新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"]
石三生
·Obama wake up to reality Times could not look back
·顾晓军忍辱负重奥巴马思过向善
·中宣部禁言误国 时代周刊坑华夏
·Gu Xiaojun swallow humiliation and bear a heavy load Obama Forsake her
·The Central Propaganda Department Ban on speech, mislead the country.T
·中美杀童案的表象与深层次
·中美杀童案的表象与深层次之中国篇
·America China Kill children case Superficial and deep
·时代周刊树歪风 美国社会缺公正
·就风云人物评选致时代周刊的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致奥巴马的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致奥巴马的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致中共的公开信
·就推荐时代周刊风云人物致习近平的公开信
·就时代周刊风云人物致骆家辉的公开信
·Because TIME weekly influential man and give Obama's open letter
·Cause TIME weekly influential man and give the Chinese Communist open
·Cause recommended TIME weekly influential man and give Xi Jinping's op
·时代周刊举止失措顾晓军主义公正无敌
·About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter
· Time magazine behavior mismanage,Gu Xiaojun ism the public impartiali
·陈水扁告洋状与马英九告瞎状
·輔導馬英九告瞎狀
·為工商聯副主席李彥宏的無知叫聲好
·網路民評官版中國十大新聞
·2012年中国十大新闻之十
·向习办推荐一下顾学
·向中纪委书记王岐山推荐一下顾学
·向中共各民主党派及工商联推荐一下顾学
·2012网络民评版中国十大公知
·2012 Network Public Evaluation version of China's ten largest public i
·红黑法拉利
·向刘云山推荐一下顾学
·向国家主席胡锦涛推荐一下顾学
·中共执政的败笔---先德体,反智思
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(一)
·To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (a
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(二)
·习近平的复兴梦与顾晓军的第一猜想
·致挪威诺贝尔和平奖评委会的推荐信(三)
·To the Norwegian Nobel Peace Prize Committee recommendation letters (b
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主昂山素季的公开信
·To the Nobel Peace Prize winner Aung San Suu Kyi's open letter
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的公开信
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama an open letter
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的第二封信
·致诺贝尔和平奖得主达赖喇嘛的第三封信
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama's second letter
·与达赖喇嘛漫谈一下顾学与时局
·To Nobel Peace Prize laureate, the Dalai Lama's third letter
·向达赖喇嘛请教一下民主与佛宗
·与达赖喇嘛聊聊诺贝尔与转世说
·原告给被告潍坊市委书记许立全的公开信
·请达赖喇嘛看看顾学及南周事件
·And the Darai Lama talk Nobel and reincarnation
·Talk GU theory and the current political situation with the Dalai Lama
·The plaintiff to the defendant by Weifang municipal Party committee se
·To consult the Dalai Lama about democracy and Buddhism purpose
·达赖喇嘛为什么要推荐顾晓军
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(序)
·Ask the Dalai Lama to watch GU theory and Southern weeks incident
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(一)
·达赖喇嘛为什么要推荐顾晓军(二)
·Why the Dalai Lama Recommended Gu Xiaojun
·Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern
·Why the Dalai Lama Recommended Gu Xiaojun (2)
·Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern
·达赖喇嘛为什么要推荐顾晓军(三)
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(二)
·Why the Dalai Lama Recommended Gu Xiaojun (3)
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(三)
·达赖喇嘛为什么要推荐顾晓军(四)
·Why the Dalai Lama Recommended Gu Xiaojun (4)
·习总的宪政不是梦
·Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern
·向七常委推荐“公正第一”
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(四)
·The General Secretary Xi constitutional not dream
·Weifang municipal government fraud the whole story
·Recommended to the seven of the Standing Committee of "the public impa
·另类黑打---潍坊市政府诈骗案始末(五)
·致全世界诺贝尔和平奖得主的公开信
·潍坊市政府诈骗案中的房管局(一)
·Housing Authority's in Weifang municipal government fraud case (1)
·To the world\'s Nobel Peace Prize laureate\'s open letter
·To the world\'s Nobel Peace Prize laureate\'s open letter
·Housing Authority's in Weifang municipal government fraud case (1)
·To the world's Nobel Peace Prize laureate's second letter
·Housing Authority's in Weifang municipal government fraud case (2)
·致全世界诺贝尔和平奖得主的第二封信
·潍坊市政府诈骗案中的房管局(二)
·2013春来早
·石三生又要胜诉了
·致全世界诺贝尔和平奖得主的第四封信
·To the world's Nobel Peace Prize laureate's Fourth letter
·致全世界诺贝尔和平奖得主的第五封信
·To the world's Nobel Peace Prize laureate's fifth letter
·石三生被诈骗经济大冤案(专题/中英文)
·向诺贝尔和平奖推荐顾晓军(专题/中英文)
·向诺贝尔和平奖推荐顾晓军(专题/中英文)
·向诺贝尔和平奖评委推荐“公正第一”
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
To Nobel Peace Prize jury recommended "the public impartiality first"

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred fifty-two
   Translator: God has eyes
   By the famous Chinese writer, a great thinker in
   the field of human sociology today, Mr. Gu


   Xiaojun first "the public impartiality, may be the
   most timely, is also close to a perfect theory.
