政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[STATEMENT ON DECLARATION OF SHAN STATE INDEPENDENCE]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·谈昂山素姬首次访华
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·缅甸将军们放下屠刀就立地成佛?
·缅甸学生七七惨案永不忘!
·煎炸烘烤动植物食品极不健康
·笑+思考+运动 = 健脑强身
·KNDO 六十七周年建军节讲话
·缅甸阿尔茨海默症
·缅甸CNF正义的呼声!
·缅甸EAO不忘小兄弟民族
·缅甸和平夜长梦多险恶
·怀念王毅诚老师
·湖南窃贼偷佛国玉坠
·缅甸众民族武装怒吼了 !
·克伦民族抵抗组织怒吼了
·韩国逍遥游
·登盛政府会平稳移交政权吗?
·寄厚望于昂山素姬新政府
·且看登盛军民政府如何逊位
·Q类败类在神州复活
·克伦民族节68周年讲话
·缅甸UNFC扩大会议文告
·赛万赛谈缅甸联邦
· 赛万赛谈缅军最近动向
·温教授继续炮轰缅甸将军们!
·赛万赛谈掸邦掸族团结自救
·缅甸老华人忆过去盼未来
·伟哉!一穷二白的缅甸佛国金塔善良村民!
·赛万赛谈缅甸新总统新副总统新政府
·上座部佛教与孟缅掸柬寮泰滇
·赛万赛谈缅甸联邦的过去和现在
·缅甸与大东亚共荣圈
·仰光大学与缅甸联邦独立
·“缅甸历次战争的实质”读后感
·灵魂工程师、未来主人翁、天下大同、天下为公
·7-JULY与母校仰大学运传欧
·缅甸德佑续游瑞列匈土
·赛万赛谈缅甸民地武大会
·赛万赛谈国内和平与中缅友好
·赛万赛谈昂山素姬访华
· 掸民盟昆吞武与中共宋涛面谈
·缅甸彬龙会议风波
·缅甸内战受害者的呼声
·21世纪彬龙会议举步艰难
·彬龙会议的石破天惊言行
·21世纪彬龙会议言论集
·缅甸UNFC柳暗花明又一村
·缅甸UNFC建议开三方会议
·让佛光普照大地
·缅甸不愿常任LDC欠发达国家
·对老怨天尤人者只好避而远之
·温教授呼吁正确认识缅甸
·赛万赛谈缅甸全国全面停战协议
·赛万赛谈缅甸议会补选与政局变化
·缅甸华人
·温教授谈Rohingya罗兴亚人
·温教授由七月七日惨案谈起
·赛万赛忆掸邦学友
·与掸族兄弟夜谈掸族掸国掸史
·游加拿大感概万千(一)
·游加拿大感概万千(二)
·游加拿大感概万千(三)
·游加拿大感概万千(四)
· 游加拿大感概万千
·廉萨空博士的暹粒讲话
·天主教生根缅甸已五百多年
·话说阿那比隆缅皇
·缅甸真的有135原住民吗?
·缅甸联邦第一任总统苏瑞泰
·读“此昂山非彼昂山”有感
·读“中国式思维”感概万千
·缅甸暹罗两大战争史
·话说缅甸佛塔
·暹王缅王储骑象单打独斗?
·缅甸人民跪求国泰民安
·印度缅甸友好史实
·昂山素姬祝贺孟邦民族节71周年
·缅甸合法左派政党史
·缅甸内战与白象王军演
·南洋伯谈骷髅头
·缅甸大部分人极贫困
·由仰光河底达摩悉迪铜钟谈起
·古老落后钦邦钦族在发奋图强
·蒲甘王朝与宋朝崇宁通宝
·蒲甘王朝与宋朝崇宁通宝
·唐朝骠国乐与缅甸王根绍画
·唐朝骠国乐与缅甸王根绍画
·唐朝骠国乐与缅甸王根绍画
·唐朝骠国乐与缅甸王根绍画
·保护儿童天赋权益
·发展与和平是大家共建共享
·愿爱心浩然正气长存人间
·缅甸史请再多读三分钟
·三八妇女节与丁丁笙环球游记
·安得广厦千万间?
·缅甸的以夷制夷 & 以华制华
·世界肾脏日与缅甸公益善举
·平等合作、相敬互助共赢、齐奔大同世界
·风吹草低见牛羊
·谨防伪装荷兰警察的东欧骗子!
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
STATEMENT ON DECLARATION OF SHAN STATE INDEPENDENCE

   (BOXUN Received S.H.A.N. & Burma's News Published by Burma's Chinese)

   The declaration of independence by the Shan elders and formation of the "Interim Government of Federated Shan States" on 17 April has forced the SDU to take up political position, so that our political allies and friends would have a clear view on where we stand.

   The SDU principle political position is that the Union of Burma is now defunct and no more in existence, due to the abolition of the 1947 Union Constitution and Panglong Agreement by the Burmese military in 1962, which are the only legal bonds between the Shan and Burman States. Thus, Shan State has no more contractual obligation to be part of the union and it is fighting to regain its sovereignty and self-determination back from the occupying Burmese forces.

   The approach to obtain this goal has been to struggle together with all the ethnic groups, including the Burman, within the now defunct Union of Burma through the reestablishment of a new federal system.

   The declaration of independence is a normal emotional outbreak of the people of Shan State, which have been oppressed due to many political reasons and unfavorable international political configuration. It is natural reaction by the people reeling under the gross human rights violations, which include mass killing of the innocent people, raping of its women, forced mass population transfer and forced labours and so on.

   This pentup anger, combined with frustration of wanting to be free, has been kept in check on the population by the political leadership of the Shan State, until it came out into the open with the declaration of the Shan independence by a group of Shan elders, who no doubt might have been mirroring the aspiration of the Shan people. But the problem here is twofold:

   One is that the Sao Hso Hkhan Hpa (Surkhanpha) led exiled government does not have the endorsement of the SNLD, the ceasefire armies and even the Restoration Council of Shan State, which is in open conflict with the SPDC regime. It is not possible to agree with the formation of such government without the key stakeholders and players of the Shan people and it is not a way to form thegovernment first and solicit for the people"s acceptance later.

   The other factor is that the virtue of declaring independence, when we are forming a united effort together with the other non-Burman ethnic nationality groups, the Burman opposition and sympathetic and friendly international states and actors to find a solution within the bounds of a genuine federal union, democracy and equality. The SDU believe that this is a more viable political objective than declaring independence and fighting it out alone against the entrenched SPDC regime.

   The SDU would continue to adhere to the principle of tripartite dialogue, restoration of democracy, equality and rights of self-determination to resolve the conflict, until it is decided by the international commu nity and the real stakeholders of the Shan people that this type of conflict resolution is no more feasible.

   Sai WansaiGeneral secretaryShan Democratic Union

   20 April 2005................................................................................................................

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场