百家争鸣
刘蔚
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[刘蔚]->[刘蔚:五毛文字展示其中毒太深—六年高考1.57]
刘蔚
·不要打着乐观的旗号当阿Q,下一代人更苦—唤醒国人之266
·海归与百姓都走投无路了,钦佩贾甲—唤醒国人之267
·贾甲,今年10月中国质变,中国人不会游泳—唤醒国人之268
·80后,90后的要物女40岁后命运悲惨—唤醒国人之269
·贪官党已向中国民众摊了牌—唤醒国人之270
·南水北调1--永定河被害死了—唤醒国人之271
·南水北调2--中国的水环境已经崩溃了—唤醒国人之272
·南水北调3--坚决反对西线工程—唤醒国人之273
·中国人每月可以用5吨水是人权—唤醒国人之274
·中国百姓多交社保金是冤大头—唤醒国人之275
·09年与中共面对面交锋四雄—贾甲,郭泉,刘晓波,冯正虎—276
·共民之争不是社资之争,而是专民之争—277
·我喜欢阴天,雨天,雪天,最讨厌晴天--唤醒国人之278
·法轮大法有什么不好?—唤醒国人之279
·八九民运好—刘蔚唤醒国人之280
·建立人人有地,人人有利,人人有票,人人有金的新中国—唤醒国人之281
·中共军外战一胜两负,钓鱼岛千万不能打 唤醒国人之282
·11厅官床上倒,反腐英雄数红霞 刘蔚唤醒国人之283
·胡耀邦在1986年就显示,中国以后不能对外开战 刘蔚唤醒之284
·5次高考失败后终于向中专撤退,5次高考作文题
·春晚最大亮点:郭德纲《败家子》揭露了压制民主
·中共军5公里跑23分钟及格,跑死,自杀的士兵都有 刘蔚唤醒国人之287
·1983年泪洒高考场,2013年泪洒求职场 刘蔚
·1982年泪洒高考场,30来年白菜白饭,都是健康年 刘蔚 唤醒国人之289
·少校退伍30年,无房无医无工作 刘蔚 唤醒国人之290
·新兵连站军姿30分钟,20来人倒地,不参军了 刘蔚唤醒国人之291
·普通百姓和邓小平每年都看《大决战》之《淮海战役》
·我军训全部不及格,却能每天步行10公里 刘蔚唤醒国人之293
·李冰冰反对北朝鲜核武,公友钱少今年也看两部她的电影 刘蔚唤醒国人之294
·1981年高考“毁树容易种树难”害得我这辈子没上大学 刘蔚唤醒国人之295
·每天学习14小时,3年考研均失败,泪眼望星空 刘蔚唤醒国人之296
·李双江说,“儿子学不坏”,强奸罪都该枪毙了 刘蔚唤醒国人之297
·3年研考终上线,4千月薪不读研,文凭无用 刘蔚唤醒国人之298
·温家宝三鞠躬,松了套的老马会跑到哪里去呢? 刘蔚唤醒国人之299
·范冰冰被指诬陷章子怡:交往官员,收取32亿元 刘蔚唤醒国人之300
·伊能静,李冰冰声援《南方周末》,百姓今年看她们两部电影 刘蔚唤醒国人之
·范冰冰已有6年没更新她在新浪的博客了,是否因为…? 刘蔚唤醒国人之302
·知青掌了权,习近平中国梦是否让青年再上山下乡呢? 刘蔚唤醒国人之303
·重庆男解放碑闹市挺薄熙来,高唱国际歌后跳楼了 刘蔚唤醒国人之304
·听了习近平的中国梦,我现在每天睡10小时去做梦 刘蔚唤醒国人之305
·这该死的高考,我已经1年没下象棋,没看名著了 刘蔚唤醒国人之306
·刘蔚:走过六年高考之1.1:20平方米的我家摆满了家具
·My School Days in China 1.1
·刘蔚:走过六年高考1.2: 天黑了爸,妈还不到幼儿园来接我
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.2: My Kindergarten in China
·刘蔚:走过六年高考1.3: 楼下的麻将,象棋
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.3: Mahjong, Chess Downstairs
·刘蔚:走过六年高考岁月1.4:成为强者有什么好?
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.4
·刘蔚:六年高考1.5:国民党才是现实中的江姐,中国需要民主
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.5: The National Party Are Movie Heroes in
·刘蔚:我参加了八九民.运
·刘蔚:六年高考1.6:四楼窗外的天空白白的 (图)
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.6: The Sky Outside the 4th Floor Looks Whi
·走过六年高考1.7:我画了中苏大战,苏联八一九事件
·My Life in China 1.7: I Draw Soviet-China War Picture, August 19 Event
·刘蔚:六年高考:国足1:5惨败说明中国必须民主
·Wei Liu: My Life in China: Chinese Soccer Lost to Thailand 1:5 Shows t
·六年高考1.8:只有那白糖一小勺,下着那白米饭(图)
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.8: Only a Spoonful Sugar to Finish the Whi
·刘蔚:武力革命在中国成功完全可能——唤醒国人之307
·Wei Liu: Absolutely Possible for the Forceful Revolution to Succeed in
·刘蔚:伟大的中国全民大革命—唤醒国人之308
