政党社团之声
[发表评论] [查看此文评论]    缅甸风云
[主页]->[政党社团之声]->[缅甸风云]->[Endorsements from Burma's Democracy & Ethnic Forces (continue)]
BURMA-缅甸风云
·惊喜祖籍国与时俱进
·台湾民主基金会颁奖给缅甸克伦族人权小组
·天朝土豪游客天上来
·丑陋的 Chinese 败类
·天朝富豪精英傲翔天上
·缅甸中国健康饮食须知
·掸复委掸邦军姚色克说要退位
·中国人质素比上不足比下有余
·美国不像东南亚种族歧视与偏见
·从中国古今13尊大佛说起
·2014年初缅甸纵横谈
·缅甸内战为何停停打打?
·亡国奴与龙的传人
·纵浪大化中,乘流沧海浮
·中国农民工是贱民
·中国车以缅甸为基地进军东南亚
·父亲节笑活
·昂山素姬能当选缅甸总统吗?
·缅甸将复兴为世界米仓与中等收入国
·父亲节另版笑活
·中国快成科技创新大国
·缅甸空军将装备中巴“枭龙”战机
·中缅两国人民要爱国爱民爱传统友谊
·泰国克拉运河终于开挖了
·纪念缅甸学生七七惨案52周年
·缅甸贪官震宇宙惊天下?
·天大巨贪是缅甸或中国将军们?
·莫言的锵锵真言
·益寿抑癌健康蔬菜排行榜
·天朝神仙辟谷术与增寿功
·讴歌太平盛世中国夢
·从人民巡警爱人民讲起
·吃价廉物美的保健蔬菜!
·大资本家李嘉诚有话说
· 缅甸仰望中国巨贪巨腐
·龙的传人欧来欧去记
·缅甸华族看香港占中
·缅甸莱比塘铜矿惨案
·赤子心童年梦
·缅甸第67周年独立节
·知否您身价💲千万¥万万缅元超百亿?
·彭家声誓要打回老家果敢去
·赛万赛采访缅甸众民族武装组织
·缅甸和谈双方须互让共赢
·歌曲:习近平寄语中华儿女
·食人族与美韓中三俘虏
·缅甸UNFC对68周年联邦节的声明
·猜谜:诸子百家?三教九流?习大大寄语?
·缅甸是战是和,登盛政府是问
·能耳闻眼见心知又如何呢?
·为后代活得有尊严而天长地久奋斗!
·缅甸和平,时进时退
·彭家声真的打回老家果敢去了
·缅甸果敢特区战火冲天
·68周年缅甸联邦节的感概
·果敢彭家声泣告天下同胞书
·临时协议是让缅甸多走一段路
·中国人不是瑞苗胞波吗?
·克伦民族联盟KNU声明
·有关缅甸果敢内战的舆论
·果敢战乱是侵犯国家主权吗?
·走向更完整的联邦制
·大缅族主义情绪被煽动起来了
·由缅甸王朝末日说起
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·缅甸果敢战争是内战或侵犯国家主权?
·由普京的锵锵之言讲起
·缅甸军队展开冷血进攻
·缅甸革命元老德钦丁米雅逝世
·缅甸军政府长寿百年?
·缅甸为民请命的名律师 U Aung Htoo
·中国为首迅速崛起
·缅甸UNFC对目前和谈与陆空攻击发表声明
·赛万赛谈最近缅甸和谈进展
·缅甸全国停火在拐弯爬行
·成龍——100%龙的传人
·缅甸果敢:温2009年知2015年
·停战!建设缅甸Federal邦联!
·缅甸全国停火会议五月初续开
·缅甸边签全国停火协议边打内战
·缅甸佤邦五月初续开全国停火会议
·缅甸UNFC主席给登盛总统的公开信
·缅甸众少数民族维护果敢兄弟
·缅甸佤邦五月初和平会议困难重重
·缅甸果敢军四月战果
·缅甸五月初佤邦和谈任重道远
·望缅甸联邦和平复兴
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议开锣了
·缅甸佤邦棒桑全国停火会议首日
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和平会议第四天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑和谈会第五天
·缅甸佤邦棒桑峰会胜利闭幕
·缅甸民族武装组织邦康峰会公报
·缅甸三分鼎立,看谁出奇制胜
·缅军誓要以果敢之血洗其臭脚
·缅甸温教授谈“联邦”
·看中国如何应对缅军逼民地武缴枪
·从果敢战事痛忆白华红华互屠
·Great! 世界宗教议会!
·缅甸内战源于大缅族极端主义背叛彬龙协议
·缅甸独裁将军们四两拨千斤
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Endorsements from Burma's Democracy & Ethnic Forces (continue)


