百家争鸣
郑恩宠
[主页]->[百家争鸣]->[郑恩宠]->[华人基督徒发布《宗教自由普渡共识》]
郑恩宠
·兴于征地,亡与征地
·兴于征地,亡于征地(二)
·上海九二七地铁事故
·北京律师肖国珍带女儿顺利到美国
·上海民众的进步,关注政治良心犯
·鲍彤﹕缺乏不同意见可导致中国社会死亡
·请关注渤海污染灾难
·上海艺术家原弓工作室遭强拆
·评地王频出
·1960年代四川饿死1000万人
·李嘉诚撤资
·科恩教授谈到访我家
·中国政府破产有几多?
·我加入了108位中国律师组成的郭飞雄法律后援团
·律师会见郭飞雄被拒将有自由飞雄运动
·祝贺廖亦武获法国政府“文学和艺术骑士军官勋章”
·上海试点人民币自由兑换接受记者采访
·鲍彤﹕论中共的群众路线
·城市化是人和企业的自由化
·我加入声援王功权的联署
·复旦大学教授韦森警告当局
·《环球时报》评六百多人声援王功权
·六十多律师加入中国律师“保障人权”法律服务团
·陈建芳出境受阻,返回上海被扣押
·香港支联会2013年9月18日声明
·我加入115人郭飞雄法律团
·我加入828人声援王功权先生联署
·鲍彤批评中共“一言之梦”
·律师会见王功权拒认罪,多律师被骚扰
·我是中共上海“反对派一号”?
·贺卫方教授不因官方压制而噤声
·朱镕基是一代名相还是伪君子?
·胡佳中秋节前快递送我月饼
·中国地方政府破产有几多?
·审计出巨额抚养费被挪用,14女律师功不可没
·我、高智晟、谭作人等收到胡佳月饼快递
·王学光申请成立“上访人员自治委员会”遭关押
·有地就抢 上海再现“面粉贵过面包”
·独立中文笔会悼念张显杨先生逝世讣告
·中秋节遭受上海闸北警方野蛮打压
·三人获“杰出民主人士奖”
·记王炳章遭单独关押十一年/盛雪
·2013上半年139政治犯被扣押
·许志永与新公民运动/许行
·薄得分,但比不上张春桥/裴毅然
·中国地方政府破产有几多?
·美国之音﹕北京月饼慰良心犯
·奇怪!警察鼓励我告国保
·湖北中医药大学20多位老教授遭逼拆
·湖北中医药大学20多位老教授遭遇逼拆
·审薄的感想/叶永烈(上海)
·三十年污染超西方二百年
·朱镕基其书其人/张坚
·关注监狱中良心犯/自由亚洲
·见证改革见证真正的改革时代/王丹
·中共干部老龄化严重
·山东苍山三村民遭强拆
·今下午我家被搜查(涉诽谤、谣言)
·黄琪被成都警方带走
·中纪委每天收举报760多件
·25名律师抗议夏俊峰死刑案的声明
·联合国人权委对我等律师关注
·香港占领中环运动升温
·专访浦志强律师
·关注香港占领中环运动的新进展
·台湾人士支持香港占领中环运动
·陈光福被断网,18 天恢复?
·江泽民与我被软禁7年以上
·江泽民与我被软禁7年以上
·中国进入网络严打时代?/牟传珩
·前浙江教授苏元真被传唤
·香港占领中环/美国之音
·孙文广教授不怕打压
·律师见当事人要花500元“买号”
·广东公安局副局长何靖被判无期
·14名基督徒律师为公义而战
·中国保障人权律师团2013年9月27日声明
·顾义民“煽动颠覆政权案”在常熟法院开庭
·法广﹕评中国近年的司法冤案
·中国地方政府债务20万亿面临社会危机
·郭飞雄的现状,访隋牧青律师
·浦志强律师赴沈阳看望夏俊峰家人
·14名律师控告法官违法
·我加入了1125人声援王功权的联署
·关注又一法律人曹顺利被刑拘
·各地访民祝“中国保障人权律师团”成立
·评中共的「清网」「灭谣」/陈理
·中共建政64年与饿死近四千万人
·国人要放弃仇恨,反思夏俊峰案
·容不下不同意见是绝望制度/鲍彤
·中国明星、富商40%信教
·美国100多教授声援北大夏业良教授
·喜闻成都访民出「简报」
·祝陈光诚加入美国三家研究机构
·湖南郴州村民自焚抗强拆!
·顾义民无罪!律师的辩护词
·北大研究生在抗暴拆中觉醒,中国有希望
·广州12名保安工人被逮捕
·四川七旬夫妇政府门前服农药自尽
·邓小平接到安徽饿死350万人后
·倪玉兰律师今日出狱,受民众爱戴
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
华人基督徒发布《宗教自由普渡共识》

