新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea]
石三生
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
·卖艺也卖身
·蔡英文与龙应台及小粉红
·肖仲华与周小平
·中纪委也学会了吹牛?
·中纪委何时扫荡“地主帮”?
·“负能量”缺席是“五个一百”的耻辱
·蔡英文回应石三生
·复旦博士于迎丽装傻为哪般?
·阎肃“假去世”与山东老汉“活人出殡”
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·习总回应石三生?
·两会代表到底怕什么?
·留美女生主犯忏悔:自由是恶魔
·华东师大学者自杀,证明上帝如白痴
·李克强的创新与唐僧的紧箍咒
·党媒姓党,却炒作一个神经病
·揭开任志强“反党”的画皮
·国务院意见扰民 党媒辩解更添堵
·拆了败家的鸟巢如何?
·鸟巢是恐怖分子的老巢?
·仰慕白痴的姚晨为何有八千万粉丝?
·鸟巢怎可能不腐败?
·鸟巢为何成禁区?
·百家讲坛与史学奇才抑郁自杀
·史学奇才自杀是因为作假吗?
·史学天才林嘉文或装死
·党媒姓党,只是不懂常识与常理
·于丹与北大终于要合伙坐实“天才少年”
·王毅响应顾晓军 “九二共识”已过时
·鸟巢的回应---边自夸;边删贴
·推荐顾晓军、潘基文、蔡英文联袂角逐诺奖
·北京法官被杀,与司法不公有关系吗?
·马彩云法官被杀,官方应公开真相
·倡议追授马彩云法官全国模范、烈士、博士
·凯迪网友七嘴八舌议马彩云法官被授勋
·马彩云法官与北师大女教授
·请王岐山书记谈谈马彩云被枪杀案
·政协发言人爱吹牛,出两小题难倒他
·用“大脑革命”质疑马彩云法官被枪杀
·马彩云法官被杀,“正义”或是元凶
·倡议追认马彩云法官为“两会代表”
·依法治国,应取缔两会提案
·谁是当今文坛第一
·两会中的腐败---申纪兰篇
·两会中的腐败--傅莹卖书,莫言扯淡
·公开叫卖、转让”当今文坛第一”
·任志强、李悔之与“动物世界的阴谋”
·大陆的尴尬:承认台湾宪法,只能“一国两政”
· 习总巧应顾晓军 “九二共识”成历史
·九三学社中央委员为何也做五毛?
·全国政协委员朱征夫是敢言还是扯淡?
·台湾蔡英文欠大陆顾晓军一个人情
·任志强与任大炮
·习总揭开了人类起源之谜
·台湾文化的假正经
·向高级动物鲁山老泉致敬
·顾晓军创立了新哲学,中国大脑敢挑战谷歌智能吗?
·中国将错过下一波浪潮---大脑革命
·中国正在错过下一波浪潮---大脑革命
·中国人的悲哀
·申纪兰代表的智能超越了阿凡狗
·顾晓军思想远播阿拉伯世界
·从两会代表的马桶式思维说开去
·我与叙利亚执政党成了好朋友
·给“一带一路”泼点冷水
·天上真的会掉馅饼
·高级动物在行动
·因推荐“公正第一” 石三生下场堪忧
·请问生意场大人:该如何谈生意?
·大脑革命影响谷歌 阿凡狗戏弄聂卫平
·生意场的生意经与顾晓军民主奖
·石三生影响着索罗斯和聂卫平
·当执政党不在乎被冒充
·因小气,蔡英文正在丧失先机
·报告!我要吃敬酒
·刘刚才赞顾晓军,温云超就疯了
·冒充之恶与北风之毒
·不讲公正第一,岳阳法官下口咬
·顾晓军思想是人类社会的航标灯
·华东师大或有难言之隐
·人民日报敢不敢与顾晓军一辩?
·刘刚道歉,顾晓军主义再增辉
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred eighty
   
   Translator: God has eyes


   
   Undeniable --- centennial Nobel Peace Prize has
   been able to Achievement brilliant today, with
   its great humanistic spreadvalues ​​ by the
   winners. From Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent,
   non-cooperation "," rich countries should cancel
   the debt of poor countries, "South African
   Archbishop Desmond Tutu, everyone reflects the
   values advocated​​ by the Nobel Peace Prize at a
   certain time and space advanced and universal
   feelings.
   
   However, when we are faced with the Nobel
   Peace Prize in the 20th century to create
   brilliant, can not fail to see --- as Mahatma
   Gandhi, the inheritor of the mantle of both the
   Dalai Lama, Aung San Suu Kyi, or Liu Xiaobo, the
   so-called "peace" ideology has been seriously
   lagging behind in this day and age, simply can
   not cope with the high-speed development and
   complex world. Rebuttable and from these heirs
   own experience, the incompetence of the so-
   called "pacifist" --- the Dalai Lama into exile;
   Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest;
   Liu Xiaobo was sentenced. Course, to hand over
   political power from the Dalai Lama, the
   mainland political indifferent; comeback after
   Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese civil war breaks
   out specific actions of the peace who does not
   promote human world peace: peace advocated by
   the Nobel Peace Prize purposes, is also
   experiencing insurmountable obstacles.
   
