新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala]
石三生
·雷锋同志心猿意马 日记喻军队国家化
·麦田恼羞成怒 韩寒杀气腾腾
·奥巴马挺南周 南周挺韩寒与转基因
·奥巴马挺南周 南周挺韩寒与转基因
·比大熊猫更珍贵的。。。
·当代五君子
·他搅乱了时局又隐没入尘埃
·我比你还要脏
·美国人为何也瞎掺乎刑诉法修正案?
·我们都被门夹了一下
·纽约时报佯攻恶法 秘密拘捕悄然通过
·缝肛与江姐及其他
·洋垃圾与洋文化
·特务手段管控社会 薄熙来害人终害己
·薄熙来唱红遭免 中国作协应检讨
·初笑薄瓜瓜 二叹薄熙来
·二笑薄瓜瓜 三叹薄熙来
·三笑薄瓜瓜 四叹薄熙来
·给艾未未的债主普及一点常识与法律
·四笑薄瓜瓜 五叹薄熙来
·新华网重大改版 高层动态失踪中
·解读时事之看天下谁主苍生
·司法部愚蠢 亵渎了法律侮辱了党
·左右皆混蛋 薄熙来末路的始作俑者
·捅破杨澜国籍的窗户纸
·写在余杰去国后的多余话
·方滨兴与秦始皇 防民防贼两长城
·孔庆东巧言献媚 韩三骗因祸得福
·孔庆东到底被包养了没?
·给流年不利的公知刘晓原律师指一招
·孔庆东与韩寒是两条不太一样的狗
·毛左派正向右看 伪公知何时蜕皮
·中国民主没有左右只有欺骗
·驳雷达先生对民主思潮的误判谬读
·艾未未不想出国背后的隐情
·再谈艾未未不想出国背后的隐情
·艾未未或偷漏税行政复议被驳回
·艾未未借钱缴税根本就是骗局
·中国第一真骂与世界第一奸骂
·韩寒与薄熙来有个约会
·韩寒与铁凝及莫言:谁懂政治?
·韩寒与铁凝及莫言:谁懂政治?
·一批美国:自由奖无自由 茅于轼应知羞
·二批美国:愚蠢的时代 荒唐的外交
·二批美国:愚蠢的时代 荒唐的外交
·我检讨:批茅于轼错了!
·韩寒是条狗与茅于轼老东西
·四月的乌有正知羞韩寒茅于轼当有耻
·毛左派偃旗息鼓 顾晓军趁火打劫
·两个中国天才韩寒与薄瓜瓜
·强烈推荐韩寒角逐诺贝尔奥斯卡奖
·撑起稻草人韩寒的骆驼们之鄢烈山篇
·对骗子情有独钟的新中国
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·美国《time》糗大了:韩寒是专制的帮凶
·破译韩寒与顾晓军的政治隐喻
·互联网也唱红打黑 顾晓军欲决战韩寒
·牛津大学与薄熙来有一腿
·李承鹏忙演戏 资中筠是看客
·艾未未急如律 刘晓原试反水
·华西都市报造谣与政法委的活埋名单
·特赦天下
·中国正在进步
·只谈韩寒
·“三个代表”与《三重门》
·别倒驴的韩粉与毛左思维
·别倒驴的韩粉与毛左思维
·于建嵘暗讥GFW 韩寒咬出XXX
·江泽民现身星巴克与新浪给鸡拜年
·赵普抢了薄熙来的风头?
·孔庆东迷途知返 “三个代表”是扯淡
·赵普效应与薄谷开来事件
·韩寒的靠山是他?
·江泽民救过胡耀邦吗?
·薄瓜瓜的声明是文革作风
·小消失的城市与断代的《江泽民传》
·陈光诚已死?
·美国政府已成骗子的托儿
·陈光诚提三条要挟温家宝
·陈光诚大逃亡证实瞎子也会飞
·陈光诚进美使馆 奥巴马仍被驴牵
·陈光诚瞎子妙算想救谁?
·美国政府为何炒作陈光诚
·陈光诚做过人体器官移植?
·中国三大假货:薄瓜瓜、韩寒、陈光诚
·一时疏忽,黑了一个网站
·陈光诚为何想亲吻克林顿?
·美国政府抛弃陈光诚的原因
·陈光诚为何又想逃离中国?
·一个牧师与一个瞎子合谋的骗局
·一个牧师
·揭开陈光诚临沂计生事件维权的骗局
·指导奥巴马正确解读评估报告
·言语轻薄的陈瞎子对美女啥感觉?
·美国国会中,有些议员是婊子养的
·维权律师陈瞎子是“三个代表”的典范
·陈瞎子一个事故的N个版本
·多线索求证陈瞎子维权的骗局
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred fifty-four
   


