大家
郭国汀律师专栏
[主页]->[大家]->[郭国汀律师专栏]->[The Essence Distinguish Between Marx and Lenin on the Dictatorship of ]
郭国汀律师专栏
·质疑张千帆教授对法轮功的评价 郭国汀
·宣誓证词Affidavit
·中共一贯谎言连篇是个地道的骗子党!
·中共下达密文奥运成迫害最大借口
·中国著名人权律师从为法轮功辩护看中共践踏法律(图)
·郭国汀律师批评中共奧運前加劇迫害法輪功
·郭国汀律师呼吁台湾政府予吴亚林政治庇护
·郭国汀律师称中共持续非法迫害法轮功及其辩护律师
·答Gavin0919郭国汀是法轮功走狗之指控
***(3)郭国汀为法轮功辩护的专访
·专访郭国汀律师(上) :为法轮功辩护
·专访郭国汀律师(下) :回首不言悔
·RFA:郭国汀介绍为法轮功学员打官司的曲折经历
·自由亞洲電台专访郭國汀谈為法輪功學員打官司
·希望之声郭国汀专访:对法轮功学员的劳教、判刑是非法行为
***(三)郭国汀律师为郑恩宠抗辩
·我为郑恩宠律师抗辩的前前后后
·为郑恩宠案翟明磊等中国新闻记者六君子的声明
·敬请关注郑恩宠律师所谓"非法获取国家秘密罪"一案
·历史将证明郑恩宠律师无罪/郭国汀
·郑恩宠案二审辩护词及网友评论/郭国汀
·关于会见在押的郑恩宠的第二次申请函
·郑恩宠律师“为境外非法提供国家秘密罪”一审判决书
·上海市高级法院郑恩宠案刑事裁定书
·郑恩宠冤案再审案至全国律协诸位会长之公开函/郭国汀
·中国最需要像郑恩宠这样的律师
·诽谤郑恩宠律师的中共党奴及特务名录
·再谈郑恩宠案 郭国汀倡律师网上辩护
·我为郑恩宠辩护的前前后后 郭国汀
·上海普通市民感受的郑恩宠大律师
·关于郑恩宠案我的声明
·我为郑恩宠律师辩护
·一切源于郑恩宠案,可敬的国安兄弟请自重!
·郑恩宠聘请辩护人的真相
·郑恩宠聘请辩护律师真相之二
·真为这位北京律师脸红!
·张思之大律师冒着酷暑赴看守所会见郑恩宠
·上海监狱当局婉拒郑恩宠的辩护律师会见
·关于会见在押的郑恩宠的第二次申请函
·揭开“时代精英“画皮
·答时代精英,
·再答时代精英教导
·向张思之律师,郑恩宠律师学习,致敬!
·南郭:仗义执言的律师还是没良心的律师
·驳“文律”兄郑案高论/南郭
·中国最需要像郑恩宠这样的律师
·凡跟郭国汀贴者一律入选黑名单
·批驳李洪东之首恶律师说!
·历史岂容任意伪造!
·惊闻郑恩宠律师夫人蒋美丽被拘捕!
·郑恩宠案二审会维持原判,辩护律师难辞其咎。
·求名求利的律师代表
·答L君之三项基本原则
·郑恩宠案网友评论
·网友支持或反对郑恩宠的评论
·支持或反对郑恩宠的网友评论之二
·中国律师声援支持郑恩宠
·吴国策律师:“求名求利的律师代表——某律师的心里”系他人盗名发表的声明
·中国律师声援支持郑恩宠律师
·网警\网友\特务与郑恩宠案
·郑恩宠律师的最后一篇代理词
·关于记者杨金志、陈斌严重侵犯郑恩宠律师名誉权的律师函
·郭国汀律师如果你还是个真正的男人的话,请你勇于承担败诉的责任。
·郑恩宠案上海当局特务什么下流无耻的手段皆用
·谋害郑恩宠的凶手是谁?
·郑恩宠案上海高院驳回上诉后网友们的评论
·请记住一位伟大的律师英雄——郑恩宠/郭国汀
***(四)香港联中公司与厦门国际贸易信托投资公司国际贸易争议再审案
·司法腐败的典型案例
·最高法院无理拖宕九年拒不下判再审案代理词
·反了你!竟敢不尊敬我大法官!
·就十五载官司致最高法院法官的公开函
·中国法官如何让吾尊敬/南郭
·最高法院的院长们为何威胁郭国汀律师?
***(五)涉外亿元合同诈骗案
·涉港“亿元”合同诈骗案之辩护词/郭国汀
·惊心动魄的辩护
·涉外亿元诈骗案致有关负责人的公开函
·致福建省委、省政府各位领导及福州市委、市府各位负责人的公开信
·关于本司与福州市粮油公司贸易纠纷案及因此而被无辜拘留、逮捕者至福州市、福建省、中国政府、公安、检察各部门负责人公开函:
·亿元合同诈骗案至福州市市长函
·亿元合同诈骗案至福州市委书记函
·关于亿元合同诈骗案至福州市委书记的函
·亿元合同诈骗案至中央政法委书记紧急呼吁函
·福州市公安局插手涉港经济纠纷造成海内外不良影响事
·亿元合同诈骗案郭国汀律师与龚雄副市长会谈备忘录
***(59)(五)郭国汀律师名案劲辩
***(1)政治良心案
·力虹(张建红)煽动颠覆国家政权案的咄咄怪事
·郭国汀力虹被中共无罪重判的真实原因
·评论严正责令胡锦涛立即无条件释放朱宇飙律师!
·简析严正学所谓颠覆国家政权案
·严正学所谓[涉嫌颠覆国家政权案]必须公开审判
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The Essence Distinguish Between Marx and Lenin on the Dictatorship of

