历史资料
满洲文化传媒
[主页]->[历史资料]->[满洲文化传媒]->[2013年新版满英词典]
满洲文化传媒
·满洲文十二生肖剪纸
·满洲人过春节年画
·通古斯满洲族起源和满语源流
·新宾满族剪纸列入非物质文化遗产名录
·满洲族始祖武笃本贝子
·Tasha塔斯哈
·寄予少年滿洲
·通古斯满洲民族资料图片集【第十八季】
·谎言文化之《说岳全传》对历史的无耻篡改
·谎言文化之《说岳全传》对历史的无耻篡改
·长白山,通古斯满洲民族的圣山 ——满族的祖先崇拜与萨满信仰述略
·满洲利亚啊,满洲利亚
·赵本山龙凤胎儿女
·德国的满洲学研究
·亡族奴警示录
·滿洲時代Manchus Time
·亡族奴们的最后记忆
·Šongkoro
·亡族奴们的最后记忆(二)
·海东青的仇与恨
·通古斯满洲族早期社会的特点
·God Bless Manchus
·Manchuria
·亡国奴的100年
·告别酱缸腐败谎言汉文化 重塑通古斯满洲八旗雄风
·通古斯满洲民族资料图片集【第十九季】
·喂,说你那~~!!
·旧满洲档所记大清国建号前国号
·滿人HIPHOP國
·满洲学研究与当代满族人的关系
·Manchu Cup
·盎格鲁·撒克逊使命
·通古斯满洲学书籍书影介绍【第七季】
·成都正蓝旗满族人祭祖思族
·满-通古斯诸语的分类
·美籍国父汉独份子党魁孙中山美国移民局档案照,伪造的美国出生证明文件,美国政府被欺骗后开具的证明文件
·德国报道满族人组织学母语
·来生不做中国人
·忘恩負義的垃圾民族大杂体已经成为世界公害
·癞蛤蟆地动仪能测地震吗?!!
·韩国满洲语研究概况【上】
·赤裸裸的文化种族灭绝
·韩国满洲语研究概况【中】
·自我赎救【Self-redemption】
·韩国满洲语研究概况【下】
·满洲文书写很有意思很形象嘛~~~O(∩_∩)O~
·满洲族谱书和满族的长白山信仰与长白山崇拜
·组图:满洲猎鹰人
·组图:满洲猎鹰人
·女真后裔赫哲人的萨满教
·满洲民族圣山长白山古迹寻踪
·辛亥暴乱国难100年纪念1911--2010
·满洲民族圣山长白山之圆池传说
·满洲贞德川岛芳子书法作品
·只有武力才能保护民族尊严与土地
·通向濒危满洲语的桥梁
·动物的眼睛猜猜它们都是谁?
·动物的眼睛猜猜它们都是谁?(二)
·海东青是满族民族精神的体现
·爱嫖妓五毒俱全的国父孙中山
·俄国阿尔泰通古斯满语言书目
·你们给我们屈辱我们用仇恨加倍奉还!!
·满清杯具
·满洲大萨满乌布西奔妈妈对我们的告诫
·川岛芳子诗一首:驼铃
·觉醒吧,通古斯满洲亡族奴们!!!!
·萨满教星辰崇拜与北方天文学的萌芽
·图说满洲诺门罕事件前因后果
·图说满洲诺门罕事件前因后果(二)
·从通古斯萨满教神话窥其生命观
·通古斯满洲民族资料图片集【第二十季】
·满洲语“西藏”的来历
·北大馆藏满文古籍孤本著录札记
·中田整一:溥仪的另一种真相
·通古斯八旗满洲族家谱五种
·康熙赐封七世达赖的金印.
·满族故事家马亚川和女真萨满神话
·成立满族文化发展公司
·滿洲亡族奴詠歎調
·亡族奴奏鸣曲
·川島芳子の遺言
·萨满教与满族早期医学的发展
·沸騰的滿洲
·解决满族自治的一大悬案
·早期明信片上的满洲风俗
·朝鲜WMD武器直接威胁满洲安全
·通古斯满洲民族的葬礼
·满族萨满教文化史料在满族先史史料学上的价值
·满族谱书和满族的长白山信仰与长白山崇拜
·1932夏的北平满族家庭祭祀
·五种文字写“满洲”
·满族资料图片集【第二十一季】
·满族萨满教响器的应用及其象征意义
·北镇满族歌谣浅析
·满族资料图片集【第二十二季】
·通古斯——满洲语族神话特色的思考
·滿洲秘檔選輯
·满洲族思想文化源流考
·满洲八旗制度考实
·后金国首都盛京满洲故宫摄影
·达赖喇嘛
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
2013年新版满英词典