   Translator: God has eyes 
   
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, just wrote
   your "Nobel Peace Prize Jury concern malala
   cheating" to introduce my observation of the so-
   called Pakistani human rights activists girl
   malala. Conversely, even "Bavi the right girl
   malala" is established, there is no way
   recommended to you and Gu dough famous
   Chinese writer, a great thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   compare.
   Do not believe, I am only thinking of simply
   compare Please take a look:
   
   1, News introduced: malala cherished a lofty
   political ideals.
   Malala is a 15 year old girl, she thought, or said
   she thought no molding. Human experience tells
   us: thought, at the age of 17 to 18 square
   formation, only 23-year-old has a complete
   prototype of. Malala, just a thought recipient.
   She said some of the words, but also is
   repeating the words of her father, do not call
   her thinking, is not it?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun, not the past, came back only in
   the network, has authored more than 3,000
   articles ("Gu Xiaojun 'has reached 2070," Gu
   Xiaojun remarks "426," Gu Xiaojun novel "160,"
   Gu Xiaojun five other narrative poem "there are
   at least 500 articles in the loss of the former
   Communist ideology on his blog blocked).
   Gu Xiaojun 'system, based on "the public
   impartiality," The impartiality of the public is
   the first values "​​as the core of the" populist
   democracy ", and auxiliary genus methodology
   questioned School.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, so, malala
   compared with Gu Xiaojun? Is not such a
   reason?
   
   2, News introduced: malala said "I would like to
   convey a message to the children of this country,
   whenever you see oppression, should raise his
   voice against tyranny if someone wants to take
   away your rights, it would improve your his voice,
   do not be afraid of anyone! "
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges noted that no, I
   do not know you? This is not peace, this is the
   typical answer violence with violence! This is a
   serious breach of the purpose of the Nobel Peace
   Prize, a serious breach of Mr. Nobel's behest, is
   not it?
   Accordingly, we take a look at Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
   how to deal with similar problems. Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, often in the care of dough teaches us to
   two "first": "work (to make money)", "life (family)
   ". He has been advocating "just for fun, love of
   democracy", he said, "Communist China is very
   unlikely to ban all personal hobby"? He himself
   was doing, maybe too much political pressure, he
   was "hidden in the city." Writing a novel; I did
   not write a few novels, there is an opportunity,
   he began political commentator. CCP's spy is
   still serving his time, he blamed "the Hermitage
   in". Even the CCP's spies are frankly: old Gu too
   cunning not catch him handle.
   Respected judges of the Nobel Peace Prize, life is
   precious, valuable freedom, we should not
   advocate Mr. Gu Xiaojun this "just for fun"
   guerrilla warfare "?
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, I suddenly
   feel like I do not write, you should be my
   teacher, you are the Chief Justice, I only
   equivalent to sue on behalf of Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   the former ideology of the Chinese Communist
   Party and the collusion lawyers of the few
   politicians in Western countries; course, malala
   just a doll, one involving political puppet, is not
   it?
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I begged let
   malala out! She is only a minor girls, do not let
   her get drawn into the political intrigue and
   conspiracy politics! Let her pure few years it!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges to select Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun! The public impartiality, requires "the
   public impartiality first! Not the public
   impartiality of the world, also need "the public
   impartiality is the first values!
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, the public
   impartiality can make human society more
   harmonious "(see Mr. Gu Xiaojun" the public
   impartiality - the cause of Sino-US political elite
   "), been living together for the sake of our blue
   planet. people are more harmonious, and please
   accept my supplication: give up girls malala!
   Choose Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Monday, February 4, 2013 20:27 china]
(2013/02/05 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场