Guoting Guo

   

   

   The Dictatorship of the Proletariat is the most important theory of the Marxism and Leninism, which also is the most confused idea in the Communist movement. As Leonhard noted that the concept of ‘the Dictatorship of the Proletariat’ has many changes in the course of development,and no other subject has given rise to such a multiplicity of polemics,discussions, and sharp clashes”. [1] The Constitution of China still has so called the“Four basic principles”, that is insist of the Marxism Leninism, the Dictatorship of the Proletariat, the road of the socialism and the Chinese Communist of Party’s(the CCP) leadership. Since in essence all political institutions of China copied from those of the Soviet of Union; After seize the state power in 1949, the CCP, in the name of the Dictatorship of the proletariat, never held a single free election for MPs, the president and local government head of officials; has been killed or jailing more than 20 millions political dissidents. I am going to study the real meaning of the dictatorship and the proletariat of Marx and Lenin, argued that for Marx and Engel, the dictatorship of the proletariat do not means a few revolutionary or elite’s dictatorship, but workers as a class for special purpose during transferring period through working class democracy ruling the worker’s state; while Lenin in essence against Marx’s theory and claims for despotic absolute violent power, which completely copied by the CCP.

   

   I. Marx on the dictatorship of the proletariat

   For Marx, social revolution presupposes a high level of economic and technological development, working class comprising the majority of the population; Absence the prerequisite, a transition to the classless society would not be possible; the social revolution would possible only by a simultaneous victory in several industrially developed countries; at first, Marx and Engels stressed revolution by force, after 1870s they regarded a peaceful transformation by means of a labour majority in parliament as desirable and probable. The social revolution would lead to the political rule of the working class (dictatorship of the proletariat)through the destruction of the power of bureaucracy, army, police, replace with a body elected by general secret ballot, exercising legislative and executive power, officials have the same pay as workers, would be recalled by electors at any time. In the end of 1870, Marx reply ‘All I know is that I am no Marxist”.

   

   The Dictatorship of the Proletariat during a short transitional period, would put into effect the measure necessary for the transformation of society. Main features:

   1. Social ownership of the means of production in the form of association of free producers or union of co-operatives;

   2. Planed development, increase the cooperative wealth, distribution of all products according to requirement;

   3. Eliminate class rule and class distinctions, abolish state power, emerge classless society;

   4. Eliminate town and country contrast;

   5. Abolish enslave division of labour, develop fully mental and physical potential;

   6. Eliminate conflicts among nations.

   

   The concept of The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, mean a dictatorial or even totalitarian system, nothing of the kind in Marx or Engels mind. They sometimes equated the concept of ‘democratic constitution’ with that of the role of the working class. The dictatorship of proletariat pursue socialist policy. Marx only discuss vague detail of such policy, to the abolition of the private property in all means of production.

