滕彪文集
[主页]->[独立中文笔会]->[滕彪文集]->[A courageous Chinese lawyer urges his country to follow its own laws]
滕彪文集
·六四短信
·倡议“5•10”作为“公民正当防卫日”
·谁是敌人——回"新浪网友"
·为逯军喝彩
·赠晓波
·正义的运动场——邓玉娇案二人谈
·这六年,公盟做了什么?
·公盟不死
·我们不怕/Elena Milashina
·The Law On Trial In China
·自由有多重要,翻墙就有多重要
·你也会被警察带走吗
·Lawyer’s Detention Shakes China’s Rights Movement
·我来推推推
·许志永年表
·庄璐小妹妹快回家吧
·开江县法院随意剥夺公民的辩护权
·Summary Biography of Xu Zhiyong
·三著名行政法学家关于“公盟取缔事件”法律意见书
·公益诉讼“抑郁症”/《中国新闻周刊》
·在中石化上访
·《零八宪章》与政治正当性问题
·我来推推推(之二)
·我来推推推(之三)
·國慶有感
·我来推推推(之四)
·国庆的故事(系列之一)
·国庆的故事(系列之二)
·
·我来推推推(之五)
·我来推推推(之六)
·净空(小说)
·作为反抗的记忆——《不虚此行——北京劳教调遣处纪实》序
·twitter直播-承德冤案申诉行动
·我来推推推(之七)
·关于我的证言的证言
·我来推推推(之八)
·不只是问问而已
·甘锦华再判死刑 紧急公开信呼吁慎重
·就甘锦华案致最高人民法院死刑复核法官的紧急公开信
·我来推推推(之九)
·DON’T BE EVIL
·我来推推推(之十)
·景德镇监狱三名死刑犯绝食吁国际关注
·江西乐平死刑冤案-向最高人民检察院的申诉材料
·我来推推推(之十一)
·法律人的尊严在于独立
·我来推推推(之十二)
·听从正义和良知的呼唤——在北京市司法局关于吊销唐吉田、刘巍律师证的听证会上的代理意见
·一个思想实验:关于中国政治
·公民维权与社会转型(上)——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲
·公民维权与社会转型——在北京传知行社会经济研究所的演讲(下)
·福州“7•4”奇遇记
·夏俊峰案二审辩护词(新版)
·摄录机打破官方垄断
·敦请最高人民检察院立即对重庆打黑运动中的刑讯逼供问题依法调查的公开信
·为政治文明及格线而奋斗——滕彪律师的维权之路
·“打死挖个坑埋了!”
·"A Hole to Bury You"
·谁来承担抵制恶法的责任——曹顺利被劳动教养案代理词
·国家尊重和保障人权从严禁酷刑开始
·分裂的真相——关于钱云会案的对话
·无国界记者:对刘晓波诽谤者的回应
·有些人在法律面前更平等(英文)
·法律人与法治国家——在《改革内参》座谈会上的演讲
·貪官、死刑與民意
·茉莉:友爱的滕彪和他的诗情
·萧瀚:致滕彪兄
·万延海:想起滕彪律师
·滕彪:被迫走上它途的文學小子/威廉姆斯
·中国两位律师获民主奖/美国之音
·独立知识分子——写给我的兄弟/许志永
·滕彪的叫真/林青
·2011年十大法治事件(公盟版)
·Chinese Human Rights Lawyers Under Assault
·《乱诗》/殷龙龙
·吴英的生命和你我有关
·和讯微访谈•滕彪谈吴英案
·吴英、司法与死刑
·努力走向公民社会(视频访谈)
·【蔡卓华案】胡锦云被诉窝藏赃物罪的二审辩护词
·23岁青年被非法拘禁致死 亲属六年申请赔偿无果
·5月2日与陈光诚的谈话记录
·华邮评论:支持中国说真话者的理由
·中国律师的阴与阳/金融时报
·陈光诚应该留还是走?/刘卫晟
·含泪劝猫莫吃鼠
·AB的故事
·陈克贵家属关于拒绝接受两名指定律师的声明
·这个时代最优异的死刑辩词/茉莉
·自救的力量
·不只是问问而已
·The use of Citizens Documentary in Chinese Civil Rights Movements
·行政强制法起草至今23年未通过
·Rights Defence Movement Online and Offline
·遭遇中国司法
·一个单纯的反对者/阳光时务周刊
·“颠覆国家政权罪”的政治意涵/滕彪
·财产公开,与虎谋皮
·Changing China through Mandarin
·通过法律的抢劫——答《公民论坛》问
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
A courageous Chinese lawyer urges his country to follow its own laws