   Mr. Gu Xiaojun broad and deep thought,
   because of Communist China's unremitting
   blocked, naturally have a lot of "the opposition".
   Hit Lu Xun "," expose and criticize Han "," Deng
   Xiaoping Thought critical ", the" Three
   Represents is nonsense, swindling "wait and see,
   invariably attract many duty-bound, scolded the
   Gu, down caregivers. Opponents even expose
   and criticize Han, broke the news that Wang
   Lijun and pour Bo, also caused great panic and
   resort to the threat of death.
   Have so many "the natural opponents Gu
   Xiaojun doctrine, when the advent of" the public
   impartiality first opposition even disappeared
   without a trace, not only did not publicly oppose
   "the public impartiality", and even the Chinese
   Communist Party Mr. Wen Jiabao, the number
   two man, not afraid to back suspected plagiarism
   everywhere to promote "fairness and justice" and
   of "the public impartiality" aired.
   Mr. Wen Jiabao everywhere to promote not only
   to promote "the public impartiality is the first
   values, and even the world-renowned American
   foreign policy", the "Times" received the
   enthusiastic recommendation of Gu dough also
   let Yasheng come forward to "how to bring
   democracy to China," said Chen Guangcheng and
   his ilk influence is minimal, "the public
   impartiality the first to respond with evidence
   really great.
   "The public impartiality first" Why is it so
   irresistible? Mr. Gu Xiaojun thought, to find the
   root cause of today's human society poles ----
   Western and socialist ideology. Socialist China,
   have played with the killing of children by the
   injustices of anger to vent; model of democracy
   in the United States, have one out gunned down
   students tragedy. Even socialist China is an
   exemplary democracy, are afraid to admit that
   injustice is the root cause of the tragedy that
   cause. These modern society, "the public
   impartiality first soil.
   So, my natural duty-bound to the Nobel Peace
   Prize judges recommended.
   Because in Connaught judges nominated
   activities deadline --- February 1 has not been in
   the past, I actually see online have burst out,
   "the Bavi rights girl had been nominated as a
   candidate for the Nobel Peace Prize". This is
   obviously a trample the event of the public
   impartiality. I know that the Western world
   despised authoritarian societies, and to be
   proud of is to pay attention to procedural
   justice. However, the Nobel Peace Prize selection
   rules, since the provisions of the nomination of
   the 50-year confidentiality period, no matter
   what, how can disclose their nominee, and
   trumpeted momentum it?
   I personally recommend noble Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, arbitration does not comply with the
   procedural justice nominees the Bavi rights girl
   "and their nomination," Pakistan's human rights
   the girls malala "out, in order to maintain the
   Nobel Peace Prize sacred and dignity . To seal
   kill Mr. Gu Xiaojun, the CCP's ideology and the
   Politics and Law Committee and its they
   respected the so-called knowledge elite who took
   pains to contact the Western elite scum, partner
   blocked Guxiao Jun Mr. have is an indisputable
   fact, may be from the "Foreign Policy" sneaky To
   get an idea theof ​​ selection and announcement
   of 2012 one hundred global thinkers "clues.
   Therefore, I like an ordinary lawyer the pleading
   the supreme of Justice - Nobel Peace Prize
   judges, the public impartiality time! Borrow you
   have a great reputation, Mr. Gu Xiaojun great
   the public impartiality first "into the world, into
   modern life (only the soul of that the time times
   killing of schoolchildren event dead children, is
   also worth also should do it)! Thanks for the
   peace of the Lord Chancellor of human society -
   Nobel Peace Prize judges! Thank you to read my
   recommendations and suggestions!
   [Shi Sansheng Saturday, February 2, 2013 4:21 china]
(2013/02/02 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场