新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[Why the Dalai Lama Recommended Gu Xiaojun (4)]
石三生
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(四)
·黄岛爆炸案为何张冠李戴(五)
·李嘉诚真的高尚吗?
·被李嘉诚炒红的张子强
·农业大丰收的神话将破灭
·偃旗息鼓的"十连增"
·李嘉诚与张子强
·李嘉诚与张子强(二)
·李嘉诚与张子强(三)
·李嘉诚与张子强(四)
·为愚蠢的湖南益阳当局支招
·李嘉诚与张子强(五)
·李嘉诚与张子强(六)
·李嘉诚与张子强(七)
·“转基因”转的到底是什么?
·陈光标和他的钱干净吗?
·央行为何纵容陈光标不法
·陈光标敢再说一次“绝不食言”吗?
·习总吃包子不是作秀胜似作秀
·看不懂的河南连霍高速大桥垮塌事故
·国税局为何纵容陈光标?
·“中国首善”渐露马脚
·陈光标的“中国首善”罩着多少阴霾?
·陈光标何不兑现承诺、破财消灾?
·缺德的“全国道德模范”
·问习总:“决不允许”已经发生该怎办?
·中美合演的人权闹剧
·一塌糊涂的青岛管道爆炸事故报告
·国务院难得糊涂 中石化瞒天过海
·就“11•22”事故致李克强总理的公开信
·中国或已掌握“海水变石油”核心技术
·许志永被判刑只会成笑柄
·骆家辉指鹿为马 许志永此地无银
·美国政府的愚蠢举世罕见
·欺世盗名的“新公民运动”
·声援许志永的“法学院五学者”很愚蠢
·挪威议员为何推袁隆平角逐诺奖
·被蒙蔽的诺贝尔奖
·那些诺贝尔和平奖的角逐者们
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(二)
·许志永“莫谈法治”的阴谋(三)
·中美人权对话的骗局(九)
·谁在纵容国土系统的腐败
·傅莹的谬误与傅成玉的荒唐
·秦光荣为何不“光荣”引咎?
·马航客机去了哪儿?
·全民竞猜:马航客机“去哪儿了”
·他们知道马航客机“去了哪儿”
·平度当局终于选择“自宫”
·政府作孽 百姓遭殃
·平度与马航、维权及其他
·马航客机失踪之谜与“塞翁失马”
·中央巡视到山东
·揣测中央巡视山东的结果
·两个“女婿”大闹人间
·杨恒均的”戏”
·杨恒均的国师梦与顾晓军的趋势论
·流于形式的“八规”与“四风”
·加藤嘉一有多假?
·韩寒、李承鹏或涉周滨案
·许志永获刑也无缘诺贝尔和平奖
·鬼子加藤嘉一与韩寒
·百度收了许立全多少钱?
·蔡奇调京 石三生被牵连
·许立全若安好 反腐便是扯淡
·莫言气急败坏 诺奖形同鸡肋
·与莫言、许立全等说说知心话
·中纪委一边反腐,一边为贪官打气
·致“一个弥天大骗局”的设计者们
·中纪委反腐形同游戏
·中纪委为何不让我说话?
·上访去
·中央巡视组驻地的口号
·裸奔中的潍坊市政府
·政府犯罪为何有恃无恐
·官官相护何时了
·真伪中央巡视组
·真伪中央巡视组
·真伪中央巡视组
·社会真的在向好吗?
·社会真的在向好吗?(二)
·贼与官
·陈光标与腐败的亿元司长(一)
·陈光标与腐败的亿元司长(二)
·来自中央巡视组的恐吓?
·来自中央巡视组的沉默
·无法消受的人权事业进步
·韩寒李承鹏或涉周滨案(二)
·言而无信的中央巡视组
·贼与官(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(二)
·写在潍坊副市长陈白峰自缢之后(三)
·三个精神病副市长:杨宽生、王立军、陈白峰
·“相关人物”突然成空白的高官
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·半月内两山东官员自杀
·“反腐”只能各自为战
·也谈宁财神吸毒
·许立全组团 美女市长现身
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
Why the Dalai Lama Recommended Gu Xiaojun (4)