   

   On May 1843 Marx to Arnold Ruge : “the only principle of despotism is contempt for man, dehumanized man, …the Despot always sees men as degraded. …The general principle of monarchy is the despised,despicable dehumanized man; Montespuieu makes distinctions among monarchy,despotism, and tyranny. But all these are names for only one idea; at most it is a behavioral difference within the same principle. …it is always good enough to govern a nation that has never has any other law than the despotism of its kings. [2]

   

   In Critique of Critical Critique, Marx and Engels believed that: “If the proletariat is victorious, it does not at all mean that it games the absolute master of society, for it is victorious only by abolishing itself and its opposite. Then the proletariat, and its determining opposite private property, disappear.”[3]

   

   Marx fight with Mikhail Bakunin, who considered The Dictatorship of the Proletariat dangerous, because like any dictatorship, it violated the human rights of freedom. “ I regret the blindness of those who believe that they can achieve economic equality and justice in any other way except by freedom. Equality without freedom is a terrible fiction, created by swindlers to mislead fools.Equality without freedom means state despotism. [4]

   

   The manifesto described ‘the first step in the revolution’ as being ‘ to raise the proletariat to the position of ruling class, to win the battle of democracy. In thedraft, Engels declared that a communist revolution ‘will inaugurate a democratic constitution and thereby, directly orindirectly, the political rule of the proletariat’.[5] Ten demands listed in themanifesto, generally applicable in the most advanced countries, base onuniversal suffrage in an advanced industrial economy. The ultimate aim is theabolition of private property. As Thomas Sowell point out that The phrase ‘ dictatorship of the proletariat’ islittle more than a paraphrase of these statements. ’ [6]

   

   This description of transition period first occurred in 1850, “theproletariat…revolutionary socialism, around communism …Blanqui…declaration ofthe permanence of the revolution point to the abolition of class differencesgenerally, to the abolition of all the productive relation on which they rest,to the abolition of all the social relation that correspond to these relationsof production, to the revolutionising all the ideas that result from thesesocial connections. [7]

   

   Marx believed that a lengthytransition period must be follow the coming to power of the proletariat,and ‘every provisional political set-up following a revolution calls fordictatorship and an energetic dictatorship at that’.[8]Marx said that “the forceis the midwife of every old society pregnant with a newone”.

   

   The revolutionary programme of The Dictatorship of the Proletariat, the conquest of politicalpower by the working class in alliance with the non-proletarian sections of theworking people, was the culminating points of Marxism.[9]

   

   Marx’s proofs concerning The Dictatorship of the Proletariat were in fact prophecies statewith great force and conviction. The class struggle must necessarily lead to the dictatorship of proletariat was his most original contribution to thetheory of class struggle, and he meant by The Dictatorship of the Proletariatprecisely what he said: The ruling power would fall into the hands of the poorfarmers and the unskilled and semi-skilled workers. The aristocrats,bourgeoisie, and the skilled workers would be dethroned, and majority poor,would inherit the earth. Then in the course of time The Dictatorship of the Proletariat would give way to a classlesssociety. [10]

   

   Marx asserted that the proletariat cannot merelytake over the existing state machine, but must smash it and create a new onesuited to the situation, from experience of 1848-1850 revolution. In theManifesto, Marx seems thought that state are a neutral instrument, but in theEighteenth Brumaire, he declared that the revolution ‘perfects the statepower…in order to concentrate all its forces of destruction against it. [11] Proletariat revolutionmust smash the state machine, not simply to transfer it to new hand. Thepolitical machine which had enslaved the working class could not be ‘thepolitical instrument of their emancipation’.

   For Marx was not just a question of the physicaltransfer of Power but necessitated that the productive capacity of thebourgeois order should first be exhausted. Marx andEngels had clearly seen revolution as a spontaneous mass rising. Leninargued that spontaneous action was not sufficient, welled organized, strictdisciplined party represented the wishes of the proletariat and acting on theirbehalf. [12]

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场