滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[Middle way should not be the only voice: Chinese activist to Tibetans]
滕彪文集
·甘锦华再判死刑 紧急公开信呼吁慎重
·就甘锦华案致最高人民法院死刑复核法官的紧急公开信
·我来推推推(之九)
·DON’T BE EVIL
·我来推推推(之十)
·景德镇监狱三名死刑犯绝食吁国际关注
·江西乐平死刑冤案-向最高人民检察院的申诉材料
·我来推推推(之十一)
·法律人的尊严在于独立
·我来推推推(之十二)
·听从正义和良知的呼唤——在北京市司法局关于吊销唐吉田、刘巍律师证的听证会上的代理意见
·一个思想实验:关于中国政治
·公民维权与社会转型(上)——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲
·公民维权与社会转型——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲(下)
·福州“7•4”奇遇记
·夏俊峰案二审辩护词(新版)
·摄录机打破官方垄断
·敦请最高人民检察院立即对重庆打黑运动中的刑讯逼供问题依法调查的公开信
·为政治文明及格线而奋斗——滕彪律师的维权之路
·“打死挖个坑埋了!”
·"A Hole to Bury You"
·谁来承担抵制恶法的责任——曹顺利被劳动教养案代理词
·国家尊重和保障人权从严禁酷刑开始
·分裂的真相——关于钱云会案的对话
·无国界记者:对刘晓波诽谤者的回应
·有些人在法律面前更平等(英文)
·法律人与法治国家——在《改革内参》座谈会上的演讲
·貪官、死刑與民意
·茉莉:友爱的滕彪和他的诗情
·萧瀚:致滕彪兄
·万延海:想起滕彪律师
·滕彪:被迫走上它途的文學小子/威廉姆斯
·中国两位律师获民主奖/美国之音
·独立知识分子——写给我的兄弟/许志永
·滕彪的叫真/林青
·2011年十大法治事件(公盟版)
·Chinese Human Rights Lawyers Under Assault
·《乱诗》/殷龙龙
·吴英的生命和你我有关
·和讯微访谈•滕彪谈吴英案
·吴英、司法与死刑
·努力走向公民社会(视频访谈)
·【蔡卓华案】胡锦云被诉窝藏赃物罪的二审辩护词
·23岁青年被非法拘禁致死 亲属六年申请赔偿无果
·5月2日与陈光诚的谈话记录
·华邮评论:支持中国说真话者的理由
·中国律师的阴与阳/金融时报
·陈光诚应该留还是走?/刘卫晟
·含泪劝猫莫吃鼠
·AB的故事
·陈克贵家属关于拒绝接受两名指定律师的声明
·这个时代最优异的死刑辩词/茉莉
·自救的力量
·不只是问问而已
·The use of Citizens Documentary in Chinese Civil Rights Movements
·行政强制法起草至今23年未通过
·Rights Defence Movement Online and Offline
·遭遇中国司法
·一个单纯的反对者/阳光时务周刊
·“颠覆国家政权罪”的政治意涵/滕彪
·财产公开,与虎谋皮
·Changing China through Mandarin
·通过法律的抢劫——答《公民论坛》问
·Teng Biao: Defense in the Second Trial of Xia Junfeng Case
·血拆危局/滕彪
·“中国专制体制依赖死刑的象征性”
·To Remember Is to Resist/Teng Biao
·Striking a blow for freedom
·滕彪:维权、微博与围观:维权运动的线上与线下(上)
·滕彪:维权、微博与围观:维权运动的线上与线下(下)
·达赖喇嘛与中国国内人士视频会面问答全文
·台灣法庭初體驗-專訪滕彪
·滕彪:中国政治需要死刑作伴
·一个反动分子的自白
·强烈要求释放丁红芬等公民、立即取缔黑监狱的呼吁书
·The Confessions of a Reactionary
·浦志强 滕彪: 王天成诉周叶中案代理词
·选择维权是一种必然/德国之声
·A courageous Chinese lawyer urges his country to follow its own laws
·警方建议起诉许志永,意见书似“公民范本”
·对《集会游行示威法》提起违宪审查的公开建议书
·对《集会游行示威法》提起违宪审查的公开建议书
·滕彪访谈录:在“反动”的道路上越走越远
·因家暴杀夫被核准死刑 学界联名呼吁“刀下留人”
·川妇因反抗家暴面临死刑 各界紧急呼吁刀下留人
·Activist’s Death Questioned as U.N. Considers Chinese Rights Report
·Tales of an unjust justice
·打虎不是反腐
·What Is a “Legal Education Center” in China
·曹雅学:谁是许志永—— 与滕彪博士的访谈
·高层有人倒行逆施 民间却在不断成长
·让我们记住作恶的法官
·China’s growing human rights movement can claim many accomplishments
·總有一種花將會開遍中華大地/郭宏治
·不要忘记为争取​自由而失去自由的人们
·Testimony at CECC Hearing on China’s Crackdown on Rights Advocates
·Tiananmen at 25: China's next revolution may already be underway
·宗教自由普度共识
·"Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom"
·Beijing urged to respect religious freedom amid ‘anti-church’ crackd
·“中共难容宗教对意识形态的消解”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Middle way should not be the only voice: Chinese activist to Tibetans

