新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Pleaseik Nobel peace prize judges concerned about the human rights sca]
石三生
·向诺贝尔和平奖推荐顾晓军、刘刚、蔡英文
·从高瑜、马永田抗强拆看伪维权的本质
·青年网的愚蠢等于凤凰姐的无知
·政治与生存---兼答刘刚先生
·政治与生存---兼答东野长峥先生
·政治与生存---再答东野长峥先生
·桃园三结义与煮酒论英雄
·桃园三结义与煮酒论英雄(二)
·当局为何鼓励网络恐怖?
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(三)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(四)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(五)
·从巴拿马运河到北京如家女子遇袭
·北京两个“弱女子”的维权
·阴谋总会得逞,邪恶常占据上风
·治本无期,何不先解决下民众疾苦?
·顾晓军与东野长峥
·发改委野心勃勃 教育部乱弹琵琶
·郎咸平终于成了郭美美
·最无辜的昏官
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢
·在中国,网络作家还不如个乞丐
·台湾的电信诈骗犯为何钟情大陆?
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢(二)
·龙应台的落后与愚昧举世罕见
·中央“下大气力”抓信访,能否“零容忍”?
·火星都能去,为何“依法治国”这么难?
·龙应台的愚昧与龙粉的愚蠢很匹配
·龙应台的“自卑”与陈小鲁的“感觉良好”
·杨恒均的裙子与龙应台的胡子
·习总的讲话给谁听?
·阎连科是一条别有用心的“丧家犬”
·鸟治时代
·鸟治时代
·劳动也创造噩梦
·习总的讲话为何不提宪法?
·霍金是扯淡、还是故弄玄虚?
·霍金走红与魏则西之死
·从总理引喻失当说开去
·霍金或欺世盗名
·霍金或欺世盗名(二)
·从马彩云到雷洋,昌平之事动静大
·人大硕士雷洋真的嫖娼了吗?
·财新网与媒体掐架,郑州血案有真相吗?
·雷洋案只能糊涂了事
·政治、维权、欺骗(一)
·向天下人求助
·从习总玉言到现实的距离
·蔡英文固执己见 “九二共识”尴尬谢幕
·习总的“六个必须”缺了什么?
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”
·法治的昏聩登峰造极
·雷洋案----一次伪民意的自我救赎秀
·副省长被打应该是杜撰
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”(二)
·雷洋案的“程序正义”只能是意淫
·是“偷鸡腿”还是偷民心?
·从“偷鸡腿”到中国的人权
·安康副市长到底是咋死的?
·安康副市长真是个清官?
·再谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·广西律师被扯破裤子的破绽
·安康副市长的“移民”算腐败吗?
·郑永年的谬论(一)
·又是一个“穷”死的县委书记?
·新常态,无常理
·胡长官一个暑假如何赚100多?
·呼格母亲梦太多 聂树斌案难公正
·同是自杀,两副市长命运两重天
·“你懂的”与“抢孩子”
·现身说法话聂树斌的签名
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(二)
·聂树斌案涉及的官到底有多大?
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(三)
·怎一个乱字了得
·众筹十万,再批周小平
·618,不只是京东们的救命稻草
·聂树斌案与乌坎事件
·“网友告政府”就是一笑话
·高考与诺贝尔奖
·且慢吹嘘聂树案再审
·《求是》副总编为何求死?
·人民日报对“反腐败”自信的离谱
·《中国共产党问责条例》可信吗?
·造谣,是一种教科书式的美德
·三谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·四谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·五谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·六谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·“三类人”与“国家保护动物”
·七谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·中国的法治:一边鞠躬;一边作孽
·南海仲裁案,德国鬼子出了个馊主意
·刘刚与高智晟及其他
·第二巡回法庭为何不扫门前雪
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(二)
·连上帝都感到意外的巧合
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(三)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(四)
·刘刚与高智晟及其他(五)
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Pleaseik Nobel peace prize judges concerned about the human rights sca

   
   
   Pleaseik Nobel peace prize judges concerned about the human rights scam
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred sixty-five
   Translator: God has eyes


