曾铮文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[曾铮文集]->[Jennifer’s]
曾铮文集
·獨家:911紀念館設計者談設計思想
·世貿中心的瞬間感動——新唐人採訪手記(1)
·卡恩究竟干了没有?—— 新唐人采访手记(2)
·亲历纽约艾琳飓风——新唐人采访手记(3)
·视频:中國沒有喬布斯 是否有華爾街
·曾铮作客新唐人〈热点互动〉直播:誰是貪官?誰是奸商?
·王立军到底有无将活摘证据交予美国?
·强摘器官惊现美国非移民签证表说明什么?
·World Premiere of “Free China: The Courage to Believe”
·Experts Discuss Freedom at Free Speech Film Festival
·Speech at the Free Speech Awards Ceremony
·震撼人心的故事 撞击心灵的音乐——评记录片《自由中国:有勇气相信》的强
·Free China Wins American Insight’s Inaugural Free Speech Film Festiva
·在《自由中国》颁奖典礼上的发言
·美律師:應以仇恨罪起訴舊金山暴徒
·谨以此诗献给钟鼎邦——旧诗重发:李祥春,我向你脱帽致敬
·《自由中国》获丹佛国际电影节最杰出电影奖
·《自由中国》加首映 电影节总裁感动落泪
·致奥巴马罗姆尼公开信
·《自由中国》入围渥太华”自由思想“电影节-11月3日放映
·“Free China or Death by China” Forum & Screening
·The One Thing I Would Like Western Governments to Do
·《伟大的隐藏者》:被“隐藏”的伟大主题
·《来自星星的你》为何爆红?
·《自由中国》再获印度国际电影节大奖
·加州选举观察:提案被否 说明什么?
·《自由中国》将在台湾四城市电影院公映
·《自由中国》台北放映 观众谴责中共迫害
·台湾人的小动作与大陆人的防盗内裤
·《一步之遥》露骨的暗示:姜文到底想说什么?
·抢先公告:新唐人1月23日对大陆播出《自由中国》
·NTD’s Exclusive Broadcast into China of Award-winning Film: Free Chin
·《自由中国》2月3日起全球网络发行
·白宫正式回应调查中共活摘器官请愿
·《自由中国》全球线上上映(图)
·《自由中国》感动人心 开放网络点播
·《自由中国》感动人心 开放网络点播
·《自由中國》舊金山灣區首映會
·The Wallet of a Taiwanese vs. "Theft- Proof” Underwear of Mainland Ch
·永远的四二五
·重温《九评》 迎接没有中共的美好明天
·【三退征文】我的父亲(上)
·【三退征文】曾铮:我的父亲(中)
·【三退征文】我的父亲(下)
·【独家图片】彭丽媛在北大演唱
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(上)
·法轮大法好莱坞圣诞遊行隊伍
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(2)-臺中篇
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(中)
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(1)-臺北篇(下)
·【圖片遊記】臺灣(3)-臺南高雄篇
·华人携200万美元现金赴美险遭没收内情
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(1)-瑞典篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(2)-瑞典篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(3)-瑞典-丹麦篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(4)-瑞典
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(5)-瑞士
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(6)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(7)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(8)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(9)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(10)-瑞士篇
·【图片游记】《自由中国》欧洲行(11)-美丽的瑞士小村庄
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔(Tower of London)-《自由中国》欧洲行(13)
·【图片游记】伦敦塔及其珍宝
·【图片游记】伦敦塔
·从我做陪审员的经历谈对梁彼得案的看法
·【图片游记】伦敦大学放映会
·【图片游记】芬兰:北极圈中的国度及女儿对母亲的国际营救
·"Injustice Anywhere Is a Threat to Justice Everywhere"
·《自由中国》伦敦高校放映 观众赞其将改变世界
·【图片游记】伦敦唐人街与大英博物馆
·【图片游记】艾克斯主教座堂-兼谈艺术的起源、目的和出路
·迷人的马赛老港
·《自由中国》在欧洲议会放映-新华社记者全程捧场
·一群法国人对一个中国人的“仰慕”-兼谈中国人的文化自信
·我的臺灣鄉愁
·洛杉矶“电召车”司机和他的四类华人客户
·在「末日」來臨的紐約 講述神韻的希望故事
·感悟神韻(之一)
·「財大氣粗」的孔子學院與「全球最恐怖上學路」
·感悟神韻(之二):感悟神韻的藝術風格
·感悟神韻舞蹈-感悟神韻(之三):
·感悟神韻音樂-感悟神韻(之四)
·感悟神韻聲樂-感悟神韻(之五)
·評《我不是潘金蓮》
·《致命中国》作者掌白宫贸委会 中美会爆发贸易战吗?
·快评川普总统就职典礼
·觀川普白宮發言人首次新聞發布會有感
·也談「文化自信」
·總統與媒體「幹仗」 誰贏面更大?
·評川普推特被美國國家檔案局收入歷史
·李克強買肉 Chinese Premier Li Keqiang Buying Meat
·倒行逆施的「兩高」釋法與歷史大勢
·再談「文化自信」
·童言童語
·女儿语录(2)Quote of My Daughter(2)
·女儿语录(3)Quote of My Daughter(3)
·女儿语录(4)Quote of My Daughter(4)
·女儿语录(5)Quote of My Daughter(5)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Jennifer’s


   
   
   
Jennifer’s

   Alexander Downer listening to my "bomb blast" question during the first press conference of APEC. Photo credit: The Epoch Times.