   
2013年新版满英词典

   
2013年新版满英词典

   出版日期: 2013年4月2日
   

   Jerry Norman's Comprehensive Manchu-English Dictionary, a substantial revision and enlargement of his Concise Manchu-English Lexicon of 1978, now long out of print, is poised to become the standard English-language resource on the Manchu language. As the dynastic language of the Qing dynasty (1644--1911), Manchu was used in official documents and was also the vehicle for an enormous translation literature, mostly from the Chinese. The new Dictionary, based exclusively on Qing sources, retains all of the information from the earlier Lexicon, but also includes hundreds of additional entries cited from original Manchu texts, enhanced cross-references, and an entirely new introduction on Manchu pronunciation and script. All content from the earlier publication has also been verified. This final book from the preeminent Manchu linguist in the English-speaking world is a reference work that not only updates Norman's earlier scholarship but also summarizes his decades of study of the Manchu language. The Dictionary, which represents a significant scholarly contribution to the field of Inner Asian studies and to all students and scholars of Manchu and other Tungusic and related languages around the world, will become a major tool for archival research on Chinese late imperial period history and government.
   基本信息
   出版社: Harvard University, Asia Center (2013年4月2日)
   丛书名: Harvard-Yenching Institute Monograph Series
   精装: 430页
   语种: 英语
   ISBN: 0674072138
   条形码: 9780674072138
   商品尺寸: 25.4 x 20.6 x 3.3 cm
   商品重量: 1 Kg
   ASIN: 0674072138
   
   购买地址:http://www.amazon.cn/mn/detailApp/ref=asc_df_0674072138816013/?asin=0674072138&tag=douban-23&creative=2384&creativeASIN=0674072138&linkCode=asn
   
2013年新版满英词典

   Jerry Lee Norman (1936–2012) was born to Okies — Depression-era refugees from the Dust Bowl of Oklahoma, who settled down as farm workers in California. He was fascinated with language from childhood. Denied permission to study Latin in school, he taught himself using an old textbook, and soon knew so much that his school asked him to teach other students. After a stint studying Chinese in the Army Language school, and a year preparing for the priesthood in a Benedictine priory (one recently transplanted to the United States from China), he finally decided his calling was to study Chinese language and so matriculated as an undergraduate at the University of California at Berkeley. At Berkeley he studied linguistic field methods, Chinese, and Mongolian, continuing into the doctoral program. He also attained a high level of fluency in Russian during those years. Norman was the principal American student of Yuen Ren Chao 趙元任 (1892–1982) in descriptive and historical Chinese linguistics. He spent almost his whole teaching career at the University of Washington, Seattle.
   
   The two years of his Fulbright grant in Taiwan, from 1965–67, were spent largely on Manchu, even though he completed all the work for a ground-breaking dissertation on Mǐn dialects of Chinese at the same time. He told me the story in an interview in 2006:
   
   When I got to Taiwan, they had in the office there a copy of the book by Tulišen 圖理珅 (1667–1741), who was a Manchu official sent by the Kāngxī Emperor to Russia in something like 1725. And he wrote an account of his journey, which is really for intelligence purposes and so forth, and very interesting — very repetitious but very interesting.
   
   I was working on that and I constantly was coming up against this problem that there’s no Manchu dictionary in English. So I would use the Japanese Manwa jiten 滿和辭典 (which also has Chinese glosses in it, so that was quite usable). And I also had Erich Hauer’s Handwörterbuch der Mandschusprache. But at least half the time I’d look the Manchu up and then I had to go and look up the German words. So at some point I just decided, well, why not — I have all this time, you know — maybe I should compile my own dictionary.
   
