新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter]
石三生
·美国智囊被噤声陈瞎子利空思变
·打通“任督二脉”符合脑子进水的症状
·顾晓军“入常”致“法拉利车祸”易主
·芜湖副市长詹云超送女上学很无聊
·在绝望中制造希望“法拉利车祸演绎的危机”
·芜湖副市长詹云超骑车送女是作秀无疑
·芜湖副市长詹云超真是富庙穷和尚?
·陈瞎子再被狙击 奥巴马装聋作哑
·询六四惊现共济会 翻薄案搜出一何新
·詹云超副市长给我出了个难题
·世纪阳谋转基因与薄熙来的末日之谜(引子)
·顾晓军与七个局中人
·骆家辉大使真的很猥琐
·又一个瞎子轰动海外
·李旺阳生的矛盾死的蹊跷
·李旺阳之死的N个可能
·美国、香港Google李旺阳
·全球扫盲之上吊常识
·李旺阳是装死!
·李旺阳的死活与《一盘更大的棋》
·周强何不请顾晓军去揭李旺阳之谜
·安监总局局长骆琳去职另有隐情
·黑客与李旺阳及“六四”事件
·李旺阳上吊为何能成谜
·温家宝总理支持“民评官”
·香港立法会梁国雄偷渡会见李旺阳?
·李旺阳上吊的四个现场
·那些不知好歹的香港人
·那些不知好歹的香港人
·李旺阳与棺材仓酷刑
·从黄胜落马看山东美玉其外
·孔庆东反应迟钝发三炮指西打东
·黑龙江与广东成事故多发地
·百度微软皆混蛋:温家宝石三生=敏感词
·中央政法委也有恐惧时
·香港《明报》原来是张瞎报
·于无声处听惊雷
·詹云超副市长为何怕百度扬善?
·李卓人与梁国雄是好同志
·说黄胜卖官潍坊副市长买官是造谣
·潍坊副市长买官有假买文凭或是真
·石三生与部长PK言论自由
·科技部是个不懂常识的弱智机构
·“三个代表”与“三讲教育”互殴
·张德江亲手捧起了“一坨屎”
·什邡钼铜项目或本就是骗局
·给脑残的韩寒李承鹏讲点什邡的常识
·给脑残的韩寒李承鹏讲点什邡的道德
·韩寒李承鹏不是人
·给脑残的韩寒李承鹏讲点什邡的计谋
·给脑残的韩寒及90后讲点什邡的阴谋
·天津大火唯恐人知 什邡事件惊天动地
·药房天津大火生变 须范冰冰陪睡一晚
·药房天津大火生变 须范冰冰陪睡一晚
·张高丽处理火灾的手段很像事故
·张高丽处理火灾的手段很像事故
·公开邀约中宣部大人笔战
·两个副省长落马现瞒天过海的伎俩
·就潍坊市委书记的三盲请教李源潮
·中纪委高调呼应石三生辟谣内幕
·民主维权是个圈儿
·夫妻党
·北京大雨与高层政治
·感谢顾晓军感谢党质疑四人帮
·公开邀约“影响中国百名博客”自曝才艺
·郭金龙书记边健忘边铭记边恐吓
·奥运会只有野蛮没有文明
·北京天津水深火热 启东什邡接踵登场
·司马南被夹之后看不懂启东事
·点破启东反排海事件的破腚
·人民日报缺心眼儿
·中国面对质疑叶诗文有点抓狂
·央视解围奥运会上的小聪明也有大道理
·奥运悲剧之青年导师李开复成流氓
·公开举报韩寒贿赂百度篡改“少年”词条
·天灾人祸如长眼 追着十八转啊转
·中华民族复兴已达到脑残级
·复兴梦之脑残的温州爆炸案
·从余杰回国看薄谷开来的命运
·奥运悲剧之刘翔委员玩单腿跳
·谷开来命悬一肉 刘翔奥运秀自残
·刘翔委员倒下钱云会站起来
·刘延东昨挺刘翔 谷开来今日受审
·刘翔誓返奥运会 谷开来来日方长
·一坨屎演绎的政治博弈
·公审薄谷开来之后的秘密
·薄熙来遇贼则兴 张德江剿匪有方
·刘翔与抢劫犯周克华的神秘微笑
·炎黄春秋突发奇文赵紫阳秘书说春秋
·苏湘渝声东击西 周克华束手送死
·重庆警方击毙周克华正走向娱乐化
·警方今天的神勇须归功于昨日的无能
·艾未未的行为艺术与薄熙来的人体标本
·重庆演戏累死狗 中国银行忙打劫
·王立军或已被审 哈根斯去向成谜
·温家宝走马浙江省张德江佯攻歌乐山
·中国毛左与日本右翼及钓鱼岛
·媒体预先得知周克华将被击毙
·重庆用疑似周克华没死的方式辟谣
·张德江再封歌乐山 周克华生死两茫茫
·谷开来判而不死 周克华亡后始乱
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred ninety-nine
   

   Translator: God has eyes
   
   See the World Wide Web one from World
   Journal "expose Xi a secretary general Premier Wen possessions? Luo Jiahui anxious: dry than the White House!" Reports, said: "U.S. Ambassador to China
   Gary Luo Jiahui said on the 17th, the U.S.
   government is not involved in planning the"
   Bloomberg "(Bloomberg) news agency reported
   that Chinese leaders Xi Jinping family hundreds
   of millions of dollars worth of assets, or the New
   York Times published Wen Jiabao The family's
   wealth. '
   
   "World News" reporter apparently lack of
   acting, actually a "radical" adjective. Luo Jiahui
   Ambassador anxious not outside media exposure
   habits total temperature and total possessions
   have over the past few months, only to think of
   for the White House to distinguish. Who've seen
   people on fire, the new homes are built on the
   ruins, remembered extinguishing the fire
   department? Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui is indeed
   ethnic Chinese, proficient fire never ending not
   anxious ---- because it is the truth of someone's
   home burned.
   