   
   Previous parts 接前文
   
   In September 2007, leaders from 21 Asia-Pacific nations and thousands of delegates and journalists gathered in Sydney for the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) forum. Sydney had thus become the focal point of the world's attention.
   On September 6, 2007, Alexander Downer, the then Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs, was going to host the first large-scale press conference about APEC; and I was going to attend the conference as a reporter of New Tang Dynasty Television.
   I was not sure how the press conference would be like, or whether I would have the opportunity to ask any questions. I knew that there must be hundreds of journalists at the conference; and everyone would want to ask questions.
   But I did have prepared a question though, a question which I believed was very important to ask. Fearing that I would be too nervous to speak in English, which is only my second language, I wrote down my question and managed to memorize it on the train to the press conference at the Sydney Convention and Exhibition Centre.
   Upon arriving at the venue for the conference, I found it was a fairly large hall, which could hold hundreds of people. As I had arrived very early, I had the freedom to choose where to sit.
   I assumed that Mr. Downer would be the one who would decide which journalists could ask questions by directly pointing to the journalists who had questions, so I sat on the central seat of the first row. I believed that was the closest seat to Mr. Downer, who was going to speak from the center of the stage. When he looked down at the journalists, it was very easy for him to see me who would be closest to him.
   Many other journalists soon arrived one by one; and the hall became almost full.
   And then arrived Mr. Downer and Australian Trade Minister Warren Truss. They sat behind the desk on the stage; and Mr. Downer gave a very short speech, briefing the journalists about what had happened at the APEC so far.
   Then he asked, "Questions?"
   Immediately a forest of arms shot up into the air. Almost every journalist raised his or her arm. I looked behind me and saw a very young female conference staff member standing in the middle of one of the aisles in the hall with a wireless microphone in her hand, totally at loss as to whom she should give the microphone to. It only became obvious to me then that whoever was given the microphone would be the one who could ask a question. So it was that young lady who would decide who was going to ask a question, not Mr. Downer himself.
   Then I realized that I had made a big mistake by choosing the central seat of the front row. For the young lady who was standing in the middle of the large hall, I was too far, at least 100-130 feet (or 30-40 meters) away from her. And there were at least several dozens of erected arms between us.
   Seeing that she was obviously overwhelmed by the forest of arms and was still hesitating as to whom she should hand her microphone, I looked at her and firmly speak to her in my mind, "Give your mic to me." I don't know whether she received my mind "signal" or not, but she really started walking down towards the front; and stopped at the first row. Then she made a very big effort to lean over to get across all the raised arms between her and me, and really handed the mic into my hand.
   Thus, to the envy of every journalist in the hall, I became the "chosen" one who could ask the first question. It was very lucky that I had prepared myself; and therefore I wasn't overwhelmed by the tense situation.
   Holding the "precious" mic in my hand, I turned around to face Mr. Downer, and asked my question with very a loud and clear voice:
   "Last year, when Mr. David Kilgour, former Secretary of State for Canada and the co-author of the 'Report into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China,' visited Australia, the Australian government agreed that an international investigation into the allegations of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP)'s organ harvesting should be conducted. Mr. Kilgour has now come here again, to call on APEC leaders to pay attention to this issue. My question is, during the past year, what has the Australian government done regarding the investigation?"
   It seemed as if my question had set off a bomb in the hall, everybody was so shocked, with Mr. Downer's facing turning pale and then red and then pale again.
   The "background" situation of the "bomb blast" was: The allegation of CCP's mass live organ harvesting of Falun Gong practitioners had just been broken for about one year. The majority of the "mainstream" media had been too "scared" or too "cautious" to cover this issue, so many of the journalists in the hall might have never heard about it then.
   And for Mr Downer, he had just virtually lost a lawsuit brought against him by Australian Falun Gong practitioners for depriving their right to peacefully protest in front of the Chinese Embassy. Before the lawsuit, Mr. Downer had been issuing certificates to restrict Falun Gong practitioners' rights to protest, obviously under the pressure of the CCP. So for him, my question could be a very difficult one to respond.
   After some awkward silence, he said something along the lines that Australian government did have made some investigation and had not found any evidence to prove that the allegations were true.
   I didn't have a chance ask how they made the investigation, whether it was just a phone call to the Chinese Embassy in Canberra, as the conference quickly moved on to other questions.
   Three days later, John Howard, Prime Minister of Australia, was going to host another press conference at the same place. This time I also arrived very early. To my surprise, and to every journalist's surprise, we heard an announcement from the audio system inside the Convention and Exhibition Centre that all journalists needed to write down their questions and submit them to the conference staff BEFORE Prime Minister's press conference. Then somebody would choose which questions to answer.
   I heard many journalists were cursing and expressing their outrage for this new "rule". Some felt puzzled why they suddenly changed the way for journalists to ask questions; some worried that their questions would surely not be selected、、.And I thought to myself, "It must be because of that 'awkward' question I asked at Mr. Downer's press conference. They didn't want to have similar things to happen again."
   Feeling that this time my question would surely not be selected, I chose to sit in the middle of the hall. When the Prime Minister was answering the pre-screened and chosen questions, I suddenly found an emotional young lady was sitting next to me, weeping and trembling, obviously very, very upset. She whispered to me that she was Sarah Matheson, a photographer from the New Zealand Office of the English Epoch Times and that she had just been physically removed by the security guards from a group photo event although she did have media accreditation to cover that event. She learned that it was because the CCP leader didn't want her to be there.
   
Jennifer’s

   Sarah Matheson: "I'm upset they put media freedom behind the wishes of the Chinese government." Photo credit: The Epoch Times
   
   I could see how badly she was feeling for being treated in such a way. As a timid young lady growing up in a free country, she found very hard to handle this kind of situation. She then asked me whether I could help her to ask the Prime Minister why they treated a journalist in this way.
   But、、.as all the questions had already been submitted before the press conference, how could I ask the question unless I shouted out? But shouting out loudly was obviously "out of the place" at that occasion, shall I shout or not?

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场