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 308: The Grand All-People Revolution in Chin
·刘蔚:为新疆和田,鄯善的起义欢呼—唤醒国人之309
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 309: Acclaim for the Uprising in Hetian Coun
·刘蔚:中国的民主进步2012年起已经进入了攻坚战—唤醒国人之310
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 310—Since 2010, China’s Democracy Progress
·刘蔚:六年高考1.9:“我们要战斗,我们要胜利”
·Wei Liu: My Life in China: 1.9: “We Must Fight, We Must Win”
·刘蔚:28万日军战力大大超过30万台军,钓鱼岛千万不能打—唤醒国人311
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 311: 280,000 Japanese Troops Stronger than 3
·中共军外战外行,它绝不敢真打钓鱼岛—唤醒国人之312
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 312: The Communist Army Incapable
·刘蔚:起义军若被俘应受国际公约保护—唤醒313
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 313: Uprising Personnel Captured Should Be P
·刘蔚:2000年以来众多高楼,道路把中国的经济,环境害了—唤醒国人之314
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 314: Since 2000, Tall Buildings, Roads Damag
·刘蔚:六年高考1.10: 我讨厌强,喜欢弱
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.10: I Resent the Strong and Like the Weak
·刘蔚:2010年代中共最怕哪两种人?唤醒315
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 315: What Two Groups of People the Communist
·5.12四川地震是地下弹药库连环爆炸吗?地质篇—唤醒316
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 316: Is the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake Caused b
·刘蔚:为什么冀中星等高端人才在2010年代的中国难以生存?唤醒317
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 317: Why Intelligent People like Ji Zhongxi
·刘蔚:六年高考1.11:深蓝色的夜我被背回了重庆城
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.11: Dark Blue Night I Am Carried
·刘蔚:民主人士谈5.12四川地震全景—水库篇—唤醒318
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 318: Democratic People’s View on Sichuan Ea
·刘蔚:民主人士看5.12四川地震全景:军备篇—唤醒319
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 319: Is the 2008 Sichuan Earthquake Caused b
·刘蔚:六年高考1.12:夏夜歇凉
·Wei Liu: My Life in China 1.12 Summer Night Outside
·刘蔚:2010年代全中国成了火炉,无限物质害了民众—唤醒320
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 320: China Becomes Oven in the 2010s, Endles
·刘蔚:350万中共军的训练必须坚持零伤亡,贴近实战太疯狂—唤醒321
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 321: 3.5 Million Communist Troops’ Training
·刘蔚:不愿意13亿民众有决定权的人绝不会是真正的爱国者—唤醒322
·Wei Liu: China Revolution 322: Those Not Willing to See People Be Deci
·刘蔚:民众的三样兵器弹弓枪,弓箭枪,燃烧瓶—唤醒323
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
刘蔚:五毛文字展示其中毒太深—六年高考1.57

