政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[Endorsements from Burma's Democracy & Ethnic Forces (continue)]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·缅甸国防军的种族奸杀灭绝政策
·缅甸国防军的种族奸杀灭绝政策
·昂山素姬呼吁尽快停火和谈的公开信
·缅甸联邦缅族与非缅族历史恩怨宿仇
·掸邦掸族断臂将军召吞英
·缅甸种族冲突能政治解决吗?
·缅甸是世界数二数三贪腐穷困国
·缅甸是世界数二数三贪腐穷困国
·缅甸的和平曙光
·93岁缅甸作家达贡达雅呼吁国内和平
·何谓和平?何谓停火?如何和谈?
·昂山素姬 Reith 第一讲:自由
·昂山素姬道高一尺,将军们魔高一丈
·昂山素姬边妥协边缓进
·缅甸三方对话才能全面和解
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第三讲
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 自由第四讲
·缅甸众族并肩共和蓝图
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第五讲
·缅族需改唯我独尊心态
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第六讲
·抛弃彬龙协议将激发缅甸各族自决
·联邦众族团结委员会覆函缅甸联邦政府
·缅甸宗教自由吗?
·昂山素姬对中国缅甸伊江建坝的意见书
·昂山素姬 BBC Reith 第七讲
·缅甸掸邦众族关心狱中68岁领袖昆吞武
·缅甸要片面或全盘和解?
·昂山素姬BBC Reith 第八讲
·缅甸新政府似无意改革或和解
·缅甸乱世出英雄?
·安息吧!赛森尊好战友!好兄弟!
·缅甸要真正联邦制或大缅族独裁制?
·缅甸克钦邦克钦族反对中国支持缅甸政府
·缅甸释放政治犯才能加速民主进程
·近代中国缅甸恩怨
·缅甸政府对昂山素姬与非缅族众原住民的策略
·勿忘缅甸半世纪内战难民与狱中仟捌政治犯
·昂山素姬与丹麦师生谈领袖谈民主运动
·钦族老革命谈昂山素姬与缅甸政府
·国际缅甸民族院奠基会反对民盟参加政府补选
·对昂山素姬与民盟参加政府补选面面观
·非缅族众原住民委员会ENC欢迎民盟NLD重新注册
·缅甸民主力量FDB对民盟注册与补选发表声明
·昂山素姬允诺兼顾民主与各族平等
·旅加缅甸9团体支持民盟注册与补选
·缅甸改革风吹草低见牛羊?
·缅共呼吁人民对中美勿一边倒
·美国回亚洲开辟新冷战
·美国回亚洲开辟新冷战
·缅甸左拥中国右抱美国
·缅甸左拥中国右抱美国
·非缅族众政党向美国国务卿请愿
·韩永贵与昂山素姬的杠杆作用
·恢复四大功能就永離癌症
·恢复四大功能就永離癌症
·温家宝在世界未来能源峰会上的讲话
·勿背叛国父昂山理念!
·勿背叛国父昂山理念!
·赛万赛谈缅甸2012年初局势
·温教授谈缅甸独立后与现在
·中国改革须走出“转型陷阱”
·恢复四大功能就永離癌症
·非缅族政党对第二彬龙会议的看法
·昂山素姬在克钦邦重提彬龙精神
·缅甸华族2012年生活守则
·缅甸联邦人民要各族平等、民主共和!
·缅甸彭家声的果敢军也愿和解
·缅甸学运领袖对登盛国会发言的反应
·缅甸联邦有望持久和平吗?
·2012年三八妇女节感言
·赛万赛点评登盛总统的和平三步走
·Khin Ohnmar 剥缅甸伪平民政府洋葱
·昂山素姬外泄的竞选录音
·缅甸人民大谈民主
·广州人物周刊拜访昂山素姬
·昂山素姬竞选缅文原稿
·土司公主3月2日的神圣呼吁
·缅甸官方大谈为国为民反贪反橡皮图章
·缅甸补选点滴趣闻
·昂山素姬为何坚信登盛总统诚意改革
·昂山素姬民盟胜了不骄傲也不辱人
·少食+多菜少荤+快乐+早睡早起 =长寿
·未来吃什么?
·腦退化症
·缅甸国内外形势说变就变?
·缅甸掸族领袖如何看昂山素姬和登盛政府
·独裁者守望台对“新缅甸”的评价
·赛万赛对缅甸局势是否太乐观?
·掸公主 Sao Noan Oo 对英国有话说
·佤邦联合军保家卫邦不怕空袭
·匈牙利布达佩斯一日游
·捷克布拉格一日游
·缅军与克钦军交火不断 中国参与斡旋
·赠神州红尘众生的锵锵劝世良言
·忆10年前云南8日游
·最美教师张丽莉与日日向善的中国人民
·最美司机48岁吴斌
·普世價值的中國先知——方励之
·谈白岩松与昂山素姬为民请命
·悼六四硬汉李旺阳被“自杀”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Endorsements from Burma's Democracy & Ethnic Forces (continue)


