新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala]
石三生
·红歌将军与气功大师
·陈副省长的戾气与奸诈
·愚蠢的问题 难产的答案
·你的祖先是猴子吗?
·中美人权对话的骗局
·中美人权对话的骗局(二)
·中美人权对话的骗局(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(四)
·中美人权对话的骗局(五)
·中美人权对话的骗局(六)
·中美人权对话的骗局(七)
·中美人权对话的骗局(八)
·孟建柱主管政法委 依法治国仍空谈
·作孽与漂白
·作孽与漂白(一)
·作孽与漂白(二)
·作孽与漂白(三)
·作孽与漂白(四)
·作孽与漂白(五)
·作孽与漂白(六)
·新快报丢骨头又丢人
·新快报丢了骨头救了市
·爆炸与维稳
·变态
·时与局
·时与局(二)
·漫谈“布道者”贺卫方
·别了,骆家辉
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴
·看任志强与央视互咬有感
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(二)
·国家安监局拿习总开涮
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(三)
·李嘉诚属“既得利益”怎成“笑谈”
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
·问习总:“决不允许”已经发生该怎办?
·中美合演的人权闹剧
·一塌糊涂的青岛管道爆炸事故报告
·国务院难得糊涂 中石化瞒天过海
·就“11•22”事故致李克强总理的公开信
·中国或已掌握“海水变石油”核心技术
·许志永被判刑只会成笑柄
·骆家辉指鹿为马 许志永此地无银
·美国政府的愚蠢举世罕见
·欺世盗名的“新公民运动”
·声援许志永的“法学院五学者”很愚蠢
·挪威议员为何推袁隆平角逐诺奖
·被蒙蔽的诺贝尔奖
·那些诺贝尔和平奖的角逐者们
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(二)
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(九)
·谁在纵容国土系统的腐败
·傅莹的谬误与傅成玉的荒唐
·秦光荣为何不“光荣”引咎?
·马航客机去了哪儿?
·全民竞猜:马航客机“去哪儿了”
·他们知道马航客机“去了哪儿”
·平度当局终于选择“自宫”
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·平度与马航、维权及其他
·马航客机失踪之谜与“塞翁失马”
·中央巡视到山东
·揣测中央巡视山东的结果
·两个“女婿”大闹人间
·杨恒均的”戏”
·杨恒均的国师梦与顾晓军的趋势论
·流于形式的“八规”与“四风”
·加藤嘉一有多假?
·韩寒、李承鹏或涉周滨案
·许志永获刑也无缘诺贝尔和平奖
·鬼子加藤嘉一与韩寒
·百度收了许立全多少钱?
·蔡奇调京 石三生被牵连
·许立全若安好 反腐便是扯淡
·莫言气急败坏 诺奖形同鸡肋
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred fifty-four
   


   Translator: God has eyes 
   
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, just wrote
   your "Nobel Peace Prize Jury concern malala
   cheating" to introduce my observation of the so-
   called Pakistani human rights activists girl
   malala. Conversely, even "Bavi the right girl
   malala" is established, there is no way
   recommended to you and Gu dough famous
   Chinese writer, a great thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   compare.
   Do not believe, I am only thinking of simply
   compare Please take a look:
   
   1, News introduced: malala cherished a lofty
   political ideals.
   Malala is a 15 year old girl, she thought, or said
   she thought no molding. Human experience tells
   us: thought, at the age of 17 to 18 square
   formation, only 23-year-old has a complete
   prototype of. Malala, just a thought recipient.
   She said some of the words, but also is
   repeating the words of her father, do not call
   her thinking, is not it?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun, not the past, came back only in
   the network, has authored more than 3,000
   articles ("Gu Xiaojun 'has reached 2070," Gu
   Xiaojun remarks "426," Gu Xiaojun novel "160,"
   Gu Xiaojun five other narrative poem "there are
   at least 500 articles in the loss of the former
   Communist ideology on his blog blocked).
   Gu Xiaojun 'system, based on "the public
   impartiality," The impartiality of the public is
   the first values "​​as the core of the" populist
   democracy ", and auxiliary genus methodology
   questioned School.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, so, malala
   compared with Gu Xiaojun? Is not such a
   reason?
   
   2, News introduced: malala said "I would like to
   convey a message to the children of this country,
   whenever you see oppression, should raise his
   voice against tyranny if someone wants to take
   away your rights, it would improve your his voice,
   do not be afraid of anyone! "
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges noted that no, I
   do not know you? This is not peace, this is the
   typical answer violence with violence! This is a
   serious breach of the purpose of the Nobel Peace
   Prize, a serious breach of Mr. Nobel's behest, is
   not it?
   Accordingly, we take a look at Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
   how to deal with similar problems. Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, often in the care of dough teaches us to
   two "first": "work (to make money)", "life (family)
   ". He has been advocating "just for fun, love of
   democracy", he said, "Communist China is very
   unlikely to ban all personal hobby"? He himself
   was doing, maybe too much political pressure, he
   was "hidden in the city." Writing a novel; I did
   not write a few novels, there is an opportunity,
   he began political commentator. CCP's spy is
   still serving his time, he blamed "the Hermitage
   in". Even the CCP's spies are frankly: old Gu too
   cunning not catch him handle.
   Respected judges of the Nobel Peace Prize, life is
   precious, valuable freedom, we should not
   advocate Mr. Gu Xiaojun this "just for fun"
   guerrilla warfare "?
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, I suddenly
   feel like I do not write, you should be my
   teacher, you are the Chief Justice, I only
   equivalent to sue on behalf of Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   the former ideology of the Chinese Communist
   Party and the collusion lawyers of the few
   politicians in Western countries; course, malala
   just a doll, one involving political puppet, is not
   it?
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I begged let
   malala out! She is only a minor girls, do not let
   her get drawn into the political intrigue and
   conspiracy politics! Let her pure few years it!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges to select Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun! The public impartiality, requires "the
   public impartiality first! Not the public
   impartiality of the world, also need "the public
   impartiality is the first values!
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, the public
   impartiality can make human society more
   harmonious "(see Mr. Gu Xiaojun" the public
   impartiality - the cause of Sino-US political elite
   "), been living together for the sake of our blue
   planet. people are more harmonious, and please
   accept my supplication: give up girls malala!
   Choose Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Monday, February 4, 2013 20:27 china]
(2013/02/05 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场