刘蔚:五毛文字展示其中毒太深—六年高考1.57

   公友/民主人士/觉醒人士/普通百姓 刘蔚 2014年7月25日

   Wei Liu Memoir 1.57: Communist Repliers Show Been Mentally Deeply Poisoned

   Human Rights Worker/Democratic People/Awakened People/Common PeopleWei Liu July 25, 2014

   网上评论余杰作品的文字不少。这里我们来看一篇短的吧。

   There are many comments on Yu Jie’s works on the Internet. Let’s look at a short one.

   “余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国

   田峰 2012年

   余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国。其结局就是余杰先生离开了中国,去了美国。中国和美国不一样,美国有美国的特色,中国有中国的特色。只不过两国的特色不同罢了。指鹿为马不对,非得指马为鹿也不对。国情不同,种亦有别,不可强求。鲁迅就是前车之鉴,呐喊了那么多年,有什么用呢?不如归去!”

   “余杰先生的错误在于把中国当成了美国”完

   “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States

   Tian Feng 2012

    Mr. Yu Jie’s mistake is to regard China as the United States. The result is his leaving China for the United States in 2012. China is different from the United States, with each of them has its own respective feature. It is wrong to regard a deer as a horse and it is also to regard a horse as a deer. The situation and the race between the two countries are all different and cannot expect to be the same. Lu Xun is a known failure example, who has shouted aloud for many years, but what outcome has it brought up? It’s better for him not to do anything!”

    The end of “Mr. Yu Jie’s Mistake Is to Regard China as the United States”

   如果你还想你或你亲友每人拿回土地,住房,医疗,拿回包括公民税率,政府各方面开支等社会事务的表决权这些民主人权,你最好读完这篇长文。你可以从Google translate/谷歌翻译听文章的朗读。你可告诉你外国朋友/老师我写的英文。他们可以在google上用“Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”搜寻出我的文字。更多文章见我的海外博讯boxun网站的博客,加上前后的www, com 我名字在首页底部的作者群中。从2007年到2014年2月,我博客的显示点击量已达300万,而按博讯说的各博客的实际点击量是显示点击量的10倍以上,那我博客的实际点击量到2014年2月已达3000万。我们的文字是对中国民众说的,是我们认为真实的情况,欢迎各位,各媒体.转载,传播。一个人给5个以上人讲我们《伟大的中国全民大革命》中的1项国际公约,2项活动主张,4项基本人权,8项优秀活动,及本县/市政权楼等几个地址,民众兵器弹弓枪等起义事宜,壮大进步力量,救自己,救别人,救中国。

    If you want you or your friends in this life to get back the human rights of half an acre land, welfares of housing, medical care, the voting rights on the tax rate and the government budget, you’d better read through this long essay. Google translate can read text aloud for you. If you have foreign friends/teachers, you may tell them to read the English part of my essay. They can google me out by “Wei Liu Revolution” or “Wei Liu Memoir”. More articles of mine can be seen in my blog at “boxun”, with “www” in the front and “com” in the back, my name Wei Liu/刘蔚 is at the bottom of the homepage. From 2007 to 2014, my blog has 3 million displayed visits, and the website says that the actual visits is 10 times as the displayed visits. Then the actual visits of my blog is 30 million. What we say here we hold is true and is for 1.3 billion Chinese people. Every one is welcomed to publish, to spread our words, one person tells 5 or more persons, about the 1 international convention, the 2 uprising opinions, the 4 fundamental human rights, the 8 excellent activities, the couple of addresses of the Communist regime buildings in the local county, the uprising elements like the slingshot of people’s weapon. Anyway, we expand the democratic strength to save ourselves, our friends and our country.

   这样文字的作者是中中共奴才教育的毒太深了。奴才教育就是上面说的,只要你赞成中共,你的作品就是好的,反之就是坏的。我们说,“只有人民/民族才是评判好坏的标准。那就是13亿人一人一票表决,看哪方得的赞成票多或者赞成票是否超过反对票。”什么叫中国特色,恐怕中共高官及其理论家自己都不清楚。1987年中共十三大提出了“沿着有中国特色的社会主义道路前进”的理论,其中并没有实在的内容,如何实在地解决民众的土地,住房,食品,教育,医疗等基本生存问题,根本就没有谈。中国特色主要的目的是中共要玩一个白马非马的把戏。邓小平,赵紫阳的意思是“中国是社会主义,但它是有中国特色的社会主义,别再拿社会主义的一套理论来束缚中国。”

