新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter]
石三生
·韩寒未输先后悔 吴英怕死难回头
·韩寒未输先后悔 吴英怕死难回头
·够绝:韩寒边悬赏边起诉
·韩寒可以免战 赌徒不能弃庄
·面对质疑,韩寒缺失起码的幽默感
·韩寒的矛与韩仁均的盾
·韩寒数学中真的很烂:30年等于15000天
·是否该起诉韩寒、李彦宏?
·李彦宏出手相救 唱衰韩寒迷雾重重
·猴子韩寒
·韩寒百度联袂捣鬼 范爷冰冰欠下巨债
·致韩寒、范冰冰的公开信
·范冰冰人美钱多 韩寒少才又缺德
·给韩寒迷们灌一点儿还魂汤
·韩寒的投降书与范冰冰的求救信
·大河网知耻而退 百度舍义为韩寒
·与韩寒谈性事同范冰冰说仗义
·抗虫生物方舟子是个骗子?
·百度恐惧“少年”时 便是韩寒受难日
·文学的性无能与扫地僧的倒韩战争
·文学的性无能与扫地僧的倒韩战争
·文学的性无能与扫地僧的倒韩战争
·归真堂:愚蠢的企业,愚蠢的公关
·扫地僧转战韩仁均 韩寒先生妙处逢生
·扫地僧闻鸡起舞 韩军团虽死犹生
·扫地僧断网出沪 百度少年今二十
·易中天品三国将就挺韩寒词不达意
·方舟子祸起萧墙 倒韩战落下帷幕
·天下第一时评人的庄严声明
·博客教父方兴东与史记作者司马迁
·致山东高级人民检察院、法院的公开信
·时代周刊为什么会选择韩寒?
·跋扈的方舟子与妾一般的深广电
·赵长天语焉不详 方韩战各怀鬼胎
·方方思维很方 洪晃挺韩荒唐
·雷锋同志心猿意马 日记喻军队国家化
·麦田恼羞成怒 韩寒杀气腾腾
·奥巴马挺南周 南周挺韩寒与转基因
·奥巴马挺南周 南周挺韩寒与转基因
·比大熊猫更珍贵的。。。
·当代五君子
·他搅乱了时局又隐没入尘埃
·我比你还要脏
·美国人为何也瞎掺乎刑诉法修正案?
·我们都被门夹了一下
·纽约时报佯攻恶法 秘密拘捕悄然通过
·缝肛与江姐及其他
·洋垃圾与洋文化
·特务手段管控社会 薄熙来害人终害己
·薄熙来唱红遭免 中国作协应检讨
·初笑薄瓜瓜 二叹薄熙来
·二笑薄瓜瓜 三叹薄熙来
·三笑薄瓜瓜 四叹薄熙来
·给艾未未的债主普及一点常识与法律
·四笑薄瓜瓜 五叹薄熙来
·新华网重大改版 高层动态失踪中
·解读时事之看天下谁主苍生
·司法部愚蠢 亵渎了法律侮辱了党
·左右皆混蛋 薄熙来末路的始作俑者
·捅破杨澜国籍的窗户纸
·写在余杰去国后的多余话
·方滨兴与秦始皇 防民防贼两长城
·孔庆东巧言献媚 韩三骗因祸得福
·孔庆东到底被包养了没?
·给流年不利的公知刘晓原律师指一招
·孔庆东与韩寒是两条不太一样的狗
·毛左派正向右看 伪公知何时蜕皮
·中国民主没有左右只有欺骗
·驳雷达先生对民主思潮的误判谬读
·艾未未不想出国背后的隐情
·再谈艾未未不想出国背后的隐情
·艾未未或偷漏税行政复议被驳回
·艾未未借钱缴税根本就是骗局
·中国第一真骂与世界第一奸骂
·韩寒与薄熙来有个约会
·韩寒与铁凝及莫言:谁懂政治?
·韩寒与铁凝及莫言:谁懂政治?
·一批美国:自由奖无自由 茅于轼应知羞
·二批美国:愚蠢的时代 荒唐的外交
·二批美国:愚蠢的时代 荒唐的外交
·我检讨:批茅于轼错了!
·韩寒是条狗与茅于轼老东西
·四月的乌有正知羞韩寒茅于轼当有耻
·毛左派偃旗息鼓 顾晓军趁火打劫
·两个中国天才韩寒与薄瓜瓜
·强烈推荐韩寒角逐诺贝尔奥斯卡奖
·撑起稻草人韩寒的骆驼们之鄢烈山篇
·对骗子情有独钟的新中国
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·韩寒与余杰,是坏与更坏的区别
·美国《time》糗大了:韩寒是专制的帮凶
·破译韩寒与顾晓军的政治隐喻
·互联网也唱红打黑 顾晓军欲决战韩寒
·牛津大学与薄熙来有一腿
·李承鹏忙演戏 资中筠是看客
·艾未未急如律 刘晓原试反水
·华西都市报造谣与政法委的活埋名单
·特赦天下
·中国正在进步
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred ninety-nine
   

   Translator: God has eyes
   
   See the World Wide Web one from World
   Journal "expose Xi a secretary general Premier Wen possessions? Luo Jiahui anxious: dry than the White House!" Reports, said: "U.S. Ambassador to China
   Gary Luo Jiahui said on the 17th, the U.S.
   government is not involved in planning the"
   Bloomberg "(Bloomberg) news agency reported
   that Chinese leaders Xi Jinping family hundreds
   of millions of dollars worth of assets, or the New
   York Times published Wen Jiabao The family's
   wealth. '
   
   "World News" reporter apparently lack of
   acting, actually a "radical" adjective. Luo Jiahui
   Ambassador anxious not outside media exposure
   habits total temperature and total possessions
   have over the past few months, only to think of
   for the White House to distinguish. Who've seen
   people on fire, the new homes are built on the
   ruins, remembered extinguishing the fire
   department? Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui is indeed
   ethnic Chinese, proficient fire never ending not
   anxious ---- because it is the truth of someone's
   home burned.
   
