新会员区

石三生
[主页]->[新会员区]->[石三生]->[About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter]
石三生
·推荐顾晓军兼批判重庆缺“公正”论
·习、马倡导和平,不如习、顾共逐诺奖
·推荐蔡英文、顾晓军联袂共逐诺奖
·习、马视为鸡肋;顾、蔡如获至宝
·“依法治国”有时比流感阴毒
·国务院一边减政一边集权
·代习先生辩:“有付出,就会有收获”
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·石三生新年献词:梦里寻梦又一年
·无锡强拆继续 永康狱中难安
·向习近平主席推荐顾晓军
·南大校长周文斌被判无期冤不冤?
·驳莫言的“两个基本判断”
·公开推荐顾晓军角逐2016年诺贝尔和平奖
·两个台湾女人搅了国共两党的好梦
·三个台湾女人唱大戏
·毛泽东为何没得诺贝尔和平奖?
·推荐顾晓军、蔡英文获诺奖是民意
·用周小平思想统一中国
·可能是史上最乌龙的香港罪犯
·为民告官胜诉率为零的上海欢呼
·周小平主席要开杀戒?
·习总为何不注重民意?
·周小平主席期冀“台独”
·向蔡英文主席推荐“公正第一”
·从周小平主席到蜀国皇帝刘备
·周小平比鲁迅更伟大
·没有选择的蔡英文
·猜猜周小平主席有没有睡艺人?
·周小平主席应该是“周家人”
·两会为何不互联网+?
·孙立平先生的“公约数论”太梦幻
·蔡英文借他山之玉 周小平祸国殃民
·周小平若不反击就太无耻了
·周小平骂两会代表陈光标是小人
·报告孟建柱:草民的“获得感”这个样
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·指导一下中国长安网遣词造句
·周小平啥样,央视就啥样
·“二妻”谣言不可笑 政协委员荒唐多
·周小平造谣是文明 网民造谣被刑拘
·周小平很生气 蔡英文要受苦
·周小平主席恨台湾而爱日本
·习总为何在政法会上讲“忧患”?
·晴天霹雳---周小平首倡“中国梦”
·罗援若武统 民主做先锋
·石三生与小粉红
·周小平主席力助周涛重掌春晚?
·石三生将编、导史诗巨制《三周魂销》
·小粉红坚壁清野 顾晓军枉费心机
·小粉红与赵忠祥也有一腿?
·小粉红己身不修,何以平天下?
·小粉红越界刷屏 蔡英文应对失措
·周涛若复出,春晚必成史上最艳夜
·扬言武统的罗援少将是逃兵?
·周涛复出主春晚 韩国议长悔不迭
·国台办耍金箍棒 蔡英文偷着乐
· 小粉红旁敲侧击 问世间何为正道
·鲁迅不倒 天理难容
·绝对奇迹--比平邑矿难更奇的山东奇迹
·可怜的鲁迅,可悲的语文
·一百年间两二货:周小平与周树人
·问孟建柱:政法委也不能干预司法吗?
·辛亥革命百年后,人民开始怀念慈禧
·央视春晚弃有污点演员,却用艳荡的主持
·李克强舍近求远为哪般
·国务院管不好住,能管好农民的嘴吗?
·抗议谷歌、抗议网络流氓
·给国务院并织金县纪委献一策
·温家宝是一个好总理吗?
·报告习总:这里有一个被丢下的贫困群众
·博客中国意欲何为?
·金正恩到底打了谁一耳光?
·冤狱23年的陈满之高尚羞煞窦娥
·云南、海南与福建三起冤案统一口径为哪般?
·陈满的境界与邓小平一般高
·如此司法进步
·有意思:周小平说方兴东是个大忽悠
·台湾地震了,春晚还演吗?
·欲加“武威三记者”之罪,何患无辞
·台湾地震与安倍及春晚
·周小平是谁的国师?
·春晚与正能量
·团中央“娱乐化”一瞥
·若老能养老,干部能养干部吗?
·龙应台与周小平的暧昧令人作呕
·龙应台的轻佻与虚伪
·谁“伪造”了龙应台的两份声明?
·谁是龙应台的后台?
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(序)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(一)
·龙应台的潜意识浅析(二)
·龙应台为周小平已神魂颠倒
·卖艺也卖身
·蔡英文与龙应台及小粉红
·肖仲华与周小平
·中纪委也学会了吹牛?
·中纪委何时扫荡“地主帮”?
·“负能量”缺席是“五个一百”的耻辱
·蔡英文回应石三生
·复旦博士于迎丽装傻为哪般?
[列出本栏目所有内容]
欢迎在此做广告
About TIME weekly influential man and give Luo Jiahui's open letter

   
   
   "China Network Public Evaluation of officials hundred people group" Shi Sansheng Kyushu
   Comments • The one hundred ninety-nine
   

   Translator: God has eyes
   
   See the World Wide Web one from World
   Journal "expose Xi a secretary general Premier Wen possessions? Luo Jiahui anxious: dry than the White House!" Reports, said: "U.S. Ambassador to China
   Gary Luo Jiahui said on the 17th, the U.S.
   government is not involved in planning the"
   Bloomberg "(Bloomberg) news agency reported
   that Chinese leaders Xi Jinping family hundreds
   of millions of dollars worth of assets, or the New
   York Times published Wen Jiabao The family's
   wealth. '
   
   "World News" reporter apparently lack of
   acting, actually a "radical" adjective. Luo Jiahui
   Ambassador anxious not outside media exposure
   habits total temperature and total possessions
   have over the past few months, only to think of
   for the White House to distinguish. Who've seen
   people on fire, the new homes are built on the
   ruins, remembered extinguishing the fire
   department? Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui is indeed
   ethnic Chinese, proficient fire never ending not
   anxious ---- because it is the truth of someone's
   home burned.
   