   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu Comments • two hundred thirty-six
    
   Translator: God has eyes
    


   In fact, starting from the purpose of the Nobel
   Peace Prize "standard of the past year have
   made the greatest contribution to mankind", Mr.
   Gu Xiaojun also may be the people of the world
   over the past year has made the greatest
   contribution to mankind.
   As we all know, the Nobel Prize is an annual
   award. With Mr. Nobel's will, the annual award
   of course, should first consider the greatest
   contribution to what the past year. But have to
   admit: the award of the Nobel Prize in natural
   sciences, there in the year to "make
   contributions to human glance. Even the people
   do not understand the natural sciences, as long
   as you tell him the whole story, they also
   understood why. This Prize for Literature and the
   Peace Prize really want to judge what make the
   greatest contribution to mankind "Over the past
   year, may be necessary to divergent views.
   Take: The EU won the Nobel Peace Prize, the
   Nobel Peace Prize last year, even within the EU,
   such as Greece and so feel incredible. The EU
   unified and non-start since last year, in the past
   year, the EU countries have plunged into
   economic crisis, unable to extricate themselves.
   China, developed countries should donate school
   bus for the EU member states or even hurt. So
   the European Union, does not hurt the world
   has been pretty good, how can you be "human
   make the greatest contribution to it?
   Of course, the Earth is always to turn down,
   humans can only forward and do not stop. Past
   can not be chasing, Who the great Chinese
   thinker, writer, political economist, Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun in the 2012 year's Nobel Peace Prize
   "Over the past year" ---- that is, in 2011,
   accounted for one fifth of the world the
   contribution of the human, not yet showing a
   direct "contribution" for all to see?
   However, when the light enter in 2012, when
   three thousand years, the greatest changes in
   Chinese society, the of thinking big bang Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun contribution to human peace, no one
   arguable fact. From the party blocked a short
   gap, by Bo Associated Press blog guide the king
   thin case right direction to meet the wishes of
   the public opinion, continuous multilingual CPC
   18 to the end of May to conduct an opinion-
   oriented. Mr. Gu Xiaojun of China's social
   contribution called hardwork.
   Take in May 2012, a "prediction the eighteen
   major CPC list of seven of the Standing
   Committee of the" all follow the trend of
   speculation, the Chinese Communists eighteen
   major media around the world, can not be
   denied that the text CPC eighteen major impact.
   When Thin Valley open case is vigorously evolved
   when even the Chinese Communist Party, do not
   know the eighteen generals where to go (to wait
   for more than 2000 on behalf of a vote by show
   of hands). Mr. Gu Xiaojun know, know, not only
   to Nine reform "and" Politics and Law Committee
   and ideology will be downgraded. If we say that
   the CCP's "Nine to change" contribution to
   humanity moment not to say. The downgrade the
   Politics and Law Committee and ideology, but it
   is real, not diverse congregation positive is the
   greatest contribution of the Chinese community!
   Not to mention that in this era of Politics and
   Law Committee made the discontent, ideological
   confusion and lead to social and moral turpitude
   only downgrade to save the flesh and blood,
   afraid to hundreds of billions of dollars, right?
   This way, the Dalai Lama also think Mr. Gu
   Xiaojun does not comply with the Nobel Peace
   Prize this year to make the greatest contribution
   to mankind "? Not worth the Dalai Lama as one
   of the recommended it? Mr. Gu Xiaojun China's
   contribution, not only the fruits of the theory,
   even as long as the Chinese Communist public
   accounts, because of the Politics and Law
   Committee ideology downgrade "contribution to
   mankind can be expressed with a specific data
   out.
   Sorts of destruction of the Chinese Communist
   Party, banned in the power of Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   still so great. Even if only to see the sake of the
   will of Mr. Nobel "Over the past year, to make
   the greatest contribution to mankind", the Dalai
   Lama should also be recommended to the judges
   of the Nobel Peace Prize, Mr. Gu Xiaojun it. Dare
   to ask this world, last year, who else can the fifth
   of the world's human to make such a large
   contribution?
    
   [Shi Sansheng Tuesday, January 15, 2013 5:28 china]
(2013/01/14 发表)
blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场