新会员区

小米的部落格
[主页]->[新会员区]->[小米的部落格]->[Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia]
小米的部落格
·“神仙”为何钟情于气功(图)
·李洪志办班赚钱传“法”后见钱眼开
·昔日邻居揭穿李洪志老底
·我经历的法轮功郑州培训班(图)
·“纸上神佛”终可笑
·李洪志的吹嘘神功大揭底
·让李洪志认怂的那些事
·俄罗斯执法部门关闭宣扬法轮功的网站
·港人骂李洪志是卖国贼(图)
·广东阳春监狱服刑人员郭飞雄体检正常 监管部门指网传郭病情严重不实
·李洪志学历造假(图)
·香港市民送给李洪志的生日“贺礼”(图)
·李伪佛现形记(图)
·李洪志家庭秘史(组图)
·李洪志难念生日经
·图解法轮功出笼真相(图)
·8年前法轮功阻止海外华人为汶川地震募捐
·Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia
·令计划一审被判无期 庭审画面曝光(图)
·“人权观察”是个什么鬼?
·美国前特工葛特曼炮制活摘谣言背后鬼影幢幢
·国际器官移植专家驳斥“法轮功”散布谣言
·世卫官员等国际专家驳斥“法轮功”邪教散布谣言
·“活摘器官”谣言荒唐可笑 中外专家肯定中国器官移植改革
·社评:造中国“活摘器官”谣,倒像丢心缺肺
·中外专家肯定中国器官移植改革成就 “活摘器官”谣言侮辱捐献者奉献精神
·国际器官移植大会首次在华举行 中外专家共赞中国成就
· 中国专家介绍中国器官移植改革成果 有力驳斥造谣与抹黑
·“东伊运”恐怖组织头目亚甫泉被土耳其警方逮捕
·何为“东伊运”
·Leader of ETIM Terrorist Group Arrested by Turkish Police
·什么是东伊运?
·网传李洪志母亲芦淑珍8月病逝纽约
·正念对待一切
·李大师为什么要送母亲去医院救治
·“佛母”真是太悲惨
·骨干死亡统计表揭穿李洪志谎言
·卢淑珍病亡对弟子的警示
·干政乱政是邪教的本质
·天下邪教都是一样的
·从“邪二代”干政看韩国邪教
·芦淑珍的“家”在哪里?
·俄犹太自治州取缔“耶和华见证人”
·俄犹太自治州取缔“耶和华见证人”
·“血水圣灵”将魔爪伸向青少年
·活摘”谣言漏洞多
·李洪志对母亲态度所凸显的人格障碍
·李洪志对母亲态度所凸显的人格障碍
·从“剁手族”看邪教敛财术
·加拿大一法轮功成员抢劫被警方击毙
·俄犹太自治州取缔“耶和华见证人”
·从瑞陶尔抢枪被击毙想到的
·李洪志缺席美西法会的四个原因
·兰州一男子在省道悬挂法轮功横幅获刑
·美媒:互联网是科学教的噩梦
·美媒:CNN关于中国活摘器官的说法不可信
·法轮功悲剧之瑞陶尔
·俄新社报道网友博文,称法轮功是邪教
·俄电视台推出记录片“幕后世界之邪教”
·信邪教妹妹抢走了姐夫
·邪教门徒会发展的新特点
·天使业会“它毁了我们的女儿”
·台湾“心灵成长佛教会”头目害命被诉
·李洪志最近有点烦有点急
·“7台手机、11张手机卡”,他是哪样?
·【现在开庭】江天勇涉嫌违法犯罪被依法采取刑事强制措施
·林耶凡落选世界小姐属意料之中
·美国法轮功骨干杨森之妻患癌症病亡
·法轮功“神韵晚会”真相
·世界知名点评网站差评“神韵演出”
·法轮功“神韵演出”遭纽约市民抵制
·法轮功“神韵演出”遭纽约市民抵制
·美华裔夫妇杀死5岁女儿 凶手疑受李洪志邪说洗脑
·港界“金融大鳄”肖建华:私生活极度糜烂,堪比古代昏帝!
·安全专家:肖建华全用女保镖不寻常,与卡扎菲「媲美」?
·港媒曝光谷肖建华早在三年前就有30多个私生子
·空手套白狼,借壳上市,发动“股灾”……金融巨鳄肖建华的不法生意令人瞠目
·涉嫌发动股灾,传金融大鳄肖建华与徐翔有「交集」
·通奸、包养、情妇录!富豪肖建华四季酒店藏5个"行宫" 情妇大曝光
·多次卷入争议性交易!“隐形富豪”肖建华的种种黑色发家史
·三家涉黄俱乐部或与“金融巨鳄”肖建华有关?
·肖建华案扑朔迷离传与“股灾”及马建案有关
·「明天系」肖建华的融资投资能力疑云重重,多宗交易或涉不法
·肖建华涉嫌操纵中国大陆2015年股灾?
·金融风险、资本大鳄与“肖建华现象”(
·肖建华实为北京涉黄集团保利俱乐部的“肖亮”?
·习近平棋高一招 特朗普终于认怂
·“股市枭雄”肖建华恐为2015年股灾罪魁祸首
·“金融巨鳄”肖建华或涉朱令案!揭秘他与朱令姐姐的隐秘联系……
·网传金融巨鳄肖建华被带回,郭文贵提心吊胆?
·美国之音关于肖建华虚假报道使其公信力丧失殆尽
·“资本大鳄”的丧钟已敲响!
·谁是证监会主席要抓的“资本大鳄”?
·澳器官移植专家:中国帮助打击全球器官贩卖
·澳器官移植专家:中国帮助打击全球器官贩卖
·澳器官移植专家:中国帮助打击全球器官贩卖
·澳器官移植专家:中国帮助打击全球器官贩卖
·澳器官移植专家:中国帮助打击全球器官贩卖
·给“滕彪们”的一点批判与忠告
·律师谢阳“遭遇酷刑”真相:系江天勇等人编造的谎言
·郭文贵是一个攻人下三路的怂包
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia

   

   

   Author: Gregory Drogba

   

   “Everyone can be an editor” is one of the slogans of Wikipedia. But, some anonymous editor should watch out.

   

   In the article named Pressure and Lobbying – Falun Gong’s Tricks against Media Criticism, it writes that the emerging Falun Gong used to bribe web management staff of Wikipedia. Out of our expectations, after the article was published, the story had an unexpected sequel.

   

   According to the edit record of Wikipedia, from April to May, 2016, the article concerning Falun Gong had been edited for over 250 times! We can imagine that most of the modification was trying to use information favorable to Falun Gong to replace the original objective entries in Wikipedia.

   

   These editors do not like us to speak negatively about Falun Gong. For instance, publications of Falun Gong were listed in extremism publications in Russia, and Falun Gong was banned by the court in Kirgizia. Moreover, it was prohibited in China, and followers who claim themselves as “true, kind and tolerant” failed in their lawsuits with reporters.

   

   Staff with Wikipedia had to provide special protection to the article in case the followers modify the information again.

   

   Mild Action

   

   Members of Falun Gong knew clearly that they could not boast themselves anymore, so they made up articles about “Falun Gong Theory” and “History of Falun Gong”. According to maintainers with Wikipedia, there used to be official homepage website of Falun Gong on Wikipedia. Some people required Wikipedia use prominent typographies for Falun Gong website and the content related to “persecutions to Falun Gong”.

   

   Members of Falun Gong even attacked maintainers with Wikipedia. They accused them “violating the rule” and “hired by China Communist Party”, and sent them e-mails to propagate “the only truth”.

   

   On the pages of Wikipedia managing staff who “made wrong decisions”, they put long articles to persuade them believe the “truth” and “kindness” of Falun Gong, and said people who criticize Falun Gong should feel ashamed. After that, there appeared a long criticizing article on Wikipedia BBS, requiring delete of negative articles of Falun Gong and punishment to website managers.

   

   An entry regarding Falun Gong as a heresy made the followers very unhappy. This entry includes studies of many researchers, including two doctors and two B. Litts who consider Falun Gong as a heresy in their books. According to the standard of Wikipedia, publications from Institute of Philosophy of Russia Institute of Science are authorized resources that can hardly be modified. But the followers thought of an unpredicted method. They said these articles had quoted Li Hongzhi and violated American copyright, and required delete the links. However, as long as the origin was noted in the article, writers can quote from others. So no one believed the followers.

   

   Obviously, the followers didn’t know that during the 15-year work of Wikipedia, this kind of argument is not new any more. Experienced website managers are familiar with these tricks. Some of the information was banned according to the rules of Wikipedia and two accounts were locked forever because of “producing virus”.

   

   To show “extensive support”, a follower may register more than one account. One of them was prohibited to upload information for a whole day, and another two were also warned. The articles and websites promoting Falun Gong were deleted. After that, followers became less enthusiastic about doing tricks on Wikipedia. But as predicted by maintainers with Wikipedia, they will return some time later. Since 2008, entries related to Falun Gong have been periodically checked.

   

   Where did they come from?

   

   Wikipedia can be registered anonymously. You can even use it without registration. Besides, Wikipedia doesn’t require users to show their belief in the register. But if a group of users care nothing but repost links of “master’s” (what followers call Li Hongzhi) words, people will notice that.

   

   There are problems on other versions of Wikipedia. For instance, in English version, “official” entries were illegally put onto the website. The entry considered Falun Gong as a “traditional Chinese school”, and the founder was not the forest police retired in 1992. Of course, before 1992, no matter in China or in other countries, no one had heard of Falun Gong. But Falun Gong followers insisted to call it a mysterious Chinese tradition. These boasting stories were all wiped out in English e-books, paper encyclopedias and expert appraisals.

(2016/06/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场