    ===========================
    S.H.A.N. & Burma’s News Published by Burma’s Chinese

    Contact & UNsubscribe: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.boxun.com/hero/Burma'sChinese
    ===========================

Re/ REPORT of HAVEL/TUTU:


   We have published Statements of NLD, KNU, RCPP, SDU etc, now continue to
    publish the other Endorsements from Burma's Democracy & Ethnic Forces Inside and Outside Burma.
   We hope, for the BEST INTEREST of all our people of Burma, A L L the members of UN Security Council will cooperate fully & friendly without using veto powers and objections .
   Burma's Chinese
   ------

(1) Editor's Note of U.S.Campaign for Burma News:

   Since the release of the report by Vaclav Havel and Desmond Tutu on why the UN Security Council should get involved in Burma two weeks ago, many key voices from inside Burma have risen to support the idea. We are posting several short statements below for you to browse. First though,
   we would like to note the courage and bravery that those living under the
   SPDC have shown by publicly calling for peaceful change in Burma. Even
   though their calls for a non-punitive resolution by the UN Security Council should not be threatening to the SPDC in any way, the regime has in the past arrested dissident leaders for calling for change. We salute their commitment to peaceful change, even at risk to their own safety.
   Additionally, we note that all of the statements below are steeped in
   realism--they are not "pie-in-the-sky" or otherwise unreasonable requests.
   Indeed, their calls for change in Burma are 100% consistent with the stated position of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Like ASEAN,they ask for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi, they call for the regime to work with the United Nations, and they request a transition to democracy. By implicitly aligning their calls with ASEAN they show that they are well-balanced as well as realistic.
   ====================

(2) Special Announcement of 11 Ethnic Nationality Parties that won 67 Seats in the 1990 General Election

   September 24, 2005
   Rangoon, Burma
   We cordially welcome the report of former Czech President Vaclav Havel and
   Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, calling for the UN Security Council to address Burma.
   We specially thank President Havel and Bishop Desmond Tutu for making such a proposal, which has no intention to harm any country, but for the sake democratization and problem solving in Burma.
   Therefore, we sincerely hope that if and when the UN Security Council
   considers to addressing Burma, as suggested by these two leaders, all member states will cooperate fully without using veto powers and objections.
   We, members of parliament elected from the ethnic nationality parties, also request for the implementation of tripartite dialogue among the military government, the National League for Democracy party and the ethnic nationality representatives, as suggested by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
   Members of Parliament, elected from 11 Ethnic Nationality Parties in the
   1990 General Election
   (Note: The following statement was read by U Fu Cin Shing Thang; MP Elect
   from Tiddim Constituency No (2), Chin State, from Zomi National Congress, in Burmese, on behalf of 67 MPs elect from the ethnic nationality parties in the 1990 general election and broadcast from Radio Free Asia-Burmese Service on September 26, 2005. This is an unofficial translation)
   [11 Ethnic parties include Shan National League for Democracy (SNLD), Mon
   Nationality Democratic Front (MNDF), Zomi National Congress (ZNC), Arakan
   League for Democracy (ALD), Chin Nationality League for Democracy (CNLD),
   National Democratic Party for Human Rights (NDPHR), The Kachin State
   National Congress for Democracy, Democratic Organization for Kayan National Unity, Mara People's Party, Shan State Kokang Democratic Party and United Nationalities League for Democracy.]
   ===========================

