新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter]
石三生
·乱lun
·爱迪生的心思 杨振宁与莫言不懂
·顾晓军与杨恒均的“社会观”
·李开复画蛇添足
·搅局与设局(二)
·杨恒均或保王林脱难
·释永信跳进黄河 王林案悄然降温
·“打虎”与我何关?
·王胜俊与“女业主被当众扒裤”
·毕福剑与杨恒均
·莫言有罪
·莫言的难言之隐
·匪夷所思
·信力健或成人权新样本
·莫须有的罪名 莫须有的人权
·请奥巴马入瓮
·“窝里斗”及其他
·再谈“窝里斗”及其他
·三谈“窝里斗”及其他
·四谈“窝里斗”及其他
·五谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·七谈“窝里斗”及其他---兼答卢德素
·十谈“窝里斗”及其他之“李嘉诚跑了”
·李嘉诚的“愚昧”论不知所云
·共产无望 共妻有戏
· “共妻”论反进化
·“共妻”论缺德
·“共妻”论反文明
·也谈“一场豪赌”
·他们在为谁做嫁衣?
·莫言为何不愿见“佛”?
·中纪委为何不管管莫言?
·习总的讲话为何不提莫言?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(二)
·也谈“习总的书单”
·百度机器人或建议腐败们早跳楼
·莫言到底是不识字、还是狡辩?(三)
·乱伦----是一种文明
·也谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·习办或闭目塞听
·再谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·三谈习总的“文艺座谈会”
·我为什么咬定莫言?
·“三个代表”高风险
·“精准扶贫”或是梦
·无梦---兼答卢德素
·“特赦贪官”不如放弃“三个代表”
·“马会韩”后“习马会”
·“放开二胎”要感谢莫言?
·最不可琢磨的汉语言
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(二)
·财新网为何不敌巩义法院枉判(三)
·日本人更懂中国
·日本人最懂中国
·“双十一”、打假与打虎
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均
·我的洋鬼子朋友杨恒均(二)
·“白毛女”或与“依法治国”相左
·莫曹杨与《打倒鲁迅》
·鲁迅与洋人杨恒均
·中央网信办为何不自信?
·杨恒均与“王的女人”将如何逆转?
·“三个自信”滋养腐败
·IS的乌托邦与周主席的“中国梦”
·张艺谋与韩寒心有灵犀
·王健林禁妄议 王思聪很惜玉
·公正如画、强拆似虎、腐败在继续
·请孙政才书记宣讲公正
·请允许我跟着李敖喊“万岁”
·请允许我跟着李敖挺圣战
·李敖老矣 唯言不休(复旦版)
·李敖还敢掀起一场中西文化论战吗?
·顾腚难顾头的文明---李敖清华演讲赏析
·左撇子的李敖不懂普世价值
·胡耀邦是怎样离开的人间?
·李敖宣布起义,北大怎么办?
·莫言的末日论与李敖的千年愿
·从中国第二大重要新闻说起
·从纽约时报整版赞习说起
·法官指天发誓启示录(二)
·法官指天发誓启示录
·高瑜认罪—一场游戏又一场梦
·杨恒均的好日子或快到头
·2016起,中国将成地球第一谎言强国
·杨恒均与石三生,谁是白痴?
·释永信无私生女 调查组或有私情
·顾晓军民主奖---一个让精英羞愧的奖
·释延洁呓语西天 中国梦泛滥成灾
·中共到底迷信不迷信?
·建言中共修改宪法序言
·建言人大修改宪法宣誓词
·刘晓庆逃税还是“逃睡”?
·新政为何笑冤不笑贫?
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈李庄诉中青报案
·笑谈贺卫方代理李庄诉中青报案
·思鸡肋弃阿斗 哈罗李敖或归隐
·被贺卫方、李庄们玩残了的法律
·被莫言、李敖们玩残了的文学
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred ninety-nine
   

   Translator: God has eyes
   
   See the World Wide Web one from World
   Journal "expose Xi a secretary general Premier Wen possessions? Luo Jiahui anxious: dry than the White House!" Reports, said: "U.S. Ambassador to China
   Gary Luo Jiahui said on the 17th, the U.S.
   government is not involved in planning the"
   Bloomberg "(Bloomberg) news agency reported
   that Chinese leaders Xi Jinping family hundreds
   of millions of dollars worth of assets, or the New
   York Times published Wen Jiabao The family's
   wealth. '
   
   "World News" reporter apparently lack of
   acting, actually a "radical" adjective. Luo Jiahui
   Ambassador anxious not outside media exposure
   habits total temperature and total possessions
   have over the past few months, only to think of
   for the White House to distinguish. Who've seen
   people on fire, the new homes are built on the
   ruins, remembered extinguishing the fire
   department? Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui is indeed
   ethnic Chinese, proficient fire never ending not
   anxious ---- because it is the truth of someone's
   home burned.
   
