新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala]
石三生
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(三)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(四)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(五)
·从巴拿马运河到北京如家女子遇袭
·北京两个“弱女子”的维权
·阴谋总会得逞,邪恶常占据上风
·治本无期,何不先解决下民众疾苦?
·顾晓军与东野长峥
·发改委野心勃勃 教育部乱弹琵琶
·郎咸平终于成了郭美美
·最无辜的昏官
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢
·在中国,网络作家还不如个乞丐
·台湾的电信诈骗犯为何钟情大陆?
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢(二)
·龙应台的落后与愚昧举世罕见
·中央“下大气力”抓信访,能否“零容忍”?
·火星都能去,为何“依法治国”这么难?
·龙应台的愚昧与龙粉的愚蠢很匹配
·龙应台的“自卑”与陈小鲁的“感觉良好”
·杨恒均的裙子与龙应台的胡子
·习总的讲话给谁听?
·阎连科是一条别有用心的“丧家犬”
·鸟治时代
·鸟治时代
·劳动也创造噩梦
·习总的讲话为何不提宪法?
·霍金是扯淡、还是故弄玄虚?
·霍金走红与魏则西之死
·从总理引喻失当说开去
·霍金或欺世盗名
·霍金或欺世盗名(二)
·从马彩云到雷洋,昌平之事动静大
·人大硕士雷洋真的嫖娼了吗?
·财新网与媒体掐架,郑州血案有真相吗?
·雷洋案只能糊涂了事
·政治、维权、欺骗(一)
·向天下人求助
·从习总玉言到现实的距离
·蔡英文固执己见 “九二共识”尴尬谢幕
·习总的“六个必须”缺了什么?
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”
·法治的昏聩登峰造极
·雷洋案----一次伪民意的自我救赎秀
·副省长被打应该是杜撰
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”(二)
·雷洋案的“程序正义”只能是意淫
·是“偷鸡腿”还是偷民心?
·从“偷鸡腿”到中国的人权
·安康副市长到底是咋死的?
·安康副市长真是个清官?
·再谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·广西律师被扯破裤子的破绽
·安康副市长的“移民”算腐败吗?
·郑永年的谬论(一)
·又是一个“穷”死的县委书记?
·新常态,无常理
·胡长官一个暑假如何赚100多?
·呼格母亲梦太多 聂树斌案难公正
·同是自杀,两副市长命运两重天
·“你懂的”与“抢孩子”
·现身说法话聂树斌的签名
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(二)
·聂树斌案涉及的官到底有多大?
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(三)
·怎一个乱字了得
·众筹十万,再批周小平
·618,不只是京东们的救命稻草
·聂树斌案与乌坎事件
·“网友告政府”就是一笑话
·高考与诺贝尔奖
·且慢吹嘘聂树案再审
·《求是》副总编为何求死?
·人民日报对“反腐败”自信的离谱
·《中国共产党问责条例》可信吗?
·造谣,是一种教科书式的美德
·三谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·四谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·五谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·六谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·“三类人”与“国家保护动物”
·七谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·中国的法治:一边鞠躬;一边作孽
·南海仲裁案,德国鬼子出了个馊主意
·刘刚与高智晟及其他
·第二巡回法庭为何不扫门前雪
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(二)
·连上帝都感到意外的巧合
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(三)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(四)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(五)
·城头变幻难解百姓之苦
·令人窒息的理想
·也谈“刘刚改了密电码”
·“四亿九”祭
·“四亿九”之后
·推荐顾晓军、刘刚、郭文贵联袂角逐诺贝尔奖
·请王岐山书记主持公正
·后周永康时代
·等于零的人生
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Please Nobel Peace Prize judges compared Gu Xiaojun malala

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • two hundred fifty-four
   


   Translator: God has eyes 
   
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, just wrote
   your "Nobel Peace Prize Jury concern malala
   cheating" to introduce my observation of the so-
   called Pakistani human rights activists girl
   malala. Conversely, even "Bavi the right girl
   malala" is established, there is no way
   recommended to you and Gu dough famous
   Chinese writer, a great thinker Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   compare.
   Do not believe, I am only thinking of simply
   compare Please take a look:
   
   1, News introduced: malala cherished a lofty
   political ideals.
   Malala is a 15 year old girl, she thought, or said
   she thought no molding. Human experience tells
   us: thought, at the age of 17 to 18 square
   formation, only 23-year-old has a complete
   prototype of. Malala, just a thought recipient.
   She said some of the words, but also is
   repeating the words of her father, do not call
   her thinking, is not it?
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun, not the past, came back only in
   the network, has authored more than 3,000
   articles ("Gu Xiaojun 'has reached 2070," Gu
   Xiaojun remarks "426," Gu Xiaojun novel "160,"
   Gu Xiaojun five other narrative poem "there are
   at least 500 articles in the loss of the former
   Communist ideology on his blog blocked).
   Gu Xiaojun 'system, based on "the public
   impartiality," The impartiality of the public is
   the first values "​​as the core of the" populist
   democracy ", and auxiliary genus methodology
   questioned School.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, so, malala
   compared with Gu Xiaojun? Is not such a
   reason?
   
   2, News introduced: malala said "I would like to
   convey a message to the children of this country,
   whenever you see oppression, should raise his
   voice against tyranny if someone wants to take
   away your rights, it would improve your his voice,
   do not be afraid of anyone! "
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges noted that no, I
   do not know you? This is not peace, this is the
   typical answer violence with violence! This is a
   serious breach of the purpose of the Nobel Peace
   Prize, a serious breach of Mr. Nobel's behest, is
   not it?
   Accordingly, we take a look at Mr. Gu Xiaojun,
   how to deal with similar problems. Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, often in the care of dough teaches us to
   two "first": "work (to make money)", "life (family)
   ". He has been advocating "just for fun, love of
   democracy", he said, "Communist China is very
   unlikely to ban all personal hobby"? He himself
   was doing, maybe too much political pressure, he
   was "hidden in the city." Writing a novel; I did
   not write a few novels, there is an opportunity,
   he began political commentator. CCP's spy is
   still serving his time, he blamed "the Hermitage
   in". Even the CCP's spies are frankly: old Gu too
   cunning not catch him handle.
   Respected judges of the Nobel Peace Prize, life is
   precious, valuable freedom, we should not
   advocate Mr. Gu Xiaojun this "just for fun"
   guerrilla warfare "?
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, I suddenly
   feel like I do not write, you should be my
   teacher, you are the Chief Justice, I only
   equivalent to sue on behalf of Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   the former ideology of the Chinese Communist
   Party and the collusion lawyers of the few
   politicians in Western countries; course, malala
   just a doll, one involving political puppet, is not
   it?
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, I begged let
   malala out! She is only a minor girls, do not let
   her get drawn into the political intrigue and
   conspiracy politics! Let her pure few years it!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges to select Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun! The public impartiality, requires "the
   public impartiality first! Not the public
   impartiality of the world, also need "the public
   impartiality is the first values!
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, the public
   impartiality can make human society more
   harmonious "(see Mr. Gu Xiaojun" the public
   impartiality - the cause of Sino-US political elite
   "), been living together for the sake of our blue
   planet. people are more harmonious, and please
   accept my supplication: give up girls malala!
   Choose Mr. Gu Xiaojun!
   
   [Shi Sansheng Monday, February 4, 2013 20:27 china]
(2013/02/05 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场