新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea]
石三生
·在中国,网络作家还不如个乞丐
·台湾的电信诈骗犯为何钟情大陆?
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢(二)
·龙应台的落后与愚昧举世罕见
·中央“下大气力”抓信访,能否“零容忍”?
·火星都能去,为何“依法治国”这么难?
·龙应台的愚昧与龙粉的愚蠢很匹配
·龙应台的“自卑”与陈小鲁的“感觉良好”
·杨恒均的裙子与龙应台的胡子
·习总的讲话给谁听?
·阎连科是一条别有用心的“丧家犬”
·鸟治时代
·鸟治时代
·劳动也创造噩梦
·习总的讲话为何不提宪法?
·霍金是扯淡、还是故弄玄虚?
·霍金走红与魏则西之死
·从总理引喻失当说开去
·霍金或欺世盗名
·霍金或欺世盗名(二)
·从马彩云到雷洋,昌平之事动静大
·人大硕士雷洋真的嫖娼了吗?
·财新网与媒体掐架,郑州血案有真相吗?
·雷洋案只能糊涂了事
·政治、维权、欺骗(一)
·向天下人求助
·从习总玉言到现实的距离
·蔡英文固执己见 “九二共识”尴尬谢幕
·习总的“六个必须”缺了什么?
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”
·法治的昏聩登峰造极
·雷洋案----一次伪民意的自我救赎秀
·副省长被打应该是杜撰
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”(二)
·雷洋案的“程序正义”只能是意淫
·是“偷鸡腿”还是偷民心?
·从“偷鸡腿”到中国的人权
·安康副市长到底是咋死的?
·安康副市长真是个清官?
·再谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·广西律师被扯破裤子的破绽
·安康副市长的“移民”算腐败吗?
·郑永年的谬论(一)
·又是一个“穷”死的县委书记?
·新常态,无常理
·胡长官一个暑假如何赚100多?
·呼格母亲梦太多 聂树斌案难公正
·同是自杀,两副市长命运两重天
·“你懂的”与“抢孩子”
·现身说法话聂树斌的签名
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(二)
·聂树斌案涉及的官到底有多大?
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(三)
·怎一个乱字了得
·众筹十万,再批周小平
·618,不只是京东们的救命稻草
·聂树斌案与乌坎事件
·“网友告政府”就是一笑话
·高考与诺贝尔奖
·且慢吹嘘聂树案再审
·《求是》副总编为何求死?
·人民日报对“反腐败”自信的离谱
·《中国共产党问责条例》可信吗?
·造谣,是一种教科书式的美德
·三谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·四谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·五谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·六谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·“三类人”与“国家保护动物”
·七谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·中国的法治:一边鞠躬;一边作孽
·南海仲裁案,德国鬼子出了个馊主意
·刘刚与高智晟及其他
·第二巡回法庭为何不扫门前雪
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(二)
·连上帝都感到意外的巧合
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(三)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(四)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(五)
·城头变幻难解百姓之苦
·令人窒息的理想
·也谈“刘刚改了密电码”
·“四亿九”祭
·“四亿九”之后
·推荐顾晓军、刘刚、郭文贵联袂角逐诺贝尔奖
·请王岐山书记主持公正
·后周永康时代
·等于零的人生
·再谈“刘志军倒下无所谓”
·这些年,那些事
·借海航十个亿,与郭文贵对赌
·小鸟与郭文贵
·西诺与文贵
·郭文贵与“发不会”
·特朗普、郭文贵及最赚钱的生意
·郭文贵事件之假想
·美国的月亮是真的圆
·刘大湿与十三省
·紫禁城月下放人 郭文贵初战告捷
·马云避实就虚 刘刚连遭辟谣
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred eighty
   
   Translator: God has eyes


   
   Undeniable --- centennial Nobel Peace Prize has
   been able to Achievement brilliant today, with
   its great humanistic spreadvalues ​​ by the
   winners. From Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent,
   non-cooperation "," rich countries should cancel
   the debt of poor countries, "South African
   Archbishop Desmond Tutu, everyone reflects the
   values advocated​​ by the Nobel Peace Prize at a
   certain time and space advanced and universal
   feelings.
   
   However, when we are faced with the Nobel
   Peace Prize in the 20th century to create
   brilliant, can not fail to see --- as Mahatma
   Gandhi, the inheritor of the mantle of both the
   Dalai Lama, Aung San Suu Kyi, or Liu Xiaobo, the
   so-called "peace" ideology has been seriously
   lagging behind in this day and age, simply can
   not cope with the high-speed development and
   complex world. Rebuttable and from these heirs
   own experience, the incompetence of the so-
   called "pacifist" --- the Dalai Lama into exile;
   Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest;
   Liu Xiaobo was sentenced. Course, to hand over
   political power from the Dalai Lama, the
   mainland political indifferent; comeback after
   Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese civil war breaks
   out specific actions of the peace who does not
   promote human world peace: peace advocated by
   the Nobel Peace Prize purposes, is also
   experiencing insurmountable obstacles.
   