   So the first thing I did was cut up the Manchu-Japanese dictionary. Since I had research funds, I had a blueprint copy made of it, printed only on one side. I hired an assistant to cut all the entries out and paste them on cards. At that time in Taiwan you couldn’t buy cards; you couldn’t go to the stationery store and say “I want four-by-five cards,” or any size — you had to have them made. So we had a whole bunch of cards made and pasted all the cut-outs onto the cards. And then we had a great big file cabinet made, with drawers, and so we put all the cards in there — it was in alphabetical order already. I would go into the office, early in the morning, maybe beginning at 6:30 or 7:00, and I just went through the whole thing and translated it. I had a Japanese gloss and a Chinese gloss probably from the Wǔtǐ Qīng wénjiàn 五體清文鑑 or something like that. The Japanese was relatively simple; I could deal with most of that, with a dictionary. And I had Hauer, and Hauer had more entries, so I sometimes added entries that were in Hauer but weren’t in the Japanese material. And in working that way I finished the thing in about seven months — went through all the cards in seven months.
   
   Then I got another assistant who typed it up as a manuscript and went through, corrected things, and so forth, and then I made another copy and had it printed in Taiwan — just purely privately; I paid for it.
   
   This was all done on a Fulbright to study Chinese! He added:
   
   But I had so much time, you know. I’d never in my life had a period when nobody told me to do anything.
   
   What he produced in Taiwan was only the foundation of the present book. He spent the next forty-five years refining and expanding it by reading Manchu documents and consulting other materials, including recordings and transcriptions of living Sibe 錫伯 that he made in Taiwan. (He described his teacher in Taiwan, [Kongur] Kuang Lu [孔古爾] 廣祿, 1900–73, as a gifted extempore storyteller in the Sibe tradition.) An initial edition of the dictionary was published in 1978, but the present volume is considerably expanded from that, and also includes a guide to pronunciation as Norman learned it.
   
   In later years, he had much help on this project from the members of a Manchu study group based in Portland, Oregon, whom he names in his own preface. In 2005, he asked me to begin helping him put it in order for publication, which I have done using LaTeX (including the “multicol” package, with gratitude to Frank Mittelbach). I am glad to acknowledge the help of my mother, Shirley Branner — even though she knows no Manchu or Chinese, she patiently read through the entire manuscript twice for sense and correct order of entries. Most of the editing and typesetting work was done in 2011 and 2012, with the very last corrections made to the text on 28 June, 2012. Five days later, Prof. Norman entered the hospital, and a few days after that he was gone.
   
   Jerry Norman was a scholar of rare erudition, though retiring by temperament. His memory for words and expressions, even in tongues he did not know, left people floored. And few linguists I have known possessed his true instinct for the workings of language. Beyond those gifts, he was also a sincere and gentle person, whose willingness to share what he knew touched many people far beyond his rather small circle of students.
   
   Norman’s Manchu name was Elbihe, ‘raccoon dog’.
   
   David Prager Branner
   City College of New York
      and Columbia University
   16 July, 2012
   
2013年新版满英词典

   The book opens with the assertion that “few language names are as all-encompassing as that of Chinese” and proceeds to explain how “Chinese” may refer to the “archaic inscriptions of the oracle bones, the literary language of the Zhou dynasty sages, the language of Tang and Song poetry and the early vernacular language of the classical novels, as well as the modern language in its standard and dialectal forms.” Norman goes on to explain how the “modern Chinese dialects are really more like a family of languages, and the Chinese of the first millennium BC is at least as different from the modern standard language as Latin is from Italian or French.” He takes this idea even further in the book, elaborating on how “the Chinese language, especially in its written form, has always been one of the most powerful symbols of this cultural unity. The aptness of language as a symbol of cultural and even political unity was facilitated by the use of a script that for all practical purposes was independent of any particular phonetic manifestation of their language, allowing the Chinese to look upon the Chinese language as being more uniform and unchanging than it actually was.”

[下一页]
blog comments powered by Disqus
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场