新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea]
石三生
·中美人权对话的骗局(四)
·中美人权对话的骗局(五)
·中美人权对话的骗局(六)
·中美人权对话的骗局(七)
·中美人权对话的骗局(八)
·孟建柱主管政法委 依法治国仍空谈
·作孽与漂白
·作孽与漂白(一)
·作孽与漂白(二)
·作孽与漂白(三)
·作孽与漂白(四)
·作孽与漂白(五)
·作孽与漂白(六)
·新快报丢骨头又丢人
·新快报丢了骨头救了市
·爆炸与维稳
·变态
·时与局
·时与局(二)
·漫谈“布道者”贺卫方
·别了,骆家辉
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴
·看任志强与央视互咬有感
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(二)
·国家安监局拿习总开涮
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(三)
·李嘉诚属“既得利益”怎成“笑谈”
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
·问习总:“决不允许”已经发生该怎办?
·中美合演的人权闹剧
·一塌糊涂的青岛管道爆炸事故报告
·国务院难得糊涂 中石化瞒天过海
·就“11•22”事故致李克强总理的公开信
·中国或已掌握“海水变石油”核心技术
·许志永被判刑只会成笑柄
·骆家辉指鹿为马 许志永此地无银
·美国政府的愚蠢举世罕见
·欺世盗名的“新公民运动”
·声援许志永的“法学院五学者”很愚蠢
·挪威议员为何推袁隆平角逐诺奖
·被蒙蔽的诺贝尔奖
·那些诺贝尔和平奖的角逐者们
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(二)
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(九)
·谁在纵容国土系统的腐败
·傅莹的谬误与傅成玉的荒唐
·秦光荣为何不“光荣”引咎?
·马航客机去了哪儿?
·全民竞猜:马航客机“去哪儿了”
·他们知道马航客机“去了哪儿”
·平度当局终于选择“自宫”
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·平度与马航、维权及其他
·马航客机失踪之谜与“塞翁失马”
·中央巡视到山东
·揣测中央巡视山东的结果
·两个“女婿”大闹人间
·杨恒均的”戏”
·杨恒均的国师梦与顾晓军的趋势论
·流于形式的“八规”与“四风”
·加藤嘉一有多假?
·韩寒、李承鹏或涉周滨案
·许志永获刑也无缘诺贝尔和平奖
·鬼子加藤嘉一与韩寒
·百度收了许立全多少钱?
·蔡奇调京 石三生被牵连
·许立全若安好 反腐便是扯淡
·莫言气急败坏 诺奖形同鸡肋
·与莫言、许立全等说说知心话
·中纪委一边反腐,一边为贪官打气
·致“一个弥天大骗局”的设计者们
·中纪委反腐形同游戏
·中纪委为何不让我说话?
·上访去
·中央巡视组驻地的口号
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
The idea of "​​civil rights" to recommend to the Nobel Pea

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred eighty
   
   Translator: God has eyes


   
   Undeniable --- centennial Nobel Peace Prize has
   been able to Achievement brilliant today, with
   its great humanistic spreadvalues ​​ by the
   winners. From Mahatma Gandhi's non-violent,
   non-cooperation "," rich countries should cancel
   the debt of poor countries, "South African
   Archbishop Desmond Tutu, everyone reflects the
   values advocated​​ by the Nobel Peace Prize at a
   certain time and space advanced and universal
   feelings.
   
   However, when we are faced with the Nobel
   Peace Prize in the 20th century to create
   brilliant, can not fail to see --- as Mahatma
   Gandhi, the inheritor of the mantle of both the
   Dalai Lama, Aung San Suu Kyi, or Liu Xiaobo, the
   so-called "peace" ideology has been seriously
   lagging behind in this day and age, simply can
   not cope with the high-speed development and
   complex world. Rebuttable and from these heirs
   own experience, the incompetence of the so-
   called "pacifist" --- the Dalai Lama into exile;
   Aung San Suu Kyi has been under house arrest;
   Liu Xiaobo was sentenced. Course, to hand over
   political power from the Dalai Lama, the
   mainland political indifferent; comeback after
   Aung San Suu Kyi, the Burmese civil war breaks
   out specific actions of the peace who does not
   promote human world peace: peace advocated by
   the Nobel Peace Prize purposes, is also
   experiencing insurmountable obstacles.
   
