新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala]
石三生
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
·TIME is full to snipe Gu Xiaojun
·TIME是在贩卖艺术还是在贩毒?
·TIME的良知与下场
·TIME conscience and the final outcome
·Asked TIME:尔等意欲何为?
·Asked TIME: What are those of you who want to
·外交政策已知羞时代周刊仍痴迷
·温家宝总理引用屈原诗赏析
·Foreign Policy already know shame TIME still obsessed
·外交政策为何要抛弃陈光诚?
·感谢美国外交政策向公正靠拢
·To thank U.S. Foreign Policy closer to impartiality
·与好争辩的美国外交政策专家谈谈
·With the like argue's U.S.Foreign Policy experts to talk
·热烈祝贺外交政策继续装傻
·顾晓军大败美国外交政策
·Warmly congratulate the foreign policy continues to play the fool
·Time 龌龊之极obama 牙白心黑
·Gu Xiaojun defeated American foreign policy
·时代风云人物—全球顶级思想家顾晓军
·Time the dirty extremely obama the teeth white heart black
·Times influential man - the world's top thinkers Gu Xiaojun
·风云人物顾晓军反智先锋数时代
·外交政策真白痴 时代风云已式微
·Influential man Gu Xiaojun Anti intellectualism pioneer is TIME
·"Foreign Policy" true idiot, "TIME" already fading
·奥巴马豪赌时代周刊 顾晓军智胜外交政策
·Obama gamble times weekly Gu Xiaojun outwit foreign policy
·时代周刊诡计多端 顾晓军思想真精彩
·时代周刊不堪凌辱 借韩媒反驳石三生
·回味顾晓军思想 看时代周刊作弊
·The U.S. TIME crafty Gu Xiaojun ism brilliant
·打倒奥巴马 解放中国人
·Time magazine unbearable humiliation borrow Korean media refute Shi Sa
·To aftertaste Gu Xiaojun Thought Time magazine cheating
·Down with Obama liberation of the Chinese people
·Down with Obama liberation of the Chinese people
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred fifty-four
   


   Translator: God has eyes 
   
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, just wrote
   your "Nobel Peace Prize Jury concern malala
   cheating" to introduce my observation of the so-
   called Pakistani human rights activists girl
   malala. Conversely, even "Bavi the right girl
   malala" is established, there is no way
   recommended to you and Gu dough famous
   Chinese writer, a great thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   compare.
   Do not believe, I am only thinking of simply
   compare Please take a look:
   
   1, News introduced: malala cherished a lofty
   political ideals.
   Malala is a 15 year old girl, she thought, or said
   she thought no molding. Human experience tells
   us: thought, at the age of 17 to 18 square
   formation, only 23-year-old has a complete
   prototype of. Malala, just a thought recipient.
   She said some of the words, but also is
   repeating the words of her father, do not call
   her thinking, is not it?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun, not the past, came back only in
   the network, has authored more than 3,000
   articles ("Gu Xiaojun 'has reached 2070," Gu
   Xiaojun remarks "426," Gu Xiaojun novel "160,"
   Gu Xiaojun five other narrative poem "there are
   at least 500 articles in the loss of the former
   Communist ideology on his blog blocked).
   Gu Xiaojun 'system, based on "the public
   impartiality," The impartiality of the public is
   the first values "​​as the core of the" populist
   democracy ", and auxiliary genus methodology
   questioned School.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, so, malala
   compared with Gu Xiaojun? Is not such a
   reason?
   
   2, News introduced: malala said "I would like to
   convey a message to the children of this country,
   whenever you see oppression, should raise his
   voice against tyranny if someone wants to take
   away your rights, it would improve your his voice,
   do not be afraid of anyone! "
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges noted that no, I
   do not know you? This is not peace, this is the
   typical answer violence with violence! This is a
   serious breach of the purpose of the Nobel Peace
   Prize, a serious breach of Mr. Nobel's behest, is
   not it?
   Accordingly, we take a look at Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
   how to deal with similar problems. Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, often in the care of dough teaches us to
   two "first": "work (to make money)", "life (family)
   ". He has been advocating "just for fun, love of
   democracy", he said, "Communist China is very
   unlikely to ban all personal hobby"? He himself
   was doing, maybe too much political pressure, he
   was "hidden in the city." Writing a novel; I did
   not write a few novels, there is an opportunity,
   he began political commentator. CCP's spy is
   still serving his time, he blamed "the Hermitage
   in". Even the CCP's spies are frankly: old Gu too
   cunning not catch him handle.
   Respected judges of the Nobel Peace Prize, life is
   precious, valuable freedom, we should not
   advocate Mr. Gu Xiaojun this "just for fun"
   guerrilla warfare "?
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, I suddenly
   feel like I do not write, you should be my
   teacher, you are the Chief Justice, I only
   equivalent to sue on behalf of Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   the former ideology of the Chinese Communist
   Party and the collusion lawyers of the few
   politicians in Western countries; course, malala
   just a doll, one involving political puppet, is not
   it?
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I begged let
   malala out! She is only a minor girls, do not let
   her get drawn into the political intrigue and
   conspiracy politics! Let her pure few years it!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges to select Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun! The public impartiality, requires "the
   public impartiality first! Not the public
   impartiality of the world, also need "the public
   impartiality is the first values!
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, the public
   impartiality can make human society more
   harmonious "(see Mr. Gu Xiaojun" the public
   impartiality - the cause of Sino-US political elite
   "), been living together for the sake of our blue
   planet. people are more harmonious, and please
   accept my supplication: give up girls malala!
   Choose Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Monday, February 4, 2013 20:27 china]
(2013/02/05 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场