新会员区

小米的部落格
[主页]->[新会员区]->[小米的部落格]->[Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia]
小米的部落格
·中国器官移植体系受到国际赞誉 回应三大疑问(图)
·8月28日纽约华人抗议称郭文贵是强奸犯、大魔头
·郭文贵是大魔头(8月28日抗议视频):
·8月30日纽约华人继续声讨郭文贵
·8月30日纽约华人继续声讨郭文贵
·郭文贵 骗子(视频)
·郭文贵的烦恼
·郭文贵又要面临新的罪行指控
·美联社独家调查:中国指控郭文贵涉嫌强奸罪
·海航向郭文贵索偿至少3亿美元的损害赔偿
·美联社称北京警方以涉嫌强奸罪调查郭文贵
·铁证如山!被郭文贵强奸的受害人马蕊露面
·9月1日纽约华人社团抗议民族败类、大骗子、诈骗犯郭文贵
·女事主曝光被郭文贵强奸的真相
·女事主曝光被郭文贵强奸的真相
·美联社曝中国警方调查郭文贵案
·贯君刘呈杰孙瑶现身击碎郭文贵谣言
·看看烂人郭文贵的成长史
·郭文贵女助理王雁平与Mary谈话二
·9月3日纽约华人团体继续声讨郭文贵
·【重磅推荐】《10分钟看穿大骗子郭文贵》
·王岐山家人集中露面击碎海外谣言
·王岐山家人集中露面击碎海外谣言
·丧家犬郭文贵哀求美国政治庇护
·9月7日纽约华人声讨郭文贵高喊“郭文贵是国际通缉犯”
·王岐山家人集中露面击碎海外谣言
·9月8日纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵
·9月9日纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵
·9月9日纽约华人团体声讨郭文贵
·郭文贵王雁平对强奸案的掩盖
·9月10日纽约华人社团声讨郭文贵"滚出美国"
·大骗子郭文贵伪造假文件申请政治避难
·大骗子郭文贵伪造假文件申请政治避难
·大骗子郭文贵伪造假文件申请政治避难
·大骗子郭文贵伪造假文件申请政治避难
·大骗子郭文贵伪造假文件申请政治避难
·大骗子郭文贵伪造假文件申请政治避难
·9月11日纽约华人抗议称“郭文贵,上帝制裁你”
·9月11日纽约华人抗议称“郭文贵,上帝制裁你”
·诈骗犯郭文贵伪造用于申请政治避难的假文件(续)
·9月11日纽约抗议队伍高喊“上帝制裁郭文贵”(视频)
·郭文贵雇T&M调查Adam Schiff的账单
·9月13日纽约华人社团声讨郭文贵(视频)。
·9月13日纽约华人社团声讨郭文贵(视频)。
·9月13日纽约华人社团声讨郭文贵(视频)
·9月13日纽约华人社团声讨郭文贵(视频)
·私人助理马蕊控告郭文贵强奸案诉状曝光
·愤怒的纽约民众在CNN总部抗议强奸犯郭文贵
·博闻社揭秘郭文贵侮辱、强奸妇女的奇特心理
·9月15日纽约华人声讨郭文贵是大汉奸(视频)
·9月15日纽约华人声讨郭文贵是大汉奸(视频)
·9月15日纽约华人声讨郭文贵是大汉奸(视频)
·郭氏直播打光打的回光返照了
·揭秘郭文贵留美保命、政治庇护的伎俩
·臭大了!郭文贵大骂《纽约时报》记者
·扒一扒郭文贵9月困局
·铁证如山!郭文贵为王雁平购买假证明
·杨澜逛街不理会大骗子郭文贵爆料
·范冰冰两天三喜,郭文贵预测泡汤
·福布斯:中国要求摩根渣打等银行冻结郭文贵账户
·孟建柱高调出镜 郭文贵造谣遭打脸(图)
·9月20日纽约华人社团声讨郭文贵强奸犯(视频)
·孟建柱高调出镜 郭文贵造谣遭打脸(图)
·依法治国必先治郭
·依法治国必先治郭
·9月26日纽约华人抗议郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国(视频)
·9月26日纽约华人抗议郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国(视频)
·9月26日纽约华人抗议郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国(视频)
·9月26日纽约华人抗议郭文贵是流氓无赖滚出美国(视频)
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·大骗子郭文贵无处可逃
·美国司法部长发话了,红通犯郭文贵无处可逃
·美国司法部长发话了,红通犯郭文贵无处可逃
·郭文贵保镖助理弃暗投明
·瞧,大骗子郭文贵要悄悄卖掉游船飞机
·看郭文贵如何财务造假骗美国审计
·郭文贵无恶不作
·杨澜表示郭文贵滥用言论自由
·杨澜表示郭文贵滥用言论自由
·9月28日纽约华人抗议大骗子郭文贵
·9月28日纽约华人抗议大骗子郭文贵
·托尼布莱尔的一世英名就这样被老郭给毁了
·郭文贵Facebook账号再次被禁
·郭文贵Facebook账号再次被禁
·揭秘郭文贵为英国前首相布莱尔设计陷阱全过程(音频)
·揭秘郭文贵为英国前首相布莱尔设计陷阱全过程(音频)
·9月30日华人抗议社团继续声讨郭文贵
·9月30日纽约华人抗议要求郭文贵滚出美国
·9月30日纽约华人抗议要求郭文贵滚出美国
·大骗子郭文贵伪造的文件漏洞百出!
·大骗子郭文贵伪造的文件漏洞百出!
·中美4日执法与网络安全高层双边对话涉及遣返郭文贵
·中美4日执法与网络安全高层双边对话涉及遣返郭文贵
·郭文贵伪造的国务院办公厅文件破绽百出!
·郭文贵伪造的国务院办公厅文件破绽百出!
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia

