政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[貌强:Editorial: Shan State and Union of Burma]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·缅甸中国健康饮食须知
·掸复委掸邦军姚色克说要退位
·中国人质素比上不足比下有余
·美国不像东南亚种族歧视与偏见
·从中国古今13尊大佛说起
·2014年初缅甸纵横谈
·缅甸内战为何停停打打?
·亡国奴与龙的传人
·纵浪大化中,乘流沧海浮
·中国农民工是贱民
·中国车以缅甸为基地进军东南亚
·父亲节笑活
·昂山素姬能当选缅甸总统吗?
·缅甸将复兴为世界米仓与中等收入国
·父亲节另版笑活
·中国快成科技创新大国
·缅甸空军将装备中巴“枭龙”战机
·中缅两国人民要爱国爱民爱传统友谊
·泰国克拉运河终于开挖了
·纪念缅甸学生七七惨案52周年
·缅甸贪官震宇宙惊天下?
·天大巨贪是缅甸或中国将军们?
·莫言的锵锵真言
·益寿抑癌健康蔬菜排行榜
·天朝神仙辟谷术与增寿功
·讴歌太平盛世中国夢
·从人民巡警爱人民讲起
·吃价廉物美的保健蔬菜!
·大资本家李嘉诚有话说
· 缅甸仰望中国巨贪巨腐
·龙的传人欧来欧去记
·缅甸华族看香港占中
·缅甸莱比塘铜矿惨案
·赤子心童年梦
·缅甸第67周年独立节
·知否您身价💲千万¥万万缅元超百亿?
·彭家声誓要打回老家果敢去
·赛万赛采访缅甸众民族武装组织
·缅甸和谈双方须互让共赢
·歌曲:习近平寄语中华儿女
·食人族与美韓中三俘虏
·缅甸UNFC对68周年联邦节的声明
·猜谜:诸子百家?三教九流?习大大寄语?
·缅甸是战是和,登盛政府是问
·能耳闻眼见心知又如何呢?
·为后代活得有尊严而天长地久奋斗!
·缅甸和平,时进时退
·彭家声真的打回老家果敢去了
·缅甸果敢特区战火冲天
·68周年缅甸联邦节的感概
·果敢彭家声泣告天下同胞书
·临时协议是让缅甸多走一段路
·中国人不是瑞苗胞波吗?
·克伦民族联盟KNU声明
·有关缅甸果敢内战的舆论
·果敢战乱是侵犯国家主权吗?
·走向更完整的联邦制
·大缅族主义情绪被煽动起来了
·由缅甸王朝末日说起
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·由普京的锵锵之言讲起
·缅甸军队展开冷血进攻
·缅甸革命元老德钦丁米雅逝世
·缅甸军政府长寿百年?
·缅甸为民请命的名律师 U Aung Htoo
·中国为首迅速崛起
·缅甸UNFC对目前和谈与陆空攻击发表声明
·赛万赛谈最近缅甸和谈进展
·缅甸全国停火在拐弯爬行
·成龍——100%龙的传人
·缅甸果敢:温2009年知2015年
·停战!建设缅甸Federal邦联!
·缅甸全国停火会议五月初续开
·缅甸边签全国停火协议边打内战
·缅甸佤邦五月初续开全国停火会议
·缅甸UNFC主席给登盛总统的公开信
·缅甸众少数民族维护果敢兄弟
·缅甸佤邦五月初和平会议困难重重
·缅甸果敢军四月战果
·缅甸五月初佤邦和谈任重道远
·望缅甸联邦和平复兴
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议开锣了
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议首日
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和平会议第四天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和谈会第五天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑峰会胜利闭幕
·缅甸民族武装组织邦康峰会公报
·缅甸三分鼎立,看谁出奇制胜
·缅军誓要以果敢之血洗其臭脚
·缅甸温教授谈“联邦”
·看中国如何应对缅军逼民地武缴枪
·从果敢战事痛忆白华红华互屠
·Great! 世界宗教议会!
·缅甸内战源于大缅族极端主义背叛彬龙协议
·缅甸独裁将军们四两拨千斤
·谈昂山素姬首次访华
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·昂山素姬与女强人妈推姬
·缅甸将军们放下屠刀就立地成佛?
·缅甸学生七七惨案永不忘!
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
貌强:Editorial: Shan State and Union of Burma

Message on The 59th Anniversary of Shan National Day

   (S.H.A.N. & Burma's News Published by Burma's Chinese)

   It is interesting to note that the linkage and emergence of the modern Shan State, its national day and the formation of the Union of Burma are so intertwined; it is almost impossible to discuss the making of this historical formation separately.

   The date 7th February 1947 is a defining moment in the record of the Shan history as a modern nation. On that day, Shan princes and the people's representatives of the Shan States demonstrated their newfound unity to declare it a "national day" which were followed by the resolutions of "Shan National Anthem", "Shan National Flag" and the formation of "Shan State Council" on the 11th and 15th of February, 1947 respectively. These had been done without reference to the British colonial overlords, who claimed protectorship over the Federated Shan States since 1886-87 (one year after the fall of the Burman kingdom and the Alaungpaya or Gonbaung dynasty).

   The formation of the Shan State Council by Shan leaders autonomously of the British represents a declaration by the Shan that they are a sovereign, free nation. This bold action constitutes a Shan declaration of independence from foreign rule, and the date, 7th February 1947, marks the entry of the Shan people onto the world's historical stage as a modern nation.