   Being called hero. It is such an outdated
   concept that has been unable to cope with the
   complexity of the world pattern era, Gu Xiaojun
   ideas emerged. Mr. Gu Xiaojun as a private
   citizen, with $ 35 more than a political game
   with the CPC theoretical articles, made the
   results are not unbeatable, and Ang, Liu Ji
   decades of efforts --- to ensure their own safety
   successfully lead to Communist China Politics
   and Law Committee and ideology downgrade.
   
   Explore Gu Xiaojun ideological success of the
   root causes, of course, first of all thanks to Gary's
   flow. In the human society has entered the era
   of the global village, when most countries
   around the world have chosen the democratic
   rule of autocratic Communist China also had to
   shy promised to gradually promote the
   democratic process, the former number two man
   of the Chinese Communist Party, Mr. Wen Jiabao
   has even threatened --- China's democracy will
   come in the modern realization (Gu's view, Mr.
   Wen Jiabao in fact in stupefying --- is the
   democratic responsibility can not be passed to
   the high quality of the people above). To break
   the curse of the Chinese Communists, with Liu
   Xiaobo's "colonial three hundred years" theory is
   simply not possible, due to the modernization of
   Mr. Liu Xiaobo colonial theory and Wen Jiabao
   trap actually resonate, are shifting the
   responsibility can not be democracy trouble.
   
   With select no enmity with the Chinese
   Communists --- but Mr. Gu Xiaojun by Ming
   repair the cliff, dark to crossing Chencang
   political theoretical articles side laid bare the
   CPC's obscurant "Communism is balderdash",
   "Three Represents is nonsense Hang Meng
   abduction; side proposed to allow the
   Communists can not be refuted "the public
   impartiality first values. Chinese people, by the
   decades stupefying education can go along with
   the Chinese Communist Party's "never
   Westernization" fallacy. But always like the big
   talk of the Chinese Communist Party, in the face
   of "the public impartiality" universal values, in
   addition to the metamorphosis blocked suppress
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun look with their own well-being for
   the people "in the same direction "the public
   impartiality, but perplexed, had plagiarized go
   into a nonsense of" fairness and justice "in order
   to confuse right and wrong.
   
   The world to see, "the public impartiality"
   universal values, has achieved numerous
   victories in the past 2012 --- big enough to cause
   the Politics and Law Committee, and ideology
   downgrade, small enough to let Ai Weiwei, Chen
   Guangcheng alone, malala international swindler
   one that is the prototype. Of course, the world
   should see that "the public impartiality" in the
   event of the Chinese Communist Party in every
   possible way blocked struggling to slightly under
   pressure test edge. Where it can be obtained,
   and Ang, Liu and other Nobel winners have the
   same support and recognition of the people of
   the world, "the public impartiality" human
   society will make a greater contribution.
   
   Today, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "gossip" democracy "to"
   Civil Rights "after the advent of, I feel duty
   bound to once again recommend to the Nobel
   Peace Prize judges. To please judges Mo looked
   this word of change over the past decade, the
   Chinese Communists precisely by the
   "democratic" stealing replaced by "people's
   livelihood" (Weifang street, originally called
   "democratic Street, Hu, Wen Party The changed
   during Minsheng Street "), the only excuse for
   economic development, political reform and the
   introduction of the supremacy of the
   maintenance of stability astray.
   
   Needless to say, Mr. Gu Xiaojun 'democratic'
   reform 'civil rights' "is a Chinese Communists
   headache but can not do anything political
   theory. Because the new session of the Chinese
   Communist Party ringleader --- set party,
   political and military power in hand, Mr. Xi
   Jinping, the most like the right of the people
   assigned to "talk about. Democracy is bound
   within the foreseeable future, in the hands of
   the Chinese Communists can be the "civil rights"
   and the "right of the people assigned to" the
   truth in the same direction. When Chinese
   Communists deny "civil rights" tantamount to
   self Zhangzui the all support it! This is also the
   root cause of the "gossip" civil rights
   "adventure".
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, please use you
   have no noble wisdom, carefully try to figure out
   what Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideas from "the public
   impartiality" to the "civil rights" wonders!
   Colonialism after the demise of the great Nobel
   Peace Prize whether the innovation ---- to
   continue the process of civilization of human
   society, the glory it? The world, as well as more
   than "the public impartiality" universal values?
   the public impartiality, free, more important
   than the "civil rights" rights?
   
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, March 24, 2013 05:01
   Yanbian]
(2013/04/04 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场