新会员区

第六感
[主页]->[新会员区]->[第六感]->[写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国记者协会]
第六感
·8月30日纽约华人社团示威,继续声讨郭文贵
·美联社独家调查:中国指控郭文贵涉嫌强奸罪
·李明哲危害国家安全案开审 其妻李凈瑜公布滋事“剧本
·李明哲危害国家安全案开审 其妻李凈瑜公布滋事“剧本
· 李明哲危害国家安全案开审 其妻李凈瑜公布滋事“剧本”(图)
·彭宇华、李明哲颠覆国家政权案一审公开开庭
·彭宇华、李明哲颠覆国家政权案一审公开开庭
·彭宇华、李明哲颠覆国家政权案一审公开开庭
·彭宇华、李明哲颠覆国家政权案一审公开开庭
·环球网:李明哲案教台湾人自觉遵守大陆法律
·郭文贵在纽约再被告 前员工指其强奸
·郭文贵在纽约再被告 前员工指其强奸
·曲龙曾遭郭文贵构陷获刑15年
·曲龙曾遭郭文贵构陷获刑15年
·孟建柱高调出镜 郭文贵造谣遭打脸(图)
·孟建柱高调出镜 郭文贵造谣遭打脸(图)
·国际刑警组织文件:郭文贵被发红色通缉令与政治迫害完全无关
·国际刑警组织文件:郭文贵被发红色通缉令与政治迫害完全无关
·国际刑警组织文件:郭文贵被发红色通缉令与政治迫害完全无关
·纽约法院判决书确认,郭文贵没有美国身份
·多少女孩在过着性冷淡的生活
·打败异地恋的,从来都不是劈腿
·撩汉这件事,只要五个字
·什么年纪就该干什么事,耽误了多少中国人
·不会好好谈钱,正在毁掉你的婚姻
·你的贫穷思维,正在毁掉你的下一代
·中国抓的日本间谍怎么越来越多了?
·中国北斗卫星导航系统为何令美国恨之入骨?
·郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国
·郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国
·郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国
·郭文贵爆料太离谱 男女分不清
·郭文贵背信弃义欺骗朋友
·澳大利亚孙利军现身视频怒怼郭文gui房产爆料造假
·中美执法对话 美国政府首次表态将遣返郭文贵
·中美执法对话 美国政府首次表态将遣返郭文贵
·美媒:特朗普总统下令遣返郭文贵(图)
·美媒:特朗普总统下令遣返郭文贵(图)
·通缉令扑克牌在网上流传 郭文贵的编号为黑桃7
·通缉令扑克牌在网上流传 郭文贵的编号为黑桃7
·纽约华人继续声讨,郭文贵推特、YouTube等社交网站账号已被限制
·金融时报:郭文贵的基金可能枯竭
·金融时报:郭文贵的基金可能枯竭
·美国福建会馆和华联总会声讨郭文贵
·郭文贵在郑州骗贷5.88亿
·郭文贵攫金的商业黑手
·郭文贵攫金的商业黑手
·郭文贵攫金的商业黑手
·谢建生在郭文贵楼下:展示郭文贵涉案笔录
·19大落幕了 他被自己的自负逼进了“死胡同”
·19大落幕了 他被自己的自负逼进了“死胡同”
·19大落幕了 他被自己的自负逼进了“死胡同”(图)
·东方日报:郭文贵情妇涉洗黑钱在港被捕 返内地爆料
·盘点西方主流媒体舆论缘何抛弃郭文贵
·写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国记者协会
·郭文贵对女星女性的诽谤侮辱和对女权的践踏
·郭文贵对女星女性的诽谤侮辱和对女权的践踏
·纽约华人声讨郭文贵进入第92天
·昔日拍檔曲龍:遭郭文貴誣告,促美盡快遣返
·纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵进入第95天
·新京报:“心灵法门”是具有邪教性质的非法组织
·纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵进入第96天(1104视频)
·中国官方揭批“心灵法门”升级,新华网再次发文
·中国逃亡富豪郭文贵疑陷入美国政治斗争
·纽约华人声讨郭文贵进入第106天
·谁写的?绝了! 郭文贵“爆料”之人格分析
·郭先生的烂戏还能演多久?
·过气“网红”郭文贵,只剩下自说自话自娱自乐了
·郭文贵指使他人销毁会计资料 非法拘禁
· 郭文贵直播暴露其对女性摧残和尊严的肆意践踏
·昔日队友曲龙为何扛起“讨郭”大旗?
·从与法轮功交手看郭文贵其人
·快看!面对西方舆论侵略者,真正懂得如何反击的中国战士,出现了!
·快看!面对西方舆论侵略者,真正懂得如何反击的中国战士,出现了!
·快看!面对西方舆论侵略者,真正懂得如何反击的中国战士,出现了!
·李明哲一审获刑5年 台湾各路人马纷纷表演
·ZT)学者:愚众制造了“幼儿园集体性侵”的荒诞剧
·转帖个关于”北京清理低端人口“的话题
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (一) 看中国站在哪里看
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (二) 看到树木更要看到森林
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (三)制度红利你不能视而不见
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (四)不要掉进博弈对手设计好的话语陷阱
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (五) 中国崩溃了,你和你的父母子女也逃不
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信  (六)中华民族永恒之痛
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (七)国家强盛是人权的前提
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (八)反腐为民族存亡之所系
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (九) 共识之内与共识之外
·李琰:致中国知识分子的一封信 (十) 不折腾,折腾就是自作孽不可活
·哈佛大学研究:一个人成为废柴的九大根源
·全球金融大战之1998年香港血战索罗斯全揭密(附朱镕基对话索罗斯)
·深扒郭文贵,何以从一介草根到房产大鳄
·美国懵了!全球威胁正从四面八方扑面而来!
·纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵进入第129天
·骗子郭文贵要推翻中国政权?
·大骗子郭文贵要推翻中国政权?
·美国军官揭秘: 是谁把美军赶出了朝鲜
·中国将军醍醐灌顶之作:中国,不能忘记!(深度好文)
·纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵进入第135天
·纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵进入第135天
·廉耻限制了想象!香港反对派这样利用南京大屠杀
·廉耻限制了想象!香港反对派这样利用南京大屠杀
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国记者协会