   The people of Shan States and leaders decided in this very year later at Panglong, on the 12th of February, to join with U Aung San and the AFPFL (Anti-Fascist People's Freedom League) and leaders of other nationalities, to live together under one flag as co-independent and equal nations. This marks the birth of a nation-state now known as "Union of Burma".

   It is not an exaggeration to state that without Panglong Agreement or Accord, signifying the intent and willingness of the free peoples and nations of what could be termed British Indochina, there would have not been born the Union of Burma in 1948.

Failed Cohabitation

   As all know, the experiment to live together in harmony within the Union of Burma has been a disaster. In 1962, the Burmese military sized state power in a coup and declared the Union Constitution abolished. In so doing, the Burmese terminated the only existing legal bond between them and the other ethnic nationalities. The declaration of the suspension of the Constitution was in effect a self-denunciation that Burma had overnight become an aggressor-nation instead of partner. Since then, Shan State has been treated as a de facto colony and occupied territory by the Burmese army. Its forced assimilation and Burmanization policies to subdue our national identity have devastated the Shan homeland and make the people homeless and refugees. Looking at the contemporary situation, one could only term the Shan nation as a downtrodden and battered one, reeling under the occupation of the oppressive Burmese military regime. Gross human rights violations, genocide and cultural genocide, population transfer designed to make the Shan a minority in their homestead, and robbing them of their birthright sovereignty and self-determination are glaring injustice, which push the Shan into the category of sub-human or slaves, especially in the eyes of their occupiers.The same situation also applies to the Karenni, Karen, Mon, Arakan, Chin and Kachin States.

   But even under such circumstances and after more than four decades of brutal suppression and occupation, the Shan sense of "national identity" and the aspiration to be the master of their own faith have not diminish but have grown stronger. The Shan Nationalities League for Democracy's (SNLD) victory in 1990 nation-wide election in the whole Shan State; the continued political activities of the Shan State Army North within the limited political space provided by the Burmese military junta; the active armed resistance of the Shan State Army South, together with the bulk of Shan State National Army; and the highly self-conscious Shan civil societies in keeping the national identity alive under intense pressure of the Burmese military junta; are indications of a nation, which refuses to be cowed.

   Given such a backdrop, it is not at all surprising that the majority of the Shan people wants to opt out of the now-defunct union for good. The question also arises as to why the mainstream Shan organizations are endorsing the notion to rebuild a new Federal Union - together with all the other ethnic nationalities, Burman included - instead of an outright total independence and clean sweep secession.

   There are two essential, important factors, which need emphasizing regarding this issue, at least from the mainstream organizations and Shan leadership point of view. One is the ever changing global perspective in relation to the issue of self-determination and the other, the constant transformation of needs and value system or aspiration of a people at a given time and space.

Changing Global Perspective

   In 1945, the United Nations member states count was 41 and by 2002, it has reached 191. Up till 1990, most emerging new states, with a few exceptions like Bangladesh and Singapore, are the product of decolonization program of the United Nations based on the so-called salt-water doctrine. However, the break-up of Soviet Union, Yugoslavia and Czechoslovakia in the early 90s has added up some 19 more new states, which raises hope that the disintegration of the existing states will continue. But this expectation was short-lived and with the end of the cold war, the pro-status quo stance gained acceptance again and the disintegration of existing states subsided. During the period of 2000 to 2006, only one new state emerged, which was a mixture of decolonization trend as prescribed by the United Nations and liberation movement or disintegration of an existing state from the point of view of the Indonesian government.

   The global trend seems to be moving towards integration than disintegration, as can be seen by the expansion of European Union, now numbering 25 states. At the same time, the international community's wariness of having to deal with failed states, such as Somalia and Democratic Republic of the Congo, have prompted to reject disintegration and push for more integration.

   If one looks around the conflict spectrum in Asia-Pacific region, most opposition movements against the existing states have toned down their secessionist tendency and are now accommodating autonomy solution or federal system arrangement, rather than secession. The Tamil Tiger of Sri Lanka and the GAM of Ache/Indonesia are good examples, which have grasped the changing international mood in relation to their aspiration of self-determination.

   Christian Hillgruber, in his " The Admission of New States to the International Community " writes:The integration of a new state in the international community does not take place automatically, but through co-optation; that is, by individual and collective recognition on the part of the already existing states. By the procedure of recognition, these states exercise their prerogative to determine in advance whether the newcomer, in their judgment, is able and willing to carry out all its obligations as a subject of international law, whether it will be a reliable member of the international community.

   Shan State is situated between China and Thailand and also shares thousands of kilometers borderline with both states and couldn't expect recognition easily, even if the Shan could throw out the Burmese occupation forces, for both countries view the conflict as an internal one. Furthermore, while China has adopted an Anti-Secession Law on 14 March 2005, Thailand is bound by it commitment in ASEAN to view Burma as a sole political entity and fellow member of the bloc, not to mention the principle of non-intervention and territorial integrity, which are cornerstones of the organization.

Transformation of Needs and Value System

   According to the unpublicized survey conducted by the Shan Herald Agency for News (SHAN), the majority of the Shan people would opt for total independence, if given the chance to choose. It is also not surprising that the people would prefer secession, under such immense rights violations and oppression by the Burmese occupation forces. It couldn't be otherwise.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场