新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern]
石三生
·刘刚大战北风,急坏了吕柏林
·朝阳群众与海外精英(三)
·请国务院收回成命
·“英雄所恨略同”与朝阳群众爱的癫狂
·刘刚给世界出了个大难题
·跟着李悔之、贺卫方学扯淡
·刘刚义比关公 北风不知好歹
·“造谣”是种特权----兼感谢海外精英
·顾晓军不计前嫌 温云超忘恩负义
·跟着贺卫方教授学扯淡
·教教青年们跟贺卫方教授掐架
·政治家的肾与聂树斌案及其他(一)
·调侃贺卫方,温云超受不了
·聂树斌案凶多吉少
·政治家的肾与聂树斌案及其他(二)
·向诺贝尔和平奖推荐顾晓军、刘刚、蔡英文
·从高瑜、马永田抗强拆看伪维权的本质
·青年网的愚蠢等于凤凰姐的无知
·政治与生存---兼答刘刚先生
·政治与生存---兼答东野长峥先生
·政治与生存---再答东野长峥先生
·桃园三结义与煮酒论英雄
·桃园三结义与煮酒论英雄(二)
·当局为何鼓励网络恐怖?
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(三)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(四)
·桃园论剑与煮酒论英雄(五)
·从巴拿马运河到北京如家女子遇袭
·北京两个“弱女子”的维权
·阴谋总会得逞,邪恶常占据上风
·治本无期,何不先解决下民众疾苦?
·顾晓军与东野长峥
·发改委野心勃勃 教育部乱弹琵琶
·郎咸平终于成了郭美美
·最无辜的昏官
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢
·在中国,网络作家还不如个乞丐
·台湾的电信诈骗犯为何钟情大陆?
·朴槿惠的虚伪与芮成钢的傲慢(二)
·龙应台的落后与愚昧举世罕见
·中央“下大气力”抓信访,能否“零容忍”?
·火星都能去,为何“依法治国”这么难?
·龙应台的愚昧与龙粉的愚蠢很匹配
·龙应台的“自卑”与陈小鲁的“感觉良好”
·杨恒均的裙子与龙应台的胡子
·习总的讲话给谁听?
·阎连科是一条别有用心的“丧家犬”
·鸟治时代
·鸟治时代
·劳动也创造噩梦
·习总的讲话为何不提宪法?
·霍金是扯淡、还是故弄玄虚?
·霍金走红与魏则西之死
·从总理引喻失当说开去
·霍金或欺世盗名
·霍金或欺世盗名(二)
·从马彩云到雷洋,昌平之事动静大
·人大硕士雷洋真的嫖娼了吗?
·财新网与媒体掐架,郑州血案有真相吗?
·雷洋案只能糊涂了事
·政治、维权、欺骗(一)
·向天下人求助
·从习总玉言到现实的距离
·蔡英文固执己见 “九二共识”尴尬谢幕
·习总的“六个必须”缺了什么?
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”
·法治的昏聩登峰造极
·雷洋案----一次伪民意的自我救赎秀
·副省长被打应该是杜撰
·哈佛教授与“五毛党”(二)
·雷洋案的“程序正义”只能是意淫
·是“偷鸡腿”还是偷民心?
·从“偷鸡腿”到中国的人权
·安康副市长到底是咋死的?
·安康副市长真是个清官?
·再谈雷洋案为什么只能糊涂了事?
·广西律师被扯破裤子的破绽
·安康副市长的“移民”算腐败吗?
·郑永年的谬论(一)
·又是一个“穷”死的县委书记?
·新常态,无常理
·胡长官一个暑假如何赚100多?
·呼格母亲梦太多 聂树斌案难公正
·同是自杀,两副市长命运两重天
·“你懂的”与“抢孩子”
·现身说法话聂树斌的签名
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(二)
·聂树斌案涉及的官到底有多大?
·聂树斌案只能糊涂了事(三)
·怎一个乱字了得
·众筹十万,再批周小平
·618,不只是京东们的救命稻草
·聂树斌案与乌坎事件
·“网友告政府”就是一笑话
·高考与诺贝尔奖
·且慢吹嘘聂树案再审
·《求是》副总编为何求死?