   For the Chinese side often think that the U.S.
   government intervention in the U.S. media
   "ulterior motives" reports "Ambassador Gary
   Luo Jiahui said," Much of the content of the U.S.
   media reported the U.S. government does not
   like the message. U.S. government to respect
   freedom of the press, and does not put pressure
   on the media. '
   
   This is really ridiculous. Seriously the U.S.
   media have freedom of speech, whether it means
   that the White House is not freedom of speech
   it?
   
   As we all know, the after Chen Guangcheng
   fled to the United States Embassy. Precisely
   Luo Jiahui-handedly created to steal its access into
   the embassy, sent​​ embassies, and then received
   the ridiculous farce of the United States. Chen
   Guangcheng Who are they? But is the United
   States, "the Times in 2006 forged a" three fake
   "(Gu Xiaojun language). Chen Guangcheng is
   mounted blind, not only the "Times" Evidently,
   even President Obama has also commissioned a
   private assessment agencies, Chen blind 10
   seconds unarmed alone climb 4 meters high
   walls made entirely negative assessment. U.S.
   media, of course there is the freedom of the
   press, forged Chen blind activist deeds is
   empirical. But if the White House did not exert
   influence in which to conceal that assessment
   report helped the "Times" to the world. U.S.
   media why no one dare Chen blind obvious flaws
   questioned?
   
   Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador of the so-called
   freedom of the press, whether means free of
   fraud? Whether it is installed blind fool
   freedom? United States really have freedom of
   the press, who helped Chan the blind
   completely clean up the article "sons of the soil
   --- the blind barefoot lawyer Chen Guangcheng"?
   White House really non-interference in the
   freedom of the press, why Google would say that
   the U.S. government is the world of its most
   demanding government?
   
   Americans can not know the Chinese
   questioned the school headed by Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   Chen Guangcheng and his ilk debunk. As a
   Chinese-American ambassador to China, Mr.
   Luo Jiahui how you can turn a blind eye, so let Chen
   blind to become a "fake" American idol, hero?
   The day care, stone expose the true face of Chen
   blind when even the Chinese Vice Foreign
   Minister to visit Mr. Gu Xiaojun blog and leave a
   message. Is it for a Chen blind go to war,
   dispatched a negotiating team to negotiate with
   the Chinese Communists Secretary Clinton at the
   U.S. government, the eyes and ears oblivious to
   the point of occlusion to Gu, stone questioned
   this?
   
   Press freedom in the United States. This is
   how ridiculous excuse! Do the authors, the White
   House to admit themselves to protect even the
   Congress are openly whom the site Chen blind
   ilk, just because consonance with the media the
   heart of the "Times", "foreign policy" tacit
   understanding among you?
   Blind ilk
   I do not know Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador
   have not thought about: the White House with
   the "freedom of the press," the U.S. media to
   foster some semi-literate. "Fake" as the Chinese
   democracy Pioneer representatives of purpose,
   not that misled the Chinese society toward anti-
   intellectual, anti-civilization it?
   
   Of course, the freedom of the press in the
   United States. But this freedom is in the White
   House with U.S. media willingly manipulated by
   the Chinese Communist Party conservative, the
   awakening of the Chinese people on the basis of
   misleading. Wicked thing is harmful to the
   Chinese people, the freedom of the press in the
   United States as if playing chicken; For any
   benefit to the idea socialof ​​ progress in China,
   good thing, U.S. News also unprecedented
   freedom --- freedom of silence.
   
   Advise Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui a right, If you
   really want to absolve the White House, do not
   do unnecessary afterwards quibble. Your
   predecessor --- Ambassador Huntsman can not
   hesitate to play the fool, as a fraud 8 million
   users, but also tax evasion 7,000,000 prospective
   criminals Ai Weiwei "Times" in 2011 the world's
   most influential figures of one hundred written
   comments that " in terms of the world, Ai Weiwei
   continues to represent the hope of China. " If
   you do not want to Luo Jiahui Ambassador Learning
   Republicans, like blindness, lack of acting, why
   do the opposite, to the "Times" Recommended
   real thinker ---- Mr. Gu Xiaojun.
   
   As a friendly envoy between China and the
   United States, Gary Luo Jiahui, Mr. responsibility, and
   also have the ability to introduce real democratic
   forces to the U.S. Government and the American
   people. Is not so?
   
   If Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui continue wide open
   one eye close one eye, evil. You shut up and do
   not quibble White House, never want to utter
   what the United States also have the freedom of
   the press.
   
   [Shi Sansheng Wednesday,December 19, 2012 09:15] (2012/12/18)
(2012/12/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场