百家争鸣
刘蔚
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[刘蔚]->[Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Pois]
刘蔚
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之89—面对共产党的压榨,不应该中立
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之90—看中共媒体、民办媒体对重庆水灾的不同报道
·唤醒国人之91—共产党实行的是党书记专政
·唤醒国人之92—中国人生活困苦的两个根源
·唤醒国人之93—共产党的精神堕落建设
·唤醒国人之94—中国人当代的第一所民办大学
·Wei Liu: Awakening Chinese People 14—Who Are the Good Guys, Who Are the Bad Guys?
·Wei Liu: Awakening Chinese People 47—The Truth of the Communist Party’s Saying that Chinese People Go to Make Money
·唤醒国人之95—算算平均每年的物价涨幅
·唤醒国人之96—我就是要起义
·唤醒国人之97—可以用暴力革命结束共产党的统治
·唤醒国人之98—以和平革命结束共产党的统治是可能的
·唤醒国人之99—和平革命对参与者的要求不亚于暴力革命
·唤醒国人之100—怎样进行和平革命?
·唤醒国人之101—市镇起义发动时的景象
·刘蔚: 唤醒国人之102—市镇起义的意义
·唤醒国人之103—起义军不必担心共产党的核生化武器
·唤醒国人之104—参加市镇起义的人员
·唤醒国人之105—市镇起义两个月时的景象
·唤醒国人之106—天下大乱才好
·唤醒国人之107—起义四年后的景象
·唤醒国人之108—市镇起义的可行性
·唤醒国人之109—共产党管区人们的五大误区
·唤醒国人之110—民主平等的新中国创业难
·唤醒国人之111—民主平等的新中国守业不难
·唤醒国人之112—用常识判断消息的可信度
·唤醒国人之113—我们今天维权应有的方向
·唤醒国人之114—“斗地主”是中国人生活困苦的开端
·唤醒国人之115—共产党的阶级论就是特权论
·唤醒国人之116—中国颜色革命的颜色
·唤醒国人之117—颜色革命的活动
·唤醒国人之118—大陆色情业泛滥显示的是民不聊生
·唤醒国人之119—从没有一寸土地到有一千平方米的土地
·唤醒国人之120—有这样的搬家才好
·唤醒国人之121—每人领取一份土地不会使人口增长
·唤醒国人之122—人靠父母养活还是靠老天养活?
·唤醒国人之123—共产党管区是1%的富人和99%的穷人
·唤醒国人之124—医治中国贫富悬殊的良药
·唤醒国人之125—抽签领取土地中的事项
·唤醒国人之126—住房地、商用地应该不会占用现有的耕地
·唤醒国人之127—人人一份地,人人不再穷
·唤醒国人之128—还要在共产党设定的环境里捞一笔吗?
·唤醒国人之129—女人不要再去卖身了
·唤醒国人之130—男人不要就想着女人的肉体
·唤醒国人之131—民众拥有他们应有的财富是唯一的标准
·唤醒国人之132—拒绝共产党的非正义战争
·唤醒国人之133—一些人从相信弱肉强食到禽兽不如
·唤醒国人之134—单方面的税费何时才休?
·唤醒国人之136—还我河山
·唤醒国人之137—在这个国家想不犯法很难
·唤醒国人之138— 拒绝缴税
·唤醒国人之139—中共是在反对台独还是在反对民主?
·唤醒国人之140—中共成了世界军事巨人
·唤醒国人之141--我们受够了中共的战争威胁
·唤醒国人之142—给大陆媒体,论坛的公开信
·唤醒国人之143—反共就是反法西斯
·唤醒国人之144—现在就实行民主
·唤醒国人之145—现在民主活动中实行民主的两个问题
·唤醒国人之146—觉醒人士2008年新年文告
·唤醒国人之147—共产党管区人们的四大误区
·唤醒国人之148—中国人应该怎样反对歧视?
·唤醒国人之149—我们为什么要谈政治?
·唤醒国人之150—说说共产党管区的语汇
·唤醒国人之151—共产党几十年来搞的是刺刀经济
·唤醒国人之152—没有国,哪有家?
·唤醒国人之153—20美金的欢迎费是怎么来的?
·唤醒国人之154—假话与假货
·唤醒国人之155—我们民众是否需要改变?
·唤醒国人之156—喜欢看围棋之1
·唤醒国人之157—喜欢看围棋之2
·唤醒国人之158—喜欢看围棋之3
·唤醒国人之159—在上海讲真相之一
·唤醒国人之160—共产党要在2008年4,5月间攻打台湾吗?
·唤醒国人之161—发动战争一方在开战前必须宣战
·唤醒国人之162—在上海讲真相之二及向今天的藏民致敬
·唤醒国人之163—在上海讲真相之三并向今天的西藏人致敬
·唤醒国人之164—雪山上的民族,你们是当今世界的英雄
·唤醒国人之165—在广州讲真相之一
·唤醒国人之166—今天中国的家庭沦为了共产党压榨民众的场所
·唤醒国人之167—全国和平革命的时机已经成熟了
·唤醒国人之168—反对中共举办奥运会
·唤醒国人之169—在广州讲真相之二
·唤醒国人之170—共产党派了王千源等来救中国股市 (上)
·唤醒国人之171—共产党派了王千源等来救中国股市 (下)
·唤醒国人之172—看清共产党假爱国,真捞钱的本质 (上)
·唤醒国人之173—看清共产党假爱国,真捞钱的本质 (下)
·唤醒国人之174—中共传递的不是和平而是狼烟 (上)
·唤醒国人之175—中共传递的不是和平而是狼烟 (下)
·唤醒国人之176—高于/压倒一切的说法站得住脚吗?(上)
·唤醒国人之177—高于/压倒一切的说法站得住脚吗?(下)
·唤醒国人之178—我没有捐款,我的帐篷只花了150元 (上)
·Wei Liu: Awakening Chinese People 180—Two Opposite Sides of People in Present China of 2008
·唤醒国人之179—我没有捐款,我的帐篷只花了150元 (下)
·唤醒国人之180—今天2008年中国的两大阵营
·唤醒国人之181—苛政猛于地震也 (上)
·唤醒国人之182—苛政猛于地震也 (下)
·唤醒国人之183—如今中国落后的真正原因 (上)
·唤醒国人之184—如今中国落后的真正原因 (下)
·唤醒国人之185—我就愿意范跑跑来教我的孩子 (上)
·唤醒国人之186—我就愿意范跑跑来教我的孩子 (下)
·唤醒国人之187—各作者应写明是否欢迎读者登载
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Pois