   of Kyushu Comments
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize Jury:
   I do not know whether you have noticed the the
   Bavi the right girls malala (Malala Yousafzai)
   "news? Out of concern for the reputation of the
   centennial Nobel Peace Prize, I feel it is
   necessary to explain to you judges defenders
   scam involving the participation of the former
   Chinese Communist ideology.
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, I want to
   tell you: the Norwegian Parliament to nominate
   candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize Pakistan
   the the defenders girl malala (Malala Yousafzai)
   is a big liar! Because of her fame "Taliban
   shooting" was forged, did not even happen. I
   now also the Best puzzled --- in the end what is
   the reason, let a flawed scam can be popular,
   and even the United Nations have swindled
   captivated --- especially for her to set up a
   malala Day? Gu dough others expose not only
   my own research in malala (Malala Yousafzai)
   shootings, had discovered at least four versions:
   ---- Some say malala (Malala Yousafzai) body
   shots, hit the head and neck;
   ---- Some say malala (Malala Yousafzai) is in the
   shot, the bullet from malala above the left eye
   to enter, through the right cheek ";
   ---- Some said that the bullet removed from the
   head, some say bullets taken from near the
   spinal cord at the shoulders;
   Russian news ---- the most outrageous, may have
   to be considered speculation was very hard to
   say "terrorists with automatic rifle fire malala
   and students ride the school bus. Malala head
   and neck injuries.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, presumably you a
   glance from the word of different malala (Malala
   Yousafzai) shootings see that this is forged it?
   Even malala (Malala Yousafzai) Taliban hit where
   unable to figure out how can there even as
   doctors attending him can not be determined in
   the end from where the bullets taken, and how
   to do her skull surgery it? Pakistani doctor for
   her to do a false bad enough. That the British
   Elizabeth Hospital doctors, and for what purpose,
   to forge for malala (Malala Yousafzai) the skull
   surgery whopper it?
   Contact malala (Malala Yousafzai) in the United
   Kingdom after surgery, the Norwegian Parliament
   to nominate candidates for the Nobel Peace Prize
   of view. I do not have to say, you must have
   insight into the gang conspiracy malala (Malala
   Yousafzai) is ultimately directed at the Peace
   Prize from it? I'm really worried that you will be
   deceived ah! Do not say such a phony liar
   simply do not deserve the Nobel Peace Prize.
   Even been nominated to participate in
   competing for the Nobel Prize, Mr. Alfred Nobel
   behest profanity, centennial Nobel Peace Prize
   great reputation in the blasphemy!
   Respected Nobel Peace Prize judges, even malala
   (Malala Yousafzai) did not defraud her, "I want
   to convey a message to the children of this
   country, and whenever you see oppression,
   should raise his voice against the tyranny If
   someone wants to take away your rights, then
   raise your voice, do not be afraid of anyone,
   "violence for violence's political ideal, is a
   serious breach of the purpose of the Nobel Peace
   Prize, a serious breach of Mr. Nobel's behest, is
   not it? One is still in minors under the
   guardianship asylum, how can such a violent
   ideology? Support malala people, do not
   condone minors in violent revolution!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, since 2011
   Throughout China's Chen Guangcheng, Ai Weiwei
   vain attempt to compete for the Nobel Peace
   Prize, activist scam to Pakistan girls hesitate
   forged Taliban shootings fraud established by
   the United Nations "malala Day cheat the
   nomination of the Parliament of Norway, you can
   find the common characteristics of the crooks:
   are the name of the rights under the guise of
   cases or a handful of people in the help of
   foreign funds for rights. Sometimes, even I am
   afraid that even in this case the rights are
   fictional, just as malala (Malala Yousafzai) by
   shootings and Chen Guangcheng, 10 seconds to
   hand over four meters high walls all forged
   fictional, like, did not see the sun, not can
   challenge.
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, the Chinese
   saying goes, is called the "money talks". I expose
   to the UN Secretary-General, Mr. Ban Ki rights of
   malala (Malala Yousafzai) scam when also
   noticed two, with malala (Malala Yousafzai) by
   the Norwegian Parliament to nominate a
   candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize - Lyudmila
   Alexei Isinbayeva of Russia and Belarus Viasna.
   To be honest, these two rights performance is
   difficult to find, touches them with malala
   (Malala Yousafzai), Chen Guangcheng, like
   Europe, America and other countries with the
   help of funds but it is an indisputable fact.
   Rights and money mix together when the judges
   you they also believe that they can sincerely
   help the most people rights? You also believe
   that this rights is not a scam?
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, defenders
   contrast more money driven under, I feel even
   more the greatness of Mr. Gu Xiaojun: Mr. Gu to
   the ordinary citizen of the body, completely
   without any help of foreign forces (not only do
   not help often join with former Chinese
   Communist Party ideology department
   suppressed, banned), adhere to "writing,
   political games," the struggle with vested
   interests in Communist China, up to more than
   3,000 articles from comment on the Chinese to
   change grand chapter, contributed to the CCP's
   "Nine changed seven" and "Ideology and the
   Politics and Law Committee downgrade"
   situation. Mr. Gu Xiaojun maintain the interests
   of the vast majority of people, ah!
   Dear Nobel Peace Prize judges, because the
   relationship between time, today, first wrote
   here. Huge contribution in the activist Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun, allow me to do elaborate in a future
   article.
   Finally, please allow me to respected judges
   Happy Chinese New Year:
   I wish you a Happy New Year! Happy family! All
   the best!
   [Shi Sansheng Friday, February 15, 2013 11:26 china]
(2013/02/17 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场