新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern]
石三生
·阳光卫视与杨澜竟如此下流
·时局变幻党叵测 顾粉团蒙冤难雪
·党不该诱骗善良的人“犯罪”
·感谢中宣部制止了我的犯罪企图
·陈平福案假戏真唱为哪般
·陈光福颠覆案的破腚
·致诺贝尔奖评委的公开信
·党没有思想不是人民的错
·人们为何都热爱骗子
·颜昌海骑驴找驴不知自己是汉奸
·陈平福罪有应得 颜昌海徒有虚名
·顾晓军主义哲学中的“封建”思想
·左右都是一家人颜昌海窝斗孔孙
·Open letter to jury Nobel Prize
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第二封信
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第三封信
·Caused the third letter of the Nobel Peace Prize Jury
·可怜颜粉百多万更无一个是男儿
·保钓与爱国及转基因与女特工
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·韩寒与狗及艾未未与李承鹏
·顾晓军归隐 焦国标登场
·致山东高级人民法院的公开信
·诺贝尔奖及其它
·致诺贝尔奖评委会的第四封信
·致山东高级人民法院院长的公开信
·诺贝尔与文学及其他
·让我们一起对着世界喊:噢...公正!
·感谢韩寒;一个不够!
·从李庄漏罪案到诺贝尔奖得主
·为什么公正是第一价值观
·中国人猜中了莫言获诺贝尔奖
·致瑞典国王的公开信
·致瑞典国王的第二封信
·Open letter to the King of Sweden
·致瑞典国王的第三封信
·莫言与顾晓军的差距
·瑞典国王的特使回访石三生
·致瑞典国王的第四封信
·论《打倒诺贝尔奖》
·诺贝尔文学奖的堕落与和平奖的无奈
·陈瞎子明修栈道 莫言偷袭诺贝尔
·诺奖丑闻缠身 莫言臭名远扬
·致瑞典国王的第五封信
·感谢顾晓军先生及热爱公正的人们
·公正始来 漫天雪飞
·马悦然为何爆料山东文化干部行贿
·致《外交政策》:顾晓军才是当之无愧的思想家
·马悦然与瑞典文学院很可能涉嫌诈骗
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”领先全球
·致外交政策:思想家需要前瞻更须影响力
·莫言获奖橙子虚 顾晓军拒不领情
·To “Foreign Policy”: Gu Xiaojun is worthy and Fully deserve thinkers
·致外交政策:“公正是第一价值观”是普世价值
·To Foreign Policy: “the public impartiality is the first values” is
·马悦然唯利是图 文学奖难免龌龊
·致外交政策:请全球思想家激辩"普世价值"
·为何马悦然与诺评委主席嘴中尽是谎言
·To Foreign Policy: Please caused global thinkers heated debate "univer
·石三生与潍坊市政府争讼案之终结篇--国家赔偿
·致外交政策:草泥马是国骂是垃圾不是思想
·权外交政策莫学纽约时报继续出洋相
·马悦然何不劝莫言扮山东文化干部?
·问外交政策:思想是什么?
·马悦然曲线求饶 张一一甘做伪使
·Asked "foreign policy": What is the Thought?
·问外交政策:你们真关心中国人的命运吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy: Do you really care about the fate of the Chinese
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们懂得忏悔吗?
·Asked Foreign Policy:谁敢指导十八大?
·Who dares to guide 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of Ch
·Asked Foreign Policy: You know Gu dough?
·Foreign Policy's Choice - pretended blind or pretended the fool
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Foreign Policy yes or no rational legitimate?
·Asked Foreign Policy:你们知道顾粉团吗?
·Foreign Policy的抉择—装瞎或装傻
·to TIME :数中国风云人物,勿忘顾晓军
·Foreign Policy 是否正当?
·to TIME A number of influential man in China, do not forget Gu Xiaojun
·问时代周刊:为何没有中国的思想家?
·Asked TIME: Why no Chinese thinker?
·时代周刊与阴部整容
·TIME magazine and the genital organs to face-lift
·罗姆尼是落水狗 时代周刊很像猪
·瑞典国也学会了反炒
·时代周刊与罗姆尼气疯了
·The TIME magazine and Romney angry Go berserk
·问时代周刊骗子的肉香吗?
·AskedTIME liar meaty fragrant?
·TIME 的三大骗
·特务与时局
·TIME's three big cheat
·装瞎的奥巴马与TIME
·问TIME你混得怎么样?