(3) Committee Representing People's Parliament (CRPP)

   Special Announcement on the Report, "Threat to the Peace; A Call to the UN
   Security Council to Act in Burma"; Commissioned by former Czech President
   Vaclav Havel and 1984 Nobel Peace Prize Recipient Bishop Desmond Tutu of
   South Africa
   September 30, 2005
   Members of CRPP called for a meeting on September 29, 2005 and discussed on the report, commissioned by former Czech President Vaclav Havel and 1984 Nobel Peace Prize Recipient Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, calling the United Nations Security Council to act in Burma. After serious discussion,all members agreed to issue a special statement on September 30, 2005, as follows.
   We believe that the report of President Havel and Bishop Tutu truthfully
   review and present the real situation in Burma and constructively propose a suggestion, calling the UN Security Council to act in Burma. Furthermore,two leaders do not suggest using the economic sanctions, exercising force and pressure, but only suggest to applying the power of the UN Security Council to implement the political dialogue in Burma. This good will of two leaders correctly reflect the will of the people of Burma, including the political parties, ethnic nationality parties, democracy forces and people from all walks of life.
   The State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) (formerly known as the State Law and Order Restoration Council-SLORC) continuously fail to implement the numerous resolutions and suggestion of the UN General Assembly, and as of today, it even stops cooperating with the UN's Special Envoy. Ignoring the good will of the United Nations, the SPDC is trying to create the future of the country with its one-sided formula. If the authorities continue to move forward with its one-sided path, we will see the future of country and lives of the people of Burma in dangerous situation.
   At this critical juncture, we wholeheartedly appreciate former President
   Havel and Bishop Tutu for making a constructive proposal, calling the UN
   Security Council to act in Burma. We also urge the members of the UN
   Security Council to pay serious attention on the recommendations of two
   leaders for the best interest of the people of Burma, and especially request the member states to refrain from exercising the use of veto power to object it.
   Committee Representing the People's Parliament
   Rangoon, Burma
   [Note:
   This report was cited by U Than Tun, a member of the CRPP and a Secretary of the NLD and U Aye Thar Aung, Secretary of CRPP and the General Secretary of the Arakan League for Democracy party to the DVB Radio Station. DVB broadcast it on September 30, 2005. This is an unofficial translation.
   CRPP was founded on October 1, 1998 to represent the parliament, as mandated by over 250 MPs elect from the 1990 general election, after continuous refusal of the military regime to convene the parliament. All CRPP members,except five members who are in detention and who are away from Rangoon,attended the meeting on September 29 and made the decision together. Four members, Aung San Suu Kyi, General Secretary and U Tin Oo, Vice Chairman of the NLD, U Khun Tun Oo, General Secretary of the Shan Nationality League for Democracy (SNLD) and U Kyaw Min from Human Rights and Democratic Party are currently under detention. U Yang Kye Maw from Shan State Kokang Democratic Party was unable to attend the meeting.
   Currently, there are 18 members and they are
   1. U Aung Shwe (NLD) - Chairman.
   2. U Aye Tha Aung (ALD) - Secretary.
   3. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi (NLD) - Member.
   4. U Tin Oo (NLD) - Member.
   5. U Lwin (NLD) - Member.
   6. U Loon Tin (NLD) - Member.
   7. U Soe Myint (NLD) - Member.
   8. U Than Tun (NLD) - Member.
   9. U Nyunt Wei (NLD) - Member.
   10. U Hla Pe (NLD) - Member.
   11. U Khun Tun Oo (SNLD) - Member.
   12. Naing Tun Thein (MNDF) - Member.
   13. U Pu Cin Siang Thang (ZNC) - Member.
   14. U Htaung Co Thang (UNLD) - Member.
   15. U Soe Win (National Democracy Party) - Member.
   16. U Kyaw Min (Human Rights and Democratic Party) - Member.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场