   The words of this author have shown that he has been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist slavery education. The slavery education is talked above that once you consent to the Communist Party, then your works is good; otherwise, it is bad. We say, “Only people is the criterion for good or bad; that is the universal vote among the 1.3 billion Chinese people, to see which side has more pro ballots than the con ballots.” What is the feature of China broadcasted by the Communist Party? Even the Communist Party’s high official or theorist cannot give a clear answer. In 1987 in the 13th Convention of that Party, it brought up the theory of “Advance on the Socialist Path with the Feature of China, but there is no substantial content in the theory, like how to solve people’s basic livings of land, housing, food, education, medical care and etc. The purpose of this theory is for the Party to play a game called a white horse is not a horse. The meaning of the high officials Deng Xiaoping and Zhao Ziyang is that “China is socialism or Communism, but it is the Communism that has the feature of China, and then do not use the Communist theory to confine China.”

   至于说此文作者提到的美国特色,去过美国的人都知道,美国根本不讲美国特色,而是讲普适价值,那就是民主公平。虽然美国在普适价值上还有缺陷,但它毕竟是做得最好的几个大国之一。

   As for the feature of the United States mentioned by the author, all people who have come to this country know that the United States never talks about the feature of the United States and talks about the Universal Value, which is democracy and fairness. Though the United States has some defects in the aspect of the Universal Value, after all it is one of the best big countries in the world.

   同样读过余杰作品的人多明白,余杰作品呼吁的中国人应该有民主公平是普适价值,是法国民众,美国民众,德国民众,中国民众,日本民众,英国民众等等都该有的权利。就这一观点,我们愿意13亿人来一人一票表决,看赞成票是否超过反对票?那位否定余杰的作者能不能告诉我们,世界上哪个国家的民众不该有民主公平呢?又能否愿意13亿人就你的观点进行一人一票的表决呢?

   Also those who have read Yu Jie’s works usually know his calling Chinese people to have democracy and fairness is the universal value; it is the human rights for French People, American people, Germen People, Chinese People, Japanese people, British People, and etc. For this point of view, we welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote, one person one ballot, and to see whether the pro ballots will be more than the con ballots. Can that author who negates Yujie tell us people in which country in this world should not have democracy and fairness? Can you welcome the 1.3 billion Chinese people to vote on your point of view, one person one ballot?

   我们看到否定余杰文字的这些人根本不谈余杰作品文字上的要素,就只是按中共语文中心思想式的与文字好坏无关的评论,他们评论的根本不是余杰的作品,只是显示他们要有意识无意识讨好当局的心态。各位可以看看,上面否定余杰的那篇文章,可以说对任何赞成民主公平的作者都适用。我看那些人读作品也就是认字,离透彻理解相差十万八千里。我说我读作品是基本上/大部分透彻理解了,就如我上面对余杰“绍兴的鸭”一文的分析一样。那些人能给民众写出那样的作品分析吗?有人说,“那些人是否定余杰作品的。”好,那些人又能写出展示文字要素的否定性作品分析吗?不能,过去不能,现在不能,将来也不能,因为他们是受中共中心思想式教育/奴才教育培养出来的。而五毛文字展示的是他们中毒太深。

   We see those who negate Yu Jie’s works have never talked about his language, and only comment it with the Central Idea taught by the Communist Chinese class, having nothing to do with the goodness or badness of a work. Their comments is not on Yu Jie’s works at all, but only show their mind consciously or unconsciously catering the Communist Regime. People can see, the above article negating Yu Jie’s works actually can be used to negate any writer for democracy and fairness. I see those people’s reading is also just recognize the words, far away from understanding well of the text. I say my reading mostly or at large understand the text well, just like what my text analysis did with Yu Jie’s “Shaoxing Duck”. Can those people show us such text analysis? Some people say, “Those people just negate Yu Jie’s works.” Then can those people show their negation with text/language/literary analysis? No, they cannot do it in the past, at present, or in the future, because they have been cultivated by the Central Idea/slavery education of the Communist, and the words of the Communist Replier/Wu Mao has shown that themselves have been mentally deeply poisoned by the Communist education.

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场