·人民日报对“反腐败”自信的离谱
·《中国共产党问责条例》可信吗?
·造谣,是一种教科书式的美德
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred thirty-five
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    


   Chapter II KuiWen Court established false cases (under)
   Procuratorate investigation and handling of the
   results, that is, tell me the pawnshop pawn
   ticket, did not break the law ". So, in the end
   pawnshop no illegal it? Of course. Just
   Procuratorate for some reason, the law turn a
   blind eye to it. I suspect the the pawnshop
   contract is forged, the pawn ticket of course, also
   a forgery:
   1, the pawn contract clearly does not meet the
   common sense, the one-year deadline actually
   expressed in the July 16, 2007, to July 16, 2008.
   Understand the point of financial common sense
   are not guilty of such a low-level error, not to
   mention the pawnshop to pinch pennies. It can
   be seen with the naked eye, a date after the
   alteration made by October 15, 2007.
   2,Pawning Measures, signed by Zhou Yongkang,and Bo Xilai requirements: real estate mortgage
   period should not exceed six months. Pawn
   contract for up to one year.
   3, the contract property keys in the hands of the
   secured party. My real estate has been in my
   hands. This proves that the pawn shops did not
   do even the actual assessment. Pawn contract is
   counterfeit. Later in the inspection of the court's
   docket Cravens, can prove that the: the Pawn
   time they had to July 16, 2007, to October 15,
   2007. Three months, reasonable and legitimate.
   What To pawn behavior the forged mortgage
   contract? Because I can no longer endure the
   buyer does not fulfill the contract, the buyer
   filed a civil action. Buyers fear of fraud and not
   another re-assurance to set their own fraud
   collusion with the pawnshop. Because under the
   existing law, the buyer even if I lose a civil
   lawsuit, if he bilk refused to implement the
   judgment of the Intermediate People's Court.
   And I can only requirement in the hospital to
   perform my property. So, the execution proceeds,
   pawn mortgage priority. That I was asked buyers
   to repay the pawn rows mortgage. Means as I
   JifeiShida half effort will go down the drain.
   Sure enough, is the vicious a coup! Ring ring,
   liquidated to occupy my real estate.
   Buyers just do a good job with the pawnshop
   buckle, in collusion with the Housing Authority
   false filing was not enough, they must also have
   the legal means can be cashed at any time. The
   root cause of this pawnshop collusion Cravens
   Court established false cases.
   Why Cravens Court established the false cases?
   1, Pawnshop prosecution time is immediately after
   my time in hospital sued the buyer. My first
   time to prosecute a lawyer bastard, and made in
   the hospital discomfort grid quickly dismissed.
   The pawn shops are not action, but will also do
   the extension of the pawn ticket that has
   expired. So the second time I re-prosecute, pawn
   shops this to the The Cravens court stand the
   matter (case files show time).
   2, litigation in the hospital because of the trial
   judge mischief mischief, insist on helping the
   defenShit cut 380,000 yuan housing fund to
   judicial appraisal contour homes approved the
   Weihai ETERN Forensic Center can withdraw the
   false identification etc., the six months of the
   civil case, the trial for a full 17 months, is a
   serious violation of the extended trial. The
   pawnshop the Cravens court case, actually no
   reason, time trial than I do here long. If false
   cases, Cravens court Why not scheduled closing
   it?
   3, is the verdict of the Intermediate People's
   Court signed May 27, 2009, to reach my hand (a
   lawyer), July 7 already. This is obviously
   intentionally delay the delivery time to do what?
   Used to start the Cravens court false cases. Do
   not to exclude the Cravens court case, Weifang
   Intermediate People's Court verdict came out,
   hastily made.
   In fact, Cravens Court established the
   genuineness of the case, just any literate person
   can check to understand. But since my report to
   the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's
   approach is handed over to the High Court.
   Provincial High Court to the Court of Weifang
   City. The Intermediate People's Court to the the
   Cravens court itself investigated. Self-
   examination and the results will be imagined.
   Can best the Cravens court stand grounds Jiaan:
   Cravens Court in this case nothing. Just pawn
   interest, more than the principal amount of the
   right? Open the pawn shop, also do charity it?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, January 15, 2013 06:43 china]
(2013/01/15 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场