新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala]
石三生
·风云人物顾晓军反智先锋数时代
·外交政策真白痴 时代风云已式微
·Influential man Gu Xiaojun Anti intellectualism pioneer is TIME
·"Foreign Policy" true idiot, "TIME" already fading
·奥巴马豪赌时代周刊 顾晓军智胜外交政策
·Obama gamble times weekly Gu Xiaojun outwit foreign policy
·时代周刊诡计多端 顾晓军思想真精彩
·时代周刊不堪凌辱 借韩媒反驳石三生
·回味顾晓军思想 看时代周刊作弊
·The U.S. TIME crafty Gu Xiaojun ism brilliant
·打倒奥巴马 解放中国人
·Time magazine unbearable humiliation borrow Korean media refute Shi Sa
·To aftertaste Gu Xiaojun Thought Time magazine cheating
·Down with Obama liberation of the Chinese people
·Down with Obama liberation of the Chinese people
·时代周刊放软话 风云人物成悬念
·Time to put the soft words, Influential man into apprehensively
·时势成就顾晓军 时代周刊枉意淫
·The current situation Achievement Gu Xiaojun Times in vain to comfort
·奥巴马愚民有方 美国人无知超常
·外交政策已销魂 时代周刊必黯然
·Obama is good at fooling the people-Americans ignorant extraordinary
·诺贝尔奖无阳谋 时代周刊多阴招
·Foreign policy overwhelmed with sorrow or joy ,Time Intense darkness w
·Foreign policy overwhelmed with sorrow or joy ,Time Intense darkness w
·奥巴马为囚徒发飙 美议员替罪犯维权
·Nobel Prize without the open conspiracy Times and more underhand
·问中宣部:习总不封路,你们还封网?
·时代周刊黔驴技穷 诺贝尔奖追腥逐臭
·时代周刊黔驴技穷诺贝尔奖追腥逐臭
·时代与外交政策为何敢愚弄中国
·莫言获奖----中共喜成人类最阴暗面
·习近平呼应顾晓军 刘云山趣谈李瑞环
·时代风云人物没有顾晓军的后果
·时代周刊正难产 诺贝尔奖已沉寂
·时代周刊不分善恶 顾晓军思想有公正
·奥巴马松口人权 顾晓军再胜美国
·奥巴马幡然悔悟 时代周刊难回首
·Obama relax mouth human rights Gu Xiaojun again wins the America
·Obama wake up to reality Times could not look back
·顾晓军忍辱负重奥巴马思过向善
·中宣部禁言误国 时代周刊坑华夏
·Gu Xiaojun swallow humiliation and bear a heavy load Obama Forsake her
·The Central Propaganda Department Ban on speech, mislead the country.T
·中美杀童案的表象与深层次
·中美杀童案的表象与深层次之中国篇
·America China Kill children case Superficial and deep
·时代周刊树歪风 美国社会缺公正
·就风云人物评选致时代周刊的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致奥巴马的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致奥巴马的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致中共的公开信
·就推荐时代周刊风云人物致习近平的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致骆家辉的公开信
·Because TIME weekly influential man and give Obama's open letter
·Cause TIME weekly influential man and give the Chinese Communist open
·Cause recommended TIME weekly influential man and give Xi Jinping's op
·时代周刊举止失措顾晓军主义公正无敌
·About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter
· Time magazine behavior mismanage,Gu Xiaojun ism the public impartiali
·陈水扁告洋状与马英九告瞎状
·輔導馬英九告瞎狀
·為工商聯副主席李彥宏的無知叫聲好
·網路民評官版中國十大新聞
·2012年中国十大新闻之十
·向习办推荐一下顾学
·向中纪委书记王岐山推荐一下顾学
·向中共各民主党派及工商联推荐一下顾学
·2012网络民评版中国十大公知
·2012 Network Public Evaluation version of China's ten largest public i
·红黑法拉利
·向刘云山推荐一下顾学
·向国家主席胡锦涛推荐一下顾学
·中共执政的败笔---先德体,反智思
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(一)
·To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (a
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(二)
·习近平的复兴梦与顾晓军的第一猜想
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(三)
·To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (b
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主昂山素季的公开信
·To the Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi's open letter
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的公开信
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama an open letter
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的第二封信
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的第三封信
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama's second letter
·与达赖喇嘛漫谈一下顾学与时局
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama's third letter
·向达赖喇嘛请教一下民主与佛宗
·与达赖喇嘛聊聊诺贝尔与转世说
·原告给被告潍坊市委书记许立全的公开信
·请达赖喇嘛看看顾学及南周事件
·And the Darai Lama talk Nobel and reincarnation
·Talk GU theory and the current political situation with the Dalai Lama
·The plaintiff to the defendant by Weifang municipal Party committee se
·To consult the Dalai Lama about democracy and Buddhism purpose
·达赖喇嘛为什么要推荐顾晓军
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(序)
·Ask the Dalai Lama to watch GU theory and Southern weeks incident
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(一)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred fifty-four
   


