新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Wu Dengsheng and Gu Xiaojun PK Nobel Peace Prize]
石三生
·中纪委沉默不语北大丑闻化乌有
·王牌军的妙计与现实
·都是反革命习近平与顾晓军竟天上地下
·我将与十八大共进退
·杨达才是个好局长 邹恒甫是个准无赖
·安监局话音才落攀枝花矿难来袭
·顾晓军分身有术 石三生笔惊四方
·魂系北大 梦消清华
·我无耻我下流我将领导中国
·等不及了
·我呆我傻我征服了世界
·三代表诅咒我生孩子没屁股
·阳光卫视与杨澜竟如此下流
·时局变幻党叵测 顾粉团蒙冤难雪
·党不该诱骗善良的人“犯罪”
·感谢中宣部制止了我的犯罪企图
·陈平福案假戏真唱为哪般
·陈光福颠覆案的破腚
·致诺贝尔奖评委的公开信
·党没有思想不是人民的错
·人们为何都热爱骗子
·颜昌海骑驴找驴不知自己是汉奸
·陈平福罪有应得 颜昌海徒有虚名
·顾晓军主义哲学中的“封建”思想
·左右都是一家人颜昌海窝斗孔孙
·Open letter to jury Nobel Prize
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第二封信
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第三封信
·Caused the third letter of the Nobel Peace Prize Jury
·可怜颜粉百多万更无一个是男儿
·保钓与爱国及转基因与女特工
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·顾晓军归隐 焦国标登场
·致山东高级人民法院的公开信
·诺贝尔奖及其它
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第四封信
·致山东高级人民法院院长的公开信
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Wu Dengsheng and Gu Xiaojun PK Nobel Peace Prize

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred seventy-four
   
   Translator: God has eyes


   
   Nomination of the people of Myanmar the
   President Wu Dengsheng candidate for the Nobel
   Peace Prize, eight ironic Nobel Peace Prize! The
   people of Burma in 2012 because of the past, it
   is not a year of peace. But a civil war broke out
   again, the people of the tragic war trampled. Wu
   president as Myanmar strongman, not only could
   not the way to peace negotiations in 2012 to
   stop the civil war was the condemnation of the
   international community, but also due to the
   employment of child soldiers.
   While we can not deny the democratic initiative
   after Wu president --- cancel the news blackout,
   absorption opposition Aung San Suu Kyi entered
   Congress. Shouted to a port of a democratic
   president, even in possession of weaponry
   absolute advantage, hired some of the minor
   children strikes, whether contrary to the
   meaning of democracy? Whether too inhuman it?
   Mere the President Wu outrageously ordered
   government forces air raid Kachin region, causing
   a large number of civilian casualties of their
   own, and in respect of sentence he may not
   participate in life candidate for the Nobel Peace
   Prize!
   
   The nomination is such a lack of humanity and
   unscrupulous candidate for the Nobel Peace
   Prize. This is not one hundred percent in the to
   insult the Nobel Peace Prize? Can believe that, if
   done Myanmar President Mr. Gu Xiaojun, he
   must not employ child soldiers die, more people
   will not use aircraft cannon. Gu Xiaojun
   thinking, "the public impartiality" as the core
   through political dialogue with the Kachin must
   find a path of peaceful settlement of disputes.
   Why the Kachin the Wu Dengsheng president
   took office only two months after it tore up the
   cease-fire agreement has been to maintain up to
   17 years? This not because Wu presidential
   power once in hand, lack the sake of the public
   impartiality?
   
   Admittedly, in a dictatorship, Features, pseudo-
   democracy run amok in the world, Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun "the public impartiality first" is not
   necessarily a panacea. Because so far, not yet
   born on earth a "the public impartiality first" for
   the purpose of the Charter of human behavior.
   Specific to Burma the Wu Dengsheng President
   poises to implement democratic at the same
   time, the people, the public impartiality towards
   all the ethnic groups can, Kachin army have
   little reason to be allowed to tear up has to
   comply with the 17-year truce agreement. ? Year,
   Myanmar is willing to recognize China as a
   sovereign state, not because the Chinese
   emperor treat Myanmar the fairly the public
   impartiality could not help but yearn of
   voluntary tribute to the Chinese emperor to
   concede defeat.? Still capable of peaceful
   coexistence between the two countries. Known as
   the To the democratic Wu Dengsheng President,
   how hand, can not let a minority in their own
   surrender it?
   
   Western-style democracy can be seen through
   the Myanmar implement democratic civil war
   caused, natural crippled ---- missing "the public
   impartiality". As Mr. Gu in "the public
   impartiality" elaborated: "freedom, actually
   advocated a spirit." Born Free "is an individual;
   human society has been formed, can not be too
   one-sided places emphasis on the individual,
   because you have your freedom, others have the
   freedom of others; When the freedom of the two
   come into conflict, even conflict, and how to do
   it? only speak to the public impartiality if
   speaking nothing wrong country? ancients, he
   must fight, war, winner slavery loser (this is the
   origin of the slave society). between the the
   Kachin Army and the Government of Myanmar, is
   two partners thirst for freedom under the
   premise of the public impartiality do happen
   contradiction?
   
   What a tragedy! Wu Dengsheng presidential
   opposition leader Aung San Suu Kyi ---- a former
   winner of the Nobel Peace Prize to absorb into
   the Congress, has always been compliance
   Kachin army turned out to tear up the armistice
   agreement. Against its own people caused a
   huge disaster, should be nominated candidate
   should have over the past year to make a great
   contribution to mankind, "the Nobel Peace Prize.
   So whimsical, whether in irony Wu Dengsheng
   president, or would like a mockery of the great
   Nobel Peace Prize?
   
   The implore Wu President Huiyanshizhu --- and
   quickly learning, the introduction of Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun of "the public impartiality first" universal
   values! Myanmar democracy as a front to the
   public impartiality, I believe not only be
   possible to resolve the conflict with the Kachin
   army. Wu president himself will cadastral first
   advocated the impartiality of the public, free,
   democratic leadership, and sooner or later
   become the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize.
   
   Daw Aung San Suu Kyi again appealed to the
   Nobel Peace Prize Committee, appealed to the
   world: the 2013 Nobel Peace Prize was awarded
   to Mr. Gu Xiaojun! In order to avoid more people
   because of lack of freedom of the public
   impartiality duel, war, the public impartiality "is
   already imperative!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, March 12, 2013 03:29 China·Weifang
(2013/04/04 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场