   Dear Miss Kate, Miss Aruna and Mr. Cezary:
   
   On October 22, the Wall Street Journal published your report, China’s Pursuit of Fugitive Businessman Guo Wengui Kicks Off Manhattan Caper Worthy of Spy Thriller, which reported some of the contacts between official from China’s Ministry of State Security and Guo Wengui. The report writes about situation when four officials from China’s Ministry of State Security met with Guo Wengui, and cited insiders in the White House and documents given by Guo.
   

   I have no objection to your report and actually it's a good story to say. But after repeated deliberation, there are a few serious problems that have forced me to write to you and submit the letter to SPJ.
   
   First, in the report, you quoted Guo Wengui’s files which show that he was persecuted by Chinese government. What needs to be stressed is that these files are false documents. Not only Chinese government, but lawyer Wen Yunchao, Teng Biao and at least thousands of others pointed out that the documents are fake.
   
   As professional journalists, I'm sure that you captured this vital point, then, why didn’t you indicate in time in your report that Guo Wengui’s files were widely considered to be forged or at least controversial?
   
   I looked through your report, and find it at last in the 18th paragraph below the picture of documents, i.e., the second paragraph to the last that says with only a few words of understatement, “Beijing has said the document is a forgery.”
   
   This is a typical and irresponsible way of writing that deliberately mislead the readers. Due to the hassle of the long report, most readers will not browse through the end, which means that many of them can't see the simple statement at the end of the report.
   
   I ask you, as professional media , if you report Guo Wengui’s events out of serious and objective media ethics, would you still write the report in this way? Will it highlight your rigorous and objective attitude if you mislead readers to believe in Guo Wengui’s forged papers? Can the standard of your work represent the Wall Street Journal's professional level?
   
   Second, it is true that events of Guo Wengui have become sensitive and complicated due to legal issues that are added by political colors. But it doesn't change the fact that Guo has insulted and offended women. If you don’t believe in the previous content, can you accept and promote Guo Wengui's practice of abusing "Ma Rui is pig, and if she rape a pig, the pig commits a suicide" in his live broadcast. Do you despise women's rights and ignore the network humiliation of the victim just like this?
   
   Harvey Weinstein sex scandal got picked up by all the major news services, but medias became blind when Marui was raped and Guo Wengui used social media to expose Marui’s privacy and abuse her. I want to ask you, what is your report’s principle, objectivity or optional negligence based on color or race. If Marui is a white, will you report Guo Wengui indiscriminately and describe him as a political symbol and try to get him off?
   
   Third, many medias and network have revealed a great deal of record and video evidence that Guo had bribed Chinese officials and tried to win support of Britain and American reporters such as Michael Forsythe, Tony Blair and others since this year. This evidence makes it clear that Guo is trying to bribe everyone he contacts. It is also evident that his disclosure is fabricated and fabled.
   
   I am not opposing to your report about Guo Wengui, but the way you deliberately hid some relevant details and cited so-called “people familiar with the situation” makes me wonder with every reason that during the process you wrote the story, Guo had tried to bribe you. Whether you have reaped the benefits is a problem I can not leave alone.
   