刘蔚:五毛文字展示其中毒太深—六年高考1.57

   公友/民主人士/觉醒人士/普通百姓 刘蔚 2014年7月25日

   Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Poisoned

   Human Rights Worker/Democratic People/Awakened People/Common PeopleWei Liu July 25, 2014

   网上评论余杰作品的文字不少。这里我们来看一篇短的吧。

   There are many comments on Yu Jie’s works on the Internet. Let’s look at a short one.

   “余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国

   田峰 2012年

   余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国。其结局就是余杰先生离开了中国,去了美国。中国和美国不一样,美国有美国的特色,中国有中国的特色。只不过两国的特色不同罢了。指鹿为马不对,非得指马为鹿也不对。国情不同,种亦有别,不可强求。鲁迅就是前车之鉴,呐喊了那么多年,有什么用呢?不如归去!”

   “余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国”完

   “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States

   Tian Feng 2012

    Mr. Yu Jie’s mistake is to regard China as the United States. The result is his leaving China for the United States in 2012. China is different from the United States, with each of them has its own respective feature. It is wrong to regard a deer as a horse and it is also to regard a horse as a deer. The situation and the race between the two countries are all different and cannot expect to be the same. Lu Xun is a known failure example, who has shouted aloud for many years, but what outcome has it brought up? It’s better for him not to do anything!”

    The end of “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States”

   如果你还想你或你亲友每人拿回土地,住房,医疗,拿回包括公民税率,政府各方面开支等社会事务的表决权这些民主人权,你最好读完这篇长文。你可以从Google translate/谷歌翻译听文章的朗读。你可告诉你外国朋友/老师我写的英文。他们可以在google上用“Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”搜寻出我的文字。更多文章见我的海外博讯boxun网站的博客,加上前后的www, com 我名字在首页底部的作者群中。从2007年到2014年2月,我博客的显示点击量已达300万,而按博讯说的各博客的实际点击量是显示点击量的10倍以上,那我博客的实际点击量到2014年2月已达3000万。我们的文字是对中国民众说的,是我们认为真实的情况,欢迎各位,各媒体.转载,传播。一个人给5个以上人讲我们《伟大的中国全民大革命》中的1项国际公约,2项活动主张,4项基本人权,8项优秀活动,及本县/市政权楼等几个地址,民众兵器弹弓枪等起义事宜,壮大进步力量,救自己,救别人,救中国。

    If you want you or your friends in this life to get back the human rights of half an acre land, welfares of housing, medical care, the voting rights on the tax rate and the government budget, you’d better read through this long essay. Google translate can read text aloud for you. If you have foreign friends/teachers, you may tell them to read the English part of my essay. They can google me out by “Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”. More articles of mine can be seen in my blog at “boxun”, with “www” in the front and “com” in the back, my name Wei Liu/刘蔚 is at the bottom of the homepage. From 2007 to 2014, my blog has 3 million displayed visits, and the website says that the actual visits is 10 times as the displayed visits. Then the actual visits of my blog is 30 million. What we say here we hold is true and is for 1.3 billion Chinese people. Every one is welcomed to publish, to spread our words, one person tells 5 or more persons, about the 1 international convention, the 2 uprising opinions, the 4 fundamental human rights, the 8 excellent activities, the couple of addresses of the Communist regime buildings in the local county, the uprising elements like the slingshot of people’s weapon. Anyway, we expand the democratic strength to save ourselves, our friends and our country.

