新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern]
石三生
·建言中共修改宪法序言
·建言人大修改宪法宣誓词
·刘晓庆逃税还是“逃睡”?
·新政为何笑冤不笑贫?
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈贺卫方代理李庄诉中青报案
·思鸡肋弃阿斗 哈罗李敖或归隐
·被贺卫方、李庄们玩残了的法律
·被莫言、李敖们玩残了的文学
·国务院管鸟事比管人事更靠谱
·贪官与鸟齐赞河南法治好
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·邓亚萍试水政法 公平正义似乒乓
·柴静是编剧雾霾是天气;“公正第一”才是思想
·河南法治动物为救少林寺?
·政法大学出尔反尔 邓亚萍进退两难
·邓亚萍兼职政法大学教授是腐败
·李冰冰卖萌 孔子学院无人睬
·政法大学越描越黑 邓亚萍免费获诽谤
·猜猜邓亚萍的金牌与博士那个真?
·邓亚萍的清华学士文凭或造假
·一生两死---从邓亚萍说到方静与徐明
·邓亚萍的剑桥博士真不了
·笑看吴法天李吉明双挺邓亚萍
·金将军太会玩:美女、核弹两不误
·茅于轼又荒唐 茅粉们再呓语
·石三生大师又多了一提鞋的
·为什么茅于轼能发出独立的声音?
·猜猜是谁阻止了朝鲜美女的演出?
·茅于轼的人文经济学都扯些什么?
·杨恒均呼吁特赦腐败 中纪委机关报自讨没趣
·向中纪委机关报推荐一下顾晓军
·也谈中纪委机关报斥责的“比烂”心态
·龙应台挺浦志强,与天何干?
·给美国史密斯议员讲讲浦志强
·解放快七十年,党还是喜欢夜里忙
·解放快七十年,党还是喜欢夜里忙
·为广东党报与法院对决喝倒彩
·广东党报认怂 东莞法院别得意
·唱红打黑歇菜后,重庆开始强拆?
·雾霾是实现民主的急先锋
·聂树斌案,最高法勿拿“程序正义”说事儿
· 党纪再严,奈何得邓亚萍吗?
·神探李昌钰也破不了聂树斌案
·鲁迅真的会讲道理吗?
·法院战胜历史 炎黄春秋败诉
·巧家奇冤,岂是无罪释放这么简单?
·奥巴马再次崩溃 龙应台继续摸黑
·住建部要为深圳渣土滑坡辟谣吗?
·三向中纪委机关报推荐顾晓军
·商务部不必酸 马大爷说的对
·王石对宝能扯文化有点不靠谱
·骗子为何不服判?
·向统战部推荐顾晓军
·云南坐13年冤狱的女孩不值得同情
·奥运冠军与东亚病夫
·鲁迅真是间谍吗?
·周小平的智力是否正常?
·不服就试试:一个你绝对会答错的社会问题
·周小平认为:大飞机前景堪忧
·除了天才周小平,没有人可以答对
·通过周小平现象管窥《白毛女》
·推荐顾晓军兼批判重庆缺“公正”论
·习、马倡导和平,不如习、顾共逐诺奖
·推荐蔡英文、顾晓军联袂共逐诺奖
·习、马视为鸡肋;顾、蔡如获至宝
·“依法治国”有时比流感阴毒
·国务院一边减政一边集权
·代习先生辩:“有付出,就会有收获”
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·无锡强拆继续 永康狱中难安
·向习近平主席推荐顾晓军
·南大校长周文斌被判无期冤不冤?
·驳莫言的“两个基本判断”
·公开推荐顾晓军角逐2016年诺贝尔和平奖
·两个台湾女人搅了国共两党的好梦
·三个台湾女人唱大戏
·毛泽东为何没得诺贝尔和平奖?
·推荐顾晓军、蔡英文获诺奖是民意
·用周小平思想统一中国
·可能是史上最乌龙的香港罪犯
·为民告官胜诉率为零的上海欢呼
·周小平主席要开杀戒?
·习总为何不注重民意?