   Besides, there are reasons to be sceptical the people you cited are puppets bought off and controlled by Guo Wengui. Given this, dare you swear to god that your report is rigorous, objective and compatible with American media’s value?
   
   Fourth, I know that the Wall Street Journal is opposing President Trump. There’s no problem in it, the society in America is a free one, people have the right to support or oppose the President. Whether support or opposition, when being presented in a news report, it should not be tinged with the tendency of opposing for the sake of opposition.
   
   According to your report, people who have been cited 21 times should be some senior advisers in the White House. President Trump was chosen by the people, his staff and team represent for the interest of America. If this team could forge ahead in unity, it would be a good news for people of America and the whole world.
   
   However, the way you wrote the journal may put the team in a state of mutual suspicion. If the government can not focus on the developing of America because of mistrust, then who is to blame? Is it President Trump, the government, or you who tried to polarize the government?
   
   In this world, China and America have become the progressive role models of this great era. Set aside ideological differences, if both countries could deepen mutually beneficial cooperation in economy, legislation, security, environmental protection and other fields, it would good news for people in these two and even the whole world.
   
   It doesn’t make sense to me why someone would want to hinder the development of the world, why someone tried so hard using a clown and criminal to impede China-US cooperation, why someone attempted to deter people with a cheat and exhibitionist, who is of no political and economic values, from pursuit of well-being.
   
   If there really is someone as described above, I have to say, the tycoon named Guo Wengui, who used to trap officials and medias through bribery and bugging, has successfully repeated the tricks in America, you and your so-called insiders have been bribed and become his puppets.
   
   Because of this, I urge departments such as the American news management office and Journalists Association to launch a careful investigation into the biased report about Guo Wengui to maintain the credibility of American medias, clear names of the three journalists under questioning and reply to tens of thousands of netizens who had voted to question the journalists.
   
   Written by @TwiZhanJ, a humble and ordinary Twitter user who cares about universal values and human development.
   
   
   写给华尔街三名记者的一封信:请恪守媒体人的原则与灵魂,并致美国新闻管理机构
   
   尊敬的凯特、阿鲁纳女士,塞尔瑞先生:
   
   10月22日,华尔街日报刊登一篇由你们执笔的,题为《中国国安人员赴美劝返郭文贵,各方交锋堪比谍战片》的报道,文章主要援引白宫知情人和郭文贵提供资料等方式,报道了中国国安人员与郭文贵接触的一些情况。
   
   首先,我对你们报道该起新闻事件没有异议,可以说这是一篇看起来很不错的报道,但仔细推敲下来,有几个严重问题使我不得不给你们写信,并同时将信件提交给美国的新闻管理机构。
   
   第一、你们在报道中引用了郭文贵用以证明其受到中国政府迫害的文件。但需要指出的是,这几份文件,在郭文贵出示后即已被广泛证实为虚假文件。除了中国政府的声明,温云超、滕彪律师等至少数千名网友均指证该文件却系伪造。
   
   作为专业的新闻人,我相信几位一定捕捉到了这个至关重要的信息点,那么,为什么在阁下的报道中,并没有及时指出郭文贵所出示的文件被舆论广泛评价为伪造、或至少存在争议性的重要情况呢?
   
   我翻遍阁下的报道,终于在你们配发这几份文件图片的十八个自然段之后,也就是文章倒数第二段才看到了轻描淡写的几个字:“北京方面指出这份文件是伪造的”。
   
   这是一种典型的刻意误导读者选择性相信的不负责任的笔法,因为,由于文章的冗长,大多数读者并不会一直看到结尾,也就是说,他们会因为没有看到你们刻意安排在文末的简陋声明,而误以为郭文贵出示的文件就是真的。
   
   我请问,作为一个专业的媒体人,假如你们报道郭文贵事件完全是出于严谨客观的媒体伦理,你们还会这样安排行文吗?你们刻意误导读者相信郭文贵伪造文件为真的做法,能够凸显你们的严谨客观吗?能够代表华尔街日报专业媒体的专业水准吗?
   
   第二、诚然,由于简单的法律问题被赋予政治色彩,导致郭文贵事件变得敏感而复杂。但是,这并不能改变郭文贵对女性侮辱侵犯的事实。如果你们不相信以前的,那么郭文贵在直播里辱骂“马蕊是猪、马蕊强奸猪猪都会自杀”的做法,就是你们可以接受和弘扬的吗?难道你们就是这样蔑视女权,无视受害者遭遇这样的网络羞辱吗?

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场