   Middle way should not be the only voice: Chinese activist to Tibetans
   
   Phayul [Thursday, May 05, 2016 19:42]
   By Tenzin Monlam
   


   http://www.phayul.com/news/article.aspx?id=37493&article=Middle+way+should+not+be+the+only+voice%3a+Chinese+activist+to+Tibetans&t=1&c=1
   
   DHARAMSHALA, May 5: Chinese human rights activist and lawyer, Dr. Teng Biao, today said that Middle Way Approach, despite being a great idea, should not be the only voice of Tibetan struggle. Biao was speaking to an exclusive audience at a talk, ‘China’s democratization and the future of Tibet’, organized by Tibetan Centre for Human Rights and Democracy (TCHRD) and International Tibet Network (ITN) here.
   
   The activist who had been arrested twice by the Chinese police said that Beijing is not serious about solving the Tibetan issue and that they do not mean what they say during the bilateral dialogue. “They never keep their promises. Moreover, they use this dialogue to justify their suppression and to show the world they are working towards a solution,” said the co-founder of the Open Constitution Initiative (Gongmeng).
   
   Biao was critical about the Middle Way policy, the official policy of the Central Tibetan Administration, being presented as the only voice. He said he had shared this same thought earlier with His Holiness the Dalai Lama.
   
   “We should not suppress the voice of independence. It is good to have more voices, radical and independent voices, which would make China heed more carefully towards those seeking autonomy through middle way,” said the 43-year old lawyer.
   
   Labeling Tibetan cause and Chinese democratization as complicated issues, he said that the Communist Party is very powerful and confident but that in reality they are not so powerful and confident. They fear human rights movements and revolutions, he said.
   
   “There may be a moment, may be 5-10 years from now, where the CCP loses their power or on their way to losing their control and a new democratic government is formed. And when the democratic set up becomes stable in 20 -25 years, that would be the right time for Tibetans to decide independence or high level autonomy in peaceful manner,” he said, adding that only Tibetans have the right to decide their own future.
   
   He also talked about how China is using economic growth as an alternative to obtain legitimacy over Tibet and how Internet and social media is aiding the human rights activists in organizing protest and human rights activities.
   
   Members of Tibetan NGOs, dignitaries of Tibetan Parliament and CTA attended Biao’s talk.
   
   Acharya Yeshi Phuntsok, Tibetan MP, said, “Since he has been through a lot, I found his talk not just sharing an opinion but his own experience of the real situation in China. I also appreciate his suggestions on our shortcomings, strong points and on how to continue with our freedom struggle.”
   
   Biao was formerly a Lecturer in the China University of Political Science and Law and he is currently a visiting Fellow at Harvard Law School, Yale Law School, NYU and the Chinese University of Hongkong.
(2016/05/11 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场