   Being called hero. It is such an outdated
   concept that has been unable to cope with the
   complexity of the world pattern era, Gu Xiaojun
   ideas emerged. Mr. Gu Xiaojun as a private
   citizen, with $ 35 more than a political game
   with the CPC theoretical articles, made the
   results are not unbeatable, and Ang, Liu Ji
   decades of efforts --- to ensure their own safety
   successfully lead to Communist China Politics
   and Law Committee and ideology downgrade.
   
   Explore Gu Xiaojun ideological success of the
   root causes, of course, first of all thanks to Gary's
   flow. In the human society has entered the era
   of the global village, when most countries
   around the world have chosen the democratic
   rule of autocratic Communist China also had to
   shy promised to gradually promote the
   democratic process, the former number two man
   of the Chinese Communist Party, Mr. Wen Jiabao
   has even threatened --- China's democracy will
   come in the modern realization (Gu's view, Mr.
   Wen Jiabao in fact in stupefying --- is the
   democratic responsibility can not be passed to
   the high quality of the people above). To break
   the curse of the Chinese Communists, with Liu
   Xiaobo's "colonial three hundred years" theory is
   simply not possible, due to the modernization of
   Mr. Liu Xiaobo colonial theory and Wen Jiabao
   trap actually resonate, are shifting the
   responsibility can not be democracy trouble.
   
   With select no enmity with the Chinese
   Communists --- but Mr. Gu Xiaojun by Ming
   repair the cliff, dark to crossing Chencang
   political theoretical articles side laid bare the
   CPC's obscurant "Communism is balderdash",
   "Three Represents is nonsense Hang Meng
   abduction; side proposed to allow the
   Communists can not be refuted "the public
   impartiality first values. Chinese people, by the
   decades stupefying education can go along with
   the Chinese Communist Party's "never
   Westernization" fallacy. But always like the big
   talk of the Chinese Communist Party, in the face
   of "the public impartiality" universal values, in
   addition to the metamorphosis blocked suppress
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun look with their own well-being for
   the people "in the same direction "the public
   impartiality, but perplexed, had plagiarized go
   into a nonsense of" fairness and justice "in order
   to confuse right and wrong.
   
   The world to see, "the public impartiality"
   universal values, has achieved numerous
   victories in the past 2012 --- big enough to cause
   the Politics and Law Committee, and ideology
   downgrade, small enough to let Ai Weiwei, Chen
   Guangcheng alone, malala international swindler
   one that is the prototype. Of course, the world
   should see that "the public impartiality" in the
   event of the Chinese Communist Party in every
   possible way blocked struggling to slightly under
   pressure test edge. Where it can be obtained,
   and Ang, Liu and other Nobel winners have the
   same support and recognition of the people of
   the world, "the public impartiality" human
   society will make a greater contribution.
   
   Today, Mr. Gu Xiaojun "gossip" democracy "to"
   Civil Rights "after the advent of, I feel duty
   bound to once again recommend to the Nobel
   Peace Prize judges. To please judges Mo looked
   this word of change over the past decade, the
   Chinese Communists precisely by the
   "democratic" stealing replaced by "people's
   livelihood" (Weifang street, originally called
   "democratic Street, Hu, Wen Party The changed
   during Minsheng Street "), the only excuse for
   economic development, political reform and the
   introduction of the supremacy of the
   maintenance of stability astray.
   
   Needless to say, Mr. Gu Xiaojun 'democratic'
   reform 'civil rights' "is a Chinese Communists
   headache but can not do anything political
   theory. Because the new session of the Chinese
   Communist Party ringleader --- set party,
   political and military power in hand, Mr. Xi
   Jinping, the most like the right of the people
   assigned to "talk about. Democracy is bound
   within the foreseeable future, in the hands of
   the Chinese Communists can be the "civil rights"
   and the "right of the people assigned to" the
   truth in the same direction. When Chinese
   Communists deny "civil rights" tantamount to
   self Zhangzui the all support it! This is also the
   root cause of the "gossip" civil rights
   "adventure".
   
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, please use you
   have no noble wisdom, carefully try to figure out
   what Mr. Gu Xiaojun ideas from "the public
   impartiality" to the "civil rights" wonders!
   Colonialism after the demise of the great Nobel
   Peace Prize whether the innovation ---- to
   continue the process of civilization of human
   society, the glory it? The world, as well as more
   than "the public impartiality" universal values?
   the public impartiality, free, more important
   than the "civil rights" rights?
   
   [Shi Sansheng Sunday, March 24, 2013 05:01
   Yanbian]
(2013/04/04 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场