“Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States
Tian Feng 2012
Mr. Yu Jie’s mistake is to regard China as the United States. The result is his leaving China for the United States in 2012. China is different from the United States, with each of them has its own respective feature. It is wrong to regard a deer as a horse and it is also to regard a horse as a deer. The situation and the race between the two countries are all different and cannot expect to be the same. Lu Xun is a known failure example, who has shouted aloud for many years, but what outcome has it brought up? It’s better for him not to do anything!”
The end of “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States”
如果你还想你或你亲友每人拿回土地，住房，医疗，拿回包括公民税率，政府各方面开支等社会事务的表决权这些民主人权，你最好读完这篇长文。你可以从Google translate/谷歌翻译听文章的朗读。你可告诉你外国朋友/老师我写的英文。他们可以在google上用“Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”搜寻出我的文字。更多文章见我的海外博讯boxun网站的博客，加上前后的www, com 我名字在首页底部的作者群中。从2007年到2014年2月，我博客的显示点击量已达300万，而按博讯说的各博客的实际点击量是显示点击量的10倍以上，那我博客的实际点击量到2014年2月已达3000万。我们的文字是对中国民众说的，是我们认为真实的情况，欢迎各位，各媒体.转载，传播。一个人给5个以上人讲我们《伟大的中国全民大革命》中的1项国际公约，2项活动主张，4项基本人权，8项优秀活动，及本县/市政权楼等几个地址，民众兵器弹弓枪等起义事宜，壮大进步力量，救自己，救别人，救中国。
If you want you or your friends in this life to get back the human rights of half an acre land, welfares of housing, medical care, the voting rights on the tax rate and the government budget, you’d better read through this long essay. Google translate can read text aloud for you. If you have foreign friends/teachers, you may tell them to read the English part of my essay. They can google me out by “Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”. More articles of mine can be seen in my blog at “boxun”, with “www” in the front and “com” in the back, my name Wei Liu/刘蔚 is at the bottom of the homepage. From 2007 to 2014, my blog has 3 million displayed visits, and the website says that the actual visits is 10 times as the displayed visits. Then the actual visits of my blog is 30 million. What we say here we hold is true and is for 1.3 billion Chinese people. Every one is welcomed to publish, to spread our words, one person tells 5 or more persons, about the 1 international convention, the 2 uprising opinions, the 4 fundamental human rights, the 8 excellent activities, the couple of addresses of the Communist regime buildings in the local county, the uprising elements like the slingshot of people’s weapon. Anyway, we expand the democratic strength to save ourselves, our friends and our country.
The words of this author have shown that he has been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist slavery education. The slavery education is talked above that once you consent to the Communist Party, then your works is good; otherwise, it is bad. We say, “Only people is the criterion for good or bad; that is the universal vote among the 1.3 billion Chinese people, to see which side has more pro ballots than the con ballots.” What is the feature of China broadcasted by the Communist Party? Even the Communist Party’s high official or theorist cannot give a clear answer. In 1987 in the 13th Convention of that Party, it brought up the theory of “Advance on the Socialist Path with the Feature of China, but there is no substantial content in the theory, like how to solve people’s basic livings of land, housing, food, education, medical care and etc. The purpose of this theory is for the Party to play a game called a white horse is not a horse. The meaning of the high officials Deng Xiaoping and Zhao Ziyang is that “China is socialism or Communism, but it is the Communism that has the feature of China, and then do not use the Communist theory to confine China.”
As for the feature of the United States mentioned by the author, all people who have come to this country know that the United States never talks about the feature of the United States and talks about the Universal Value, which is democracy and fairness. Though the United States has some defects in the aspect of the Universal Value, after all it is one of the best big countries in the world.
Also those who have read Yu Jie’s works usually know his calling Chinese people to have democracy and fairness is the universal value; it is the human rights for French People, American people, Germen People, Chinese People, Japanese people, British People, and etc. For this point of view, we welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote, one person one ballot, and to see whether the pro ballots will be more than the con ballots. Can that author who negates Yujie tell us people in which country in this world should not have democracy and fairness? Can you welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote on your point of view, one person one ballot?
We see those who negate Yu Jie’s works have never talked about his language, and only comment it with the Central Idea taught by the Communist Chinese class, having nothing to do with the goodness or badness of a work. Their comments is not on Yu Jie’s works at all, but only show their mind consciously or unconsciously catering the Communist Regime. People can see, the above article negating Yu Jie’s works actually can be used to negate any writer for democracy and fairness. I see those people’s reading is also just recognize the words, far away from understanding well of the text. I say my reading mostly or at large understand the text well, just like what my text analysis did with Yu Jie’s “Shaoxing Duck”. Can those people show us such text analysis? Some people say, “Those people just negate Yu Jie’s works.” Then can those people show their negation with text/language/literary analysis? No, they cannot do it in the past, at present, or in the future, because they have been cultivated by the Central Idea/slavery education of the Communist, and the words of the Communist Replier/Wu Mao has shown that themselves have been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist education.