新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"]
石三生
·云南、海南与福建三起冤案统一口径为哪般?
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
·卖艺也卖身
·蔡英文与龙应台及小粉红
·肖仲华与周小平
·中纪委也学会了吹牛?
·中纪委何时扫荡“地主帮”?
·“负能量”缺席是“五个一百”的耻辱
·蔡英文回应石三生
·复旦博士于迎丽装傻为哪般?
·阎肃“假去世”与山东老汉“活人出殡”
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·习总回应石三生?
·两会代表到底怕什么?
·留美女生主犯忏悔:自由是恶魔
·华东师大学者自杀,证明上帝如白痴
·李克强的创新与唐僧的紧箍咒
·党媒姓党,却炒作一个神经病
·揭开任志强“反党”的画皮
·国务院意见扰民 党媒辩解更添堵
·拆了败家的鸟巢如何?
·鸟巢是恐怖分子的老巢?
·仰慕白痴的姚晨为何有八千万粉丝?
·鸟巢怎可能不腐败?
·鸟巢为何成禁区?
·百家讲坛与史学奇才抑郁自杀
·史学奇才自杀是因为作假吗?
·史学天才林嘉文或装死
·党媒姓党,只是不懂常识与常理
·于丹与北大终于要合伙坐实“天才少年”
·王毅响应顾晓军 “九二共识”已过时
·鸟巢的回应---边自夸;边删贴
·推荐顾晓军、潘基文、蔡英文联袂角逐诺奖
·北京法官被杀,与司法不公有关系吗?
·马彩云法官被杀,官方应公开真相
·倡议追授马彩云法官全国模范、烈士、博士
·凯迪网友七嘴八舌议马彩云法官被授勋
·马彩云法官与北师大女教授
·请王岐山书记谈谈马彩云被枪杀案
·政协发言人爱吹牛,出两小题难倒他
·用“大脑革命”质疑马彩云法官被枪杀
·马彩云法官被杀,“正义”或是元凶
·倡议追认马彩云法官为“两会代表”
·依法治国,应取缔两会提案
·谁是当今文坛第一
·两会中的腐败---申纪兰篇
·两会中的腐败--傅莹卖书,莫言扯淡
·公开叫卖、转让”当今文坛第一”
·任志强、李悔之与“动物世界的阴谋”
·大陆的尴尬:承认台湾宪法,只能“一国两政”
· 习总巧应顾晓军 “九二共识”成历史
·九三学社中央委员为何也做五毛?
·全国政协委员朱征夫是敢言还是扯淡?
·台湾蔡英文欠大陆顾晓军一个人情
·任志强与任大炮
·习总揭开了人类起源之谜
·台湾文化的假正经
·向高级动物鲁山老泉致敬
·顾晓军创立了新哲学,中国大脑敢挑战谷歌智能吗?
·中国将错过下一波浪潮---大脑革命
·中国正在错过下一波浪潮---大脑革命
·中国人的悲哀
·申纪兰代表的智能超越了阿凡狗
·顾晓军思想远播阿拉伯世界
·从两会代表的马桶式思维说开去
·我与叙利亚执政党成了好朋友
·给“一带一路”泼点冷水
·天上真的会掉馅饼
·高级动物在行动
·因推荐“公正第一” 石三生下场堪忧
·请问生意场大人:该如何谈生意?
·大脑革命影响谷歌 阿凡狗戏弄聂卫平
·生意场的生意经与顾晓军民主奖
·石三生影响着索罗斯和聂卫平
·当执政党不在乎被冒充
·因小气,蔡英文正在丧失先机
·报告!我要吃敬酒
·刘刚才赞顾晓军,温云超就疯了
·冒充之恶与北风之毒
·不讲公正第一,岳阳法官下口咬
·顾晓军思想是人类社会的航标灯
·华东师大或有难言之隐
·人民日报敢不敢与顾晓军一辩?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred fifty-two
   Translator: God has eyes
   By the famous Chinese writer, a great thinker in
   the field of human sociology today, Mr. Gu


   Xiaojun first "the public impartiality, may be the
   most timely, is also close to a perfect theory.
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun broad and deep thought,
   because of Communist China's unremitting
   blocked, naturally have a lot of "the opposition".
   Hit Lu Xun "," expose and criticize Han "," Deng
   Xiaoping Thought critical ", the" Three
   Represents is nonsense, swindling "wait and see,
   invariably attract many duty-bound, scolded the
   Gu, down caregivers. Opponents even expose
   and criticize Han, broke the news that Wang
   Lijun and pour Bo, also caused great panic and
   resort to the threat of death.
   Have so many "the natural opponents Gu
   Xiaojun doctrine, when the advent of" the public
   impartiality first opposition even disappeared
   without a trace, not only did not publicly oppose
   "the public impartiality", and even the Chinese
   Communist Party Mr. Wen Jiabao, the number
   two man, not afraid to back suspected plagiarism
   everywhere to promote "fairness and justice" and
   of "the public impartiality" aired.
   Mr. Wen Jiabao everywhere to promote not only
   to promote "the public impartiality is the first
   values, and even the world-renowned American
   foreign policy", the "Times" received the
   enthusiastic recommendation of Gu dough also
   let Yasheng come forward to "how to bring
   democracy to China," said Chen Guangcheng and
   his ilk influence is minimal, "the public
   impartiality the first to respond with evidence
   really great.
   "The public impartiality first" Why is it so
   irresistible? Mr. Gu Xiaojun thought, to find the
   root cause of today's human society poles ----
   Western and socialist ideology. Socialist China,
   have played with the killing of children by the
   injustices of anger to vent; model of democracy
   in the United States, have one out gunned down
   students tragedy. Even socialist China is an
   exemplary democracy, are afraid to admit that
   injustice is the root cause of the tragedy that
   cause. These modern society, "the public
   impartiality first soil.
   So, my natural duty-bound to the Nobel Peace
   Prize judges recommended.
   Because in Connaught judges nominated
   activities deadline --- February 1 has not been in
   the past, I actually see online have burst out,
   "the Bavi rights girl had been nominated as a
   candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize". This is
   obviously a trample the event of the public
   impartiality. I know that the Western world
   despised authoritarian societies, and to be
   proud of is to pay attention to procedural
   justice. However, the Nobel Peace Prize selection
   rules, since the provisions of the nomination of
   the 50-year confidentiality period, no matter
   what, how can disclose their nominee, and
   trumpeted momentum it?
   I personally recommend noble Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, arbitration does not comply with the
   procedural justice nominees the Bavi rights girl
   "and their nomination," Pakistan's human rights
   the girls malala "out, in order to maintain the
   Nobel Peace Prize sacred and dignity . To seal
   kill Mr. Gu Xiaojun, the CCP's ideology and the
   Politics and Law Committee and its they
   respected the so-called knowledge elite who took
   pains to contact the Western elite scum, partner
   blocked Guxiao Jun Mr. have is an indisputable
   fact, may be from the "Foreign Policy" sneaky To
   get an idea theof ​​ selection and announcement
   of 2012 one hundred global thinkers "clues.
   Therefore, I like an ordinary lawyer the pleading
   the supreme of Justice - Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, the public impartiality time! Borrow you
   have a great reputation, Mr. Gu Xiaojun great
   the public impartiality first "into the world, into
   modern life (only the soul of that the time times
   killing of schoolchildren event dead children, is
   also worth also should do it)! Thanks for the
   peace of the Lord Chancellor of human society -
   Nobel Peace Prize judges! Thank you to read my
   recommendations and suggestions!
   [Shi Sansheng Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:21 china]
(2013/02/02 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场