   

   

   Author: Gregory Drogba

   

   “Everyone can be an editor” is one of the slogans of Wikipedia. But, some anonymous editor should watch out.

   

   In the article named Pressure and Lobbying – Falun Gong’s Tricks against Media Criticism, it writes that the emerging Falun Gong used to bribe web management staff of Wikipedia. Out of our expectations, after the article was published, the story had an unexpected sequel.

   

   According to the edit record of Wikipedia, from April to May, 2016, the article concerning Falun Gong had been edited for over 250 times! We can imagine that most of the modification was trying to use information favorable to Falun Gong to replace the original objective entries in Wikipedia.

   

   These editors do not like us to speak negatively about Falun Gong. For instance, publications of Falun Gong were listed in extremism publications in Russia, and Falun Gong was banned by the court in Kirgizia. Moreover, it was prohibited in China, and followers who claim themselves as “true, kind and tolerant” failed in their lawsuits with reporters.

   

   Staff with Wikipedia had to provide special protection to the article in case the followers modify the information again.

   

   Mild Action

   

   Members of Falun Gong knew clearly that they could not boast themselves anymore, so they made up articles about “Falun Gong Theory” and “History of Falun Gong”. According to maintainers with Wikipedia, there used to be official homepage website of Falun Gong on Wikipedia. Some people required Wikipedia use prominent typographies for Falun Gong website and the content related to “persecutions to Falun Gong”.

   

   Members of Falun Gong even attacked maintainers with Wikipedia. They accused them “violating the rule” and “hired by China Communist Party”, and sent them e-mails to propagate “the only truth”.

   

   On the pages of Wikipedia managing staff who “made wrong decisions”, they put long articles to persuade them believe the “truth” and “kindness” of Falun Gong, and said people who criticize Falun Gong should feel ashamed. After that, there appeared a long criticizing article on Wikipedia BBS, requiring delete of negative articles of Falun Gong and punishment to website managers.

   

   An entry regarding Falun Gong as a heresy made the followers very unhappy. This entry includes studies of many researchers, including two doctors and two B. Litts who consider Falun Gong as a heresy in their books. According to the standard of Wikipedia, publications from Institute of Philosophy of Russia Institute of Science are authorized resources that can hardly be modified. But the followers thought of an unpredicted method. They said these articles had quoted Li Hongzhi and violated American copyright, and required delete the links. However, as long as the origin was noted in the article, writers can quote from others. So no one believed the followers.

   

   Obviously, the followers didn’t know that during the 15-year work of Wikipedia, this kind of argument is not new any more. Experienced website managers are familiar with these tricks. Some of the information was banned according to the rules of Wikipedia and two accounts were locked forever because of “producing virus”.

   

   To show “extensive support”, a follower may register more than one account. One of them was prohibited to upload information for a whole day, and another two were also warned. The articles and websites promoting Falun Gong were deleted. After that, followers became less enthusiastic about doing tricks on Wikipedia. But as predicted by maintainers with Wikipedia, they will return some time later. Since 2008, entries related to Falun Gong have been periodically checked.

   

   Where did they come from?

   

   Wikipedia can be registered anonymously. You can even use it without registration. Besides, Wikipedia doesn’t require users to show their belief in the register. But if a group of users care nothing but repost links of “master’s” (what followers call Li Hongzhi) words, people will notice that.

   

   There are problems on other versions of Wikipedia. For instance, in English version, “official” entries were illegally put onto the website. The entry considered Falun Gong as a “traditional Chinese school”, and the founder was not the forest police retired in 1992. Of course, before 1992, no matter in China or in other countries, no one had heard of Falun Gong. But Falun Gong followers insisted to call it a mysterious Chinese tradition. These boasting stories were all wiped out in English e-books, paper encyclopedias and expert appraisals.

(2016/06/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场