   这样文字的作者是中中共奴才教育的毒太深了。奴才教育就是上面说的,只要你赞成中共,你的作品就是好的,反之就是坏的。我们说,“只有人民/民族才是评判好坏的标准。那就是13亿人一人一票表决,看哪方得的赞成票多或者赞成票是否超过反对票。”什么叫中国特色,恐怕中共高官及其理论家自己都不清楚。1987年中共十三大提出了“沿着有中国特色的社会主义道路前进”的理论,其中并没有实在的内容,如何实在地解决民众的土地,住房,食品,教育,医疗等基本生存问题,根本就没有谈。中国特色主要的目的是中共要玩一个白马非马的把戏。邓小平,赵紫阳的意思是“中国是社会主义,但它是有中国特色的社会主义,别再拿社会主义的一套理论来束缚中国。”

   The words of this author have shown that he has been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist slavery education. The slavery education is talked above that once you consent to the Communist Party, then your works is good; otherwise, it is bad. We say, “Only people is the criterion for good or bad; that is the universal vote among the 1.3 billion Chinese people, to see which side has more pro ballots than the con ballots.” What is the feature of China broadcasted by the Communist Party? Even the Communist Party’s high official or theorist cannot give a clear answer. In 1987 in the 13th Convention of that Party, it brought up the theory of “Advance on the Socialist Path with the Feature of China, but there is no substantial content in the theory, like how to solve people’s basic livings of land, housing, food, education, medical care and etc. The purpose of this theory is for the Party to play a game called a white horse is not a horse. The meaning of the high officials Deng Xiaoping and Zhao Ziyang is that “China is socialism or Communism, but it is the Communism that has the feature of China, and then do not use the Communist theory to confine China.”

   至于说此文作者提到的美国特色,去过美国的人都知道,美国根本不讲美国特色,而是讲普适价值,那就是民主公平。虽然美国在普适价值上还有缺陷,但它毕竟是做得最好的几个大国之一。

   As for the feature of the United States mentioned by the author, all people who have come to this country know that the United States never talks about the feature of the United States and talks about the Universal Value, which is democracy and fairness. Though the United States has some defects in the aspect of the Universal Value, after all it is one of the best big countries in the world.

   同样读过余杰作品的人多明白,余杰作品呼吁的中国人应该有民主公平是普适价值,是法国民众,美国民众,德国民众,中国民众,日本民众,英国民众等等都该有的权利。就这一观点,我们愿意13亿人来一人一票表决,看赞成票是否超过反对票?那位否定余杰的作者能不能告诉我们,世界上哪个国家的民众不该有民主公平呢?又能否愿意13亿人就你的观点进行一人一票的表决呢?

   Also those who have read Yu Jie’s works usually know his calling Chinese people to have democracy and fairness is the universal value; it is the human rights for French People, American people, Germen People, Chinese People, Japanese people, British People, and etc. For this point of view, we welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote, one person one ballot, and to see whether the pro ballots will be more than the con ballots. Can that author who negates Yujie tell us people in which country in this world should not have democracy and fairness? Can you welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote on your point of view, one person one ballot?

   我们看到否定余杰文字的这些人根本不谈余杰作品文字上的要素,就只是按中共语文中心思想式的与文字好坏无关的评论,他们评论的根本不是余杰的作品,只是显示他们要有意识无意识讨好当局的心态。各位可以看看,上面否定余杰的那篇文章,可以说对任何赞成民主公平的作者都适用。我看那些人读作品也就是认字,离透彻理解相差十万八千里。我说我读作品是基本上/大部分透彻理解了,就如我上面对余杰“绍兴的鸭”一文的分析一样。那些人能给民众写出那样的作品分析吗?有人说,“那些人是否定余杰作品的。”好,那些人又能写出展示文字要素的否定性作品分析吗?不能,过去不能,现在不能,将来也不能,因为他们是受中共中心思想式教育/奴才教育培养出来的。而五毛文字展示的是他们中毒太深。

   We see those who negate Yu Jie’s works have never talked about his language, and only comment it with the Central Idea taught by the Communist Chinese class, having nothing to do with the goodness or badness of a work. Their comments is not on Yu Jie’s works at all, but only show their mind consciously or unconsciously catering the Communist Regime. People can see, the above article negating Yu Jie’s works actually can be used to negate any writer for democracy and fairness. I see those people’s reading is also just recognize the words, far away from understanding well of the text. I say my reading mostly or at large understand the text well, just like what my text analysis did with Yu Jie’s “Shaoxing Duck”. Can those people show us such text analysis? Some people say, “Those people just negate Yu Jie’s works.” Then can those people show their negation with text/language/literary analysis? No, they cannot do it in the past, at present, or in the future, because they have been cultivated by the Central Idea/slavery education of the Communist, and the words of the Communist Replier/Wu Mao has shown that themselves have been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist education.

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场