·周小平主席期冀“台独”
·向蔡英文主席推荐“公正第一”
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Offbeat Underworld community to combat mode---Weifang municipal govern

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred thirty-five
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    


   Chapter II KuiWen Court established false cases (under)
   Procuratorate investigation and handling of the
   results, that is, tell me the pawnshop pawn
   ticket, did not break the law ". So, in the end
   pawnshop no illegal it? Of course. Just
   Procuratorate for some reason, the law turn a
   blind eye to it. I suspect the the pawnshop
   contract is forged, the pawn ticket of course, also
   a forgery:
   1, the pawn contract clearly does not meet the
   common sense, the one-year deadline actually
   expressed in the July 16, 2007, to July 16, 2008.
   Understand the point of financial common sense
   are not guilty of such a low-level error, not to
   mention the pawnshop to pinch pennies. It can
   be seen with the naked eye, a date after the
   alteration made by October 15, 2007.
   2,Pawning Measures, signed by Zhou Yongkang,and Bo Xilai requirements: real estate mortgage
   period should not exceed six months. Pawn
   contract for up to one year.
   3, the contract property keys in the hands of the
   secured party. My real estate has been in my
   hands. This proves that the pawn shops did not
   do even the actual assessment. Pawn contract is
   counterfeit. Later in the inspection of the court's
   docket Cravens, can prove that the: the Pawn
   time they had to July 16, 2007, to October 15,
   2007. Three months, reasonable and legitimate.
   What To pawn behavior the forged mortgage
   contract? Because I can no longer endure the
   buyer does not fulfill the contract, the buyer
   filed a civil action. Buyers fear of fraud and not
   another re-assurance to set their own fraud
   collusion with the pawnshop. Because under the
   existing law, the buyer even if I lose a civil
   lawsuit, if he bilk refused to implement the
   judgment of the Intermediate People's Court.
   And I can only requirement in the hospital to
   perform my property. So, the execution proceeds,
   pawn mortgage priority. That I was asked buyers
   to repay the pawn rows mortgage. Means as I
   JifeiShida half effort will go down the drain.
   Sure enough, is the vicious a coup! Ring ring,
   liquidated to occupy my real estate.
   Buyers just do a good job with the pawnshop
   buckle, in collusion with the Housing Authority
   false filing was not enough, they must also have
   the legal means can be cashed at any time. The
   root cause of this pawnshop collusion Cravens
   Court established false cases.
   Why Cravens Court established the false cases?
   1, Pawnshop prosecution time is immediately after
   my time in hospital sued the buyer. My first
   time to prosecute a lawyer bastard, and made in
   the hospital discomfort grid quickly dismissed.
   The pawn shops are not action, but will also do
   the extension of the pawn ticket that has
   expired. So the second time I re-prosecute, pawn
   shops this to the The Cravens court stand the
   matter (case files show time).
   2, litigation in the hospital because of the trial
   judge mischief mischief, insist on helping the
   defenShit cut 380,000 yuan housing fund to
   judicial appraisal contour homes approved the
   Weihai ETERN Forensic Center can withdraw the
   false identification etc., the six months of the
   civil case, the trial for a full 17 months, is a
   serious violation of the extended trial. The
   pawnshop the Cravens court case, actually no
   reason, time trial than I do here long. If false
   cases, Cravens court Why not scheduled closing
   it?
   3, is the verdict of the Intermediate People's
   Court signed May 27, 2009, to reach my hand (a
   lawyer), July 7 already. This is obviously
   intentionally delay the delivery time to do what?
   Used to start the Cravens court false cases. Do
   not to exclude the Cravens court case, Weifang
   Intermediate People's Court verdict came out,
   hastily made.
   In fact, Cravens Court established the
   genuineness of the case, just any literate person
   can check to understand. But since my report to
   the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court's
   approach is handed over to the High Court.
   Provincial High Court to the Court of Weifang
   City. The Intermediate People's Court to the the
   Cravens court itself investigated. Self-
   examination and the results will be imagined.
   Can best the Cravens court stand grounds Jiaan:
   Cravens Court in this case nothing. Just pawn
   interest, more than the principal amount of the
   right? Open the pawn shop, also do charity it?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, January 15, 2013 06:43 china]
(2013/01/15 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场