   For the Chinese side often think that the U.S.
   government intervention in the U.S. media
   "ulterior motives" reports "Ambassador Gary
   Luo Jiahui said," Much of the content of the U.S.
   media reported the U.S. government does not
   like the message. U.S. government to respect
   freedom of the press, and does not put pressure
   on the media. '
   
   This is really ridiculous. Seriously the U.S.
   media have freedom of speech, whether it means
   that the White House is not freedom of speech
   it?
   
   As we all know, the after Chen Guangcheng
   fled to the United States Embassy. Precisely
   Luo Jiahui-handedly created to steal its access into
   the embassy, sent​​ embassies, and then received
   the ridiculous farce of the United States. Chen
   Guangcheng Who are they? But is the United
   States, "the Times in 2006 forged a" three fake
   "(Gu Xiaojun language). Chen Guangcheng is
   mounted blind, not only the "Times" Evidently,
   even President Obama has also commissioned a
   private assessment agencies, Chen blind 10
   seconds unarmed alone climb 4 meters high
   walls made entirely negative assessment. U.S.
   media, of course there is the freedom of the
   press, forged Chen blind activist deeds is
   empirical. But if the White House did not exert
   influence in which to conceal that assessment
   report helped the "Times" to the world. U.S.
   media why no one dare Chen blind obvious flaws
   questioned?
   
   Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador of the so-called
   freedom of the press, whether means free of
   fraud? Whether it is installed blind fool
   freedom? United States really have freedom of
   the press, who helped Chan the blind
   completely clean up the article "sons of the soil
   --- the blind barefoot lawyer Chen Guangcheng"?
   White House really non-interference in the
   freedom of the press, why Google would say that
   the U.S. government is the world of its most
   demanding government?
   
   Americans can not know the Chinese
   questioned the school headed by Mr. Gu Xiaojun
   Chen Guangcheng and his ilk debunk. As a
   Chinese-American ambassador to China, Mr.
   Luo Jiahui how you can turn a blind eye, so let Chen
   blind to become a "fake" American idol, hero?
   The day care, stone expose the true face of Chen
   blind when even the Chinese Vice Foreign
   Minister to visit Mr. Gu Xiaojun blog and leave a
   message. Is it for a Chen blind go to war,
   dispatched a negotiating team to negotiate with
   the Chinese Communists Secretary Clinton at the
   U.S. government, the eyes and ears oblivious to
   the point of occlusion to Gu, stone questioned
   this?
   
   Press freedom in the United States. This is
   how ridiculous excuse! Do the authors, the White
   House to admit themselves to protect even the
   Congress are openly whom the site Chen blind
   ilk, just because consonance with the media the
   heart of the "Times", "foreign policy" tacit
   understanding among you?
   Blind ilk
   I do not know Gary Luo Jiahui Ambassador
   have not thought about: the White House with
   the "freedom of the press," the U.S. media to
   foster some semi-literate. "Fake" as the Chinese
   democracy Pioneer representatives of purpose,
   not that misled the Chinese society toward anti-
   intellectual, anti-civilization it?
   
   Of course, the freedom of the press in the
   United States. But this freedom is in the White
   House with U.S. media willingly manipulated by
   the Chinese Communist Party conservative, the
   awakening of the Chinese people on the basis of
   misleading. Wicked thing is harmful to the
   Chinese people, the freedom of the press in the
   United States as if playing chicken; For any
   benefit to the idea socialof ​​ progress in China,
   good thing, U.S. News also unprecedented
   freedom --- freedom of silence.
   
   Advise Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui a right, If you
   really want to absolve the White House, do not
   do unnecessary afterwards quibble. Your
   predecessor --- Ambassador Huntsman can not
   hesitate to play the fool, as a fraud 8 million
   users, but also tax evasion 7,000,000 prospective
   criminals Ai Weiwei "Times" in 2011 the world's
   most influential figures of one hundred written
   comments that " in terms of the world, Ai Weiwei
   continues to represent the hope of China. " If
   you do not want to Luo Jiahui Ambassador Learning
   Republicans, like blindness, lack of acting, why
   do the opposite, to the "Times" Recommended
   real thinker ---- Mr. Gu Xiaojun.
   
   As a friendly envoy between China and the
   United States, Gary Luo Jiahui, Mr. responsibility, and
   also have the ability to introduce real democratic
   forces to the U.S. Government and the American
   people. Is not so?
   
   If Ambassador Gary Luo Jiahui continue wide open
   one eye close one eye, evil. You shut up and do
   not quibble White House, never want to utter
   what the United States also have the freedom of
   the press.
   
   [Shi Sansheng Wednesday,December 19, 2012 09:15] (2012/12/18)
(2012/12/19 发表)

blog comments powered by Disqus

©Boxun News Network All Rights Reserved.
所有栏目和文章由作者或专栏管理员整理制作,均不代表博讯立场