新会员区

小米的部落格
[主页]->[新会员区]->[小米的部落格]->[Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia]
小米的部落格
·习大大访美五大看点
·是天真还是愚蠢?
·美国宗教专家:法轮功欲从我身上摄取“德”
·美国宗教专家:法轮功欲从我身上摄取“德”
·美国宗教专家:法轮功欲从我身上摄取“德”
·美国宗教专家:法轮功欲从我身上摄取“德”
·习近平访英前说了8句提气话,你造么?
·66年磨一“见”
·习李王能破掉美国给中国做了30 年的“局”吗?
·八问浦志强
·怀念关先生 浪花里再也飞不出欢乐的歌
·“加拿大世姐”必须为其政治行为负责
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·“天安门自焚”十五年祭殇
·美国专家:天安门自焚事件真实性毋庸置疑
·美国专家:天安门自焚事件真实性毋庸置疑
·美国专家:天安门自焚事件真实性毋庸置疑
·陈果:美丽是这样被摧毁的
·花朵夭折谁之过
·花朵夭折谁之过
·花朵夭折谁之过
·花朵夭折谁之过
·花朵夭折谁之过
·花朵夭折谁之过
·花朵夭折谁之过
·拷问,自焚者燃起的火
·昭昭前事,惕惕后人
·假如没有那次自焚(图)
·旺角暴乱:能够成为香港自我救赎的一次机会吗?
·旺角暴乱:能够成为香港自我救赎的一次机会吗?
·旺角暴乱:能够成为香港自我救赎的一次机会吗?
·旺角暴乱:能够成为香港自我救赎的一次机会吗?
· 旺角暴乱后致香港“回归一代”:请回望这片被你无视的土地
· 再致香港回归一代:放开心中矛盾理想一起去追
·三致香港“回归一代”:其实你和我拥有共同的梦想
·涉嫌煽动旺角暴乱 香港激进政治组织头目被捕
·“中国伟哥之父”82分钟输掉2100万人民币
·夫死妻随 日本法轮功骨干肖辛力病亡
·〝常人〞眼里的法轮功
·原法轮功练习者、历史学家向《华侨时报》发出求援书
·华侨时报受到黑客攻击
·外媒:达赖为美国邪教辩解 以获取巨额捐赠
·“3.15”打假:法轮功特别版
·打假、假打与假打假
·KBS取消神韵艺术团的演出
·英国勒令科学教停播电视宣传广告
·美国《外交政策》:神韵演出满场政治教化
·习近平创两纪录:仅隔半年再访美 中国领导人首访捷克
·美国专家:期待中国在峰会上发挥更大作用
·习主席首访中东欧为何选捷克
·以色列反邪教新举措 通过涉邪教刑法修正案
·法轮功把愚弄人当职业
·加艺术家:神韵网站售票具有欺骗性且表演毫无艺术性可言
·谁把李洪志打回了原形
·师徒的小船说翻就翻(图)
·李洪志父亲李丹身世之谜(组图)
·吉林省查证李洪志购房偷逃大量税款
·吉林省查证李洪志购房偷逃大量税款
·李洪志吹破牛皮的简历
·李洪志早期合作者揭发其偷税
·骗钱有术的李洪志
·潘玉芳老人指证李洪志伪造出生日期
·为逝者点烛献花,“邪教受害者纪念馆”正式上线
·法轮功演化史:从邪教到反华势力急先锋
·何祚庥:李洪志归天法轮功就完了(图)
·俄日加强反邪教情报信息国际合作
·世界各国是如何打击邪教的
·司马南:法轮功帮了我一个大忙(图)
·李洪志父亲李丹年谱
·李洪志父母是如何走到一起的
·“神仙”其实是常人凡胎
·李洪志函授高中毕业证
·李洪志不择手段敛取不义之财
·公主岭的家乡人说李洪志
·原总后内蒙古八一军马场领导戳穿李洪志的老底
·还其本来面目———见证人评说李洪志(1999年07月29日)
·我与“偶像”李洪志的“亲密接触”(图)
·“神仙”为何钟情于气功(图)
·李洪志办班赚钱传“法”后见钱眼开
·昔日邻居揭穿李洪志老底
·我经历的法轮功郑州培训班(图)
·“纸上神佛”终可笑
·李洪志的吹嘘神功大揭底
·让李洪志认怂的那些事
·俄罗斯执法部门关闭宣扬法轮功的网站
·港人骂李洪志是卖国贼(图)
·广东阳春监狱服刑人员郭飞雄体检正常 监管部门指网传郭病情严重不实
·李洪志学历造假(图)
·香港市民送给李洪志的生日“贺礼”(图)
·李伪佛现形记(图)
·李洪志家庭秘史(组图)
·李洪志难念生日经
·图解法轮功出笼真相(图)
·8年前法轮功阻止海外华人为汶川地震募捐
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Falun Gong was Frustrated in its Attack to Wikipedia