    ===========================
    S.H.A.N. & Burma’s News Published by Burma’s Chinese

    Contact & UNsubscribe: [email protected]
    Website: http://www.boxun.com/hero/Burma'sChinese
    ===========================

Re/ REPORT of HAVEL/TUTU:


   We have published Statements of NLD, KNU, RCPP, SDU etc, now continue to
    publish the other Endorsements from Burma's Democracy & Ethnic Forces Inside and Outside Burma.
   We hope, for the BEST INTEREST of all our people of Burma, A L L the members of UN Security Council will cooperate fully & friendly without using veto powers and objections .
   Burma's Chinese
   ------

(1) Editor's Note of U.S.Campaign for Burma News:

   Since the release of the report by Vaclav Havel and Desmond Tutu on why the UN Security Council should get involved in Burma two weeks ago, many key voices from inside Burma have risen to support the idea. We are posting several short statements below for you to browse. First though,
   we would like to note the courage and bravery that those living under the
   SPDC have shown by publicly calling for peaceful change in Burma. Even
   though their calls for a non-punitive resolution by the UN Security Council should not be threatening to the SPDC in any way, the regime has in the past arrested dissident leaders for calling for change. We salute their commitment to peaceful change, even at risk to their own safety.
   Additionally, we note that all of the statements below are steeped in
   realism--they are not "pie-in-the-sky" or otherwise unreasonable requests.
   Indeed, their calls for change in Burma are 100% consistent with the stated position of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). Like ASEAN,they ask for the release of Aung San Suu Kyi, they call for the regime to work with the United Nations, and they request a transition to democracy. By implicitly aligning their calls with ASEAN they show that they are well-balanced as well as realistic.
   ====================

(2) Special Announcement of 11 Ethnic Nationality Parties that won 67 Seats in the 1990 General Election

   September 24, 2005
   Rangoon, Burma
   We cordially welcome the report of former Czech President Vaclav Havel and
   Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, calling for the UN Security Council to address Burma.
   We specially thank President Havel and Bishop Desmond Tutu for making such a proposal, which has no intention to harm any country, but for the sake democratization and problem solving in Burma.
   Therefore, we sincerely hope that if and when the UN Security Council
   considers to addressing Burma, as suggested by these two leaders, all member states will cooperate fully without using veto powers and objections.
   We, members of parliament elected from the ethnic nationality parties, also request for the implementation of tripartite dialogue among the military government, the National League for Democracy party and the ethnic nationality representatives, as suggested by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan.
   Members of Parliament, elected from 11 Ethnic Nationality Parties in the
   1990 General Election
   (Note: The following statement was read by U Fu Cin Shing Thang; MP Elect
   from Tiddim Constituency No (2), Chin State, from Zomi National Congress, in Burmese, on behalf of 67 MPs elect from the ethnic nationality parties in the 1990 general election and broadcast from Radio Free Asia-Burmese Service on September 26, 2005. This is an unofficial translation)
   [11 Ethnic parties include Shan National League for Democracy (SNLD), Mon
   Nationality Democratic Front (MNDF), Zomi National Congress (ZNC), Arakan
   League for Democracy (ALD), Chin Nationality League for Democracy (CNLD),
   National Democratic Party for Human Rights (NDPHR), The Kachin State
   National Congress for Democracy, Democratic Organization for Kayan National Unity, Mara People's Party, Shan State Kokang Democratic Party and United Nationalities League for Democracy.]
   ===========================