   For the Chinese side often think that the U.S.
   government intervention in the U.S. media
   "ulterior motives" reports "Ambassador Gary
   Luo Jiahui said," Much of the content of the U.S.
   media reported the U.S. government does not
   like the message. U.S. government to respect
   freedom of the press, and does not put pressure
   on the media. '
   
   This is really ridiculous. Seriously the U.S.
   media have freedom of speech, whether it means
   that the White House is not freedom of speech
   it?
   
   As we all know, the after Chen Guangcheng
   fled to the United States Embassy. Precisely
   Luo Jiahui-handedly created to steal its access into
   the embassy, sent​​ embassies, and then received
   the ridiculous farce of the United States. Chen
   Guangcheng Who are they? But is the United
   States, "the Times in 2006 forged a" three fake
   "(Gu Xiaojun language). Chen Guangcheng is
   mounted blind, not only the "Times" Evidently,
   even President Obama has also commissioned a
   private assessment agencies, Chen blind 10
   seconds unarmed alone climb 4 meters high
   walls made entirely negative assessment. U.S.
   media, of course there is the freedom of the
   press, forged Chen blind activist deeds is
   empirical. But if the White House did not exert
   influence in which to conceal that assessment
   report helped the "Times" to the world. U.S.
   media why no one dare Chen blind obvious flaws
   questioned?
   
   Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador of the so-called
   freedom of the press, whether means free of
   fraud? Whether it is installed blind fool
   freedom? United States really have freedom of
   the press, who helped Chan the blind
   completely clean up the article "sons of the soil
   --- the blind barefoot lawyer Chen Guangcheng"?
   White House really non-interference in the
   freedom of the press, why Google would say that
   the U.S. government is the world of its most
   demanding government?
   
   Americans can not know the Chinese
   questioned the school headed by Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   Chen Guangcheng and his ilk debunk. As a
   Chinese-American ambassador to China, Mr.
   Luo Jiahui how you can turn a blind eye, so let Chen
   blind to become a "fake" American idol, hero?
   The day care, stone expose the true face of Chen
   blind when even the Chinese Vice Foreign
   Minister to visit Mr. Gu Xiaojun blog and leave a
   message. Is it for a Chen blind go to war,
   dispatched a negotiating team to negotiate with
   the Chinese Communists Secretary Clinton at the
   U.S. government, the eyes and ears oblivious to
   the point of occlusion to Gu, stone questioned
   this?
   
   Press freedom in the United States. This is
   how ridiculous excuse! Do the authors, the White
   House to admit themselves to protect even the
   Congress are openly whom the site Chen blind
   ilk, just because consonance with the media the
   heart of the "Times", "foreign policy" tacit
   understanding among you?
   Blind ilk
   I do not know Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador
   have not thought about: the White House with
   the "freedom of the press," the U.S. media to
   foster some semi-literate. "Fake" as the Chinese
   democracy Pioneer representatives of purpose,
   not that misled the Chinese society toward anti-
   intellectual, anti-civilization it?
   
   Of course, the freedom of the press in the
   United States. But this freedom is in the White
   House with U.S. media willingly manipulated by
   the Chinese Communist Party conservative, the
   awakening of the Chinese people on the basis of
   misleading. Wicked thing is harmful to the
   Chinese people, the freedom of the press in the
   United States as if playing chicken; For any
   benefit to the idea socialof ​​ progress in China,
   good thing, U.S. News also unprecedented
   freedom --- freedom of silence.
   
   Advise Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui a right, If you
   really want to absolve the White House, do not
   do unnecessary afterwards quibble. Your
   predecessor --- Ambassador Huntsman can not
   hesitate to play the fool, as a fraud 8 million
   users, but also tax evasion 7,000,000 prospective
   criminals Ai Weiwei "Times" in 2011 the world's
   most influential figures of one hundred written
   comments that " in terms of the world, Ai Weiwei
   continues to represent the hope of China. " If
   you do not want to Luo Jiahui Ambassador Learning
   Republicans, like blindness, lack of acting, why
   do the opposite, to the "Times" Recommended
   real thinker ---- Mr. Gu Xiaojun.
   
   As a friendly envoy between China and the
   United States, Gary Luo Jiahui, Mr. responsibility, and
   also have the ability to introduce real democratic
   forces to the U.S. Government and the American
   people. Is not so?
   
   If Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui continue wide open
   one eye close one eye, evil. You shut up and do
   not quibble White House, never want to utter
   what the United States also have the freedom of
   the press.
   
   [Shi Sansheng Wednesday,December 19, 2012 09:15] (2012/12/18)
(2012/12/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场