   

   

   Author: Gregory Drogba

   

   “Everyone can be an editor” is one of the slogans of Wikipedia. But, some anonymous editor should watch out.

   

   In the article named Pressure and Lobbying – Falun Gong’s Tricks against Media Criticism, it writes that the emerging Falun Gong used to bribe web management staff of Wikipedia. Out of our expectations, after the article was published, the story had an unexpected sequel.

   

   According to the edit record of Wikipedia, from April to May, 2016, the article concerning Falun Gong had been edited for over 250 times! We can imagine that most of the modification was trying to use information favorable to Falun Gong to replace the original objective entries in Wikipedia.

   

   These editors do not like us to speak negatively about Falun Gong. For instance, publications of Falun Gong were listed in extremism publications in Russia, and Falun Gong was banned by the court in Kirgizia. Moreover, it was prohibited in China, and followers who claim themselves as “true, kind and tolerant” failed in their lawsuits with reporters.

   

   Staff with Wikipedia had to provide special protection to the article in case the followers modify the information again.

   

   Mild Action

   

   Members of Falun Gong knew clearly that they could not boast themselves anymore, so they made up articles about “Falun Gong Theory” and “History of Falun Gong”. According to maintainers with Wikipedia, there used to be official homepage website of Falun Gong on Wikipedia. Some people required Wikipedia use prominent typographies for Falun Gong website and the content related to “persecutions to Falun Gong”.

   

   Members of Falun Gong even attacked maintainers with Wikipedia. They accused them “violating the rule” and “hired by China Communist Party”, and sent them e-mails to propagate “the only truth”.

   

   On the pages of Wikipedia managing staff who “made wrong decisions”, they put long articles to persuade them believe the “truth” and “kindness” of Falun Gong, and said people who criticize Falun Gong should feel ashamed. After that, there appeared a long criticizing article on Wikipedia BBS, requiring delete of negative articles of Falun Gong and punishment to website managers.

   

   An entry regarding Falun Gong as a heresy made the followers very unhappy. This entry includes studies of many researchers, including two doctors and two B. Litts who consider Falun Gong as a heresy in their books. According to the standard of Wikipedia, publications from Institute of Philosophy of Russia Institute of Science are authorized resources that can hardly be modified. But the followers thought of an unpredicted method. They said these articles had quoted Li Hongzhi and violated American copyright, and required delete the links. However, as long as the origin was noted in the article, writers can quote from others. So no one believed the followers.

   

   Obviously, the followers didn’t know that during the 15-year work of Wikipedia, this kind of argument is not new any more. Experienced website managers are familiar with these tricks. Some of the information was banned according to the rules of Wikipedia and two accounts were locked forever because of “producing virus”.

   

   To show “extensive support”, a follower may register more than one account. One of them was prohibited to upload information for a whole day, and another two were also warned. The articles and websites promoting Falun Gong were deleted. After that, followers became less enthusiastic about doing tricks on Wikipedia. But as predicted by maintainers with Wikipedia, they will return some time later. Since 2008, entries related to Falun Gong have been periodically checked.

   

   Where did they come from?

   

   Wikipedia can be registered anonymously. You can even use it without registration. Besides, Wikipedia doesn’t require users to show their belief in the register. But if a group of users care nothing but repost links of “master’s” (what followers call Li Hongzhi) words, people will notice that.

   

   There are problems on other versions of Wikipedia. For instance, in English version, “official” entries were illegally put onto the website. The entry considered Falun Gong as a “traditional Chinese school”, and the founder was not the forest police retired in 1992. Of course, before 1992, no matter in China or in other countries, no one had heard of Falun Gong. But Falun Gong followers insisted to call it a mysterious Chinese tradition. These boasting stories were all wiped out in English e-books, paper encyclopedias and expert appraisals.

(2016/06/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场