyunt knew it in advance and rescued her and for this he is now languishing in jail. How can a power maniac be the Chairman of this prestigious ASEAN?

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场