新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Housing Authority's in Weifang municipal government fraud case (2)]
石三生
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(三)
·李嘉诚属“既得利益”怎成“笑谈”
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
·问习总:“决不允许”已经发生该怎办?
·中美合演的人权闹剧
·一塌糊涂的青岛管道爆炸事故报告
·国务院难得糊涂 中石化瞒天过海
·就“11•22”事故致李克强总理的公开信
·中国或已掌握“海水变石油”核心技术
·许志永被判刑只会成笑柄
·骆家辉指鹿为马 许志永此地无银
·美国政府的愚蠢举世罕见
·欺世盗名的“新公民运动”
·声援许志永的“法学院五学者”很愚蠢
·挪威议员为何推袁隆平角逐诺奖
·被蒙蔽的诺贝尔奖
·那些诺贝尔和平奖的角逐者们
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(二)
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(九)
·谁在纵容国土系统的腐败
·傅莹的谬误与傅成玉的荒唐
·秦光荣为何不“光荣”引咎?
·马航客机去了哪儿?
·全民竞猜:马航客机“去哪儿了”
·他们知道马航客机“去了哪儿”
·平度当局终于选择“自宫”
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·平度与马航、维权及其他
·马航客机失踪之谜与“塞翁失马”
·中央巡视到山东
·揣测中央巡视山东的结果
·两个“女婿”大闹人间
·杨恒均的”戏”
·杨恒均的国师梦与顾晓军的趋势论
·流于形式的“八规”与“四风”
·加藤嘉一有多假?
·韩寒、李承鹏或涉周滨案
·许志永获刑也无缘诺贝尔和平奖
·鬼子加藤嘉一与韩寒
·百度收了许立全多少钱?
·蔡奇调京 石三生被牵连
·许立全若安好 反腐便是扯淡
·莫言气急败坏 诺奖形同鸡肋
·与莫言、许立全等说说知心话
·中纪委一边反腐,一边为贪官打气
·致“一个弥天大骗局”的设计者们
·中纪委反腐形同游戏
·中纪委为何不让我说话?
·上访去
·中央巡视组驻地的口号
·裸奔中的潍坊市政府
·政府犯罪为何有恃无恐
·官官相护何时了
·真伪中央巡视组
·真伪中央巡视组
·真伪中央巡视组
·社会真的在向好吗?
·社会真的在向好吗?(二)
·贼与官
·陈光标与腐败的亿元司长(一)
·陈光标与腐败的亿元司长(二)
·来自中央巡视组的恐吓?
·来自中央巡视组的沉默
·无法消受的人权事业进步
·韩寒李承鹏或涉周滨案(二)
·言而无信的中央巡视组
·贼与官(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(三)
·三个精神病副市长:杨宽生、王立军、陈白峰
·“相关人物”突然成空白的高官
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·“反腐”只能各自为战
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Housing Authority's in Weifang municipal government fraud case (2)

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments•two hundred forty-six
   


   Translator: God has eyes
   
   In fact, corruption in the Weifang municipal
   government to govern the process already formed
   a very close interest in the chain --- greed greed
   all, a complete lack of self-correcting measures.
   
   Shi Sansheng be fraud, only the Land Bureau
   and the Housing Authority colluded, still can not
   help buyers to defraud succeed. Even the the
   "LAT Regulations of the People's Republic of
   China" lapse in Weifang independent kingdom.
   Deed tax collection agencies are able to be taxed
   according to the law, buyers and Land Bureau,
   the Housing Authority conspired to defraud trick
   is still unable to carry on. Deed tax levied in
   accorShice with the law, necessarily involves my
   original contract with the buyer or even re-
   assessment of the real estate. But, the fact is
   that even the deed tax levied authorities also
   assist buyers to deliberate on the Housing
   Authority and the Land Office of Fiscal Evasion
   behavior turned a blind eye, throws away the
   national interest.
   
   In deed tax levied last link out of control, the
   Housing Authority on the basis of illegal do the
   right, and of his rights to do illegal filing. My
   real estate practice deception become the
   property of the existential name die. Central the
   LAT Ordinance promulgated in Weifang city
   government into a pile of toilet paper, deed tax
   collection authorities do not levied according to
   the actual transaction amount. National
   interests in the hands of these assholes, subtly
   change the public for private, became a tool to
   serve their own interests. Conspiracy in order to
   buyers is in this way bribery, will be completely
   impossible reality.
   
   In the fraud, Weifang City Land Bureau and the
   municipal government of course is their secret
   operations, can be the land of others accounted
   for himself. To Weifang City Housing Authority,
   the need to involve multisectoral collaboration,
   to be illegal is indeed the right to become a
   reality. Is signed jointly by the Ministry of Public
   Security and the Ministry of Commerce
   department regulations ---- pawn management
   approach from fraud hardwork but seems to be
   absent. Housing Authority, deed tax collection
   authority, the Inland Revenue Department, the
   public security departments and business
   competent authorities are indispensable.
   
   In all these departments are involved, Shi
   Sansheng the role played by the public security
   and the business sector in which I completely
   unable to understand: in accorShice with the
   Pawning Measures, public security and the
   commercial sector is clearly the implementation
   of Pawning Measures authorities. But in the
   process of registration of property rights, the two
   departments are completely invisible, in addition
   to other rights involved in filing the relevant
   provisions of the pawn "management approach".
   Both from the approval or the charges, and has
   nothing to do with the two departments. Neither
   involved in the approval nor participate in the
   spoils of the two departments, why put his hand
   to the industry that has nothing to do with their
   own? Really do not understand when he was
   Minister of Commerce Bo Xilai and Minister of
   Public Security Zhou Yongkang, in the end is how
   to think? Is it just to embrace the right to
   expand the sectoral interests?
   
   Pawning Measures, to no avail, completely rotten
   persimmon let the Housing Authority of the
   squeeze it to pawn mortgage if disputes arise,
   developed by the two departments, pawn
   management approach ", but has become beyond
   civil law above Constitution "--- the court
   execution proceeds must be paid in priority
   pawn mortgage. Only from the legal point of
   view, who can distinguish the national
   departments large it big?
   
   In short, the Housing Authority of the Weifang
   municipal government fraud, and the land
   bureau, public security departments, business
   departments fail to abide by the law, chaos Act
   chaotic management, bribery, collusion, became
   design bureau harmful departments, rather than
   government departments.
   
   [Shi Sansheng Saturday, January 19, 2013 01:06 china]
(2013/01/21 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场