转载来源:参与首发
   
    华人基督徒发布《宗教自由普度共识》(中英文、图)
   
   [日期:2014-05-14] 来源:参与 作者:参与记者柳江河

   
   
   
   
   
   (参与2014年5月14日讯)2014年5月14日,一批知名华人基督徒知识分子和牧师、律师等,在普度大学(Purdue University)联合发布《宗教自由普度共识》。以下是《宗教自由普度共识》的中英文版本及首批签名。
   
    “宗教自由普度共识”及签名
   
    “宗教自由与中国社会:典型案例学术研讨会” 于2014年5月5-7日在美国普度大学(Purdue University)举行,参加者包括律师、牧师和学者。经过三天的热烈研讨,对于宗教自由问题形成很多共识,因此有人提议起草有关宗教自由的一个共识文本并且联署签名,借以传播对于宗教自由的认知、倡导对于宗教自由问题的关注。文本在经过全体参会人员讨论之后定稿,今天(2014年5月14日)予以公布。
   
    如果你愿意表达对于这个共识的支持,请发邮件到: [email protected],并请注明你的姓名、职业、居住地,也欢迎提交更详细的信息。
   
    “宗教自由普度共识”及签名
   
   我们深切关注以下现实:
   
   1、在中国的宪法和法律中,缺乏对宗教自由的清晰界定和足够的保护。
   
   2、在中国的法律和社会实践中,充满对公民的宗教自由的各种误解、侵犯、歧视和迫害。
   
   3、在中国知识分子和一般民众中,也因此对宗教自由的价值和涵义缺乏理解和基本共识。
   
   根据一系列国际人权公约对宗教自由的界定和保护,我们相信:
   
   1、宗教自由不但包括个人有选择相信或不相信某种宗教的良心自由和表达自由,包括家庭成员(成人和儿童)持有和表达宗教信仰的自由,包括父母有按着自己的宗教信仰教导子女或为子女选择宗教教育的自由,及儿童有相信宗教和接受父母所选择的宗教教育的自由;宗教自由也包括宗教群体在集体礼拜、设立宗教场所和使用宗教标识、出版宗教书籍及传播宗教信仰等宗教实践的自由。
   
   2、宗教自由是现代国家和社会的基本和核心的价值。对宗教自由的保障不完整,则宪法上的言论和表达自由、思想和学术自由、家庭及教育的自由等其他自由,均无法得到完整和切实的保障。
   
   3、宗教自由意味着宗教信仰和非宗教的思想体系在私人和公共领域内均拥有平等的表达自由和法律地位,宗教或非宗教的思想体系均不应被视为一种负面的和受歧视的思想体系。
   
   4、 宗教自由意味着对国家权力范围的一种限制,即国家不能判断任何宗教或非宗教思想体系在教义和道德上的对错和正邪,更不能以此作为处罚公民的依据。亦不能将任何一种宗教或非宗教的思想体系确立为国家的合法性依据或赋予其法律上的优先地位。
   
   5、宗教自由意味着国家无权或没有道德上的正当性,在“合法宗教”与“封建迷信”、“正教”与“邪教”或“正统”与“极端”之间进行区分和判断。任何传统宗教或新兴宗教的成员,都不应仅仅因其相信、表达、传播和实践其宗教信仰,而受到政府的审查和法律的判断。
   
   为此,我们热切呼吁:
   
   无论相信任何宗教、教派或非宗教思想体系的中国公民,都有责任在法律上和公共生活中尊重、保护和争取上述宗教自由的原则和价值。
   
   签名:
   杨凤岗教授
   王永信牧师
   刘同苏牧师
   王怡牧师
   滕彪律师
   张凯律师
   洪予健牧师
   傅希秋牧师
   凌沧洲先生
   夏钧律师
   曼德牧师
   颜新恩牧师
   吴朝阳先生
   陈建刚律师
   金明日牧师
   黎雄兵律师
   李和平律师
   刘军宁博士
   张千帆教授
   孙毅教授
   陈耀敏牧师
   金中权牧师
   王保罗牧师
   张培鸿律师
   昝爱宗先生
   李亚丁牧师
   陈永苗先生
   李苏滨律师
   李方平律师
   隋牧青律师
   江天勇律师
   陈国第律师
   邢福增教授
   张志鹏博士
   朱瑞峰先生
   王文锋牧师
   庄道鹤律师
   唐吉田律师
   肖芳华律师
   王成律师
   唐荆陵律师
   刘士辉律师
   范学德先生
   夏业良博士
   刘凤钢牧师
   刘官长老
   王志勇牧师
   张伯笠牧师
   张立恒律师
   陈佐人教授
   刘卫国律师
   温司卡教授
   等
   
   
   "Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom" with Signatories
   
   
   “Religious Freedom and Chinese Society: A Symposium of Case Analysis” was held on May 5-7, 2014 at Purdue University. The participants included lawyers, ministers, and scholars. Through engaging discussions, some consensus was reached. Consequently, some participants proposed to draft a text of consensus for signatures so that the understanding of religious freedom can be spread and greater attention can be paid to the issues of religious freedom in China. The text was finalized after further discussion by the symposium participants. The text and signatories of the Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom are made public today (May 14, 2014).
   
