新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"]
石三生
·陈光诚是假瞎 全世界却装瞎
·陈光诚或成菲佣
·李克强与陈光诚接踵访欧有感
·顾晓军与陈光诚PK诺贝尔和平奖
·老子是个伪君子
·俞可平终于找到了替罪羊
·东北六月三把火
·顾晓军或成诺贝尔和平奖大赢家
·南非的良心与中国的骗子
·谁伪造了陈水总的微博?
·当局或借厦门纵火案诱导新型犯罪
·厦门日报越俎代庖向死人宣战
·从延安城管到革命圣地
·奥巴马或特赦棱镜泄密者
·愚蠢的美国泄密者斯诺登
·前谷歌副总裁李开复为何乱弹琴?
·中美英接踵上演间谍闹剧
·斯诺登与陈光诚
·再谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·四谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·五谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·六谈斯诺登与陈光诚
·聂树斌与王书金谁是真凶?
·时评家石三生的遭遇
·聂树斌与王书金谁是真凶?(五)
·曾成杰死刑之谜(二)
·他们和他们及谁与谁
·曾成杰死刑之谜(三)
·红歌将军与气功大师
·陈副省长的戾气与奸诈
·愚蠢的问题 难产的答案
·你的祖先是猴子吗?
·中美人权对话的骗局
·中美人权对话的骗局(二)
·中美人权对话的骗局(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(四)
·中美人权对话的骗局(五)
·中美人权对话的骗局(六)
·中美人权对话的骗局(七)
·中美人权对话的骗局(八)
·孟建柱主管政法委 依法治国仍空谈
·作孽与漂白
·作孽与漂白(一)
·作孽与漂白(二)
·作孽与漂白(三)
·作孽与漂白(四)
·作孽与漂白(五)
·作孽与漂白(六)
·新快报丢骨头又丢人
·新快报丢了骨头救了市
·爆炸与维稳
·变态
·时与局
·时与局(二)
·漫谈“布道者”贺卫方
·别了,骆家辉
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴
·看任志强与央视互咬有感
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(二)
·国家安监局拿习总开涮
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(三)
·李嘉诚属“既得利益”怎成“笑谈”
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
·问习总:“决不允许”已经发生该怎办?
·中美合演的人权闹剧
·一塌糊涂的青岛管道爆炸事故报告
·国务院难得糊涂 中石化瞒天过海
·就“11•22”事故致李克强总理的公开信
·中国或已掌握“海水变石油”核心技术
·许志永被判刑只会成笑柄
·骆家辉指鹿为马 许志永此地无银
·美国政府的愚蠢举世罕见
·欺世盗名的“新公民运动”
·声援许志永的“法学院五学者”很愚蠢
·挪威议员为何推袁隆平角逐诺奖
·被蒙蔽的诺贝尔奖
·那些诺贝尔和平奖的角逐者们
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred fifty-two
   Translator: God has eyes
   By the famous Chinese writer, a great thinker in
   the field of human sociology today, Mr. Gu


   Xiaojun first "the public impartiality, may be the
   most timely, is also close to a perfect theory.
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun broad and deep thought,
   because of Communist China's unremitting
   blocked, naturally have a lot of "the opposition".
   Hit Lu Xun "," expose and criticize Han "," Deng
   Xiaoping Thought critical ", the" Three
   Represents is nonsense, swindling "wait and see,
   invariably attract many duty-bound, scolded the
   Gu, down caregivers. Opponents even expose
   and criticize Han, broke the news that Wang
   Lijun and pour Bo, also caused great panic and
   resort to the threat of death.
   Have so many "the natural opponents Gu
   Xiaojun doctrine, when the advent of" the public
   impartiality first opposition even disappeared
   without a trace, not only did not publicly oppose
   "the public impartiality", and even the Chinese
   Communist Party Mr. Wen Jiabao, the number
   two man, not afraid to back suspected plagiarism
   everywhere to promote "fairness and justice" and
   of "the public impartiality" aired.
   Mr. Wen Jiabao everywhere to promote not only
   to promote "the public impartiality is the first
   values, and even the world-renowned American
   foreign policy", the "Times" received the
   enthusiastic recommendation of Gu dough also
   let Yasheng come forward to "how to bring
   democracy to China," said Chen Guangcheng and
   his ilk influence is minimal, "the public
   impartiality the first to respond with evidence
   really great.
   "The public impartiality first" Why is it so
   irresistible? Mr. Gu Xiaojun thought, to find the
   root cause of today's human society poles ----
   Western and socialist ideology. Socialist China,
   have played with the killing of children by the
   injustices of anger to vent; model of democracy
   in the United States, have one out gunned down
   students tragedy. Even socialist China is an
   exemplary democracy, are afraid to admit that
   injustice is the root cause of the tragedy that
   cause. These modern society, "the public
   impartiality first soil.
   So, my natural duty-bound to the Nobel Peace
   Prize judges recommended.
   Because in Connaught judges nominated
   activities deadline --- February 1 has not been in
   the past, I actually see online have burst out,
   "the Bavi rights girl had been nominated as a
   candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize". This is
   obviously a trample the event of the public
   impartiality. I know that the Western world
   despised authoritarian societies, and to be
   proud of is to pay attention to procedural
   justice. However, the Nobel Peace Prize selection
   rules, since the provisions of the nomination of
   the 50-year confidentiality period, no matter
   what, how can disclose their nominee, and
   trumpeted momentum it?
   I personally recommend noble Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, arbitration does not comply with the
   procedural justice nominees the Bavi rights girl
   "and their nomination," Pakistan's human rights
   the girls malala "out, in order to maintain the
   Nobel Peace Prize sacred and dignity . To seal
   kill Mr. Gu Xiaojun, the CCP's ideology and the
   Politics and Law Committee and its they
   respected the so-called knowledge elite who took
   pains to contact the Western elite scum, partner
   blocked Guxiao Jun Mr. have is an indisputable
   fact, may be from the "Foreign Policy" sneaky To
   get an idea theof ​​ selection and announcement
   of 2012 one hundred global thinkers "clues.
   Therefore, I like an ordinary lawyer the pleading
   the supreme of Justice - Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, the public impartiality time! Borrow you
   have a great reputation, Mr. Gu Xiaojun great
   the public impartiality first "into the world, into
   modern life (only the soul of that the time times
   killing of schoolchildren event dead children, is
   also worth also should do it)! Thanks for the
   peace of the Lord Chancellor of human society -
   Nobel Peace Prize judges! Thank you to read my
   recommendations and suggestions!
   [Shi Sansheng Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:21 china]
(2013/02/02 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场