·专访滕彪、杨建利:美国新法案 不给人权侵害者发签证
·A Joint Statement Upon the Establishment of ‘China Human Rights Accou
·Group to Probe China's Human Rights Violations Under U.S. Law
·The Long Reach of China to Silence Its Critics
·Trump has the power to fight China on human rights. Will he use it?
·「吊照门」事件 引发法界震盪
·Harassed Chinese rights lawyer still speaking out on Tibetans’ plight
·Beijing Suspends Licenses of 2 Lawyers Who Offered to Defend Tibetans
·Announcement of the Establishment of the China Anti-Torture Alliance
·Chinese Court Upends 13-Year-Old Rape, Murder, Robbery Convictions
·Scholars Return to YLS to Discuss Human Rights Advocacy in China
·Abducted Activists
·Conversation on China’s human rights: Professor provides first hand a
·Exiled Chinese lawyer says the country is moving toward a new totalita
·Chinese human rights lawyer stresses the duty to resist
·Street Vendor’s Execution Stokes Anger in China
·[video]Academic freedom in the East and Southeast
·Chinese Rights Lawyer Strikes Back at ABA Over Scuttled Book/WSJ
·China puts leading human rights lawyer on trial for 'inciting subversi
·川普政府吁中共尊重人权 学者促弃绥靖政策
·从709维权律师审判看盘古氏公司庭审秀 习近平是圣君还是反人类罪犯
· 纪念709,推动首届中国人权律师节
·Announcing the Inaugural China Human Rights Lawyers’ Day
·Why the West treats China with kid gloves
·Key Moments from CECC hearing “Gagging the Lawyers”
·Gagging the Lawyers: China’s Crackdown on Human Rights Lawyers and It
·中国人权律师节启动 在笑与泪中纪念“709”两周年
·Chinese human rights lawyers remain defiant despite crackdown
· 萬人簽署08憲章,為什麼唯獨重判劉曉波
·709抓捕兩週年 律師籲持續國際施壓
·The Political Meaning of the Crime of “Subverting State Power”
·Selected Publications/presentations as of 2017/8
·The Costs and Risks of Fighting for Human Dignity and Freedom
·China faces split into seven parts
· A Call for Investigation Into HNA Group’s Activities in the US and L
·王全璋律师竞逐郁金香人权奖:无畏强权 勇气与付出
·City of Asylum -Interview
·China’s top human rights lawyer in exile to speak at Saint Michael’s
·Activist expats raise voices on China rights crackdown
·A Human Rights Lawyer Lifts the Communist Party’s Spell
·Returning to Revolution
·One-man rule? China's Xi Jinping consolidates grip on power
·Kidnap, torture, exile: Dr. Teng Biao shares his story
·Arrested, Assaulted and Tortured: Exiled Human Rights Lawyer Details P
·Coercive Family Planning in Linyi
·Chinese lawyers hailed as “heroes for justice”
·李明哲案 滕彪:陸意圖影響台灣政治籌碼

   ANG Jianli TENG Biao
   This week, China’s President Xi, in Washington for the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Summit, will also meet on the side with President Obama. Obama continues to visibly rely on Xi’s professed commitments to the U.S., ranging from explicit to implicit, on an array of issues: carbon emission reduction, anti-nuclear proliferation, policing commercial hackers, and U.N. Security Council effort to stop ISIS, among others.
   While monitoring how Xi fulfills his commitments, and whether he can be trusted to do so in the future, Obama would do well to remember a reliable indicator.

   History teaches us that, when a dictator betrays the rights guaranteed the people by his nation’s own laws and constitution, his international agreements and commitment also are untrustworthy. In the 20th Century, we learned that lesson well.
   So it behoves Obama to press Xi about how his escalating repression of human rights not only has shocked the world’s conscience, but also has violated China’s own laws and constitution. He might start with the following questions. Xi’s answers would permit Obama to recalibrate what bargains to strike with him and how vigilantly to monitor Xi’s compliance.
   –“Why do you permit such gross violations of China’s constitutional provisions and laws guaranteeing religious freedom? The Communist Party has demolished more than 1,500 crosses and many churches in Zhejiang Province, alone. The Party continues to torture Falun Gong believers for peacefully practicing their faith (as recently confirmed by the U.N. Committee Against Torture), and also harvests and sells organs from live Falun Gong prisoners (the subject of a Resolution recently reported unanimously from the House Foreign Affairs Committee.)”
   –“Why do you deny ethnic minorities that constitute a significant population of a Chinese province the substantial autonomy that Article 4 of China’s constitution guarantees them? Why, for example, have you instead continued the ethnic and cultural repression of Tibetans in Tibet that has driven desperate monks and nuns to self-immolation? And if you are not trying to illegally destroy the Uyghurs’ ethnic identity, why do you forbid their wearing beards and whiskers as the founder of Communism, Karl Marx did?
   — “Do you think it is acceptable to unleash armed tanks and machine guns on peacefully protesting students and citizens; or do you agree with your father’s known position against the massacre of them in Tiananmen Square? If you do not think that was acceptable, then why do you try to enforce “national amnesia’ about the Tiananmen massacre? Will you permit citizens to peacefully commemorate the victims’ sacrifice on the anniversary of that tragedy this June?
   — “Is your alarming escalation of brutal repression consistent with your claim of fidelity to the ‘Rule of Law?’ In 2015, the world watched you disappear or imprison increasing numbers of attorneys, human rights advocates, journalists, others peacefully exercising their rights under China’s constitution, and even their bystander relatives.
   Starting October 2015, five staff of Hong Kong Causeway Bay Books, which was about to publish a China forbidden book on Xi’s private life, went missing one after another and were later found in detention in China. Martin Lee, the famous Hong Kong democratic leader, described the disappearances as the “most worrying thing that has happened in Hong Kong since the handover in 1997.”
   Just last week, the two younger brothers and a younger sister of Mr.Chang Ping, the Germany-based Chinese journalist, were abducted by the Chinese police, becoming the latest victims in the incident surrounding the open letter demanding Xi Jinping’s resignation.
   Citizens are sentenced on the basis of public confessions made following torture, but before their alleged crimes have been adjudicated in court. Is this adherence to the ‘rule of law’, or rather a renaissance of the infamous Cultural Revolution and the “collective punishment” doctrine of ancient China?
   President Obama should ponder carefully Xi’s answers, or silences, in response to these question. Xi’s widespread violations of China’s own constitution and statutes — let alone his continued disregard of China’s obligations under the Convention Against Torture, the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, and other universally accepted codes of decency it has signed — should put Obama on notice and prompt his due diligence before relying too much on Xi’s smiling assurances. It also should encourage him to stop muffling his public call for human rights in China
(2016/04/08 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.