(3) Committee Representing People's Parliament (CRPP)

   Special Announcement on the Report, "Threat to the Peace; A Call to the UN
   Security Council to Act in Burma"; Commissioned by former Czech President
   Vaclav Havel and 1984 Nobel Peace Prize Recipient Bishop Desmond Tutu of
   South Africa
   September 30, 2005
   Members of CRPP called for a meeting on September 29, 2005 and discussed on the report, commissioned by former Czech President Vaclav Havel and 1984 Nobel Peace Prize Recipient Bishop Desmond Tutu of South Africa, calling the United Nations Security Council to act in Burma. After serious discussion,all members agreed to issue a special statement on September 30, 2005, as follows.
   We believe that the report of President Havel and Bishop Tutu truthfully
   review and present the real situation in Burma and constructively propose a suggestion, calling the UN Security Council to act in Burma. Furthermore,two leaders do not suggest using the economic sanctions, exercising force and pressure, but only suggest to applying the power of the UN Security Council to implement the political dialogue in Burma. This good will of two leaders correctly reflect the will of the people of Burma, including the political parties, ethnic nationality parties, democracy forces and people from all walks of life.
   The State Peace and Development Council (SPDC) (formerly known as the State Law and Order Restoration Council-SLORC) continuously fail to implement the numerous resolutions and suggestion of the UN General Assembly, and as of today, it even stops cooperating with the UN's Special Envoy. Ignoring the good will of the United Nations, the SPDC is trying to create the future of the country with its one-sided formula. If the authorities continue to move forward with its one-sided path, we will see the future of country and lives of the people of Burma in dangerous situation.
   At this critical juncture, we wholeheartedly appreciate former President
   Havel and Bishop Tutu for making a constructive proposal, calling the UN
   Security Council to act in Burma. We also urge the members of the UN
   Security Council to pay serious attention on the recommendations of two
   leaders for the best interest of the people of Burma, and especially request the member states to refrain from exercising the use of veto power to object it.
   Committee Representing the People's Parliament
   Rangoon, Burma
   [Note:
   This report was cited by U Than Tun, a member of the CRPP and a Secretary of the NLD and U Aye Thar Aung, Secretary of CRPP and the General Secretary of the Arakan League for Democracy party to the DVB Radio Station. DVB broadcast it on September 30, 2005. This is an unofficial translation.
   CRPP was founded on October 1, 1998 to represent the parliament, as mandated by over 250 MPs elect from the 1990 general election, after continuous refusal of the military regime to convene the parliament. All CRPP members,except five members who are in detention and who are away from Rangoon,attended the meeting on September 29 and made the decision together. Four members, Aung San Suu Kyi, General Secretary and U Tin Oo, Vice Chairman of the NLD, U Khun Tun Oo, General Secretary of the Shan Nationality League for Democracy (SNLD) and U Kyaw Min from Human Rights and Democratic Party are currently under detention. U Yang Kye Maw from Shan State Kokang Democratic Party was unable to attend the meeting.
   Currently, there are 18 members and they are
   1. U Aung Shwe (NLD) - Chairman.
   2. U Aye Tha Aung (ALD) - Secretary.
   3. Daw Aung San Suu Kyi (NLD) - Member.
   4. U Tin Oo (NLD) - Member.
   5. U Lwin (NLD) - Member.
   6. U Loon Tin (NLD) - Member.
   7. U Soe Myint (NLD) - Member.
   8. U Than Tun (NLD) - Member.
   9. U Nyunt Wei (NLD) - Member.
   10. U Hla Pe (NLD) - Member.
   11. U Khun Tun Oo (SNLD) - Member.
   12. Naing Tun Thein (MNDF) - Member.
   13. U Pu Cin Siang Thang (ZNC) - Member.
   14. U Htaung Co Thang (UNLD) - Member.
   15. U Soe Win (National Democracy Party) - Member.
   16. U Kyaw Min (Human Rights and Democratic Party) - Member.

[下一页]

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场