   Translator: God has eyes 
   
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, just wrote
   your "Nobel Peace Prize Jury concern malala
   cheating" to introduce my observation of the so-
   called Pakistani human rights activists girl
   malala. Conversely, even "Bavi the right girl
   malala" is established, there is no way
   recommended to you and Gu dough famous
   Chinese writer, a great thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   compare.
   Do not believe, I am only thinking of simply
   compare Please take a look:
   
   1, News introduced: malala cherished a lofty
   political ideals.
   Malala is a 15 year old girl, she thought, or said
   she thought no molding. Human experience tells
   us: thought, at the age of 17 to 18 square
   formation, only 23-year-old has a complete
   prototype of. Malala, just a thought recipient.
   She said some of the words, but also is
   repeating the words of her father, do not call
   her thinking, is not it?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun, not the past, came back only in
   the network, has authored more than 3,000
   articles ("Gu Xiaojun 'has reached 2070," Gu
   Xiaojun remarks "426," Gu Xiaojun novel "160,"
   Gu Xiaojun five other narrative poem "there are
   at least 500 articles in the loss of the former
   Communist ideology on his blog blocked).
   Gu Xiaojun 'system, based on "the public
   impartiality," The impartiality of the public is
   the first values "​​as the core of the" populist
   democracy ", and auxiliary genus methodology
   questioned School.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, so, malala
   compared with Gu Xiaojun? Is not such a
   reason?
   
   2, News introduced: malala said "I would like to
   convey a message to the children of this country,
   whenever you see oppression, should raise his
   voice against tyranny if someone wants to take
   away your rights, it would improve your his voice,
   do not be afraid of anyone! "
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges noted that no, I
   do not know you? This is not peace, this is the
   typical answer violence with violence! This is a
   serious breach of the purpose of the Nobel Peace
   Prize, a serious breach of Mr. Nobel's behest, is
   not it?
   Accordingly, we take a look at Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
   how to deal with similar problems. Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, often in the care of dough teaches us to
   two "first": "work (to make money)", "life (family)
   ". He has been advocating "just for fun, love of
   democracy", he said, "Communist China is very
   unlikely to ban all personal hobby"? He himself
   was doing, maybe too much political pressure, he
   was "hidden in the city." Writing a novel; I did
   not write a few novels, there is an opportunity,
   he began political commentator. CCP's spy is
   still serving his time, he blamed "the Hermitage
   in". Even the CCP's spies are frankly: old Gu too
   cunning not catch him handle.
   Respected judges of the Nobel Peace Prize, life is
   precious, valuable freedom, we should not
   advocate Mr. Gu Xiaojun this "just for fun"
   guerrilla warfare "?
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, I suddenly
   feel like I do not write, you should be my
   teacher, you are the Chief Justice, I only
   equivalent to sue on behalf of Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   the former ideology of the Chinese Communist
   Party and the collusion lawyers of the few
   politicians in Western countries; course, malala
   just a doll, one involving political puppet, is not
   it?
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I begged let
   malala out! She is only a minor girls, do not let
   her get drawn into the political intrigue and
   conspiracy politics! Let her pure few years it!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges to select Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun! The public impartiality, requires "the
   public impartiality first! Not the public
   impartiality of the world, also need "the public
   impartiality is the first values!
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, the public
   impartiality can make human society more
   harmonious "(see Mr. Gu Xiaojun" the public
   impartiality - the cause of Sino-US political elite
   "), been living together for the sake of our blue
   planet. people are more harmonious, and please
   accept my supplication: give up girls malala!
   Choose Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Monday, February 4, 2013 20:27 china]
(2013/02/05 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场