新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea]
石三生
·中纪委反腐形同游戏
·中纪委为何不让我说话?
·上访去
·中央巡视组驻地的口号
·裸奔中的潍坊市政府
·政府犯罪为何有恃无恐
·官官相护何时了
·真伪中央巡视组
·真伪中央巡视组
·真伪中央巡视组
·社会真的在向好吗?
·社会真的在向好吗?(二)
·贼与官
·陈光标与腐败的亿元司长(一)
·陈光标与腐败的亿元司长(二)
·来自中央巡视组的恐吓?
·来自中央巡视组的沉默
·无法消受的人权事业进步
·韩寒李承鹏或涉周滨案(二)
·言而无信的中央巡视组
·贼与官(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(三)
·三个精神病副市长:杨宽生、王立军、陈白峰
·“相关人物”突然成空白的高官
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·“反腐”只能各自为战
·也谈宁财神吸毒
·许立全组团 美女市长现身
·贼与官(三)
·杨恒均的心事
·杨恒均的使命
·走下坡路的杨恒均与李承鹏
·且看中央巡视组山东打老虎
·贼与官(四)
·山东“老虎”喜迎李总理
·与老老常委齐名
·为虎作伥者之韩寒篇
·为虎作伥者之高智晟篇
·诺贝尔和平奖或沦陷
·山东终于表态拥护打大老虎
·习王无恩,何来感谢?
·本轮反腐中的山东之最
·贼与官(五)
·无法可依
·想到的与未想到的
·反腐或成鸡肋
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·“泰坦尼克”与“东方之星”
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·中纪委的回应很莫名
·搅局与设局
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·请教牛泪:人类社会如何进步?
·明的癣疥脓疮呢?
·洋人与二奶
·乱lun
·爱迪生的心思 杨振宁与莫言不懂
·顾晓军与杨恒均的“社会观”
·李开复画蛇添足
·搅局与设局(二)
·杨恒均或保王林脱难
·释永信跳进黄河 王林案悄然降温
·“打虎”与我何关?
·王胜俊与“女业主被当众扒裤”
·毕福剑与杨恒均
·莫言有罪
·莫言的难言之隐
·匪夷所思
·信力健或成人权新样本
·莫须有的罪名 莫须有的人权
·请奥巴马入瓮
·“窝里斗”及其他
·再谈“窝里斗”及其他
·三谈“窝里斗”及其他
·四谈“窝里斗”及其他
·五谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·七谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·十谈“窝里斗”及其他之“李嘉诚跑了”
·李嘉诚的“愚昧”论不知所云
·共产无望 共妻有戏
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred eighty
   
   Translator: God has eyes


   
   Undeniable --- centennial Nobel Peace Prize has
   been able to Achievement brilliant today, with
   its great humanistic spreadvalues ​​ by the
   winners. From Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent,
   non-cooperation "," rich countries should cancel
   the debt of poor countries, "South African
   Archbishop Desmond Tutu, everyone reflects the
   values advocated​​ by the Nobel Peace Prize at a
   certain time and space advanced and universal
   feelings.
   
   However, when we are faced with the Nobel
   Peace Prize in the 20th century to create
   brilliant, can not fail to see --- as Mahatma
   Gandhi, the inheritor of the mantle of both the
   Dalai Lama, Aung San Suu Kyi, or Liu Xiaobo, the
   so-called "peace" ideology has been seriously
   lagging behind in this day and age, simply can
   not cope with the high-speed development and
   complex world. Rebuttable and from these heirs
   own experience, the incompetence of the so-
   called "pacifist" --- the Dalai Lama into exile;
   Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest;
   Liu Xiaobo was sentenced. Course, to hand over
   political power from the Dalai Lama, the
   mainland political indifferent; comeback after
   Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese civil war breaks
   out specific actions of the peace who does not
   promote human world peace: peace advocated by
   the Nobel Peace Prize purposes, is also
   experiencing insurmountable obstacles.
   
   Being called hero. It is such an outdated
   concept that has been unable to cope with the
   complexity of the world pattern era, Gu Xiaojun
   ideas emerged. Mr. Gu Xiaojun as a private
   citizen, with $ 35 more than a political game
   with the CPC theoretical articles, made the
   results are not unbeatable, and Ang, Liu Ji
   decades of efforts --- to ensure their own safety
   successfully lead to Communist China Politics
   and Law Committee and ideology downgrade.
   