   For the Chinese side often think that the U.S.
   government intervention in the U.S. media
   "ulterior motives" reports "Ambassador Gary
   Luo Jiahui said," Much of the content of the U.S.
   media reported the U.S. government does not
   like the message. U.S. government to respect
   freedom of the press, and does not put pressure
   on the media. '
   
   This is really ridiculous. Seriously the U.S.
   media have freedom of speech, whether it means
   that the White House is not freedom of speech
   it?
   
   As we all know, the after Chen Guangcheng
   fled to the United States Embassy. Precisely
   Luo Jiahui-handedly created to steal its access into
   the embassy, sent​​ embassies, and then received
   the ridiculous farce of the United States. Chen
   Guangcheng Who are they? But is the United
   States, "the Times in 2006 forged a" three fake
   "(Gu Xiaojun language). Chen Guangcheng is
   mounted blind, not only the "Times" Evidently,
   even President Obama has also commissioned a
   private assessment agencies, Chen blind 10
   seconds unarmed alone climb 4 meters high
   walls made entirely negative assessment. U.S.
   media, of course there is the freedom of the
   press, forged Chen blind activist deeds is
   empirical. But if the White House did not exert
   influence in which to conceal that assessment
   report helped the "Times" to the world. U.S.
   media why no one dare Chen blind obvious flaws
   questioned?
   
   Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador of the so-called
   freedom of the press, whether means free of
   fraud? Whether it is installed blind fool
   freedom? United States really have freedom of
   the press, who helped Chan the blind
   completely clean up the article "sons of the soil
   --- the blind barefoot lawyer Chen Guangcheng"?
   White House really non-interference in the
   freedom of the press, why Google would say that
   the U.S. government is the world of its most
   demanding government?
   
   Americans can not know the Chinese
   questioned the school headed by Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   Chen Guangcheng and his ilk debunk. As a
   Chinese-American ambassador to China, Mr.
   Luo Jiahui how you can turn a blind eye, so let Chen
   blind to become a "fake" American idol, hero?
   The day care, stone expose the true face of Chen
   blind when even the Chinese Vice Foreign
   Minister to visit Mr. Gu Xiaojun blog and leave a
   message. Is it for a Chen blind go to war,
   dispatched a negotiating team to negotiate with
   the Chinese Communists Secretary Clinton at the
   U.S. government, the eyes and ears oblivious to
   the point of occlusion to Gu, stone questioned
   this?
   
   Press freedom in the United States. This is
   how ridiculous excuse! Do the authors, the White
   House to admit themselves to protect even the
   Congress are openly whom the site Chen blind
   ilk, just because consonance with the media the
   heart of the "Times", "foreign policy" tacit
   understanding among you?
   Blind ilk
   I do not know Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador
   have not thought about: the White House with
   the "freedom of the press," the U.S. media to
   foster some semi-literate. "Fake" as the Chinese
   democracy Pioneer representatives of purpose,
   not that misled the Chinese society toward anti-
   intellectual, anti-civilization it?
   
   Of course, the freedom of the press in the
   United States. But this freedom is in the White
   House with U.S. media willingly manipulated by
   the Chinese Communist Party conservative, the
   awakening of the Chinese people on the basis of
   misleading. Wicked thing is harmful to the
   Chinese people, the freedom of the press in the
   United States as if playing chicken; For any
   benefit to the idea socialof ​​ progress in China,
   good thing, U.S. News also unprecedented
   freedom --- freedom of silence.
   
   Advise Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui a right, If you
   really want to absolve the White House, do not
   do unnecessary afterwards quibble. Your
   predecessor --- Ambassador Huntsman can not
   hesitate to play the fool, as a fraud 8 million
   users, but also tax evasion 7,000,000 prospective
   criminals Ai Weiwei "Times" in 2011 the world's
   most influential figures of one hundred written
   comments that " in terms of the world, Ai Weiwei
   continues to represent the hope of China. " If
   you do not want to Luo Jiahui Ambassador Learning
   Republicans, like blindness, lack of acting, why
   do the opposite, to the "Times" Recommended
   real thinker ---- Mr. Gu Xiaojun.
   
   As a friendly envoy between China and the
   United States, Gary Luo Jiahui, Mr. responsibility, and
   also have the ability to introduce real democratic
   forces to the U.S. Government and the American
   people. Is not so?
   
   If Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui continue wide open
   one eye close one eye, evil. You shut up and do
   not quibble White House, never want to utter
   what the United States also have the freedom of
   the press.
   
   [Shi Sansheng Wednesday,December 19, 2012 09:15] (2012/12/18)
(2012/12/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场