新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Please Mr. Ban Ki to Note "malala day"'s preposterous]
石三生
·厦门日报越俎代庖向死人宣战
·从延安城管到革命圣地
·奥巴马或特赦棱镜泄密者
·愚蠢的美国泄密者斯诺登
·前谷歌副总裁李开复为何乱弹琴?
·中美英接踵上演间谍闹剧
·斯诺登与陈光诚
·再谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·四谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·五谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·六谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·聂树斌与王书金谁是真凶?
·时评家石三生的遭遇
·聂树斌与王书金谁是真凶?(五)
·曾成杰死刑之谜(二)
·他们和他们及谁与谁
·曾成杰死刑之谜(三)
·红歌将军与气功大师
·陈副省长的戾气与奸诈
·愚蠢的问题 难产的答案
·你的祖先是猴子吗?
·中美人权对话的骗局
·中美人权对话的骗局(二)
·中美人权对话的骗局(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(四)
·中美人权对话的骗局(五)
·中美人权对话的骗局(六)
·中美人权对话的骗局(七)
·中美人权对话的骗局(八)
·孟建柱主管政法委 依法治国仍空谈
·作孽与漂白
·作孽与漂白(一)
·作孽与漂白(二)
·作孽与漂白(三)
·作孽与漂白(四)
·作孽与漂白(五)
·作孽与漂白(六)
·新快报丢骨头又丢人
·新快报丢了骨头救了市
·爆炸与维稳
·变态
·时与局
·时与局(二)
·漫谈“布道者”贺卫方
·别了,骆家辉
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴
·看任志强与央视互咬有感
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(二)
·国家安监局拿习总开涮
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(三)
·李嘉诚属“既得利益”怎成“笑谈”
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
·问习总:“决不允许”已经发生该怎办?
·中美合演的人权闹剧
·一塌糊涂的青岛管道爆炸事故报告
·国务院难得糊涂 中石化瞒天过海
·就“11•22”事故致李克强总理的公开信
·中国或已掌握“海水变石油”核心技术
·许志永被判刑只会成笑柄
·骆家辉指鹿为马 许志永此地无银
·美国政府的愚蠢举世罕见
·欺世盗名的“新公民运动”
·声援许志永的“法学院五学者”很愚蠢
·挪威议员为何推袁隆平角逐诺奖
·被蒙蔽的诺贝尔奖
·那些诺贝尔和平奖的角逐者们
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(二)
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(九)
·谁在纵容国土系统的腐败
·傅莹的谬误与傅成玉的荒唐
·秦光荣为何不“光荣”引咎?
·马航客机去了哪儿?
·全民竞猜:马航客机“去哪儿了”
·他们知道马航客机“去了哪儿”
·平度当局终于选择“自宫”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Please Mr. Ban Ki to Note "malala day"'s preposterous

   
   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred fifty-five


   
   Translator: God has eyes 
   
   Dear United Nations Secretary-General, Mr. Ban
   Ki: I do not recommend to the Nobel Peace Prize,
   the United States, "the Times, the United States'
   foreign policy" to "Shi Sansheng famous Chinese
   writer, thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun, really could not
   know that the United Nations will set up a
   "malala day. Dear Mr. Ban Ki Moon, the
   establishment of "malala Day" is nonsense, is
   your hands infidelity, is they want to harm you,
   trap you into the world's embarrassment (your
   men, you people of the same idea, the objective
   is to harm you, unless they are a group of the
   natural pig brain)! Why do you say that? The 15-
   year-old malala, is a standard developed by the
   United Nations Convention on the Rights of the
   Child "in children, and was a girls. She is a
   minor, the right to guardianship. Dear Mr. Ban
   Ki Moon, That malala ward, she does not have an
   independent political personality, do not have
   the body set "malala Day qualifications. Dear
   Mr. Ban Ki Moon, your men fraudulent use of
   your reputation the establishment malala Day,
   this is not to take you when Zhu Tousan take
   you when the 250 take you when thrown sub?
   This is not with your hands, to fight your mouth
   sub mercilessly hit your mouth sub footed it?
   Admittedly, your hands, and perhaps did not
   expect mutual contradiction between the
   Convention on the Rights of the Child, "and"
   malala Day, maybe not intentionally, deliberately
   to harm you, but at least they set up "malala
   Day practice, idea of a pig brain, pig brain,
   behavior, unworthy of walking in the institutions
   of the United Nations with the act, is not it?
   Dear Mr. Ban Ki Moon, faster than the Chinese
   New Year, I was too busy to give you write so
   much. UN Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki Wishing:
   Dear Chinese Happy New Year! Making a fortune
   in the coming year, rolling in luck!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, February 5, 2013 12:26 china]
(2013/02/05 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场