   Explore Gu Xiaojun ideological success of the
   root causes, of course, first of all thanks to Gary's
   flow. In the human society has entered the era
   of the global village, when most countries
   around the world have chosen the democratic
   rule of autocratic Communist China also had to
   shy promised to gradually promote the
   democratic process, the former number two man
   of the Chinese Communist Party, Mr. Wen Jiabao
   has even threatened --- China's democracy will
   come in the modern realization (Gu's view, Mr.
   Wen Jiabao in fact in stupefying --- is the
   democratic responsibility can not be passed to
   the high quality of the people above). To break
   the curse of the Chinese Communists, with Liu
   Xiaobo's "colonial three hundred years" theory is
   simply not possible, due to the modernization of
   Mr. Liu Xiaobo colonial theory and Wen Jiabao
   trap actually resonate, are shifting the
   responsibility can not be democracy trouble.
   
   With select no enmity with the Chinese
   Communists --- but Mr. Gu Xiaojun by Ming
   repair the cliff, dark to crossing Chencang
   political theoretical articles side laid bare the
   CPC's obscurant "Communism is balderdash",
   "Three Represents is nonsense Hang Meng
   abduction; side proposed to allow the
   Communists can not be refuted "the public
   impartiality first values. Chinese people, by the
   decades stupefying education can go along with
   the Chinese Communist Party's "never
   Westernization" fallacy. But always like the big
   talk of the Chinese Communist Party, in the face
   of "the public impartiality" universal values, in
   addition to the metamorphosis blocked suppress
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun look with their own well-being for
   the people "in the same direction "the public
   impartiality, but perplexed, had plagiarized go
   into a nonsense of" fairness and justice "in order
   to confuse right and wrong.
   
   The world to see, "the public impartiality"
   universal values, has achieved numerous
   victories in the past 2012 --- big enough to cause
   the Politics and Law Committee, and ideology
   downgrade, small enough to let Ai Weiwei, Chen
   Guangcheng alone, malala international swindler
   one that is the prototype. Of course, the world
   should see that "the public impartiality" in the
   event of the Chinese Communist Party in every
   possible way blocked struggling to slightly under
   pressure test edge. Where it can be obtained,
   and Ang, Liu and other Nobel winners have the
   same support and recognition of the people of
   the world, "the public impartiality" human
   society will make a greater contribution.
   
   Today, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "gossip" democracy "to"
   Civil Rights "after the advent of, I feel duty
   bound to once again recommend to the Nobel
   Peace Prize judges. To please judges Mo looked
   this word of change over the past decade, the
   Chinese Communists precisely by the
   "democratic" stealing replaced by "people's
   livelihood" (Weifang street, originally called
   "democratic Street, Hu, Wen Party The changed
   during Minsheng Street "), the only excuse for
   economic development, political reform and the
   introduction of the supremacy of the
   maintenance of stability astray.
   
   Needless to say, Mr. Gu Xiaojun 'democratic'
   reform 'civil rights' "is a Chinese Communists
   headache but can not do anything political
   theory. Because the new session of the Chinese
   Communist Party ringleader --- set party,
   political and military power in hand, Mr. Xi
   Jinping, the most like the right of the people
   assigned to "talk about. Democracy is bound
   within the foreseeable future, in the hands of
   the Chinese Communists can be the "civil rights"
   and the "right of the people assigned to" the
   truth in the same direction. When Chinese
   Communists deny "civil rights" tantamount to
   self Zhangzui the all support it! This is also the
   root cause of the "gossip" civil rights
   "adventure".
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, please use you
   have no noble wisdom, carefully try to figure out
   what Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideas from "the public
   impartiality" to the "civil rights" wonders!
   Colonialism after the demise of the great Nobel
   Peace Prize whether the innovation ---- to
   continue the process of civilization of human
   society, the glory it? The world, as well as more
   than "the public impartiality" universal values?
   the public impartiality, free, more important
   than the "civil rights" rights?
   
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, March 24, 2013 05:01
   Yanbian]
(2013/04/04 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场