   
   By Fred Hiatt
   
   http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/post-partisan/wp/2013/11/06/a-courageous-chinese-lawyer-urges-his-country-to-follow-its-own-laws/
   


   China's President Xi Jinping waits to greet Cuba's First Vice President of the Council of State Miguel Diaz-Canel at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, in this file picture taken June 18, 2013. China is considering the use of international law in a big push to get free trade zones up and running to promote the use of the yuan in global trade, which could challenge Hong Kong longer term as the main offshore centre for the currency. REUTERS/Ed Jones/Pool/Files (CHINA - Tags: POLITICS BUSINESS)
   President Xi Jinping (Ed JonesReuters)
   
   HONG KONG — This week, while most China watchers focus on leaders gathering for a closed-door meeting to set economic policy, Teng Biao says he won’t be paying much attention.
   
   “We human rights lawyers are more focused on civil society,” Teng told me during a conversation here this week. “If it is pressured, the Communist Party will have to make changes. If not, it will never give up any power.”
   
   The phrase “human rights lawyer” may seem incongruous in China. But Teng is one of a new generation of activists — he is 40 — who are pressing China to honor its own constitution, which grants rights that its rulers have never honored.
   
   That they are calling for leaders simply to follow their own laws has not endeared them to President Xi Jinping and his Politburo comrades. In the year since Xi took office, Teng tells me, some 200 human rights activists have been arrested or detained, “maybe five or ten times as many as last year.”
   
   Teng himself has been detained several times, most recently this summer and once, in 2010, he listened as police threatened to “beat him to death and dig a hole to bury him.” In 2011 he was held in solitary confinement for 70 days.
   
   “During the 70 days in detention, I wore handcuffs 24 hours for 36 days, I was forced to stay in one position, facing a wall, for 18 hours for 57 days,” he wrote recently. “Physically and mentally tortured, I began to write statements of repentance and statements of guarantee. I had to rewrite them over and over to improve my sincerity. Never so profoundly did I experience the super power of ‘the people’s democratic dictatorship.’”
   
   He has a guest position at a law school in Hong Kong, which is part of China but with a freer political system, but says he intends to return to Beijing in due course.
   
   Why take such chances? Teng says a top-down, authoritarian system can’t solve the complex problems China faces now that it has reached “middle-income” status. And he warns that people outside China ought to be paying attention. “If China becomes the strongest economically and militarily but without human rights or political freedom, it must be a threat to the whole world, like Nazi Germany,” he said.
   
   I said that Chinese officials often say that activists like Teng have little support among the people, who (officials say) value stability above all.
   
   “Activists are very few, because it is very risky,” he replied. Most people are indifferent to politics. But, he said, people’s attitudes change when their own rights are violated — “forced evictions, forced abortions, a relative is detained.”
   
   Teng said the Internet is opening new possibilities for civil action — for organizations that are barely organized, with no fixed address or defined leaders, like the New Citizens’ Movement he has helped promote. In a country with endemic corruption, the movement demands that officials disclose their assets. With millions of internal migrants not allowed to register in their new locations and so excluded from many services, it demands equal education for all children. These are issues that can resonate with ordinary Chinese.
   
   On the last Saturday of every month, Teng told me, in as many as 30 cities, sympathizers meet at a restaurant and discuss these issues, following Robert’s Rules of Order to help promote democratic ways of thinking and interacting.
   
   Teng was a typically apolitical Chinese until he went to law school, he said. “After entering university, I gradually began to think independently,” he said. “Some professors, and some books, influenced me, and especially the social reality — seeing so many violations of human rights every day.”
   
   Even so, he was able to work within the system for many years. He is on the faculty of a Beijing law school; his calls for constitutional reform were initially welcomed. That he is now viewed as dangerous reflects how far Party leaders have regressed.
   
   It pains Teng to see so many of his countrymen risking arrest, imprisonment and torture with so little international support, he told me.
   
   “The U.S. and other countries seem to have a policy to avoid making the Chinese government angry,” he said. “The U.S. needs China, but China needs the U.S. too. And freedom is something non-negotiable.”
(2013/11/06 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场