·Spies and the current political situation
·Disguised as blind Obama and TIME
·Asked TIME: How well do you unspoken rules?
·TIME为Obama挖了一个坑
·TIME dug a pit for Obama
·TIME正全力狙击顾晓军
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred thirty-five
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    


   Chapter II KuiWen Court established false cases (under)
   Procuratorate investigation and handling of the
   results, that is, tell me the pawnshop pawn
   ticket, did not break the law ". So, in the end
   pawnshop no illegal it? Of course. Just
   Procuratorate for some reason, the law turn a
   blind eye to it. I suspect the the pawnshop
   contract is forged, the pawn ticket of course, also
   a forgery:
   1, the pawn contract clearly does not meet the
   common sense, the one-year deadline actually
   expressed in the July 16, 2007, to July 16, 2008.
   Understand the point of financial common sense
   are not guilty of such a low-level error, not to
   mention the pawnshop to pinch pennies. It can
   be seen with the naked eye, a date after the
   alteration made by October 15, 2007.
   2,Pawning Measures, signed by Zhou Yongkang,and Bo Xilai requirements: real estate mortgage
   period should not exceed six months. Pawn
   contract for up to one year.
   3, the contract property keys in the hands of the
   secured party. My real estate has been in my
   hands. This proves that the pawn shops did not
   do even the actual assessment. Pawn contract is
   counterfeit. Later in the inspection of the court's
   docket Cravens, can prove that the: the Pawn
   time they had to July 16, 2007, to October 15,
   2007. Three months, reasonable and legitimate.
   What To pawn behavior the forged mortgage
   contract? Because I can no longer endure the
   buyer does not fulfill the contract, the buyer
   filed a civil action. Buyers fear of fraud and not
   another re-assurance to set their own fraud
   collusion with the pawnshop. Because under the
   existing law, the buyer even if I lose a civil
   lawsuit, if he bilk refused to implement the
   judgment of the Intermediate People's Court.
   And I can only requirement in the hospital to
   perform my property. So, the execution proceeds,
   pawn mortgage priority. That I was asked buyers
   to repay the pawn rows mortgage. Means as I
   JifeiShida half effort will go down the drain.
   Sure enough, is the vicious a coup! Ring ring,
   liquidated to occupy my real estate.
   Buyers just do a good job with the pawnshop
   buckle, in collusion with the Housing Authority
   false filing was not enough, they must also have
   the legal means can be cashed at any time. The
   root cause of this pawnshop collusion Cravens
   Court established false cases.
   Why Cravens Court established the false cases?
   1, Pawnshop prosecution time is immediately after
   my time in hospital sued the buyer. My first
   time to prosecute a lawyer bastard, and made in
   the hospital discomfort grid quickly dismissed.
   The pawn shops are not action, but will also do
   the extension of the pawn ticket that has
   expired. So the second time I re-prosecute, pawn
   shops this to the The Cravens court stand the
   matter (case files show time).
   2, litigation in the hospital because of the trial
   judge mischief mischief, insist on helping the
   defenShit cut 380,000 yuan housing fund to
   judicial appraisal contour homes approved the
   Weihai ETERN Forensic Center can withdraw the
   false identification etc., the six months of the
   civil case, the trial for a full 17 months, is a
   serious violation of the extended trial. The
   pawnshop the Cravens court case, actually no
   reason, time trial than I do here long. If false
   cases, Cravens court Why not scheduled closing
   it?
   3, is the verdict of the Intermediate People's
   Court signed May 27, 2009, to reach my hand (a
   lawyer), July 7 already. This is obviously
   intentionally delay the delivery time to do what?
   Used to start the Cravens court false cases. Do
   not to exclude the Cravens court case, Weifang
   Intermediate People's Court verdict came out,
   hastily made.
   In fact, Cravens Court established the
   genuineness of the case, just any literate person
   can check to understand. But since my report to
   the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's
   approach is handed over to the High Court.
   Provincial High Court to the Court of Weifang
   City. The Intermediate People's Court to the the
   Cravens court itself investigated. Self-
   examination and the results will be imagined.
   Can best the Cravens court stand grounds Jiaan:
   Cravens Court in this case nothing. Just pawn
   interest, more than the principal amount of the
   right? Open the pawn shop, also do charity it?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, January 15, 2013 06:43 china]
(2013/01/15 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场