   Being called hero. It is such an outdated
   concept that has been unable to cope with the
   complexity of the world pattern era, Gu Xiaojun
   ideas emerged. Mr. Gu Xiaojun as a private
   citizen, with $ 35 more than a political game
   with the CPC theoretical articles, made the
   results are not unbeatable, and Ang, Liu Ji
   decades of efforts --- to ensure their own safety
   successfully lead to Communist China Politics
   and Law Committee and ideology downgrade.
   
   Explore Gu Xiaojun ideological success of the
   root causes, of course, first of all thanks to Gary's
   flow. In the human society has entered the era
   of the global village, when most countries
   around the world have chosen the democratic
   rule of autocratic Communist China also had to
   shy promised to gradually promote the
   democratic process, the former number two man
   of the Chinese Communist Party, Mr. Wen Jiabao
   has even threatened --- China's democracy will
   come in the modern realization (Gu's view, Mr.
   Wen Jiabao in fact in stupefying --- is the
   democratic responsibility can not be passed to
   the high quality of the people above). To break
   the curse of the Chinese Communists, with Liu
   Xiaobo's "colonial three hundred years" theory is
   simply not possible, due to the modernization of
   Mr. Liu Xiaobo colonial theory and Wen Jiabao
   trap actually resonate, are shifting the
   responsibility can not be democracy trouble.
   
   With select no enmity with the Chinese
   Communists --- but Mr. Gu Xiaojun by Ming
   repair the cliff, dark to crossing Chencang
   political theoretical articles side laid bare the
   CPC's obscurant "Communism is balderdash",
   "Three Represents is nonsense Hang Meng
   abduction; side proposed to allow the
   Communists can not be refuted "the public
   impartiality first values. Chinese people, by the
   decades stupefying education can go along with
   the Chinese Communist Party's "never
   Westernization" fallacy. But always like the big
   talk of the Chinese Communist Party, in the face
   of "the public impartiality" universal values, in
   addition to the metamorphosis blocked suppress
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun look with their own well-being for
   the people "in the same direction "the public
   impartiality, but perplexed, had plagiarized go
   into a nonsense of" fairness and justice "in order
   to confuse right and wrong.
   
   The world to see, "the public impartiality"
   universal values, has achieved numerous
   victories in the past 2012 --- big enough to cause
   the Politics and Law Committee, and ideology
   downgrade, small enough to let Ai Weiwei, Chen
   Guangcheng alone, malala international swindler
   one that is the prototype. Of course, the world
   should see that "the public impartiality" in the
   event of the Chinese Communist Party in every
   possible way blocked struggling to slightly under
   pressure test edge. Where it can be obtained,
   and Ang, Liu and other Nobel winners have the
   same support and recognition of the people of
   the world, "the public impartiality" human
   society will make a greater contribution.
   
   Today, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "gossip" democracy "to"
   Civil Rights "after the advent of, I feel duty
   bound to once again recommend to the Nobel
   Peace Prize judges. To please judges Mo looked
   this word of change over the past decade, the
   Chinese Communists precisely by the
   "democratic" stealing replaced by "people's
   livelihood" (Weifang street, originally called
   "democratic Street, Hu, Wen Party The changed
   during Minsheng Street "), the only excuse for
   economic development, political reform and the
   introduction of the supremacy of the
   maintenance of stability astray.
   
   Needless to say, Mr. Gu Xiaojun 'democratic'
   reform 'civil rights' "is a Chinese Communists
   headache but can not do anything political
   theory. Because the new session of the Chinese
   Communist Party ringleader --- set party,
   political and military power in hand, Mr. Xi
   Jinping, the most like the right of the people
   assigned to "talk about. Democracy is bound
   within the foreseeable future, in the hands of
   the Chinese Communists can be the "civil rights"
   and the "right of the people assigned to" the
   truth in the same direction. When Chinese
   Communists deny "civil rights" tantamount to
   self Zhangzui the all support it! This is also the
   root cause of the "gossip" civil rights
   "adventure".
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, please use you
   have no noble wisdom, carefully try to figure out
   what Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideas from "the public
   impartiality" to the "civil rights" wonders!
   Colonialism after the demise of the great Nobel
   Peace Prize whether the innovation ---- to
   continue the process of civilization of human
   society, the glory it? The world, as well as more
   than "the public impartiality" universal values?
   the public impartiality, free, more important
   than the "civil rights" rights?
   
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, March 24, 2013 05:01
   Yanbian]
(2013/04/04 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场