   For those who want to support this consensus, please send an email [email protected] Please include at least this information: your full name, profession, and residence.
   
   "Purdue Consensus on Religious Freedom" with Signatories
   
   We are deeply concerned about the following reality:
   
   1. China’s Constitution and law lack a clear definition of and sufficient protection for religious freedom.
   
   2. Misunderstanding, violation, discrimination and persecution abound with regard to religious freedom in legal and social practices of China.
   
   3. As a result, intellectuals and the general public in China lack an understanding of and a basic consensus on the value and implications of religious freedom.
   
   In accordance with the definition and protection of religious freedom prescribed by a series of international covenants on human rights, we hold the following beliefs:
   
   1. Religious freedom encompasses not only individual freedom of conscience and the freedom to express belief or disbelief in a religion, but also the freedom of family members (adults and children) to adhere to and to express their religious faith, the freedom of parents to instruct their children in their religious faith, the freedom of parents to choose religious education for their children, and the freedom of children to practice their religion and receive the religious education chosen for them by their parents. Religious freedom also encompasses the freedom of religious groups to practice their faith, to worship together, to establish religious venues, to use religious symbols, to publish religious books, and to disseminate religious faith.
   
   2. Religious freedom is a basic and core value of modern nations and societies. Without full protection of religious freedom, other freedoms such as the freedom of speech and the freedom of expression, the freedom of thought, the freedom of academic pursuit, the freedom of family, and the freedom of education that are guaranteed by the Constitution will not be fully protected in reality.
   
   3. Religious freedom implies that religious faiths and non-religious systems, whether in private or in public, are entitled to equality with respect to free expression and legal standing. Neither religious nor non-religious systems shall be deemed negative and discriminated against.
   
   4. Religious freedom implies a constraint on state power, i.e. the state cannot pass judgment on any religious or non-religious system as doctrinally or morally right or wrong, good or bad, let alone penalize citizens on basis of such judgment. Neither can the state make any religious or non-religious system the basis for the state’s legitimacy and accord it a preferential legal status.
   
   5. Religious freedom implies that the state has no right or moral authority to distinguish between “legitimate religion” and “feudal superstition,” between “orthodox religion” and “heterodox cult,” between “orthodoxy” and “heresy.” Members of any traditional or emerging religion shall not be subject to government censorship or legal judgment for merely believing, expressing, disseminating, or practicing their religious faith.
   
   To that end, we fervently appeal that:
   
   In legal and public life, all Chinese citizens, irrespective of their religion, denomination, and non-religious system, have the responsibility to respect, to protect, and to fight for the above principles and values of religious freedom.
   
   Signatories:
   Professor Yang Fenggang
   Rev. Wang Yongxin (Thomas Wang)
   Rev. Liu Tongsu
   Rev. Wang Yi
   Attorney Teng Biao
   Attorney Zhang Kai
   Rev. Hong Yujian
   Rev. Fu Xiqiu (Bob Fu)
   Mr. Ling Cangzhou
   Attorney Xia Jun
   Rev. Man De (Guo Baosheng)
   Rev. Yan Xin’en (John Yan)
   Mr. Wu Chaoyang
   Attorney Chen Jian’gang
   Rev. Jin Mingri (Ezra Jin)
   Attorney Li Xiongbing
   Attorney Li Heping
   Dr. Liu Junning
   Professor Zhang Qianfan
   Professor Sun Yi
   Rev. Chen Yaomin
   Rev. Jin Zhongquan
   Rev. Wang Baoluo (Paul Wang)
   Attorney Zhang Peihong
   Mr. Zan Aizong
   Rev. Li Yading
   Mr. Chen Yongmiao
   Attorney Li Subin
   Attorney Li Fangping
   Attorney Sui Muqing
   Attorney Jiang Tianyong
   Attorney Chen Guodi
   Professor Xing Fuzeng (Ying Fuk-Tsang)
   Dr. Zhang Zhipeng
   Mr. Zhu Ruifeng
   Rev. Wang Wenfeng
   Attorney Zhuang Daohe

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场