新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"]
石三生
·为民告官胜诉率为零的上海欢呼
·周小平主席要开杀戒?
·习总为何不注重民意?
·周小平主席期冀“台独”
·向蔡英文主席推荐“公正第一”
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·周小平啥样,央视就啥样
·“二妻”谣言不可笑 政协委员荒唐多
·周小平造谣是文明 网民造谣被刑拘
·周小平很生气 蔡英文要受苦
·周小平主席恨台湾而爱日本
·习总为何在政法会上讲“忧患”?
·晴天霹雳---周小平首倡“中国梦”
·罗援若武统 民主做先锋
·石三生与小粉红
·周小平主席力助周涛重掌春晚?
·石三生将编、导史诗巨制《三周魂销》
·小粉红坚壁清野 顾晓军枉费心机
·小粉红与赵忠祥也有一腿?
·小粉红己身不修,何以平天下?
·小粉红越界刷屏 蔡英文应对失措
·周涛若复出,春晚必成史上最艳夜
·扬言武统的罗援少将是逃兵?
·周涛复出主春晚 韩国议长悔不迭
·国台办耍金箍棒 蔡英文偷着乐
· 小粉红旁敲侧击 问世间何为正道
·鲁迅不倒 天理难容
·绝对奇迹--比平邑矿难更奇的山东奇迹
·可怜的鲁迅,可悲的语文
·一百年间两二货:周小平与周树人
·问孟建柱:政法委也不能干预司法吗?
·辛亥革命百年后,人民开始怀念慈禧
·央视春晚弃有污点演员,却用艳荡的主持
·李克强舍近求远为哪般
·国务院管不好住,能管好农民的嘴吗?
·抗议谷歌、抗议网络流氓
·给国务院并织金县纪委献一策
·温家宝是一个好总理吗?
·报告习总:这里有一个被丢下的贫困群众
·博客中国意欲何为?
·金正恩到底打了谁一耳光?
·冤狱23年的陈满之高尚羞煞窦娥
·云南、海南与福建三起冤案统一口径为哪般?
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
·卖艺也卖身
·蔡英文与龙应台及小粉红
·肖仲华与周小平
·中纪委也学会了吹牛?
·中纪委何时扫荡“地主帮”?
·“负能量”缺席是“五个一百”的耻辱
·蔡英文回应石三生
·复旦博士于迎丽装傻为哪般?
·阎肃“假去世”与山东老汉“活人出殡”
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·被总书记忽悠了一把
·习总回应石三生?
·两会代表到底怕什么?
·留美女生主犯忏悔:自由是恶魔
·华东师大学者自杀,证明上帝如白痴
·李克强的创新与唐僧的紧箍咒
·党媒姓党,却炒作一个神经病
·揭开任志强“反党”的画皮
·国务院意见扰民 党媒辩解更添堵
·拆了败家的鸟巢如何?
·鸟巢是恐怖分子的老巢?
·仰慕白痴的姚晨为何有八千万粉丝?
·鸟巢怎可能不腐败?
·鸟巢为何成禁区?
·百家讲坛与史学奇才抑郁自杀
·史学奇才自杀是因为作假吗?
·史学天才林嘉文或装死
·党媒姓党,只是不懂常识与常理
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred fifty-two
   Translator: God has eyes
   By the famous Chinese writer, a great thinker in
   the field of human sociology today, Mr. Gu


   Xiaojun first "the public impartiality, may be the
   most timely, is also close to a perfect theory.
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun broad and deep thought,
   because of Communist China's unremitting
   blocked, naturally have a lot of "the opposition".
   Hit Lu Xun "," expose and criticize Han "," Deng
   Xiaoping Thought critical ", the" Three
   Represents is nonsense, swindling "wait and see,
   invariably attract many duty-bound, scolded the
   Gu, down caregivers. Opponents even expose
   and criticize Han, broke the news that Wang
   Lijun and pour Bo, also caused great panic and
   resort to the threat of death.
   Have so many "the natural opponents Gu
   Xiaojun doctrine, when the advent of" the public
   impartiality first opposition even disappeared
   without a trace, not only did not publicly oppose
   "the public impartiality", and even the Chinese
   Communist Party Mr. Wen Jiabao, the number
   two man, not afraid to back suspected plagiarism
   everywhere to promote "fairness and justice" and
   of "the public impartiality" aired.
   Mr. Wen Jiabao everywhere to promote not only
   to promote "the public impartiality is the first
   values, and even the world-renowned American
   foreign policy", the "Times" received the
   enthusiastic recommendation of Gu dough also
   let Yasheng come forward to "how to bring
   democracy to China," said Chen Guangcheng and
   his ilk influence is minimal, "the public
   impartiality the first to respond with evidence
   really great.
   "The public impartiality first" Why is it so
   irresistible? Mr. Gu Xiaojun thought, to find the
   root cause of today's human society poles ----
   Western and socialist ideology. Socialist China,
   have played with the killing of children by the
   injustices of anger to vent; model of democracy
   in the United States, have one out gunned down
   students tragedy. Even socialist China is an
   exemplary democracy, are afraid to admit that
   injustice is the root cause of the tragedy that
   cause. These modern society, "the public
   impartiality first soil.
   So, my natural duty-bound to the Nobel Peace
   Prize judges recommended.
   Because in Connaught judges nominated
   activities deadline --- February 1 has not been in
   the past, I actually see online have burst out,
   "the Bavi rights girl had been nominated as a
   candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize". This is
   obviously a trample the event of the public
   impartiality. I know that the Western world
   despised authoritarian societies, and to be
   proud of is to pay attention to procedural
   justice. However, the Nobel Peace Prize selection
   rules, since the provisions of the nomination of
   the 50-year confidentiality period, no matter
   what, how can disclose their nominee, and
   trumpeted momentum it?
   I personally recommend noble Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, arbitration does not comply with the
   procedural justice nominees the Bavi rights girl
   "and their nomination," Pakistan's human rights
   the girls malala "out, in order to maintain the
   Nobel Peace Prize sacred and dignity . To seal
   kill Mr. Gu Xiaojun, the CCP's ideology and the
   Politics and Law Committee and its they
   respected the so-called knowledge elite who took
   pains to contact the Western elite scum, partner
   blocked Guxiao Jun Mr. have is an indisputable
   fact, may be from the "Foreign Policy" sneaky To
   get an idea theof ​​ selection and announcement
   of 2012 one hundred global thinkers "clues.
   Therefore, I like an ordinary lawyer the pleading
   the supreme of Justice - Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, the public impartiality time! Borrow you
   have a great reputation, Mr. Gu Xiaojun great
   the public impartiality first "into the world, into
   modern life (only the soul of that the time times
   killing of schoolchildren event dead children, is
   also worth also should do it)! Thanks for the
   peace of the Lord Chancellor of human society -
   Nobel Peace Prize judges! Thank you to read my
   recommendations and suggestions!
   [Shi Sansheng Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:21 china]
(2013/02/02 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场