VOA时事大家谈：中国司法不独立，如何进行司法改革？ /滕彪文集

滕彪文集

[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[VOA时事大家谈：中国司法不独立，如何进行司法改革？ ]

滕彪文集

·Hongkong: the Unbearable Weight of the Revolution

·Courts are told what decision to make in important cases

·RISKY BUSINESS fighting for Human Rights in China

·藏族、維吾爾族、南（内）蒙古族以及漢族活動人士的聯合聲明

·A STATEMENT OF SOLIDARITY FROM A TIBETAN, UYGHUR, SOUTHERN MONGOLIAN,

·The Supremacy of the Constitution, and Freedom of Religion

·如果有人倾听你对昨夜梦境的复述（诗四首）

·China’s Empty Promise of Rule by Law

·Sensing subversion, China throws the book at kids' libraries

·VOA时事大家谈：中国司法不独立，如何进行司法改革？

·VOA时事大家谈：通奸女官员被“游街”：罪有应得还是侵犯人权？

·滕彪：中共“依法治国”的画皮

·What will this crackdown on activists do to China’s nascent civil soc

·浦志强、滕彪：李保华诉周国平名誉权纠纷案代理词

·The most dangerous job in law

·关于撤销《黑龙江省垦区条例》的建议

·Selective Blindness over China and Huamn Rights

·中共体制是一个不定时的炸弹/VOA

·滕彪在伦敦闹市被打劫

·「西方學者自我審查問題嚴重」/BBC

·CHINA'S LONG ROAD TO DEATH PENALTY REFORM

·Blood, Justice and Corruption: Why the Chinese Love Their Death Penalt

·完善我国宪法人权保护条款的建议

·计生基本国策是完全错误的

·死刑作為政治籌碼

·Human Rights Advocates Vanish as China Intensifies Crackdown/NYT

·学者滕彪等人探望基督徒母亲被殴打/RFA

·‘Did We Stand on the Side of Tank Man?’

·The Quest to Save the World's Scholars From Persecution and Death

·北京准备出手整肃海内外NGO与学术界

·时事大家谈：中国新国安法,党国不分？

·Comments on the draft law on Foreign NGO Management

·评《境外非政府组织管理法》和《国家安全法》草案

·《回到革命》亮相香港书展

·China is moving toward a new totalitarianism

·Uncivil/ The Economist

·《回到革命》编选说明、封面设计说明

·习近平为何清洗人权律师

·Why Xi Jinping is Purging China’s Human Rights Lawyers

·CCP party has an exaggerated fear of a color revolution

·維權律師享受和集權者鬥爭樂趣

·Toast at the Stateless Breakfast

·"China é responsável por 90% das execuções mundiais"

·敗訴多於勝訴的名律師(上)

·敗訴多於勝訴的名律師(下)

·China's international relations at a time of rising rule of law challe

·Seven Chinese activists wrote to the Dutch King

·七名中国民主人士致信荷兰国王

·專訪維權律師滕彪對中國法治人權的解讀

·中共的政治株连

·Dictatorship is a Decapitator, Whether it Tortures You or Treats You W

·Innocence project movement in China rises to aid the wrongfully convic

·好處沙龍【選後台灣如何面對中國巨變】

·“你恐惧，中共的目的就达到了”

·SOME QUESTIONS FOR PRESIDENT OBAMA TO ASK PRESIDENT XI

·Book Debate Raises Questions of Self-Censorship by Foreign Groups in C

·Leaked Email: ABA Cancels Book for Fear of ‘Upsetting the Chinese Gov

·Is the ABA Afraid of the Chinese Government?

·Middle way should not be the only voice: Chinese activist to Tibetans

·Middle way not the only way for Tibet, says Chinese rights lawyer

·被曝光的电邮：怕惹恼北京美国律师协会取消出版《黎明前的黑暗》

·美律协违约拒为滕彪出书国会要求解释

·高智晟：ABA和滕彪哪個更應該強大

·Lawmakers Pounce After ABA Scraps Book by China Rights Lawyer

·American Self-Censorship Association/WSJ

·An interview with China’s foremost rights lawyer Dr Teng Biao

·纽约时报：中国律师新书命运引发在华NGO自我审查争议

·Is China Returning to the Madness of Mao’s Cultural Revolution?

·The Conundrum of Compromise/Robert Precht

·Congress Still Calling Out ABA Over Canceled Book Deal

·No country for academics: Chinese crackdown forces intellectuals abroa

·中共血債大於其他專制國家

·江绪林之死反映中国知识分子精神痛苦唯有自杀寻求解脱

·"THERE WILL ALWAYS BE SOME BRAVE ACTIVISTS WHO REFUSE TO KEEP QUIET"

·“你们全家都是共产党员！”

·滕彪和江天勇获第25届杰出民主人士奖

·访滕彪：中国司法何以如此“高效率”

·'China wacht een revolutie, ik hoop een vreedzame'

·Arrestatiegolf China toont angst van regime

·ENTRETIEN AVEC LE DéFENSEUR DES DROITS DE L'HOMME TENG BIAO

·Le Parti communiste chinois est confronté à une série de crises

·英媒：遭受打击中国知识分子被迫出国

·709 Crackdown/ Front Line Defenders

·Cataloging the Torture of Lawyers in China

·南海仲裁的法理基础及其对中国的政治冲击

·the Comfort of Self-Censorship

·G20前夕美国家安全顾问会晤中国人权人士

·Chinese dissidents urge Obama to press Xi Jinping on human rights at G

·China blocks major civil society groups from monitoring G20 summit

·Open Letter to G20 Leaders attending the 2016 G20 Summit

·自我审查的自我安慰/滕彪

·细雨中的独白——写给十七年

·Rights lawyers publicly shamed by China's national bar association

·沉默的暴行

·中共“长臂”施压维权律师滕彪妻子被迫离职

·除了革命，中国已经别无道路

·高瑜案件从一开始就是政治操控

·毛式文革与恐怖主义之异同——国内外专家学者访谈

·最高法维护狼牙山五壮士名誉学者批司法为文宣服务

·滕彪和杨建利投书彭博社批评美国大选不谈中国人权议题

·“未来关键运动的发起者可能是我们都不认识的人。”

[列出本栏目所有内容]

欢迎在此做广告

VOA时事大家谈：中国司法不独立，如何进行司法改革？

   https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IWFagRS7uQI

   十八届四中全会高唱”依法治国”，会中决定作为司法改革试点之一的上海，也在上周末成立了中国首个法官检察官遴选惩戒委员会。但在缺乏司法独立的情况下，是否能够真正依法治国丶进行司法改革，也遭到质疑。没有司法独立，能够依法治国吗？如何进行司法改革？在当前中国法律体制环境下，中国法官与中国律师面临什么样的处境？
   今天我们邀请到两位嘉宾来参加节目讨论。一位是美国福特汉姆大学宪政学者、中国律师王军先生；另外一位是美国哈佛大学访问学者、中国人权律师滕彪先生。

   文字报道：http://www.voachinese.com/content/voa、、.

   《时事大家谈》脸书： https://www.facebook.com/VOAIO
   《时事大家谈》推特： https://twitter.com/VOAIO
   美国之音中文网视频 - http://www.voachinese.com/media/video、、.
（2015/01/21 发表）

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作，均不代表博讯立场